"Gentleman" considered harmful in US

The manners of a British merchant and official, alien to America. It makes sense to get rid of it, like many other things, This is a step towards breaking the US with Europe and de-Germanizing the US

The manners of any cultured society are to be valued.

The rudeness of someone pretending they know about your culture, when they obviously do not is what we need to be rid of.

Manners are not alien to America. They have just gotten more rare as time goes on.
 
Mixing chivalry and mercantile-servile culture is just as dangerous as mixing trumpeters with true rightists. It destroys the male world. It's worse than just left dogs that don't pretend to be right
 
Mixing chivalry and mercantile-servile culture is just as dangerous as mixing trumpeters with true rightists. It destroys the male world. It's worse than just left dogs that don't pretend to be right

Chivalry is much like being a gentleman. The mercantile culture is not servile. They cater to the customer, but that does not mean they are servile.

And the idea that a man should be overly macho and violent is the worst excuse for a man that exists.
 
Chivalry is much like being a gentleman. The mercantile culture is not servile. They cater to the customer, but that does not mean they are servile.

And the idea that a man should be overly macho and violent is the worst excuse for a man that exists.
All of this is absolutely connected. Commercialism and servility destroys patriarchy and leads to slavery, as it has always been. An obvious example is when the plebeian nobility rose to power and brought Rome into imperial slavery.
 

The base of Rta has always been based on the idea of serving the sky for the sake of truth and nothing else. At the heart of a commercial and bureaucratic society is serving the owner for the sake of profit.

Pluto, the god of trade, was also the god of deceit.

These are the Saro-European ideas that gave birth to British and Prussian imperialism and stifled the Spring of Nations.
 
All of this is absolutely connected. Commercialism and servility destroys patriarchy and leads to slavery, as it has always been. An obvious example is when the plebeian nobility rose to power and brought Rome into imperial slavery.

The merchant class was the first upwardly mobile class in most societies. It also provides material goods for both nobility and the masses.

The entire economy is based on the merchant class risking their own money to create wealth.
 
Slavery is a direct consequence of the trade-bureaucratic system, it itself expresses the idea of slavery, because the slave and the master are two sides of the same coin. To serve for profit is to be a slave, to serve for a handout is to be a disgraceful dog.
 
The base of Rta has always been based on the idea of serving the sky for the sake of truth and nothing else. At the heart of a commercial and bureaucratic society is serving the owner for the sake of profit.

Pluto, the god of trade, was also the god of deceit.

These are the Saro-European ideas that gave birth to British and Prussian imperialism and stifled the Spring of Nations.

Those serving the sky were fed by those with more practical aspirations.

Commerce is serving mankind by providing goods and services that are needed and wanted. They risk their own resources to do so. So expecting a profit is not a problem.

It is capitalism. The opposite is socialism.
 
The merchant class was the first upwardly mobile class in most societies. It also provides material goods for both nobility and the masses.

The entire economy is based on the merchant class risking their own money to create wealth.
This is a lie. Merchants are simply robbing the working people through the mechanisms of socialist redistribution
 
hose serving the sky were fed by those with more practical aspirations.

Commerce is serving mankind by providing goods and services that are needed and wanted. They risk their own resources to do so. So expecting a profit is not a problem.
This is a lie. Merchants seize the flow of goods and impose unnecessary things on slaves
 
This is a lie. Merchants are simply robbing the working people through the mechanisms of socialist redistribution

The working people obtain what they need via merchants. It is not slavery. It is capitalism.

What you are suggesting is socialism.
 
Slavery is a direct consequence of the trade-bureaucratic system, it itself expresses the idea of slavery, because the slave and the master are two sides of the same coin. To serve for profit is to be a slave, to serve for a handout is to be a disgraceful dog.

The merchant is how cultures have expanded and enjoyed the materials not available locally.
 
The merchant is how cultures have expanded and enjoyed the materials not available locally.
This is the expansion of the old Europe of swindlers and feminists, which destroyed the Heavenly order. Pluto - god of trade and deceit
 
actually no. They simply declare themselves bankrupt and the working people pay for them.

Declaring bankruptcy relieves debt. It does not replace capital lost.

The merchant is at the heart of capitalism. To remove them is to favor socialism.
 
This is the expansion of the old Europe of swindlers and feminists, which destroyed the Heavenly order. Pluto - god of trade and deceit

Once again you have gotten off topic.

But merchant class is the first way the lower classes could rise to a higher station through hard work.
 

Forum List

Back
Top