toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
- Apr 29, 2017
- 74,452
- 69,251
the right to confront one's accuser is a trial right. The House did not conduct a trial. The constitution is quite clear that the Senate has the trial. The whistleblower is not being used as a witness. Democrats haven't called on him. His complaint is not being used as testimony. He cannot be considered the accuser given he hasn't witnessed the actions.
Glad you understand that as the triers of the case, that Trump and the Senate will have the right and ability to call the whistleblower to the stand and face his accuser. The whistleblower's complaint is the entire basis of Trump's impeachment and now you admit that he hasn't even witnessed the actions? Wow.
Now I admit he hasn’t witnessed the actions? I never stated he did. Why would I? Not even the whistleblower said he did.
OH, MOONPIE, You are such a delicate delinquent. You even deny saying you never said something while copying the proof that you DID right in your own post!
![asshole :asshole: :asshole:](/styles/smilies/asshole.gif)
Does the fact that 99 out of 100 posts here (and hundreds at that) having all disagreed with you tell you anything? Nope. Like the immortal deadhead tard, you plod ahead fully assured that you are right and the rest of the world is wrong. Precious!
![21 :21: :21:](/styles/smilies/new/21.gif)