A transmitter was recovered next to the shooter's body.

I'm not 'gaslighting' anyone...All one has to do is look back at other events, mass shootings, etc. to see that we get information in a much more transparent way. Not the case here, why?

When information is withheld, conspiracy theory is what you get.
What’s the rush?

Wouldn’t you rather have a complete result instead of piecemeal that may or may not be accurate?
 
First, that is NOT what she determined. Judge Cannon determined that Jack Smith was appointed SP unconstitutionally, there fore dismissed the case.

If these cases were so important to the government, why'd they go about selecting the prosecutor unconstitutionally?
False. She took the hint from Thomas, the lone SCOTUS to question whether SP are legal.
 
Of course its a no

Where is your proof nothing was amiss when trump was almost killed?
He was almost killed (and one person was killed don’t forget), and so it certainly was “amiss”.

But there’s no reason to believe that he couldn’t have fired those shots himself.

You claimed it was unbelievable, but not sure why you claim that other than you really are addicted to conspiracy theories.
 
Mariner, are you paying attention here? This post is what "gaslighting" looks like....

Photo is posted, and Synth comes in and says something so stupid as this...
No, you show a bloody ear. That could have happened from broken glass, or anything else turned into a projectile by a shot hitting the teleprompter.
 
What’s the rush?

Wouldn’t you rather have a complete result instead of piecemeal that may or may not be accurate?

What's the rush?

Are you serious about that question?

A presidential candidate, and former POTUS was shot at in an attempted assassination, and you want to what? Walk around with your hands in your pockets?

Jesus...I'm sure there would be more urgency if it were Biden that was shot at....
 
False. She took the hint from Thomas, the lone SCOTUS to question whether SP are legal.
Proof? You're making a pretty declarative statement there, what do you have to back that up, other than you disagree with both of their approaches?
 
No, you show a bloody ear. That could have happened from broken glass, or anything else turned into a projectile by a shot hitting the teleprompter.
Ok, show us a teleprompter that was shattered? Neither one was hit....
 
What's the rush?

Are you serious about that question?

A presidential candidate, and former POTUS was shot at in an attempted assassination, and you want to what? Walk around with your hands in your pockets?

Jesus...I'm sure there would be more urgency if it were Biden that was shot at....
Yeah. What’s the rush? The shooter is dead. Threat eliminated.

If your concern is about the safety of the president and former president, how is that any better by you getting the details you want? You don’t have anything to do with anything.
 
He was almost killed (and one person was killed don’t forget), and so it certainly was “amiss”.

But there’s no reason to believe that he couldn’t have fired those shots himself.

You claimed it was unbelievable, but not sure why you claim that other than you really are addicted to conspiracy theories.
Something was amiss but you dont want to find out what it was
 

Forum List

Back
Top