Doc1
Gold Member
That's not the point. There's nothing remotely unusual about one political campaign purchasing research about what another politician did or said. This is not some deep state ohhh so fucking scary issue. IT'S FUCKING POLITICS AS USUAL. It's a conspiracy for one campaign to break into another's office and instill taps, and then lie to the FBI about it. It would be a conspiracy to promise things to Russia or Assange for them to illegally hack another campaigns computers. THAT'S THE FUCKING ISSUE.How did Clinton use that material against her opponent?
Sadly, it is you who is out of touch with reality.
Stupid question Private Pyle.
Then answer it, loser.
(smile) Look Gomer, if you have to even ASK the question you're too ignorant to admit you are wrong. Tell me little man, just what is OPPOSITION research in Politics?
I want to know what you believe and how you believe it was done.
Can you even show that either the Clinton campaign or the DNC ever even saw the dossier during the election?
I really don't see any question that Trump did that. And neither do a maj of Americans. But proving it's another question.
There's no fucking deep state. We have career civil servants and lawyers who operate on premises of the DoS doing certain things certain ways, and investigations being conducted in certain ways. And we now have an Alt-R view of the ******* taking shit from us that is just really bad.
There is no educating the willfully blind, and there is nothing more tragic than a willfully closed mind.