Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What was Putin NOT going to get if Obama followed YOUR plan,
which was that we simply step away from the whole affair?
That was your plan wasn't it?
Obama wanted to attack Syria. Putin didn't want him to. At least at this point Putin is not going to attack Syria and Putin gave up nothing to get that. And now I'm supposed to say dang, you're right, Obama did win?
Putin really put a lot of people's panties in a wad, didn't he?
Russia and the US are kind of in the same boat, empires who have seen their better days pass them by.
That we are fighting over Syria where neither one of us have anything at stake is kind of silly.
What was Putin NOT going to get if Obama followed YOUR plan,
which was that we simply step away from the whole affair?
That was your plan wasn't it?
Obama wanted to attack Syria. Putin didn't want him to. At least at this point Putin is not going to attack Syria and Putin gave up nothing to get that. And now I'm supposed to say dang, you're right, Obama did win?
Obama wants Syria to stop using chemical weapons, to sign onto the ban, and to get rid of their chemical weapons. Obama wanted Russian cooperation in this.
That is the direction we are now moving. Without airstrikes.
How can you be so stupid as to claim this is not a positive outcome, SO FAR, for the US and for the Obama administration?
that peace loving Obama WHO has that peace prize medal hanging round his neck has been just wonderful for peace hasn't he?
what country hasn't he pissed off against us?
damn we better hope and PRAY with this man in office for another THREE YEARS
History shows that America's biggest warmongers have been democrats......And the difference between them and McQuisling is nil.that peace loving Obama WHO has that peace prize medal hanging round his neck has been just wonderful for peace hasn't he?
what country hasn't he pissed off against us?
damn we better hope and PRAY with this man in office for another THREE YEARS
Steph, dear, we better hope that he IS is office. Otherwise, we would have troops stationed in Syria at this very moment. Look at McCain beating the war drums...
You seems to have forgotten history.
CNN) – Americans shouldn't let Vladimir Putin's opinions get under their skin because the Russian president is a one-time KGB officer whose primary interest is nationalism, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Thursday.
"While we have to deal with him as the president of Russia, we don't have to respect his views. We don't have to respect his opinions," said Gingrich, co-host of CNN's "Crossfire."
"And frankly, we should laugh at him when he tries to lecture America about exceptionalism, because he ain't exceptional. He's just one more in a long tradition of dictators and thugs."
Gingrich: Putin is a dictator and a thug ? CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
Absolutely..
Someone really needs to stuff cotton balls in Limbaugh's mouth and tape it shut FOREVER.
A better circumstance would be the American president having more credibility on the world stage than a murderous thug who used to run the KGB.So what do you Obama haters claim would be the better circumstance, at this point in time?
You all claim this is bad, and yet none of you can say how it would be better,
within the realm of possibilities.
Obama wanted to attack Syria. Putin didn't want him to. At least at this point Putin is not going to attack Syria and Putin gave up nothing to get that. And now I'm supposed to say dang, you're right, Obama did win?
Obama wants Syria to stop using chemical weapons, to sign onto the ban, and to get rid of their chemical weapons. Obama wanted Russian cooperation in this.
That is the direction we are now moving. Without airstrikes.
How can you be so stupid as to claim this is not a positive outcome, SO FAR, for the US and for the Obama administration?
Many in the GOP are just hoping that Obama will misstep on this. It is so ironic that he is seeking to take action again a dictator that actually used WMD, while the last GOP President took action against a dictator who he claimed had WMD. Of course that all turned out to be a fabrication and a lie.
Obama is taking the correct action even as some like McCain scream for blood.
A better circumstance would be the American president having more credibility on the world stage than a murderous thug who used to run the KGB.So what do you Obama haters claim would be the better circumstance, at this point in time?
You all claim this is bad, and yet none of you can say how it would be better,
within the realm of possibilities.
But he doesn't and it's a coin toss as to whether that is hilarious or terrifying.
Nobody gives a commie dictator options....Not even the Boiking.A better circumstance would be the American president having more credibility on the world stage than a murderous thug who used to run the KGB.So what do you Obama haters claim would be the better circumstance, at this point in time?
You all claim this is bad, and yet none of you can say how it would be better,
within the realm of possibilities.
But he doesn't and it's a coin toss as to whether that is hilarious or terrifying.
What makes you believe or think that Putin is credible on the world stage? He was given one option and one option only. Get Assad to cooperate. If he fails Russia loose's it's only port in the Mediterranean Sea and the only country in it's only economic and security partner in the area other than Iran and Iran ain't on the Mediterranean. He's getting by on bs and world leaders know it.
Nobody gives a commie dictator options....Not even the Boiking.A better circumstance would be the American president having more credibility on the world stage than a murderous thug who used to run the KGB.
But he doesn't and it's a coin toss as to whether that is hilarious or terrifying.
What makes you believe or think that Putin is credible on the world stage? He was given one option and one option only. Get Assad to cooperate. If he fails Russia loose's it's only port in the Mediterranean Sea and the only country in it's only economic and security partner in the area other than Iran and Iran ain't on the Mediterranean. He's getting by on bs and world leaders know it.
He's doing what he's doing because he sees a percentage in it for him, no other reason.
Nobody gives a commie dictator options....Not even the Boiking.What makes you believe or think that Putin is credible on the world stage? He was given one option and one option only. Get Assad to cooperate. If he fails Russia loose's it's only port in the Mediterranean Sea and the only country in it's only economic and security partner in the area other than Iran and Iran ain't on the Mediterranean. He's getting by on bs and world leaders know it.
He's doing what he's doing because he sees a percentage in it for him, no other reason.
You are evading an answer. You say nobody gives a commie dictator options and he sees a percentage. What the hell is a percentage supposed to mean? The claim here is that Putin has more credibility on the world stage than the President of the United States of America. Show some kind of evidence. Otherwise your bluff is called. Your a cheer leader for a Russian leader because you hate your President and don't love your country enough to put your hate aside.
The evidence is the overwhelming negative reaction -both inside America and around the world- to your Dear Leader's foolhardy sabre rattling and subsequent backpedaling on his "red line" chest thumping, versus the nearly palpable relief of people that Putin has come onto the scene.Nobody gives a commie dictator options....Not even the Boiking.What makes you believe or think that Putin is credible on the world stage? He was given one option and one option only. Get Assad to cooperate. If he fails Russia loose's it's only port in the Mediterranean Sea and the only country in it's only economic and security partner in the area other than Iran and Iran ain't on the Mediterranean. He's getting by on bs and world leaders know it.
He's doing what he's doing because he sees a percentage in it for him, no other reason.
You are evading an answer. You say nobody gives a commie dictator options and he sees a percentage. What the hell is a percentage supposed to mean? The claim here is that Putin has more credibility on the world stage than the President of the United States of America. Show some kind of evidence. Otherwise your bluff is called. Your a cheer leader for a Russian leader because you hate your President and don't love your country enough to put your hate aside.
Newt also reminded crossfire viewers that Putin, as a career KGB agent, oversaw the torture and killing of many people. He also had a great point when he said that, regarding getting UN approval for military strikes, Putin invaded Georgia in 2008 without any such permission from the security council. While I don't think Newt was advocating for strikes on Syria, it's clear he was insisting that Putin's op ed in the NY Times wasn't worth the pixel dust it was written with.
