Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Curious WorldWatcher, your opinion as to any justification you might have to why gay married couples have greater access to public accomodations laws than straight couples?
There are no public accommodation laws that list "gay" as a criteria.
>>>>
Sex and sexuality. And in some cases sexual identity. I am male (a sex) I am straight (a sexuality)
A lesbian wishes to be with women the same way as a male, yet the lesbian or even, in some cases a tranny can shower in the same locker / gym shower with my wife, yet I can't?
Tell me where that is not a violation of the law.
It's not a violation of the law.
If you think it is, feel free to report a lesbian couple showering (showering, not having sex) at your local community gym and file a complaint.
Locker rooms are based on gender, not sexual orientation.
>>>>
So you now want to argue, that in some cases seperate but equal is good public policy? Even though you can't cite where my argument is bogus?
Sweat.
Yes, feel free to jump into a debate and supply links to what was not part of my discussion.
Curious WorldWatcher, your opinion as to any justification you might have to why gay married couples have greater access to public accomodations laws than straight couples?
There are no public accommodation laws that list "gay" as a criteria.
>>>>
Sex and sexuality. And in some cases sexual identity. I am male (a sex) I am straight (a sexuality)
A lesbian wishes to be with women the same way as a male, yet the lesbian or even, in some cases a tranny can shower in the same locker / gym shower with my wife, yet I can't?
Tell me where that is not a violation of the law.
It's not a violation of the law.
If you think it is, feel free to report a lesbian couple showering (showering, not having sex) at your local community gym and file a complaint.
Locker rooms are based on gender, not sexual orientation.
>>>>
So you now want to argue, that in some cases seperate but equal is good public policy? Even though you can't cite where my argument is bogus?
Sweat.
I didn't argue anything.
I said if you think your argument is valid, file a complaint and take it to court.
Don't see you winning on your little attempt at "gotcha" but I support your right to hire an attorney and pay their fees.
>>>>
There are no public accommodation laws that list "gay" as a criteria.
>>>>
Sex and sexuality. And in some cases sexual identity. I am male (a sex) I am straight (a sexuality)
A lesbian wishes to be with women the same way as a male, yet the lesbian or even, in some cases a tranny can shower in the same locker / gym shower with my wife, yet I can't?
Tell me where that is not a violation of the law.
It's not a violation of the law.
If you think it is, feel free to report a lesbian couple showering (showering, not having sex) at your local community gym and file a complaint.
Locker rooms are based on gender, not sexual orientation.
>>>>
So you now want to argue, that in some cases seperate but equal is good public policy? Even though you can't cite where my argument is bogus?
Sweat.
I didn't argue anything.
I said if you think your argument is valid, file a complaint and take it to court.
Don't see you winning on your little attempt at "gotcha" but I support your right to hire an attorney and pay their fees.
>>>>
OH MY GOD. You read law better than anyone in this forum, you quote and comment on it often.
And this?
Wow, just wow
Sex and sexuality. And in some cases sexual identity. I am male (a sex) I am straight (a sexuality)
A lesbian wishes to be with women the same way as a male, yet the lesbian or even, in some cases a tranny can shower in the same locker / gym shower with my wife, yet I can't?
Tell me where that is not a violation of the law.
It's not a violation of the law.
If you think it is, feel free to report a lesbian couple showering (showering, not having sex) at your local community gym and file a complaint.
Locker rooms are based on gender, not sexual orientation.
>>>>
So you now want to argue, that in some cases seperate but equal is good public policy? Even though you can't cite where my argument is bogus?
Sweat.
I didn't argue anything.
I said if you think your argument is valid, file a complaint and take it to court.
Don't see you winning on your little attempt at "gotcha" but I support your right to hire an attorney and pay their fees.
>>>>
OH MY GOD. You read law better than anyone in this forum, you quote and comment on it often.
And this?
Wow, just wow
Your attempt a "gotcha" with the whole lesbians showing (not having sex, showering) in the same facility is clear to anyone.
Lesbians showing in the same facilities is not new, they've been around as long as there have been public showers - even back to the day when people went skinny dipping in the pond to wash.
>>>>
It's not a violation of the law.
If you think it is, feel free to report a lesbian couple showering (showering, not having sex) at your local community gym and file a complaint.
Locker rooms are based on gender, not sexual orientation.
>>>>
So you now want to argue, that in some cases seperate but equal is good public policy? Even though you can't cite where my argument is bogus?
Sweat.
I didn't argue anything.
I said if you think your argument is valid, file a complaint and take it to court.
Don't see you winning on your little attempt at "gotcha" but I support your right to hire an attorney and pay their fees.
>>>>
OH MY GOD. You read law better than anyone in this forum, you quote and comment on it often.
And this?
Wow, just wow
Your attempt a "gotcha" with the whole lesbians showing (not having sex, showering) in the same facility is clear to anyone.
Lesbians showing in the same facilities is not new, they've been around as long as there have been public showers - even back to the day when people went skinny dipping in the pond to wash.
>>>>
Pure deflection.
We are talking a whole new world now.
Married Lesbians now are identifiable due to the license they sign. That document is equal to the males "package". By signing that public document they declare they desire women. Yet a married lesbian can shower with my wife, but I can't shower with the lesbians wife.
She does and shows her privates? NOTHING. I do, and show my privates? JAIL TIME AND SEX OFFENDERS LIST.
So you now want to argue, that in some cases seperate but equal is good public policy? Even though you can't cite where my argument is bogus?
Sweat.
I didn't argue anything.
I said if you think your argument is valid, file a complaint and take it to court.
Don't see you winning on your little attempt at "gotcha" but I support your right to hire an attorney and pay their fees.
>>>>
OH MY GOD. You read law better than anyone in this forum, you quote and comment on it often.
And this?
Wow, just wow
Your attempt a "gotcha" with the whole lesbians showing (not having sex, showering) in the same facility is clear to anyone.
Lesbians showing in the same facilities is not new, they've been around as long as there have been public showers - even back to the day when people went skinny dipping in the pond to wash.
>>>>
Pure deflection.
We are talking a whole new world now.
Married Lesbians now are identifiable due to the license they sign. That document is equal to the males "package". By signing that public document they declare they desire women. Yet a married lesbian can shower with my wife, but I can't shower with the lesbians wife.
She does and shows her privates? NOTHING. I do, and show my privates? JAIL TIME AND SEX OFFENDERS LIST.
Filed a complaint yet?
>>>>
The foot stomping hissy fits surrounding the colored lights on The White House is just hilarious to me. What a bunch of fucking crybabies!
So says someone who call rectal sex by same sex couples is normal!
YOU CANT MAKE THIS SHIT UP!
The foot stomping hissy fits surrounding the colored lights on The White House is just hilarious to me. What a bunch of fucking crybabies!
So says someone who call rectal sex by same sex couples is normal!
YOU CANT MAKE THIS SHIT UP!
Whether you think it is normal or not is amazingly irrelevant to the law.
Incoming slippery slope hysterics in 3...2...1...
Whether you think polygamy or incest is normal or not is amazingly irrelevant to the law.
Justification of your odd lifestyle being legally any different then those in 3.....2.....1......
The foot stomping hissy fits surrounding the colored lights on The White House is just hilarious to me. What a bunch of fucking crybabies!
So says someone who call rectal sex by same sex couples is normal!
YOU CANT MAKE THIS SHIT UP!
Well you seem to.
The foot stomping hissy fits surrounding the colored lights on The White House is just hilarious to me. What a bunch of fucking crybabies!
So says someone who call rectal sex by same sex couples is normal!
YOU CANT MAKE THIS SHIT UP!
Whether you think it is normal or not is amazingly irrelevant to the law.
Incoming slippery slope hysterics in 3...2...1...
Whether you think polygamy or incest is normal or not is amazingly irrelevant to the law.
Justification of your odd lifestyle being legally any different then those in 3.....2.....1......
As pointed out- polygamy is legal. Same gender sex is legal. Incest is not legal.
Can you provide any argument why same gender sex should be illegal?
Can you provide any argument why incest should not be legal?
Can you provide any argument- about anything at all that is more than "because Pop says so"?
Doesn't take hours.Your obsession with gay men in banana hammocks is weird, bordering on creepy.
You want to see some heterosexual debauchery? Go to Mardi Gras, Carnivale, college spring break. All glorified by society.
Certain toutine days/nights of drunken debauchery in areas essentially roped off and well known in advance as "no go zones" for children (no matter which idiots take their kids in spite of this or not) are different than mid-day sober parades and any and all times of the year, of "pride" (lewd acts in front of kids) ?
I had a great time at the San Francisco Pride Parade there.
Didn't see a single lewd act beyond two women kissing and men dancing.
But what do I know- I was only there, and I didn't spend hours searching the internet trying to find lewd pictures from a gay pride parade like you do.
gay parade - Google Search
Took seconds.
"everyone has a right to marry whom they love" that is the Gays platform. That can be everyones platform. It's bullshit but it's what they ruled on.No.Sil, Do us all a favor. Get laid, and then smoke a cigarette. Then chill out, and have a good night's sleep.
Now, back to the topic which I notice has been buried...again...
Which is... who will decide the Brown's polygamy (polyamory-orientation) civil rights marriage case? The states or SCOTUS? And why? I notice that the LGBT regulars are REALLY avoiding answering that question succinctly and directly. So far I think just one has answered that way. The rest are diversions, rather obvious ones, or ad hominems.
Is it "report to the moderator" time again?
Oh report away- I would love to see a log of your reports- they must be a hoot.
State courts will decide first and then Federal courts.
Won't even make it to the Supreme Court.
You butted in someone else's conversation. My post was in reply to SYRIUSLY SAID: who claimed it would take hours. He's wrong it took seconds.You claimed it would take hours to find them. I found them in seconds.Doesn't take hours.I had a great time at the San Francisco Pride Parade there.
Didn't see a single lewd act beyond two women kissing and men dancing.
But what do I know- I was only there, and I didn't spend hours searching the internet trying to find lewd pictures from a gay pride parade like you do.
gay parade - Google Search
Took seconds.
It does nothing for me, but you can look at the pictures you like
I don't recall claiming that. I know you can find pictures of anything you like in seconds on the internet. It just isn't my cup of tea. But I'm not judging you.
Curious WorldWatcher, your opinion as to any justification you might have to why gay married couples have greater access to public accomodations laws than straight couples?
There are no public accommodation laws that list "gay" as a criteria.
>>>>
Sex and sexuality. And in some cases sexual identity. I am male (a sex) I am straight (a sexuality)
A lesbian wishes to be with women the same way as a male, yet the lesbian or even, in some cases a tranny can shower in the same locker / gym shower with my wife, yet I can't?
Tell me where that is not a violation of the law.
I didn't argue anything.
I said if you think your argument is valid, file a complaint and take it to court.
Don't see you winning on your little attempt at "gotcha" but I support your right to hire an attorney and pay their fees.
>>>>
OH MY GOD. You read law better than anyone in this forum, you quote and comment on it often.
And this?
Wow, just wow
Your attempt a "gotcha" with the whole lesbians showing (not having sex, showering) in the same facility is clear to anyone.
Lesbians showing in the same facilities is not new, they've been around as long as there have been public showers - even back to the day when people went skinny dipping in the pond to wash.
>>>>
Pure deflection.
We are talking a whole new world now.
Married Lesbians now are identifiable due to the license they sign. That document is equal to the males "package". By signing that public document they declare they desire women. Yet a married lesbian can shower with my wife, but I can't shower with the lesbians wife.
She does and shows her privates? NOTHING. I do, and show my privates? JAIL TIME AND SEX OFFENDERS LIST.
Filed a complaint yet?
>>>>
Cat got your tounge?
Looks like the ultimate defender of freedom is dumb struck defending separate but equal
It's not a violation of the law.
If you think it is, feel free to report a lesbian couple showering (showering, not having sex) at your local community gym and file a complaint.
Locker rooms are based on gender, not sexual orientation.
>>>>
So you now want to argue, that in some cases seperate but equal is good public policy? Even though you can't cite where my argument is bogus?
Sweat.
I didn't argue anything.
I said if you think your argument is valid, file a complaint and take it to court.
Don't see you winning on your little attempt at "gotcha" but I support your right to hire an attorney and pay their fees.
>>>>
OH MY GOD. You read law better than anyone in this forum, you quote and comment on it often.
And this?
Wow, just wow
Your attempt a "gotcha" with the whole lesbians showing (not having sex, showering) in the same facility is clear to anyone.
Lesbians showing in the same facilities is not new, they've been around as long as there have been public showers - even back to the day when people went skinny dipping in the pond to wash.
>>>>
Pure deflection.
We are talking a whole new world now.
Married Lesbians now are identifiable due to the license they sign. That document is equal to the males "package". By signing that public document they declare they desire women. Yet a married lesbian can shower with my wife, but I can't shower with the lesbians wife.
She does and shows her privates? NOTHING. I do, and show my privates? JAIL TIME AND SEX OFFENDERS LIST.
OH MY GOD. You read law better than anyone in this forum, you quote and comment on it often.
And this?
Wow, just wow
Your attempt a "gotcha" with the whole lesbians showing (not having sex, showering) in the same facility is clear to anyone.
Lesbians showing in the same facilities is not new, they've been around as long as there have been public showers - even back to the day when people went skinny dipping in the pond to wash.
>>>>
Pure deflection.
We are talking a whole new world now.
Married Lesbians now are identifiable due to the license they sign. That document is equal to the males "package". By signing that public document they declare they desire women. Yet a married lesbian can shower with my wife, but I can't shower with the lesbians wife.
She does and shows her privates? NOTHING. I do, and show my privates? JAIL TIME AND SEX OFFENDERS LIST.
Filed a complaint yet?
>>>>
Cat got your tounge?
Looks like the ultimate defender of freedom is dumb struck defending separate but equal
Ultimate defender?
Oh, God no. (But it's nice to know you respect me that much.)
Dumb struck?
No.
Think you are trying to play "gotcha".
Yes.
Willing to play?
No.
>>>>
So you now want to argue, that in some cases seperate but equal is good public policy? Even though you can't cite where my argument is bogus?
Sweat.
I didn't argue anything.
I said if you think your argument is valid, file a complaint and take it to court.
Don't see you winning on your little attempt at "gotcha" but I support your right to hire an attorney and pay their fees.
>>>>
OH MY GOD. You read law better than anyone in this forum, you quote and comment on it often.
And this?
Wow, just wow
Your attempt a "gotcha" with the whole lesbians showing (not having sex, showering) in the same facility is clear to anyone.
Lesbians showing in the same facilities is not new, they've been around as long as there have been public showers - even back to the day when people went skinny dipping in the pond to wash.
>>>>
Pure deflection.
We are talking a whole new world now.
Married Lesbians now are identifiable due to the license they sign. That document is equal to the males "package". By signing that public document they declare they desire women. Yet a married lesbian can shower with my wife, but I can't shower with the lesbians wife.
She does and shows her privates? NOTHING. I do, and show my privates? JAIL TIME AND SEX OFFENDERS LIST.
Pop is dragging out all of his sexual fantasies now with his straw men.
Curious WorldWatcher, your opinion as to any justification you might have to why gay married couples have greater access to public accomodations laws than straight couples?
There are no public accommodation laws that list "gay" as a criteria.
>>>>
Sex and sexuality. And in some cases sexual identity. I am male (a sex) I am straight (a sexuality)
A lesbian wishes to be with women the same way as a male, yet the lesbian or even, in some cases a tranny can shower in the same locker / gym shower with my wife, yet I can't?
Tell me where that is not a violation of the law.
Its not a violation of the law.
But if you want to pursue your right to use the female locker room- the courts are available for you to make your case.
Not that you are any good at making any case.
