Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The article is true in general but it ignores the main point. And that is that the government ir anyone else has no right to force anyone into participating in anything, especially if it violates their religion. Period, end of story.
So the government can't force you to pay taxes? lol
I must disagree. You have dumb "down". This doesn't have anything to do with progressivism. It has to do with your talking yourself into a corner you couldn't get out of.I guess I can't dumb it down far enough for you to understand. I guess that explains why you are a progressive.
How is people voting "mob rule"? I'd swear you sit around 24./7 thinking up stupid things to say.It's what, like 3? 4? New York enacted it through the legislature. Colorado had a ballot measure. But everywhere else unelected judges overturned the will of the people and made this country a tyranny.
3? 4? - No.
Delaware – Legislatively - 2013
District of Columbia – Legislatively - 2009
Hawaii – Legislatively - 2013
Illinois – Legislatively - 2013
Maine – Ballot – 2012
Maryland – Ballot - 2012
Minnesota – Ballot/Legislatively - 2012
New Hampshire – Legislatively - 2009
New York – Legislatively - 2011
Rhode Island – Legislatively - 2013
Vermont – Legislatively - 2009
Washington – Ballot - 2012
>>>>
"Legislatively" means not by popular vote, and what the fuck does "Legislatively/Ballot" mean?
The point that started the response was the ideal that Federal courts would be imposing SSCM in all 50 states. That is false. A number of states passed SSCM on their own with out Federal Court action.
"Legislatively" means by the legislature elected by the people.
If you were familiar with the issue you would understand that Minnesota passed SSCM in two steps. First there was a ballot initiative to ban SSCM, that measure failed. As a result of that failing ballot initiative the legislature passed the law for the governor to sign which made SSCM legal in that state.
>>>>
I know what "legislatively means. I asked you what "Ballot/Legislatively" mean?
Being approved by the state legislature doesn't mean it's supported by the voters. Politicians are all sleazy weasels who will sell out their constituents for almost any consideration. A lot of state legislatures approved so-called "gay marriage" legislation and then were overruled by a referendum.
So you want mob rule.
The article is true in general but it ignores the main point. And that is that the government ir anyone else has no right to force anyone into participating in anything, especially if it violates their religion. Period, end of story.
So the government can't force you to pay taxes? lol
True. Not ethically.
How is people voting "mob rule"? I'd swear you sit around 24./7 thinking up stupid things to say.3? 4? - No.
Delaware – Legislatively - 2013
District of Columbia – Legislatively - 2009
Hawaii – Legislatively - 2013
Illinois – Legislatively - 2013
Maine – Ballot – 2012
Maryland – Ballot - 2012
Minnesota – Ballot/Legislatively - 2012
New Hampshire – Legislatively - 2009
New York – Legislatively - 2011
Rhode Island – Legislatively - 2013
Vermont – Legislatively - 2009
Washington – Ballot - 2012
>>>>
"Legislatively" means not by popular vote, and what the fuck does "Legislatively/Ballot" mean?
The point that started the response was the ideal that Federal courts would be imposing SSCM in all 50 states. That is false. A number of states passed SSCM on their own with out Federal Court action.
"Legislatively" means by the legislature elected by the people.
If you were familiar with the issue you would understand that Minnesota passed SSCM in two steps. First there was a ballot initiative to ban SSCM, that measure failed. As a result of that failing ballot initiative the legislature passed the law for the governor to sign which made SSCM legal in that state.
>>>>
I know what "legislatively means. I asked you what "Ballot/Legislatively" mean?
Being approved by the state legislature doesn't mean it's supported by the voters. Politicians are all sleazy weasels who will sell out their constituents for almost any consideration. A lot of state legislatures approved so-called "gay marriage" legislation and then were overruled by a referendum.
So you want mob rule.
3? 4? - No.
Delaware – Legislatively - 2013
District of Columbia – Legislatively - 2009
Hawaii – Legislatively - 2013
Illinois – Legislatively - 2013
Maine – Ballot – 2012
Maryland – Ballot - 2012
Minnesota – Ballot/Legislatively - 2012
New Hampshire – Legislatively - 2009
New York – Legislatively - 2011
Rhode Island – Legislatively - 2013
Vermont – Legislatively - 2009
Washington – Ballot - 2012
>>>>
"Legislatively" means not by popular vote, and what the fuck does "Legislatively/Ballot" mean?
The point that started the response was the ideal that Federal courts would be imposing SSCM in all 50 states. That is false. A number of states passed SSCM on their own with out Federal Court action.
"Legislatively" means by the legislature elected by the people.
If you were familiar with the issue you would understand that Minnesota passed SSCM in two steps. First there was a ballot initiative to ban SSCM, that measure failed. As a result of that failing ballot initiative the legislature passed the law for the governor to sign which made SSCM legal in that state.
>>>>
I know what "legislatively means. I asked you what "Ballot/Legislatively" mean?
Being approved by the state legislature doesn't mean it's supported by the voters. Politicians are all sleazy weasels who will sell out their constituents for almost any consideration. A lot of state legislatures approved so-called "gay marriage" legislation and then were overruled by a referendum.
So you want mob rule.
No one has a right to be served by any business. Having an unelected judge unilaterally overrule state law on this matter is worse than mob rule.
How do collect taxes ethically? A sternly worded note? What's your enforcement tactic or would taxes just be suggestions?True. Not ethically.So the government can't force you to pay taxes? lol
The article is true in general but it ignores the main point. And that is that the government ir anyone else has no right to force anyone into participating in anything, especially if it violates their religion. Period, end of story.
So the government can't force you to pay taxes? lol
Not even relevant.
You're forced to participate in the funding of the government.
You're forced to participate in the serving of black people in your diner.
I must disagree. You have dumb "down". This doesn't have anything to do with progressivism. It has to do with your talking yourself into a corner you couldn't get out of.I guess I can't dumb it down far enough for you to understand. I guess that explains why you are a progressive.
3? 4? - No.
Delaware – Legislatively - 2013
District of Columbia – Legislatively - 2009
Hawaii – Legislatively - 2013
Illinois – Legislatively - 2013
Maine – Ballot – 2012
Maryland – Ballot - 2012
Minnesota – Ballot/Legislatively - 2012
New Hampshire – Legislatively - 2009
New York – Legislatively - 2011
Rhode Island – Legislatively - 2013
Vermont – Legislatively - 2009
Washington – Ballot - 2012
>>>>
"Legislatively" means not by popular vote, and what the fuck does "Legislatively/Ballot" mean?
The point that started the response was the ideal that Federal courts would be imposing SSCM in all 50 states. That is false. A number of states passed SSCM on their own with out Federal Court action.
"Legislatively" means by the legislature elected by the people.
If you were familiar with the issue you would understand that Minnesota passed SSCM in two steps. First there was a ballot initiative to ban SSCM, that measure failed. As a result of that failing ballot initiative the legislature passed the law for the governor to sign which made SSCM legal in that state.
>>>>
I know what "legislatively means. I asked you what "Ballot/Legislatively" mean?
Being approved by the state legislature doesn't mean it's supported by the voters. Politicians are all sleazy weasels who will sell out their constituents for almost any consideration. A lot of state legislatures approved so-called "gay marriage" legislation and then were overruled by a referendum.
So you want mob rule.
No one has a right to be served by any business. Having an unelected judge unilaterally overrule state law on this matter is worse than mob rule.
Legal marriage isn't a right. That's why it requires a license. Being black isn't defined by behavior.
Fucking morons!
You didn't address the difference between providing a cake and providing a cab ride. You just said it was too dumb to discuss. A cheap way out, IMO, hence my appraisal of why you lost the argument.I not only got out of it, I killed your argument but you aren't smart enough or honest enough to understand it.
You didn't address the difference between providing a cake and providing a cab ride. You just said it was too dumb to discuss. A cheap way out, IMO, hence my appraisal of why you lost the argument.I not only got out of it, I killed your argument but you aren't smart enough or honest enough to understand it.
All you did was say you couldn't dumb it down enough. You never said what the difference was between providing a cake and providng a ride.I did too dumbass, read it again.]You didn't address the difference between providing a cake and providing a cab ride. You just said it was too dumb to discuss. A cheap way out, IMO, hence my appraisal of why you lost the argument.
You shot down your own argument by the word 'some'. Gun ownership is a personal choice that involves only the owner. Marriage involves everyone.Legal marriage isn't a right. That's why it requires a license. Being black isn't defined by behavior.
Fucking morons!
Owning some guns requires a license in some states. I guess owning a gun isn't a right.
Marriage has been declared a Fundamental Right many times by SCOTUS.Legal marriage isn't a right. That's why it requires a license. Being black isn't defined by behavior.
Fucking morons!
"Legislatively" means not by popular vote, and what the fuck does "Legislatively/Ballot" mean?
The point that started the response was the ideal that Federal courts would be imposing SSCM in all 50 states. That is false. A number of states passed SSCM on their own with out Federal Court action.
"Legislatively" means by the legislature elected by the people.
If you were familiar with the issue you would understand that Minnesota passed SSCM in two steps. First there was a ballot initiative to ban SSCM, that measure failed. As a result of that failing ballot initiative the legislature passed the law for the governor to sign which made SSCM legal in that state.
>>>>
I know what "legislatively means. I asked you what "Ballot/Legislatively" mean?
Being approved by the state legislature doesn't mean it's supported by the voters. Politicians are all sleazy weasels who will sell out their constituents for almost any consideration. A lot of state legislatures approved so-called "gay marriage" legislation and then were overruled by a referendum.
So you want mob rule.
No one has a right to be served by any business. Having an unelected judge unilaterally overrule state law on this matter is worse than mob rule.
So Hobby Lobby should be complying with all of the ACA instead of getting a pass on part of it from those unelected judges?
lol
A marriage license isn't.Marriage has been declared a Fundamental Right many times by SCOTUS.Legal marriage isn't a right. That's why it requires a license. Being black isn't defined by behavior.
Fucking morons!
If two consenting adults request a marriage license, and there are no prohibitions from them marrying, and they have complied with all applicable laws - yes, the license to marry is a Right.A marriage license isn't.Marriage has been declared a Fundamental Right many times by SCOTUS.Legal marriage isn't a right. That's why it requires a license. Being black isn't defined by behavior.
Fucking morons!
