Carl in Michigan
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 57,301
- 42,319
and if he's black, that there will be riots over him
and if he's black....
![auiqs.jpg :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:](/styles/smilies/new/auiqs.jpg.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and if he's black, that there will be riots over him
Guns also save and protect people.
Almost 800 people killed in Chicago with the strictest gun control laws in the country.
Then we have this attack in New York, with a stupid Democrat Mayor that has defunded the police.
That ain't how reality worksGuns also save and protect people.
No, they really don't. GUn in the house is 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a bad guy.
Almost 800 people killed in Chicago with the strictest gun control laws in the country.
Then we have this attack in New York, with a stupid Democrat Mayor that has defunded the police.
Chicago hasn't had strict gun laws in over a decade. They overturned our gun laws in 2010, and the Gun Industry couldn't want to open a gun shop on every block.
Pencils cause misspellings - ban pencils.
Joe, the constitution is clear. Our founding fathers were clear. We have the right to own weapons and we don’t need the governments permission. You don’t like our founding. So instead of trying to change this country just move to another country. There are dozens that have all the gun control and socialist systems you pine for.
woooohoooooooooAgain, we aren't going to pass sensible gun laws, so we've all decided this is something we can live with.
Guns also save and protect people.
No, they really don't. GUn in the house is 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a bad guy.
Almost 800 people killed in Chicago with the strictest gun control laws in the country.
Then we have this attack in New York, with a stupid Democrat Mayor that has defunded the police.
Chicago hasn't had strict gun laws in over a decade. They overturned our gun laws in 2010, and the Gun Industry couldn't want to open a gun shop on every block.
Pencils cause misspellings - ban pencils.
If misspellings killed 39,000 people a year, I'd consider it.
Joe, the constitution is clear. Our founding fathers were clear. We have the right to own weapons and we don’t need the governments permission. You don’t like our founding. So instead of trying to change this country just move to another country. There are dozens that have all the gun control and socialist systems you pine for.
Actually, the constitution isn't "clear". That's why the issue has been debated for over 200 years.
So instead of trying to guess what the Founding Slave Rapists really meant, guns or militias, why not start the discussion at "Should everyone have a gun" and "Shouldn't we try to keep people who don't need guns from having them."
Guns also save and protect people.
No, they really don't. GUn in the house is 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a bad guy.
Almost 800 people killed in Chicago with the strictest gun control laws in the country.
Then we have this attack in New York, with a stupid Democrat Mayor that has defunded the police.
Chicago hasn't had strict gun laws in over a decade. They overturned our gun laws in 2010, and the Gun Industry couldn't want to open a gun shop on every block.
No, they really don't. GUn in the house is 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a bad guy.
Pencils cause misspellings - ban pencils.
If misspellings killed 39,000 people a year, I'd consider it.
Pencils cause misspellings - ban pencils.
If misspellings killed 39,000 people a year, I'd consider it.
Joe, the constitution is clear. Our founding fathers were clear. We have the right to own weapons and we don’t need the governments permission. You don’t like our founding. So instead of trying to change this country just move to another country. There are dozens that have all the gun control and socialist systems you pine for.
Actually, the constitution isn't "clear". That's why the issue has been debated for over 200 years.
So instead of trying to guess what the Founding Slave Rapists really meant, guns or militias, why not start the discussion at "Should everyone have a gun" and "Shouldn't we try to keep people who don't need guns from having them."
Your figure of 39k is bogus as hell. The only way you get that many gun deaths is if you include 29,000 or 30,000 suicides. And if you think you can stop suicides by remove one single method, you are more delusional than I thought.
Your bizarre, sick fetish/obsession with my religion is really not relevant to that thread, to this one, nor any of the other threads in which you keep harping on it.
If I recall your past claims, you claim to have been a member of the standing army. That is absolutely not the militia referenced in the Second Amendment. A law passed shortly after the Bill of Rights was ratified defines the militia as every able-bodied man between the ages of 17 and 45 years. A later law, in effect to this day, defines two militias—an updated version of the original definition, and separately, the National Guard.
I think it is clear enough which side you are on. And from that, it is clear enough what you, yourself, are. The only reason that you would side so strongly with violent, destructive subhuman pieces of shit as you do, would be if you were one.
Yours is the side that wants to dump subhuman pieces of criminal shit on the street, rather than keep them locked up as they need to be. The resulting fear, violence, and destruction belong to you and your side. And, of course, for obvious reasons, you want actual human beings to be unarmed and helpless, so that we can be easier prey for the subhuman shit whose side you openly take, against that of actual human beings.
You have no idea what hardships I've faced, what I've endured, what I've survived, or how much good my “privilege” has or has not done for me.
As with racism, you just cannot help waving your misogyny around like some proud banner, even as you falsely accuse others of being mysogynistic.
It's obvious enough why. You're an old, bitter incel, with whom no woman will have anything to do. So you hate women, describing them as bitches out to get half your stuff.
Tobacco cause over 10 times more.
Start there?
......blacks being murdered by BLACKS is up in many cities [and the rate was high BEFORE that ] ......good thing they got rid of those statues and the police!!!!
Pencils cause misspellings - ban pencils.
If misspellings killed 39,000 people a year, I'd consider it.
Joe, the constitution is clear. Our founding fathers were clear. We have the right to own weapons and we don’t need the governments permission. You don’t like our founding. So instead of trying to change this country just move to another country. There are dozens that have all the gun control and socialist systems you pine for.
Actually, the constitution isn't "clear". That's why the issue has been debated for over 200 years.
So instead of trying to guess what the Founding Slave Rapists really meant, guns or militias, why not start the discussion at "Should everyone have a gun" and "Shouldn't we try to keep people who don't need guns from having them."
Your figure of 39k is bogus as hell. The only way you get that many gun deaths is if you include 29,000 or 30,000 suicides. And if you think you can stop suicides by remove one single method, you are more delusional than I thought.
People never committed suicide before guns?
Tobacco cause over 10 times more.
Start there?
I'd be fine with banning smoking...
Do you really want to regulate guns like we do smokes? I'm game for that.
That old lie about the gun being 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a bad guy has been debunked so many times I am amazed you still trot it out.
The pundits, politicos, and elites that pitch the bullshit stats you are posting here are first to make sure they are protected by firearms. Remind them of your stats. If firearm protections are good enough for them, they are good enough for me.
Your figure of 39k is bogus as hell. The only way you get that many gun deaths is if you include 29,000 or 30,000 suicides. And if you think you can stop suicides by remove one single method, you are more delusional than I thought.
That old lie about the gun being 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a bad guy has been debunked so many times I am amazed you still trot it out.
Well, when you trot out a debunking that doesn't come from the National Rampage Assocation, I'll take it seriously.
Actually, that number is probably low.
The pundits, politicos, and elites that pitch the bullshit stats you are posting here are first to make sure they are protected by firearms. Remind them of your stats. If firearm protections are good enough for them, they are good enough for me.
Okay. You totally have the right to hire a bonded, professional security person.
Your figure of 39k is bogus as hell. The only way you get that many gun deaths is if you include 29,000 or 30,000 suicides. And if you think you can stop suicides by remove one single method, you are more delusional than I thought.
I think you can reduce suicides by removing a popular method, um, yeah.
When the British changed over from lethal coal gas to natural gas, the suicide rate DID drop when people couldn't off themselves by sticking their heads in the oven.
And when Australia banned private ownership of almost all guns, the suicide rate did NOT drop. It actually rose by a tiny percentage.
That old lie about the gun being 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a bad guy has been debunked so many times I am amazed you still trot it out.
Well, when you trot out a debunking that doesn't come from the National Rampage Assocation, I'll take it seriously.
Actually, that number is probably low.
The pundits, politicos, and elites that pitch the bullshit stats you are posting here are first to make sure they are protected by firearms. Remind them of your stats. If firearm protections are good enough for them, they are good enough for me.
Okay. You totally have the right to hire a bonded, professional security person.
Your figure of 39k is bogus as hell. The only way you get that many gun deaths is if you include 29,000 or 30,000 suicides. And if you think you can stop suicides by remove one single method, you are more delusional than I thought.
I think you can reduce suicides by removing a popular method, um, yeah.
When the British changed over from lethal coal gas to natural gas, the suicide rate DID drop when people couldn't off themselves by sticking their heads in the oven.
Okay. You totally have the right to hire a bonded, professional security person.