Gaetz “Ukraine Fatigue” Resolution suspends additional military & financial aid to Ukraine & urge combatants to reach a peace agreement immediately

Who is this great and biggest adversary to America?

You can't make tactical slipups that won't be noticed.

Depends on the theater

In Western Europe it is Russia
In Korea, it is N Korea
In Taiwan, it is China

In Continental US, there is no one
 
No he wouldn't.
You weren't even around then.

Reagan would most certainly call Gaetz, et. al., supporters of Putin.

He would call them appeasers, which is what they are.

There is only one thing Russia and mass murdering KGB thugs like Putin understand, and that's strength!

Reagan's resolve drained the USSR and ultimately led to their collapse. Our resolve now will lead to Putin's collapse.

peace-through-strength.jpg
 
You're aware that literally every war Russia has fought has gone this way, right? The first year is a shit show then they ramp up the Russian war machine and throw huge amounts of men and material at the problem. That's not to say that they will win but just because this first year has gone terrible for them, given history that shouldn't have been unexpected.
Difference is we have NATO supporting Ukraine
 
"America's reason for starting the war."

HOLY WILLFULLY BLIND MONKEY, BATMAN!
Free advice! Keep it together. This is no more of a astounding statement than me telling you again that it's America that has started 40 wars of aggression since the end of WW2.

The debate needs to be about the question of Putin losing the support of his people. It can't be more clear than that, due to America's propaganda effort spelling that out hundreds of times over.
 
We've given more money to Ukraine in the last year than we gave the Afghan military in over 20. And no one said Ukraine has to agree to anything, they are free to continue to fight as long as they like. We aren't obligated to fund it though. Since we are footing the bill we get a say.
The Afghans were not fighting tanks, cruise missiles, artillery, fighter jets and bombers, attack helicopters and such. THAT is the difference.
 
Free advice! Keep it together. This is no more of a astounding statement than me telling you again that it's America that has started 40 wars of aggression since the end of WW2.

The debate needs to be about the question of Putin losing the support of his people. It can't be more clear than that, due to America's propaganda effort spelling that out hundreds of times over.
Um...retard? Putin is the aggressor. He is the invader.

Wow. I can't believe your level of self-delusion goes this deep!
 
The Afghans were not fighting tanks, cruise missiles, artillery, fighter jets and bombers, attack helicopters and such. THAT is the difference.
Thanks. We just had to build and outfit an entire military infrastructure which we dont have to do in Ukraine. It's also over 20 years vs less than 1. If you think sending 100 billion dollars to Ukraine is a good use of taxpayer dollars we will have to agree to disagree.
 
Actually, the Afghans were fighting all of those things. Except perhaps cruise missiles.

We provided Afghanistan $2 trillion
Their military lasted two weeks

Ukraine has proved to be a better investment
 
Um...retard? Putin is the aggressor. He is the invader.

Wow. I can't believe your level of self-delusion goes this deep!
The invader was the Nazi faction of the Ukraine, but let's not lose sight of America's goal. Russia has always been aware of America's endgame of regime change in Russia.

There's too much water under the bridge for ignoring America's promise of no further Nato encroachment on Russia's borders.

And too much material for us to handle in one discussion. Can you stick to providing some proof on Putin's popularity decline. That's the most important consideration by far batman.
 
If you think sending 100 billion dollars to Ukraine is a good use of taxpayer dollars we will have to agree to disagree.

We spend $850 billion each year for Defense

Much of that is to counter the threat of Russia. Ukraine is countering that threat for us
 
The invader was the Nazi faction of the Ukraine, but let's not lose sight of America's goal. Russia has always been aware of America's endgame of regime change in Russia.

There's too much water under the bridge for ignoring America's promise of no further Nato encroachment on Russia's borders.

And too much material for us to handle in one discussion. Can you stick to providing some proof on Putin's popularity decline. That's the most important consideration by far batman.
"The invader was the Nazi faction of the Ukraine."

I'm starting to wonder if you work for the FSB.

You're like those tards who say there was no violence on January 6. Or that it was pulled off by Antifa and BLM.
 
The right's support for the fascist Putin continues.
100 billion dollars to the Ukraine is a very good investment if it succeeds in turning the Russian people against Putin.

But it also can be a huge waste of the American taxpayer's money!
 

Forum List

Back
Top