easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,143
- 2,645
No he wouldn't.Reagan would call Gaetz a supporter of our enemies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No he wouldn't.Reagan would call Gaetz a supporter of our enemies.
Who is this great and biggest adversary to America?
You can't make tactical slipups that won't be noticed.
Correct.What the GOP *actually* want is a wholesale abandonment of NATO.
You weren't even around then.No he wouldn't.
Difference is we have NATO supporting UkraineYou're aware that literally every war Russia has fought has gone this way, right? The first year is a shit show then they ramp up the Russian war machine and throw huge amounts of men and material at the problem. That's not to say that they will win but just because this first year has gone terrible for them, given history that shouldn't have been unexpected.
Free advice! Keep it together. This is no more of a astounding statement than me telling you again that it's America that has started 40 wars of aggression since the end of WW2."America's reason for starting the war."
HOLY WILLFULLY BLIND MONKEY, BATMAN!
Quote of the week!So much of the GOP just radiates loser energy.
The Afghans were not fighting tanks, cruise missiles, artillery, fighter jets and bombers, attack helicopters and such. THAT is the difference.We've given more money to Ukraine in the last year than we gave the Afghan military in over 20. And no one said Ukraine has to agree to anything, they are free to continue to fight as long as they like. We aren't obligated to fund it though. Since we are footing the bill we get a say.
Um...retard? Putin is the aggressor. He is the invader.Free advice! Keep it together. This is no more of a astounding statement than me telling you again that it's America that has started 40 wars of aggression since the end of WW2.
The debate needs to be about the question of Putin losing the support of his people. It can't be more clear than that, due to America's propaganda effort spelling that out hundreds of times over.
Can we please not cause clutter here by bringing in America's domestic politics.The right's support for the fascist Putin continues.
Actually, the Afghans were fighting all of those things. Except perhaps cruise missiles.The Afghans were not fighting tanks, cruise missiles, artillery, fighter jets and bombers, attack helicopters and such. THAT is the difference.
Thanks. We just had to build and outfit an entire military infrastructure which we dont have to do in Ukraine. It's also over 20 years vs less than 1. If you think sending 100 billion dollars to Ukraine is a good use of taxpayer dollars we will have to agree to disagree.The Afghans were not fighting tanks, cruise missiles, artillery, fighter jets and bombers, attack helicopters and such. THAT is the difference.
The Afghans were not fighting tanks, cruise missiles, artillery, fighter jets and bombers, attack helicopters and such. THAT is the difference.
See post 43.If you think sending 100 billion dollars to Ukraine is a good use of taxpayer dollars we will have to agree to disagree.
Actually, the Afghans were fighting all of those things. Except perhaps cruise missiles.
The invader was the Nazi faction of the Ukraine, but let's not lose sight of America's goal. Russia has always been aware of America's endgame of regime change in Russia.Um...retard? Putin is the aggressor. He is the invader.
Wow. I can't believe your level of self-delusion goes this deep!
If you think sending 100 billion dollars to Ukraine is a good use of taxpayer dollars we will have to agree to disagree.
We provided Afghanistan $2 trillion
Their military lasted two weeks
"The invader was the Nazi faction of the Ukraine."The invader was the Nazi faction of the Ukraine, but let's not lose sight of America's goal. Russia has always been aware of America's endgame of regime change in Russia.
There's too much water under the bridge for ignoring America's promise of no further Nato encroachment on Russia's borders.
And too much material for us to handle in one discussion. Can you stick to providing some proof on Putin's popularity decline. That's the most important consideration by far batman.
100 billion dollars to the Ukraine is a very good investment if it succeeds in turning the Russian people against Putin.The right's support for the fascist Putin continues.