Front Runner Ben Carson.But What Happened To Republicans&Conservatives Are All Racists?

Have the democrats found anyone to run yet who is not old, rich, and white?

Barack Obama is president. Where have you been?
He's not running this year. The GOP has more minority and just as many female candidates running as the democrats do.

Which means, what, exactly?

The conservative agenda is generally cut taxes on the rich, do nothing for anyone, build up the military, and use the military to further the agenda of corporate America in third world nations that do not have nuclear weapons.


under obama the very richest got richer, the poorest got poorer; both at a faster pace than under Bush and Republicans

thank God the poor have Progressives to "help" them

idiots and hypocrites

This is true and completely ignores the context and the history.

It's kind of like saying the doctor who removes a cancerous tumor brutally cut the patient.


no it isnt like saying that idiot. you want credit for creating MORE "PATIENTS" TO "OPERATE" ON

ur a joke; as i've shown repeatedly
 
Have the democrats found anyone to run yet who is not old, rich, and white?

Barack Obama is president. Where have you been?
He's not running this year. The GOP has more minority and just as many female candidates running as the democrats do.

Which means, what, exactly?

The conservative agenda is generally cut taxes on the rich, do nothing for anyone, build up the military, and use the military to further the agenda of corporate America in third world nations that do not have nuclear weapons.
Now....without your spin....

But saying the exact same thing.....

The conservative agenda is to cut taxes for the business owners...so the private sector can be solely involved in creating jobs as it is supposed to do while ensuring the federal government does its best to build up the military to protect our asses....and in the meantime, allowing the private sector to expand internationally in lesser developed nations, assisting them in building themselves up.

Now, you may not agree that such will work.....but the fact that you need to spin the intentions of conservatives tells me one of two things...

either you feel insecure in your position....

or....

well...there is no or.
 
Have the democrats found anyone to run yet who is not old, rich, and white?

Barack Obama is president. Where have you been?
He's not running this year. The GOP has more minority and just as many female candidates running as the democrats do.

Which means, what, exactly?

The conservative agenda is generally cut taxes on the rich, do nothing for anyone, build up the military, and use the military to further the agenda of corporate America in third world nations that do not have nuclear weapons.


under obama the very richest got richer, the poorest got poorer; both at a faster pace than under Bush and Republicans

thank God the poor have Progressives to "help" them

idiots and hypocrites

This is true and completely ignores the context and the history.

It's kind of like saying the doctor who removes a cancerous tumor brutally cut the patient.
saying that republicans want to cut taxes for the rich is saying the same exact thing......

Do you not see that?
 
dude seriously; you are simply LAUGHABLE


bush's unemployment average is 5.2% OVER THE WHOLE 8 YEARS
when Republicans mentioned this it was people LIKE YOU that pooh-pooed that, insisting many were in low-paying jobs

NOW THAT IT IS PROVEN TO BE THE CASE UNDER OBAMA, as evidenced by the THIRTEEN MILLION MORE ON FOOD STAMPS IN OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR, you want to cry that is being taken out of context. How typical!!


and of course we know you can work and still collect food stamps; and then you must conclude these are the jobs "created" under obama

AND OF COURSE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 45 MILLION or so on food stamps under obama ABSOLUTLEY NEEDS THE HELP; since the Left insists nobody is gaming the system

libs are losers who lie to themselves
 
people who have defense-related jobs are generally much higher paid than the people obama "created" jobs for that has others noting there are 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps in obama's SEVENTH YEAR then there were under Bush and Republicans

libs are losers who lie to themselves

The government creates the jobs in the defense industry.
 
people who have defense-related jobs are generally much higher paid than the people obama "created" jobs for that has others noting there are 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps in obama's SEVENTH YEAR then there were under Bush and Republicans

libs are losers who lie to themselves

The government creates the jobs in the defense industry.


not if you idiots get your way now isnt that right leftard?
 
And there it is.
Ben Carson, a guy who always looks like he's on his way to or from a nap,

is exactly the kind of black token conservatives can get behind.
there should be no need to "woo" minorities...they should want what's best for america over policies that advance their racial agenda.
Maybe "woo" isn't the best word but you do have to convince people that your stance is better, but Republicans can't seem to do it without further alienating people. Depending on what people "should do" is a sure road to political irrelevancy.

you're obsessed with the republican/democrat dichotomy and pretending that "your" party and "your" politicians are "good" and the others are "bad".....many people see through the shrill hypartisan rhetoric and are tired of the whole charade.

This from the guy who wants to separate the races.

10 Things That Would Instantly Happen If All Negroes Left America | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
 
dude seriously; you are simply LAUGHABLE


bush's unemployment average is 5.2% OVER THE WHOLE 8 YEARS
when Republicans mentioned this it was people LIKE YOU that pooh-pooed that, insisting many were in low-paying jobs

NOW THAT IT IS PROVEN TO BE THE CASE UNDER OBAMA, as evidenced by the THIRTEEN MILLION MORE ON FOOD STAMPS IN OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR, you want to cry that is being taken out of context. How typical!!


and of course we know you can work and still collect food stamps; and then you must conclude these are the jobs "created" under obama

AND OF COURSE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 45 MILLION or so on food stamps under obama ABSOLUTLEY NEEDS THE HELP; since the Left insists nobody is gaming the system

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Again lack of context and history.

Bush entered the White House with the economy in pretty good shape, a surplus instead of a deficit and a world at relative peace.

His agenda was to cut taxes on the rich, attack Iraq, piss off the Chinese and the Russians, and privatize SSI.

He immediately cut taxes on the rich and tried to re-ignite the cold war. He completely overlooked the trouble in the tech sector and chose instead to focus on bolstering a war/oil economy. He basically nullified the anti-ballistic missile treaty and allocated funding on weapon systems that were geared to provide defense against nuclear weapons.

The economy began falling apart and the Fed lowered interest rates. This heated up the housing market. Then 9/11 happened and Bush got his wish to attack Iraq.

Thus? The defense, housing and oil industry were on fire, on the government dime and responsible for the low UE. That didn't last long. Bush's crappy economy based on war/oil and housing fell apart in the second term.
 
And there it is.
Ben Carson, a guy who always looks like he's on his way to or from a nap,

is exactly the kind of black token conservatives can get behind.
there should be no need to "woo" minorities...they should want what's best for america over policies that advance their racial agenda.
Maybe "woo" isn't the best word but you do have to convince people that your stance is better, but Republicans can't seem to do it without further alienating people. Depending on what people "should do" is a sure road to political irrelevancy.

you're obsessed with the republican/democrat dichotomy and pretending that "your" party and "your" politicians are "good" and the others are "bad".....many people see through the shrill hypartisan rhetoric and are tired of the whole charade.

This from the guy who wants to separate the races.

10 Things That Would Instantly Happen If All Negroes Left America | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum


Yes...I support black nationalists and agree with their reasoning generally ...

...all races want to protect and maintain their own cultures, heritage, traditions and values...what's the problem?

..but now you've derailed the thread and want to talk about me instead of the topic...pretty weak tactic
 
dude seriously; you are simply LAUGHABLE


bush's unemployment average is 5.2% OVER THE WHOLE 8 YEARS
when Republicans mentioned this it was people LIKE YOU that pooh-pooed that, insisting many were in low-paying jobs

NOW THAT IT IS PROVEN TO BE THE CASE UNDER OBAMA, as evidenced by the THIRTEEN MILLION MORE ON FOOD STAMPS IN OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR, you want to cry that is being taken out of context. How typical!!


and of course we know you can work and still collect food stamps; and then you must conclude these are the jobs "created" under obama

AND OF COURSE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 45 MILLION or so on food stamps under obama ABSOLUTLEY NEEDS THE HELP; since the Left insists nobody is gaming the system

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Again lack of context and history.

Bush entered the White House with the economy in pretty good shape, a surplus instead of a deficit and a world at relative peace.

His agenda was to cut taxes on the rich, attack Iraq, piss off the Chinese and the Russians, and privatize SSI.

He immediately cut taxes on the rich and tried to re-ignite the cold war. He completely overlooked the trouble in the tech sector and chose instead to focus on bolstering a war/oil economy. He basically nullified the anti-ballistic missile treaty and allocated funding on weapon systems that were geared to provide defense against nuclear weapons.

The economy began falling apart and the Fed lowered interest rates. This heated up the housing market. Then 9/11 happened and Bush got his wish to attack Iraq.

Thus? The defense, housing and oil industry were on fire, on the government dime and responsible for the low UE. That didn't last long. Bush's crappy economy based on war/oil and housing fell apart in the second term.


AGAIN ;you need to disappear for a half hour or so and come back with some more laughable stupidity that is just excuse-making
 
people who have defense-related jobs are generally much higher paid than the people obama "created" jobs for that has others noting there are 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps in obama's SEVENTH YEAR then there were under Bush and Republicans

libs are losers who lie to themselves

The government creates the jobs in the defense industry.
the only place government can create jobs is within the government.

Any politician on either side of the aisle that claims "I will create jobs in the private sector" (or anything like that) is lying through their teeth.

Obama knew he couldn't "create" private sector jobs. You can not force a business to hire. Period.

However, what Obama has done is made it less dire for those without a job....you know....expanding entitlements for the neediest.....that does not take much to do when you are president....a pen and a phone and viola.....

But to do it without increasing the debt is another story.....likely impossible....thus why many politicians; mostly on the right; do not like that approach.

Republicans can not create jobs either....but they believe in giving business owners incentives to hire....not make them hire....give them reason to want to hire...and let them keep the cash needed to hire. Sure, there are valid reasons to believe that wont work either.....you know...greed and such....but overall it can work....and likely the only thing that would work.
 
dude seriously; you are simply LAUGHABLE


bush's unemployment average is 5.2% OVER THE WHOLE 8 YEARS
when Republicans mentioned this it was people LIKE YOU that pooh-pooed that, insisting many were in low-paying jobs

NOW THAT IT IS PROVEN TO BE THE CASE UNDER OBAMA, as evidenced by the THIRTEEN MILLION MORE ON FOOD STAMPS IN OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR, you want to cry that is being taken out of context. How typical!!


and of course we know you can work and still collect food stamps; and then you must conclude these are the jobs "created" under obama

AND OF COURSE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 45 MILLION or so on food stamps under obama ABSOLUTLEY NEEDS THE HELP; since the Left insists nobody is gaming the system

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Again lack of context and history.

Bush entered the White House with the economy in pretty good shape, a surplus instead of a deficit and a world at relative peace.

His agenda was to cut taxes on the rich, attack Iraq, piss off the Chinese and the Russians, and privatize SSI.

He immediately cut taxes on the rich and tried to re-ignite the cold war. He completely overlooked the trouble in the tech sector and chose instead to focus on bolstering a war/oil economy. He basically nullified the anti-ballistic missile treaty and allocated funding on weapon systems that were geared to provide defense against nuclear weapons.

The economy began falling apart and the Fed lowered interest rates. This heated up the housing market. Then 9/11 happened and Bush got his wish to attack Iraq.

Thus? The defense, housing and oil industry were on fire, on the government dime and responsible for the low UE. That didn't last long. Bush's crappy economy based on war/oil and housing fell apart in the second term.

your post is simply a moronic collection of whines that dont hold up to scrutiny; just like everything else you posted.
 
dude seriously; you are simply LAUGHABLE


bush's unemployment average is 5.2% OVER THE WHOLE 8 YEARS
when Republicans mentioned this it was people LIKE YOU that pooh-pooed that, insisting many were in low-paying jobs

NOW THAT IT IS PROVEN TO BE THE CASE UNDER OBAMA, as evidenced by the THIRTEEN MILLION MORE ON FOOD STAMPS IN OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR, you want to cry that is being taken out of context. How typical!!


and of course we know you can work and still collect food stamps; and then you must conclude these are the jobs "created" under obama

AND OF COURSE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 45 MILLION or so on food stamps under obama ABSOLUTLEY NEEDS THE HELP; since the Left insists nobody is gaming the system

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Again lack of context and history.

Bush entered the White House with the economy in pretty good shape, a surplus instead of a deficit and a world at relative peace.

His agenda was to cut taxes on the rich, attack Iraq, piss off the Chinese and the Russians, and privatize SSI.

He immediately cut taxes on the rich and tried to re-ignite the cold war. He completely overlooked the trouble in the tech sector and chose instead to focus on bolstering a war/oil economy. He basically nullified the anti-ballistic missile treaty and allocated funding on weapon systems that were geared to provide defense against nuclear weapons.

The economy began falling apart and the Fed lowered interest rates. This heated up the housing market. Then 9/11 happened and Bush got his wish to attack Iraq.

Thus? The defense, housing and oil industry were on fire, on the government dime and responsible for the low UE. That didn't last long. Bush's crappy economy based on war/oil and housing fell apart in the second term.

your post is simply a moronic collection of whines that dont hold up to scrutiny; just like everything else you posted.
Got nothing, huh?
 
dude seriously; you are simply LAUGHABLE


bush's unemployment average is 5.2% OVER THE WHOLE 8 YEARS
when Republicans mentioned this it was people LIKE YOU that pooh-pooed that, insisting many were in low-paying jobs

NOW THAT IT IS PROVEN TO BE THE CASE UNDER OBAMA, as evidenced by the THIRTEEN MILLION MORE ON FOOD STAMPS IN OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR, you want to cry that is being taken out of context. How typical!!


and of course we know you can work and still collect food stamps; and then you must conclude these are the jobs "created" under obama

AND OF COURSE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 45 MILLION or so on food stamps under obama ABSOLUTLEY NEEDS THE HELP; since the Left insists nobody is gaming the system

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Again lack of context and history.

Bush entered the White House with the economy in pretty good shape, a surplus instead of a deficit and a world at relative peace.

His agenda was to cut taxes on the rich, attack Iraq, piss off the Chinese and the Russians, and privatize SSI.

He immediately cut taxes on the rich and tried to re-ignite the cold war. He completely overlooked the trouble in the tech sector and chose instead to focus on bolstering a war/oil economy. He basically nullified the anti-ballistic missile treaty and allocated funding on weapon systems that were geared to provide defense against nuclear weapons.

The economy began falling apart and the Fed lowered interest rates. This heated up the housing market. Then 9/11 happened and Bush got his wish to attack Iraq.

Thus? The defense, housing and oil industry were on fire, on the government dime and responsible for the low UE. That didn't last long. Bush's crappy economy based on war/oil and housing fell apart in the second term.
Uh...Sallow......where you around when Bush took office?

The dot com surge that Clinton rode burst right before Clinton left office.......billions of dollars of "paper" wealth disappeared.....the middle class lost billions of "paper wealth" in investments in a matter of days.....middle class folk who were suddenly millionaires on paper and spending like there was no tomorrow and all of a sudden it stopped...

Hundreds of thousands lost their jobs as thousands of companies went belly up.

The rest of your post is meaningless because it is not based on fact....just your opinion.

But Bush did not enter the white house with the economy in pretty good shape. He entered it during a financial crisis.
 
dude seriously; you are simply LAUGHABLE


bush's unemployment average is 5.2% OVER THE WHOLE 8 YEARS
when Republicans mentioned this it was people LIKE YOU that pooh-pooed that, insisting many were in low-paying jobs

NOW THAT IT IS PROVEN TO BE THE CASE UNDER OBAMA, as evidenced by the THIRTEEN MILLION MORE ON FOOD STAMPS IN OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR, you want to cry that is being taken out of context. How typical!!


and of course we know you can work and still collect food stamps; and then you must conclude these are the jobs "created" under obama

AND OF COURSE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 45 MILLION or so on food stamps under obama ABSOLUTLEY NEEDS THE HELP; since the Left insists nobody is gaming the system

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Again lack of context and history.

Bush entered the White House with the economy in pretty good shape, a surplus instead of a deficit and a world at relative peace.

His agenda was to cut taxes on the rich, attack Iraq, piss off the Chinese and the Russians, and privatize SSI.

He immediately cut taxes on the rich and tried to re-ignite the cold war. He completely overlooked the trouble in the tech sector and chose instead to focus on bolstering a war/oil economy. He basically nullified the anti-ballistic missile treaty and allocated funding on weapon systems that were geared to provide defense against nuclear weapons.

The economy began falling apart and the Fed lowered interest rates. This heated up the housing market. Then 9/11 happened and Bush got his wish to attack Iraq.

Thus? The defense, housing and oil industry were on fire, on the government dime and responsible for the low UE. That didn't last long. Bush's crappy economy based on war/oil and housing fell apart in the second term.
Uh...Sallow......where you around when Bush took office?

The dot com surge that Clinton rode burst right before Clinton left office.......billions of dollars of "paper" wealth disappeared.....the middle class lost billions of "paper wealth" in investments in a matter of days.....middle class folk who were suddenly millionaires on paper and spending like there was no tomorrow and all of a sudden it stopped...

Hundreds of thousands lost their jobs as thousands of companies went belly up.

The rest of your post is meaningless because it is not based on fact....just your opinion.

But Bush did not enter the white house with the economy in pretty good shape. He entered it during a financial crisis.
Bullshit.
 
people who have defense-related jobs are generally much higher paid than the people obama "created" jobs for that has others noting there are 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps in obama's SEVENTH YEAR then there were under Bush and Republicans

libs are losers who lie to themselves

The government creates the jobs in the defense industry.
the only place government can create jobs is within the government.

Any politician on either side of the aisle that claims "I will create jobs in the private sector" (or anything like that) is lying through their teeth.

Obama knew he couldn't "create" private sector jobs. You can not force a business to hire. Period.

However, what Obama has done is made it less dire for those without a job....you know....expanding entitlements for the neediest.....that does not take much to do when you are president....a pen and a phone and viola.....

But to do it without increasing the debt is another story.....likely impossible....thus why many politicians; mostly on the right; do not like that approach.

Republicans can not create jobs either....but they believe in giving business owners incentives to hire....not make them hire....give them reason to want to hire...and let them keep the cash needed to hire. Sure, there are valid reasons to believe that wont work either.....you know...greed and such....but overall it can work....and likely the only thing that would work.

Jobs are created with investment capital. When the government invests in, for example, a weapons system, it uses taxpayer dollars as the investment capital to pay the defense contractor.

That creates jobs in the private sector.

Same thing happens when building roads, or schools, funding research, funding medical care, etc.
 
dude seriously; you are simply LAUGHABLE


bush's unemployment average is 5.2% OVER THE WHOLE 8 YEARS
when Republicans mentioned this it was people LIKE YOU that pooh-pooed that, insisting many were in low-paying jobs

NOW THAT IT IS PROVEN TO BE THE CASE UNDER OBAMA, as evidenced by the THIRTEEN MILLION MORE ON FOOD STAMPS IN OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR, you want to cry that is being taken out of context. How typical!!


and of course we know you can work and still collect food stamps; and then you must conclude these are the jobs "created" under obama

AND OF COURSE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 45 MILLION or so on food stamps under obama ABSOLUTLEY NEEDS THE HELP; since the Left insists nobody is gaming the system

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Again lack of context and history.

Bush entered the White House with the economy in pretty good shape, a surplus instead of a deficit and a world at relative peace.

His agenda was to cut taxes on the rich, attack Iraq, piss off the Chinese and the Russians, and privatize SSI.

He immediately cut taxes on the rich and tried to re-ignite the cold war. He completely overlooked the trouble in the tech sector and chose instead to focus on bolstering a war/oil economy. He basically nullified the anti-ballistic missile treaty and allocated funding on weapon systems that were geared to provide defense against nuclear weapons.

The economy began falling apart and the Fed lowered interest rates. This heated up the housing market. Then 9/11 happened and Bush got his wish to attack Iraq.

Thus? The defense, housing and oil industry were on fire, on the government dime and responsible for the low UE. That didn't last long. Bush's crappy economy based on war/oil and housing fell apart in the second term.
Uh...Sallow......where you around when Bush took office?

The dot com surge that Clinton rode burst right before Clinton left office.......billions of dollars of "paper" wealth disappeared.....the middle class lost billions of "paper wealth" in investments in a matter of days.....middle class folk who were suddenly millionaires on paper and spending like there was no tomorrow and all of a sudden it stopped...

Hundreds of thousands lost their jobs as thousands of companies went belly up.

The rest of your post is meaningless because it is not based on fact....just your opinion.

But Bush did not enter the white house with the economy in pretty good shape. He entered it during a financial crisis.
Bullshit.
that's your response?

Bullshit?

You mean there was no dot come bubble bursting?

The NASDAQ was not considered a place for the middle class to invest when it was surging in the 90's?

People did not "think" they were making money hand over fist and spending it on larger houses, boats, designer clothes, sports cars, etc.?

Or are you saying bullshit because you did not have a mature response.
 
dude seriously; you are simply LAUGHABLE


bush's unemployment average is 5.2% OVER THE WHOLE 8 YEARS
when Republicans mentioned this it was people LIKE YOU that pooh-pooed that, insisting many were in low-paying jobs

NOW THAT IT IS PROVEN TO BE THE CASE UNDER OBAMA, as evidenced by the THIRTEEN MILLION MORE ON FOOD STAMPS IN OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR, you want to cry that is being taken out of context. How typical!!


and of course we know you can work and still collect food stamps; and then you must conclude these are the jobs "created" under obama

AND OF COURSE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 45 MILLION or so on food stamps under obama ABSOLUTLEY NEEDS THE HELP; since the Left insists nobody is gaming the system

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Again lack of context and history.

Bush entered the White House with the economy in pretty good shape, a surplus instead of a deficit and a world at relative peace.

His agenda was to cut taxes on the rich, attack Iraq, piss off the Chinese and the Russians, and privatize SSI.

He immediately cut taxes on the rich and tried to re-ignite the cold war. He completely overlooked the trouble in the tech sector and chose instead to focus on bolstering a war/oil economy. He basically nullified the anti-ballistic missile treaty and allocated funding on weapon systems that were geared to provide defense against nuclear weapons.

The economy began falling apart and the Fed lowered interest rates. This heated up the housing market. Then 9/11 happened and Bush got his wish to attack Iraq.

Thus? The defense, housing and oil industry were on fire, on the government dime and responsible for the low UE. That didn't last long. Bush's crappy economy based on war/oil and housing fell apart in the second term.
Uh...Sallow......where you around when Bush took office?

The dot com surge that Clinton rode burst right before Clinton left office.......billions of dollars of "paper" wealth disappeared.....the middle class lost billions of "paper wealth" in investments in a matter of days.....middle class folk who were suddenly millionaires on paper and spending like there was no tomorrow and all of a sudden it stopped...

Hundreds of thousands lost their jobs as thousands of companies went belly up.

The rest of your post is meaningless because it is not based on fact....just your opinion.

But Bush did not enter the white house with the economy in pretty good shape. He entered it during a financial crisis.

Bush entered office with unemployment at 4% and with the budget balanced.
 
dude seriously; you are simply LAUGHABLE


bush's unemployment average is 5.2% OVER THE WHOLE 8 YEARS
when Republicans mentioned this it was people LIKE YOU that pooh-pooed that, insisting many were in low-paying jobs

NOW THAT IT IS PROVEN TO BE THE CASE UNDER OBAMA, as evidenced by the THIRTEEN MILLION MORE ON FOOD STAMPS IN OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR, you want to cry that is being taken out of context. How typical!!


and of course we know you can work and still collect food stamps; and then you must conclude these are the jobs "created" under obama

AND OF COURSE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 45 MILLION or so on food stamps under obama ABSOLUTLEY NEEDS THE HELP; since the Left insists nobody is gaming the system

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Again lack of context and history.

Bush entered the White House with the economy in pretty good shape, a surplus instead of a deficit and a world at relative peace.

His agenda was to cut taxes on the rich, attack Iraq, piss off the Chinese and the Russians, and privatize SSI.

He immediately cut taxes on the rich and tried to re-ignite the cold war. He completely overlooked the trouble in the tech sector and chose instead to focus on bolstering a war/oil economy. He basically nullified the anti-ballistic missile treaty and allocated funding on weapon systems that were geared to provide defense against nuclear weapons.

The economy began falling apart and the Fed lowered interest rates. This heated up the housing market. Then 9/11 happened and Bush got his wish to attack Iraq.

Thus? The defense, housing and oil industry were on fire, on the government dime and responsible for the low UE. That didn't last long. Bush's crappy economy based on war/oil and housing fell apart in the second term.
Uh...Sallow......where you around when Bush took office?

The dot com surge that Clinton rode burst right before Clinton left office.......billions of dollars of "paper" wealth disappeared.....the middle class lost billions of "paper wealth" in investments in a matter of days.....middle class folk who were suddenly millionaires on paper and spending like there was no tomorrow and all of a sudden it stopped...

Hundreds of thousands lost their jobs as thousands of companies went belly up.

The rest of your post is meaningless because it is not based on fact....just your opinion.

But Bush did not enter the white house with the economy in pretty good shape. He entered it during a financial crisis.

Bush entered office with unemployment at 4% and with the budget balanced.


Then 9/11 happened.......:(
 

Forum List

Back
Top