TNHarley
Diamond Member
- Sep 27, 2012
- 93,933
- 56,235
- 2,605
Words don't kill people, ms StalinThis entire thread is silly. If she would have said nothing at all, he would be here today. There is no question she prompted the death of this boy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Words don't kill people, ms StalinThis entire thread is silly. If she would have said nothing at all, he would be here today. There is no question she prompted the death of this boy.
Murder is a crime!words aren't participating.Suicide isn't a crime. Apples and orangesWhat if she had texted him that unless he killed another person, she would no longer be his girlfriend?
That would be accessory to murder
In this case she texted that unless he killed himself, she would no longer be his girlfriend
Makes her an accessory to the suicide....in this case voluntary manslaughter
Participating in one is a crime
Ask Dr Kevorkian
Your ass gets on here and screams about th right attacking liberty and shit and here you are shitting on it all. Emotional basket case.
Sad
Of course they are
What if she said....Unless you kill this teacher, I will not be your girlfriend any more
Are those just words or is she an accessory to murder?
Manslaughter is killing someone genius.Guilty of what crime?I am sorry, I think this was a terrible ruling and will likely get overturned on appeal. Make no mistake, she is a huge piece of shit.
Ya, that's why I'm on the fence about it.
Manslaughter involves reckless endangerment. What she did was callous and reckless
She participated in the suicide
She is guilty
Manslaughter
Just like the judge, the law is not on your side
or aiding and abetting the loss of life of someone else. Is Kervorkian still in jail?Manslaughter is killing someone genius.Guilty of what crime?I am sorry, I think this was a terrible ruling and will likely get overturned on appeal. Make no mistake, she is a huge piece of shit.
Ya, that's why I'm on the fence about it.
Manslaughter involves reckless endangerment. What she did was callous and reckless
She participated in the suicide
She is guilty
Manslaughter
Just like the judge, the law is not on your side
In this case it did.Words don't kill people, ms StalinThis entire thread is silly. If she would have said nothing at all, he would be here today. There is no question she prompted the death of this boy.
It can't be adding and abetting without a crime!!or aiding and abetting the loss of life of someone else. Is Kervorkian still in jail?Manslaughter is killing someone genius.Guilty of what crime?Ya, that's why I'm on the fence about it.
Manslaughter involves reckless endangerment. What she did was callous and reckless
She participated in the suicide
She is guilty
Manslaughter
Just like the judge, the law is not on your side
Killing oneself is a crime. They just can't be arrested.It can't be adding and abetting without a crime!!or aiding and abetting the loss of life of someone else. Is Kervorkian still in jail?Manslaughter is killing someone genius.Guilty of what crime?Manslaughter involves reckless endangerment. What she did was callous and reckless
She participated in the suicide
She is guilty
Manslaughter
Just like the judge, the law is not on your side
Well, I'm glad I made your day.Wanting this girl to go to prison for not even breaking a law?
You people disgust me
Words don't assist in something that's not a crime. Why don't you read about what assisted suicide actually isMurder is a crime!words aren't participating.Suicide isn't a crime. Apples and oranges
Participating in one is a crime
Ask Dr Kevorkian
Your ass gets on here and screams about th right attacking liberty and shit and here you are shitting on it all. Emotional basket case.
Sad
Of course they are
What if she said....Unless you kill this teacher, I will not be your girlfriend any more
Are those just words or is she an accessory to murder?
So is assisting in a suicide
She recklessly participated his death .....manslaughter
Words don't assist in something that's not a crime. Why don't you read about what assisted suicide actually isMurder is a crime!words aren't participating.Participating in one is a crime
Ask Dr Kevorkian
Your ass gets on here and screams about th right attacking liberty and shit and here you are shitting on it all. Emotional basket case.
Sad
Of course they are
What if she said....Unless you kill this teacher, I will not be your girlfriend any more
Are those just words or is she an accessory to murder?
So is assisting in a suicide
She recklessly participated his death .....manslaughter
Not it isn't!!Killing oneself is a crime. They just can't be arrested.It can't be adding and abetting without a crime!!or aiding and abetting the loss of life of someone else. Is Kervorkian still in jail?Manslaughter is killing someone genius.Guilty of what crime?
Manslaughter
Just like the judge, the law is not on your side
That involves someone killing someone else you dumbass.Words don't assist in something that's not a crime. Why don't you read about what assisted suicide actually isMurder is a crime!words aren't participating.
Your ass gets on here and screams about th right attacking liberty and shit and here you are shitting on it all. Emotional basket case.
Sad
Of course they are
What if she said....Unless you kill this teacher, I will not be your girlfriend any more
Are those just words or is she an accessory to murder?
So is assisting in a suicide
She recklessly participated his death .....manslaughter
manslaughter
There are numerous cases in which an omission to act or a failure to perform a duty constitutes criminally negligent manslaughter. The existence of a duty is essential. Since the law does not recognize that an ordinary person has a duty to aid or rescue another in distress, an ensuing death from failure to act would not be manslaughter. On the other hand, an omission in which one has a duty, such as the failure of a lifeguard to attempt to save a drowning person, might constitute the offense.
When the failure to act is reckless or negligent, and not intentional, it is usually manslaughter. If the omission is intentional and death is likely or substantially likely to result, the offense might be murder. When an intent to kill, recklessness, and negligence are present, no offense is committed.
Horse shit! Then all advertising companies need to be sued, when I spend money after them urging me to buy a product, and then regret the purchase... After all... Why should I be responsible for my actions?This is on the boundary of what is and what is not legal. But I think the law should be changed, so that a person urging another to commit suicide is held accountable in the law. This was cyberbullying.
Hardly an argument for "aiding and abetting."Horse shit! Then all advertising companies need to be sued, when I spend money after them urging me to buy a product, and then regret the purchase... After all... Why should I be responsible for my actions?This is on the boundary of what is and what is not legal. But I think the law should be changed, so that a person urging another to commit suicide is held accountable in the law. This was cyberbullying.
Neither is what this girl did. She is being punished for him being weak.Hardly an argument for "aiding and abetting."Horse shit! Then all advertising companies need to be sued, when I spend money after them urging me to buy a product, and then regret the purchase... After all... Why should I be responsible for my actions?This is on the boundary of what is and what is not legal. But I think the law should be changed, so that a person urging another to commit suicide is held accountable in the law. This was cyberbullying.
"When the failure to act is reckless or negligent"That involves someone killing someone else you dumbass.Words don't assist in something that's not a crime. Why don't you read about what assisted suicide actually isMurder is a crime!Of course they are
What if she said....Unless you kill this teacher, I will not be your girlfriend any more
Are those just words or is she an accessory to murder?
So is assisting in a suicide
She recklessly participated his death .....manslaughter
manslaughter
There are numerous cases in which an omission to act or a failure to perform a duty constitutes criminally negligent manslaughter. The existence of a duty is essential. Since the law does not recognize that an ordinary person has a duty to aid or rescue another in distress, an ensuing death from failure to act would not be manslaughter. On the other hand, an omission in which one has a duty, such as the failure of a lifeguard to attempt to save a drowning person, might constitute the offense.
When the failure to act is reckless or negligent, and not intentional, it is usually manslaughter. If the omission is intentional and death is likely or substantially likely to result, the offense might be murder. When an intent to kill, recklessness, and negligence are present, no offense is committed.
If it was your son in that boy's place, would you have called him weak? He was broken and she took advantage of that.Neither is what this girl did. She is being punished for him being weak.Hardly an argument for "aiding and abetting."Horse shit! Then all advertising companies need to be sued, when I spend money after them urging me to buy a product, and then regret the purchase... After all... Why should I be responsible for my actions?This is on the boundary of what is and what is not legal. But I think the law should be changed, so that a person urging another to commit suicide is held accountable in the law. This was cyberbullying.
So Obama should be an accessory to the gun man that shot the Senate? Obama did say if they bring a knife we will bring a gun.Guilty of what crime?I am sorry, I think this was a terrible ruling and will likely get overturned on appeal. Make no mistake, she is a huge piece of shit.
Ya, that's why I'm on the fence about it.
Manslaughter involves reckless endangerment. What she did was callous and reckless
She participated in the suicide
She is guilty
Manslaughter