Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Civil rights? Nobody is calling for the hillbilly to be arrested.
Phil is just another idiotic fundamentalist right winger with a reality TV show on cable. I don't think anyone was surprised by his views, but we were surprised that his handlers didn't keep him reigned in better. Maybe this is just a publicity ploy, though, because the dumb fuckers that enjoy that show aren't likely offended anyway.
It is really sad that young people such as yourself grow up with such a distorted view of our history.
The Foxnewsation of America....Don't like history? Make up your own
No, I have a far superior view of our history than you do. In fact, I wasn't the one who said he got his views of the world from the newspaper and the nightly news.
The liberals of America: Don't like reality? Make up your own.
Yes...I understand
You got your view of history from rightwing blogsites
That is how you can post such a ridiculous OP and expect people to think it has any merit
Civil rights? Nobody is calling for the hillbilly to be arrested.
When was the last time a homosexual was arrested for being queer? 1650 or so? Yet you Communists have claimed for years this is a civil rights issue. (Which it in fact is.)
So the campaign of demagoguery that your filthy party is engaged in is VERY MUCH an assault on civil liberty. You seek to intimidate ANYONE who would dare hold an opinion not assigned to them by the party.
You are at war against civil rights - I intend to fight you to the last breath.
Straight up question, TK: do you agree with what Phil said about blacks and gays.
Yeah, if you read what he said, he isn't one to judge, whatever failing a person has, it is between them and god. His job is to spread the gospel. Second, he tilled the fields with blacks, he never once slandered them.
So yes, I agree, simply because unlike the lot of you, I did read the GQ interview.
He said blacks were happier in the pre-civil rights era.
My personal opinion here is that no TV network should be allowed to censor a man for expressing his religious beliefs.
This is a profoundly disturbing suggestion. The first amendment applies to the government, not private entities. That aside, A&E has no less a right to free speech than Robertson. That right entitles A&E the right to include Robertson in programming, or not to include him, at the company's discretion.
I don't care what it applies to. That doesn't mean you have to sacrifice your beliefs simply for the entertainment of others.
Really? Are you a psychic? How can you read his mind? Are you a Vulcan? Did you do a mind meld with him or something? How can you sit there and say a man's memories are 'tainted'? Listen to yourself!
Yes, really
You don't have to be psychic to understand the social and legal barriers facing blacks in the pre-Civil Rights south. If Robertsons memories of that time were that blacks were all happy and singing then yes, his memories are tainted
Beyond that, he is a fucking racist
You can read minds? Were you living with Phil Robertson then? Were you living in that era at all?
Shall I alert the presses that we have a psychic time traveler on our hands?
This is a profoundly disturbing suggestion. The first amendment applies to the government, not private entities. That aside, A&E has no less a right to free speech than Robertson. That right entitles A&E the right to include Robertson in programming, or not to include him, at the company's discretion.
I don't care what it applies to. That doesn't mean you have to sacrifice your beliefs simply for the entertainment of others.
You make it sound like Robertson has some kind of inherent right to be the star of a reality TV show on A&E. If Robertson wants to continue appearing on reality TV he can go find some other network interested in a new show, or he can create his own show and broadcast it himself.
This is a profoundly disturbing suggestion. The first amendment applies to the government, not private entities. That aside, A&E has no less a right to free speech than Robertson. That right entitles A&E the right to include Robertson in programming, or not to include him, at the company's discretion.
I don't care what it applies to. That doesn't mean you have to sacrifice your beliefs simply for the entertainment of others.
You make it sound like Robertson has some kind of inherent right to be the star of a reality TV show on A&E. If Robertson wants to continue appearing on reality TV he can go find some other network interested in a new show, or he can create his own show and broadcast it himself.
Civil rights? Nobody is calling for the hillbilly to be arrested.
When was the last time a homosexual was arrested for being queer? 1650 or so? Yet you Communists have claimed for years this is a civil rights issue. (Which it in fact is.)
So the campaign of demagoguery that your filthy party is engaged in is VERY MUCH an assault on civil liberty. You seek to intimidate ANYONE who would dare hold an opinion not assigned to them by the party.
You are at war against civil rights - I intend to fight you to the last breath.
Civil rights? Nobody is calling for the hillbilly to be arrested.
When was the last time a homosexual was arrested for being queer? 1650 or so? Yet you Communists have claimed for years this is a civil rights issue. (Which it in fact is.)
So the campaign of demagoguery that your filthy party is engaged in is VERY MUCH an assault on civil liberty. You seek to intimidate ANYONE who would dare hold an opinion not assigned to them by the party.
You are at war against civil rights - I intend to fight you to the last breath.
You should take it easy on the crazy pills.
I don't care what it applies to. That doesn't mean you have to sacrifice your beliefs simply for the entertainment of others.
You make it sound like Robertson has some kind of inherent right to be the star of a reality TV show on A&E. If Robertson wants to continue appearing on reality TV he can go find some other network interested in a new show, or he can create his own show and broadcast it himself.
No. He has an inherent right to his opinion. Nobody has an inherent right to be famous. Big difference.
What basic freedom is being attacked by me?
Despite what your party claims, "freedom of speech" is not the right to say what the party tells us to say.
You seek to destroy a man for stating views in a magazine interview that you don't agree with.
Queers are intolerant and attacking basic liberty. Fuck em'
Some cannot tell the difference.Why do all of those supporting the hillbilly keep leaving out his other comment about gays that takes it beyond religion?
It seems like, to me, a vagina as a man would be more desirable than a mans anus. Thats just me, Robertson stated. Im just thinking: Theres more there! Shes got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what Im saying? But hey, sin: Its not logical, my man. Its just not logical.
Why is it you Communists that everyone conform EXACTLY to your opinion, or you try to destroy them?
Oh that's right, because you are engaged in a war against basic civil rights.
Civil rights? Nobody is calling for the hillbilly to be arrested.
How are we putting them down? You keep failing to see how we put anyone down for expressing our religious beliefs.
Tell me, is he putting them down when he says things like THIS?
We never, ever judge someone on whos going to heaven, hell. Thats the Almightys job. We just love em, give em the good news about Jesuswhether theyre homosexuals, drunks, terrorists. We let God sort em out later, you see what Im saying?
--Phil Robertson
Once again ignoring his other comments.
It seems like, to me, a vagina as a man would be more desirable than a mans anus. Thats just me, Robertson stated. Im just thinking: Theres more there! Shes got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what Im saying? But hey, sin: Its not logical, my man. Its just not logical.
It seems like, to me, a vagina as a man would be more desirable than a mans anus. Thats just me, Robertson stated. Im just thinking: Theres more there! Shes got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what Im saying? But hey, sin: Its not logical, my man. Its just not logical
Isn't that in the bible?
Phil is just another idiotic fundamentalist right winger with a reality TV show on cable. I don't think anyone was surprised by his views, but we were surprised that his handlers didn't keep him reigned in better. Maybe this is just a publicity ploy, though, because the dumb fuckers that enjoy that show aren't likely offended anyway.
That is the whole problem.
The elite lefties of the Political Correctness Police. It has gotten way out of hand.
Reigned in better?
No one should say anything that is opposite of their their points of view?
Mr. Robertson was and is free to say anything he wants about homosexual sodomy. He is free to compare it to any other type of sexual perversion, whether he finds them the same, different, or unrelated.
Any other person or organization learning of Mr. Robertson's words or beliefs is free to react in any way they want, other than committing some sort of actionable defamation.
The network that gives free publicity to him and his family and his family business is free to react to his public pronouncements on the subject (or private pronouncements, for that matter) in any way that it wants, including suspending him, cancelling the show, or issuing a public apology.
Every potential watcher of the show is free to start, continue, or stop watching as a result of this dust-up, or not.
Where is the attack on freedom? Might I lose my freedom to see this particular character on this particular program? WGAF?
Never having seen this program before I sought it out from my cable provider, to have a look.
Maybe I caught it on a bad day, but it was even worse than the motorcycle and tattoo shows.
Good grief.
You make it sound like Robertson has some kind of inherent right to be the star of a reality TV show on A&E. If Robertson wants to continue appearing on reality TV he can go find some other network interested in a new show, or he can create his own show and broadcast it himself.
No. He has an inherent right to his opinion. Nobody has an inherent right to be famous. Big difference.
So you agree A&E can fire him?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
