🤑 ⏳ Last chance to grab those Amazon Prime Deals! (Don’t miss out—click here to check them out!) 🛒✨

"Freedom Watch" calls the President a criminal for killing Bin Laden

This man needs to be fired.

Why? Because he dared question the legality of the hit? He's not the only one.

It wasn't a "hit" or an execution or an assassination.

Our military is not full of hitmen, executioners, or assassins.
Our government HAS had it's moments.....​

"I spent 33 years and 4 months in active service as a member of our country's most agile military force--the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from second lieutenant to Major General. And during that period I spent most of my time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism. I suspected I was part of a racket all the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all members of the military profession I never had an original thought until I left the service."


....And, we can't very-well forget ....


.....our God-given Right to take whatever we could get our claws into....by whatever-means-necessary....​
 
Last edited:
Here's the specific clip, for people who don't don't have much time:

Fox Business' Napolitano: Bin Laden "Killed On The Illegal Whim Of The President" | Media Matters for America

(And yes, its from "Media Matters", but it's just video of the intro of the show).

and here's the full show:

YouTube - Freedom Watch - Killing The Rule Of Law 5/2/2011

"Freedom Watch" starts about 50 Seconds into the video.

Judge Napolitano specifically states that Osama Bin Laden was assassinated "on the illegal whim of the president".
The CON$ are totally pissed that their hero and St Ronnie's Freedom Fighter was killed. Their MessiahRushie has even elevated his idol, OBL, to a "FOREIGN LEADER."

May 3, 2011
RUSH: So, again, to review, an American president, with admittedly incomplete intelligence, invades a foreign and supposedly friendly nation without that nation's knowledge or consent. Using information extracted from Guantanamo detainees subjected to allegedly illegal enhanced interrogation methods, i.e., waterboarding, the president gives a kill order for a target in a private residence where there are women and children present. And in the course of this attack, upwards of 22 foreign nationals are either killed or captured, including the illegally targeted unarmed foreign leader.

Yea, Sure thing R2D2 :cuckoo:
 
Here's the specific clip, for people who don't don't have much time:

Fox Business' Napolitano: Bin Laden "Killed On The Illegal Whim Of The President" | Media Matters for America

(And yes, its from "Media Matters", but it's just video of the intro of the show).

and here's the full show:

YouTube - Freedom Watch - Killing The Rule Of Law 5/2/2011

"Freedom Watch" starts about 50 Seconds into the video.

Judge Napolitano specifically states that Osama Bin Laden was assassinated "on the illegal whim of the president".
The CON$ are totally pissed that their hero and St Ronnie's Freedom Fighter was killed. Their MessiahRushie has even elevated his idol, OBL, to a "FOREIGN LEADER."

May 3, 2011
RUSH: So, again, to review, an American president, with admittedly incomplete intelligence, invades a foreign and supposedly friendly nation without that nation's knowledge or consent. Using information extracted from Guantanamo detainees subjected to allegedly illegal enhanced interrogation methods, i.e., waterboarding, the president gives a kill order for a target in a private residence where there are women and children present. And in the course of this attack, upwards of 22 foreign nationals are either killed or captured, including the illegally targeted unarmed foreign leader.

osama was a 'foreign leader'?

poor rush. is he back on the oxycontin?
 
That being said, even if you disagree with that policy, would you disagree with the policy of using our military to take out a mass murderer? I mean certainly Seal Team Six could have just as easily went in and killed his ass without a war, but that wasn't my call.

No. Not a mass murderer. A mass murderer of Americans. That's an important distinction. Bin Laden was far more than a scary Muslim terrorist. He was responsible for killing Americans.

That justifies our actions. I do not think we are justified in using our military to go and kill every other scumbag in the world.


Oh I see, so yall on the left believe that the COTUS protects the rights of everyone in the world, but that the US military should not protect the lives of everyone in the world.

What an odd world view.
 

There are international laws governing this kind of shit. I watched a discussion on the BBC about it. They had a panel of International Law Specialists, and they were all pretty convinced that we - technically - acted outside of international law. However, they all agreed with the action and none of them were critical of what we did.

If we broke international law - frankly, who gives a shit?
Again I ask: how?

We certainly violated Paki Airspace and probably a host of other Pakistani laws.

Who gives a shit? If Pakistan wouldn't have been shielding OBL, it could have all been avoided.
 
That being said, even if you disagree with that policy, would you disagree with the policy of using our military to take out a mass murderer? I mean certainly Seal Team Six could have just as easily went in and killed his ass without a war, but that wasn't my call.

No. Not a mass murderer. A mass murderer of Americans. That's an important distinction. Bin Laden was far more than a scary Muslim terrorist. He was responsible for killing Americans.

That justifies our actions. I do not think we are justified in using our military to go and kill every other scumbag in the world.


Oh I see, so yall on the left believe that the COTUS protects the rights of everyone in the world, but that the US military should not protect the lives of everyone in the world.

What an odd world view.

I don't believe that the the Constitution, the basis for our laws, applies to anyone but us.

I haven't heard anyone else claim that it does.
 
Why? Because he dared question the legality of the hit? He's not the only one.

It wasn't a "hit" or an execution or an assassination.

Our military is not full of hitmen, executioners, or assassins.
Our government HAS had it's moments.....​

"I spent 33 years and 4 months in active service as a member of our country's most agile military force--the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from second lieutenant to Major General. And during that period I spent most of my time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism. I suspected I was part of a racket all the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all members of the military profession I never had an original thought until I left the service."


....And, we can very-well forget ....


.....our God-given Right to take whatever we could get our claws into....by whatever-means-necessary....​

You ride that bike without a helmet don't you ? :eusa_whistle:
 
There are international laws governing this kind of shit. I watched a discussion on the BBC about it. They had a panel of International Law Specialists, and they were all pretty convinced that we - technically - acted outside of international law. However, they all agreed with the action and none of them were critical of what we did.

If we broke international law - frankly, who gives a shit?
Again I ask: how?

We certainly violated Paki Airspace and probably a host of other Pakistani laws.

Who gives a shit? If Pakistan wouldn't have been shielding OBL, it could have all been avoided.

Oh, so now we're all in favor of violating foreign sovereignty if it suits our needs? You guys are so full-of-shit.

:lol:
 

Do you think the US would take kindly to France sending a special forces team into our country to kill a terrorist without permission?

Now it is my opinion that Pakistan can't be trusted, and I therefor don't give a shit if they are upset that we violated their sovereignty, but nonetheless we DID so.
We have already been acting, in agreement with Pakistan, to conduct military action in their country.


No we haven't, we had permission to conduct LIMITED raids along the border. This operation fell far outside that scope.

Why are you arguing about this? Your boy made the right call. Fuck international law and fuck diplomacy, Bin Laden was too important a target to risk...
 
Here's the specific clip, for people who don't don't have much time:

Fox Business' Napolitano: Bin Laden "Killed On The Illegal Whim Of The President" | Media Matters for America

(And yes, its from "Media Matters", but it's just video of the intro of the show).

and here's the full show:

YouTube - Freedom Watch - Killing The Rule Of Law 5/2/2011

"Freedom Watch" starts about 50 Seconds into the video.

Judge Napolitano specifically states that Osama Bin Laden was assassinated "on the illegal whim of the president".
The CON$ are totally pissed that their hero and St Ronnie's Freedom Fighter was killed. Their MessiahRushie has even elevated his idol, OBL, to a "FOREIGN LEADER."

May 3, 2011
RUSH: So, again, to review, an American president, with admittedly incomplete intelligence, invades a foreign and supposedly friendly nation without that nation's knowledge or consent. Using information extracted from Guantanamo detainees subjected to allegedly illegal enhanced interrogation methods, i.e., waterboarding, the president gives a kill order for a target in a private residence where there are women and children present. And in the course of this attack, upwards of 22 foreign nationals are either killed or captured, including the illegally targeted unarmed foreign leader.

osama was a 'foreign leader'?

poor rush. is he back on the oxycontin?

As long as there are orgaizations like Move On .org all insults against FOX are laughable.
 
No. Not a mass murderer. A mass murderer of Americans. That's an important distinction. Bin Laden was far more than a scary Muslim terrorist. He was responsible for killing Americans.

That justifies our actions. I do not think we are justified in using our military to go and kill every other scumbag in the world.


Oh I see, so yall on the left believe that the COTUS protects the rights of everyone in the world, but that the US military should not protect the lives of everyone in the world.

What an odd world view.

I don't believe that the the Constitution, the basis for our laws, applies to anyone but us.

I haven't heard anyone else claim that it does.

So then, Gitmo and the tribunals are perfectly ok now? We can drop all the habeas corpus arguments made from 2002 - 2008?

:lol:
 
This man needs to be fired.

Why? Because he dared question the legality of the hit? He's not the only one.

Exactly.. and let's take it a step further... if Shrub had done this, they'd all be howling for his head... this is a certainty.

That's what this is really all about, isn't it? Payback for the way poor old George was treated?

As I said, I am just glad someone was able to get him. I don't care who was in office.

Of course, Bush never did get him, so your hypothetical will remain just that.
 

Do you think the US would take kindly to France sending a special forces team into our country to kill a terrorist without permission?

Now it is my opinion that Pakistan can't be trusted, and I therefor don't give a shit if they are upset that we violated their sovereignty, but nonetheless we DID so.
We have already been acting, in agreement with Pakistan, to conduct military action in their country.

Well if you read todays news, they seem kind of pissed about this last one.
 
No. Not a mass murderer. A mass murderer of Americans. That's an important distinction. Bin Laden was far more than a scary Muslim terrorist. He was responsible for killing Americans.

That justifies our actions. I do not think we are justified in using our military to go and kill every other scumbag in the world.


Oh I see, so yall on the left believe that the COTUS protects the rights of everyone in the world, but that the US military should not protect the lives of everyone in the world.

What an odd world view.

I don't believe that the the Constitution, the basis for our laws, applies to anyone but us.

I haven't heard anyone else claim that it does.

You have got to be fucking kidding me. Come on man, I thought you were going to be someone I could disagree with, but still enjoy an honest debate.

The ENTIRE war cry of the left over waterboarding and GITMO has always been that it violated the COTUS because it protected EVERYONE.
 
Why? Because he dared question the legality of the hit? He's not the only one.

Exactly.. and let's take it a step further... if Shrub had done this, they'd all be howling for his head... this is a certainty.

That's what this is really all about, isn't it? Payback for the way poor old George was treated?

As I said, I am just glad someone was able to get him. I don't care who was in office.

Of course, Bush never did get him, so your hypothetical will remain just that.

But information he had beaten out of the detainees is what lead to us getting him.
 
Going after Bin Laden in Pakistan the other day was no different than going after Bin Laden in Afghanistan 10 years ago.

Did Napolitano, and the rest of you who agree with him, proclaim that a violation of international law??

eh??
 
Why? Because he dared question the legality of the hit? He's not the only one.

Exactly.. and let's take it a step further... if Shrub had done this, they'd all be howling for his head... this is a certainty.

That's what this is really all about, isn't it? Payback for the way poor old George was treated?

As I said, I am just glad someone was able to get him. I don't care who was in office.

Of course, Bush never did get him, so your hypothetical will remain just that.

No, it's about the full-of-shitedness and utter hypocrisy of folks like yourself.
 
Exactly.. and let's take it a step further... if Shrub had done this, they'd all be howling for his head... this is a certainty.

That's what this is really all about, isn't it? Payback for the way poor old George was treated?

As I said, I am just glad someone was able to get him. I don't care who was in office.

Of course, Bush never did get him, so your hypothetical will remain just that.

No, it's about the full-of-shitedness and utter hypocrisy of folks like yourself.

Oh, the irony.
 

Forum List

Back
Top