George Zimmerman

Mebbe White Folk in this country need to pick a case where some young Black Guy stalked and killed a White Teen and then got off scot-free, and then organize nationwide protests and riots, to get the Lamestream Media's attention...

Of course, if that was the case, some of our finest Talking Heads and Media Whores would be clucking their tongues and labeling such nationwide activism as Nazi -like or KKK -like or Reactionary... racist in nature, inciting violence and rioting, and downright seditious...

And, of course, proportionally, we would have far fewer protesters and rioters; mostly because White Folk seem more inclined to accept the verdicts and findings of The Law, or, at least, seem less inclined to react violently about verdicts and findings they do not agree with; nor do they seem as susceptible to the same kind of collective emotional manipulation as their Black countrymen have been subjected to time-and-again by Race Baiters and Race Hustlers within their own community...

I blame the Lamestream Media itself for continuing to fan the flames, as well as those refugees from the 1960s - Sharpton and Jackson - who profit from fanning those flames...
 
Last edited:
WAS Zimmerman's PAST allowed in evidence?
no
friggin moron.

MOST people WHO READ are aware of this BOMBSHELL.

not everything is an evil plot,
except of course, in the minds of conservative morons.

in Bold?

Lol...and you referred to him as a friggin moron?

Uh....excused me....yes.....Zimmermans past WAS allowed into the trial.

As a matter of fact...it was used to try to show mal intent.

6 years and fifty 9-11 calls was admitted into the trial.....and the prosecutor used it to claim Zimmerman was frustrated that he couldn't help catch a criminal.

An assumption...of course...a valid one....sure.....but using ones past to show "intent" should be allowed.

Know your facts before you call someone a friggin moron.
 
Yes!

And in marches the redneck army. :lmao:

You forgot to answer as to what it is that makes me a racist?

I'm in Los Angeles, so not sure that "redneck" fits. Oh, i know you're just spewing hatred for whites, but it remains a malapropism.

IF you can find posts that demonstrate racism on my part, please feel free to do so.

You, OTH, leave a path of racism in every thread you participate in.

While she herself is ashamed of being black, evidenced by her avatars of a white woman.
 
“How a Miami School Crime Cover-Up Policy Led to Trayvon Martin’s Death”

By Robert Stacy McCain on 7.15.13 @ 1:05AM

The American Spectator : The Spectacle Blog : How a Miami School Crime Cover-Up Policy Led to Trayvon Martin's Death

The February 2012 shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martion might never have happened if school officials in Miami-Dade County had not instituted an unofficial policy of treating crimes as school disciplinary infractions. Revelations that emerged from an internal affairs investigation explain why Martin was not arrested when caught at school with stolen jewelry in October 2011 or with marijuana in February 2012. Instead, the teenager was suspended from school, the last time just days before he was shot dead by George Zimmerman.

Trayvon Martin was not from Sanford, the town north of Orlando where he was shot in 2012 and where a jury acquitted Zimmerman of murder charges Saturday. Martin was from Miami Gardens, more than 200 miles away, and had come to Sanford to stay with his father’s girlfriend Brandy Green at her home in the townhouse community where Zimmerman was in charge of the neighborhood watch. Trayvon was staying with Green after he had been suspended for the second time in six months from Krop High School in Miami-Dade County, where both his father, Tracy Martin, and mother, Sybrina Fulton, lived.

Both of Trayvon’s suspensions during his junior year at Krop High involved crimes that could have led to his prosecution as a juvenile offender. However, Chief Charles Hurley of the Miami-Dade School Police Department (MDSPD) in 2010 had implemented a policy that reduced the number of criminal reports, manipulating statistics to create the appearance of a reduction in crime within the school system. Less than two weeks before Martin’s death, the school system commended Chief Hurley for “decreasing school-related juvenile delinquency by an impressive 60 percent for the last six months of 2011.” What was actually happening was that crimes were not being reported as crimes, but instead treated as disciplinary infractions.

In October 2011, after a video surveillance camera caught Martin writing graffiti on a door, MDSPD Office Darryl Dunn searched Martin’s backpack, looking for the marker he had used. Officer Dunn found 12 pieces of women’s jewelry and a man’s watch, along with a flathead screwdriver the officer described as a “burglary tool.” The jewelry and watch, which Martin claimed he had gotten from a friend he refused to name, matched a description of items stolen during the October 2011 burglary of a house on 204th Terrace, about a half-mile from the school.

However, because of Chief Hurley’s policy “to lower the arrest rates,” as one MDSPD sergeant said in an internal investigation, the stolen jewelry was instead listed as “found property” and was never reported to Miami-Dade Police who were investigating the burglary. Similarly, in February 2012 when an MDSPD officer caught Martin with a small plastic bag containing marijuana residue, as well as a marijuana pipe, this was not treated as a crime, and instead Martin was suspended from school.

Either of those incidents could have put Trayvon Martin into the custody of the juvenile justice system. However, because of Chief Hurley’s attempt to reduce the school crime statistics — according to sworn testimony, officers were “basically told to lie and falsify” reports — Martin was never arrested. And if he had been arrested, he might never have been in Sanford the night of his fatal encounter with Zimmerman.

In fact, the reason Zimmerman was patrolling the townhouse community the night of the February 2012 shooting was that there had been a rash of burglaries in the neighborhood, although there was no indication that Trayvon Martin was involved in any of those crimes.

As for Chief Hurley’s policy, it was the controversy over Martin’s death that accidentally exposed it. In March 2012, the Miami Herald reported on Martin’s troubled history of disciplinary incidents at Krop High. Chief Hurley then launched the internal affairs investigation in an attempt to find out who had provided information to the reporter. During the course of that investigation, MDSPD officers and supervisors described Chief Hurley’s policy of not reporting crimes by students. Chief Hurley was subsequently accused of sexually harassing two female subordinates. He resigned in February, about a year after Trayvon Martin’s death.



Chief Hurley's Policy is the big story, Katz. Have a closer look. It's the Obama Administrations policy and he backed it with an executive order concerning black students! That memo didn't just go out to Public Schools across America. It went out to every Police Dept in America too and that is why we have two police depts not communicating with one another in this story! - Jeri
 
The Justice System assumes innocence until guilt is proven - NOT A JURIST.

A juror swears to have an OPEN MIND.

Juror 37B's mind was made up from the get-go that Zimmerman was justified in shooting Trayvon - and no testimony was going to change it.

.... Simply because "George" is white and a local boy, and his intentions were honorable, Trayvon is black, suspicious looking, and doesn't belong here.

Enter the DOJ

:)

Of which the juror is an integral part. Innocence is assumed by everyone in the system, judge, jury, everyone. The prosecutor has to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

if you look at the rest of his post...it is not justice he cares about. It is reparations. He wants "non blacks" to live under a different type of justice system. He wants to allow emotions to play a role in determining ones guilt.

And the DA is ALSO supposed to presume innocence and only bring charges if there is evidence implying otherwise.

In this case, only emotion implied otherwise.

The DA got it wrong and the jury got it right.

Sunshine...the post above?
I was referring to Driveby being that way....not Zimmerman.
 
The thug was the little guy who murdered the kid...

It's clear you reject Zimmerman's claim of self defense. Can you articulate with specificity what evidence you have that has allowed you to come to that conclusion?
 
He does realize that a huge portion of black communities are christian and very religious...right? :cuckoo:
 
WAS Zimmerman's PAST allowed in evidence?
no
friggin moron.

MOST people WHO READ are aware of this BOMBSHELL.

not everything is an evil plot,
except of course, in the minds of conservative morons.

So you are saying that most Americans are aware of Obama memo to Public School System in 2011 not to punish black students for crimes commited on campus? To lower the number of reports - such as Chief Hurley did by cutting 60% of his own reports and erasing them ( as he did for Trayvon Martin ) so that he wouldn't be put into the juvenile court system? This is the Obama agenda, Pal. A completely separate police dept overseeing school system and their job is solely to NOT ENFORCE THE LAW and DO NOT LET THE REAL POLICE DEPT KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON.

He signed an executive order to make it happen.
 
You're missing the big picture here, Katz. It is much bigger than just the Trayvon case. They covered up far more than Trayvons criminal record - by orders of the Obama administration the police depts have been split up into two distinct units. One doesn't know what the other is doing. Get it?

Oh I know that. But the reason why Martin's background didn't come in is because it was simply not relevant. Zimmerman's background never came in. Zimmerman's background was discussed so intensively in the media and from liberals that people assume that Zimmerman's background was before the jury. Neither background came before the jury.
 
You're missing the big picture here, Katz. It is much bigger than just the Trayvon case. They covered up far more than Trayvons criminal record - by orders of the Obama administration the police depts have been split up into two distinct units. One doesn't know what the other is doing. Get it?

Oh I know that. But the reason why Martin's background didn't come in is because it was simply not relevant. Zimmerman's background never came in. Zimmerman's background was discussed so intensively in the media and from liberals that people assume that Zimmerman's background was before the jury. Neither background came before the jury.

That is not accurate.

The fact that, over an 8 year period, Zimmerman made fifty 9-11 calls WAS permitted by the judge.

It was used to paint him as a cop wannabe with frustrations of not nabbing "the big one"....

And when the judge saw that the prosecution was defining Martin as a low profile, good kid, who would never indulge in physical violence unless prompted, she should have allowed his record to come into play.....in my opinion.
 
This will make you laugh until your sides hurt.

CNN: Zimmerman Prosecutor Excused Potential Black Juror for Being a Fox News Watcher | NewsBusters

George Zimmerman haters throughout the media have carped and whined about the fact that there weren’t any African-Americans on the jury despite the law requiring the accused NOT the victim be judged by his peers.

On CNN Newsroom Tuesday, it was revealed that a potential black juror had been struck by the prosecution for committing the crime of being a Fox News watcher
 
The DA knew it was wrong and hid three times the exculpatory evidence than it turned over

The DA got it wrong and the jury got it right.


No sunshine, de la Rionda was put there by the white people to get an innocent decision, he got the right decision.

No one prosecutor in America could be so incompetent and screw up so completely - voluntarily, as did this prosecution.

De la Rionda embarrassed all prosecutors.

:)
 
Last edited:
The DA got it wrong and the jury got it right.

The DA knew it was wrong and hid three times the exculpatory evidence than it turned over.

No sunshine, de la Rionda was put there by the white people to get an innocent decision.

No one prosecutor in America could be so incompetent and screw up so completely - voluntarily, as did this prosecution.

:)[/QUOTE]

BINGO.....

Now that you have said it.....let me see if you will do what EVERY SINGLE PERSON WHO HAS MADE THAT CLAIM DID, WHEN I ASKED THEM the following question.....run!

My question to you.......

Please cite what evidence you are aware of that exists that the prosecution could have used to get a conviction, but didn't.

I mean....obviously, you know he should have been convicted...and you blame the prosecutor.....so what is it that you know as fact that was not presented in the case?

So far, every single person that blamed the prosecution refused to answer...and ran from the question.

Will you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top