Global warming in action....right before our eyes

[Toddsterpatriot]

Dumb republicans need to learn something about the jet stream and the effects of a changing climate. Anti-science party!!! Should be wiped out every last one of these kooks come election time.

Funny, but when I produce evidence of unsafe levels of aluminum, srontium and barium in the water and soli? They say nothing...isn't that "science"????? You know, taking water and soil samples to an independent lab and getting it tested???? Isn't that science? Or how about videos like this that are being recoreded all over NATO countries showing the spraying of nano-particulate metals....isn't that "science"????? Seems to me that you are very subjective as to what "science" is unless it pushes your narrative and can negate it...tough shit but the facts are what they are.

That water vapor, it's all for you. Derp!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why haven't the global warming fires dried up the floods

Listen,

Global warming causes extremes within the short term weather pattern. One area of our planet could during a period of time have stronger ridges of high pressure = more extreme droughts under them, while other areas will have the extreme rain. Learn the subject as you don't seem to understand it very well at all. There's a reason one area has droughts but another can be have record rainfall, and both can happen at the same time on our planet based on the meteorological setup.

Global warming causes extremes within the short term weather pattern.

What is the perfect global temperature for minimal swings in short term weather patterns?

Especially causes extreme short term weather patterns when you are spraying nano-particulate metals into the upper atmosphere and zapping them with ionispheric heaters and that is a fact. Consider yourself "schooled".

Especially causes extreme short term weather patterns when you are spraying nano-particulate metals

Do they use special tanks, or is it added to the fuel?

and zapping them with ionispheric heaters

I bought one of those at Costco.

Consider yourself "schooled"

You're "funny".

 

[RollingThunder]

I thought global warming causes fires and droughts.

You start lying with your first two words, CrazyFruitcake, followed by your usual ignorant twaddle.

Heavy Flooding and Global Warming: Is There a Connection?
Union of Concerned Scientists
Climate change increases the probability of some types of weather. Recent heavy rains and flooding in the Northeast, Midwest, and Great Plains are consistent with a warming planet, and such events are expected to become more common over time.

As average temperatures in regions across the country have gone up, more rain has fallen during the heaviest downpours. Very heavy precipitation events, defined as the heaviest one percent, now drop 67 percent more precipitation in the Northeast, 31 percent more in the Midwest and 15 percent more in the Great Plains, including the Dakotas, than they did 50 years ago.

This happens because warmer air holds more moisture. This fact is apparent when you see water vapor hanging in the air after turning off a hot shower. When warm air holding moisture meets cooler air, the moisture condenses into tiny droplets that float in the air. If the drops get bigger and become heavy enough, they fall as precipitation.

If the emissions that cause global warming continue unabated, scientists expect the amount of rainfall during the heaviest precipitation events across country to increase more than 40 percent by the end of the century. Even if we dramatically curbed emissions, these downpours will still increase, but by only a little more than 20 percent. Regardless of what action we take to cut emissions, municipalities that are vulnerable to heavy precipitation events should plan for more flooding. Any efforts to reduce emissions would make it easier for them to adapt.

Climate science contrarians often argue that it is impossible for global warming to cause both heavy precipitation and drought. They are either misinformed or purposefully confusing the issue. Drought is a measure of annual precipitation, not the intensity of precipitation events.

As a consequence of global warming, annual precipitation levels have increased in many parts of the country and decreased in others. Between 1958 and 2007, for example, the Southeast and Southwest experienced more drought even while overall precipitation across the country increased an average of five percent. These precipitation changes, along with temperature shifts, threaten agriculture and have contributed to the northerly movement of plant hardiness zones.

It is worth noting that last months blizzard in the Midwest, Mid-Atlantic, and Northeast also is consistent with global warming. That heavy precipitation event just happened to occur in winter rather than spring, bringing snow rather than rain. Global warming will likely make the winter season shorter and colder weather less common, but winter will not disappear altogether.

Global warming also is causing measurable season creep worldwide. Spring weather is arriving earlier and fall weather is arriving later than ever before. If temperatures were a bit colder in the Northeast or Midwest, those regions would have been contending with a massive snowfall instead of heavy rains.

Geo-engineering via the use of aerosol nano-particulate metals used in conjunction with ionospheric heaters with the weird weather anomalies is the cause. They have been able to manipulate weather fronts in earnest for at least the last 25 years but they have been working on managing the weather since the late 40's. If we had an over abundance of c02, trees would not be dying at an alarming rate, we would have more rain not less. California is being intentionally droughted out so Monsanto can come in and buy up the farmland on the cheap. The aluminum corruption of the soil is killing organic farmers as one of the particulates being sprayed is aluminum. Guess what? Monsanto has hybrid seeds that are drought and aluminum resistant! What are the odds??? Hmmmm? Soil and water samples do not lie because they show an extremely unhealthy level of aluminum, barium and strontium. Until you figure in the aerosol spraying that began in earnest in every NATO country since 1997? I don't wnt to hear diddly squat about the alleged "Co2 problem. It is simply being used as a front to manipulate the dumbed down masses into believing that it's THEIR carbon footprint causing this. You might say that I am expert when it comes to this particular issue and especially when it comes to ionospheric heaters and the chemtrailing.

And one of the mainstays of the AGW/CC denier cult, a loony, anti-science, crackpot conspiracy theory wacko pops up with more deranged bullshit and nonsense.....seems like maybe an 'Alex Jones' type nutjob this time.

I know more than you....infinitely more and especially when it comes to this topic.

Flat-Earther idiots like you always say that, DumbSchmuck....even though, in reality, you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground, you poor paranoid conspiracy theory wacko.....your insane insistence that you "know infinitely more" than everybody else is entirely based on your severe affliction by the Dunning-Kruger Effect.....and belied by every bit of ignorant crackpot bullshit filling your every post.

The reality of CO2 driven global warming and its consequent climate disruptions and changes represents the strong conclusion of the world's climate scientists and is affirmed by virtually the entire rest of world scientific community.

The sources for your crazy crapola are undoubtedly crackpot conspiracy websites, like ol' Alex Jones and his PrisonPlanet/InfoWars baloney. You seem to be a very gullible retard.

 

[yiostheoy]

There is no doubt that the globe is warming.

It is unlikely that we will ever know why however.

It is extremely unlikely that the species comparable in scale to ants but called humans who inhabit it together with millions of other species can influence the climate one way or the other however.

Carbon tax is just more taxation.

 

[Dale Smith]

I thought global warming causes fires and droughts.

You start lying with your first two words, CrazyFruitcake, followed by your usual ignorant twaddle.

Heavy Flooding and Global Warming: Is There a Connection?
Union of Concerned Scientists
Climate change increases the probability of some types of weather. Recent heavy rains and flooding in the Northeast, Midwest, and Great Plains are consistent with a warming planet, and such events are expected to become more common over time.

As average temperatures in regions across the country have gone up, more rain has fallen during the heaviest downpours. Very heavy precipitation events, defined as the heaviest one percent, now drop 67 percent more precipitation in the Northeast, 31 percent more in the Midwest and 15 percent more in the Great Plains, including the Dakotas, than they did 50 years ago.

This happens because warmer air holds more moisture. This fact is apparent when you see water vapor hanging in the air after turning off a hot shower. When warm air holding moisture meets cooler air, the moisture condenses into tiny droplets that float in the air. If the drops get bigger and become heavy enough, they fall as precipitation.

If the emissions that cause global warming continue unabated, scientists expect the amount of rainfall during the heaviest precipitation events across country to increase more than 40 percent by the end of the century. Even if we dramatically curbed emissions, these downpours will still increase, but by only a little more than 20 percent. Regardless of what action we take to cut emissions, municipalities that are vulnerable to heavy precipitation events should plan for more flooding. Any efforts to reduce emissions would make it easier for them to adapt.

Climate science contrarians often argue that it is impossible for global warming to cause both heavy precipitation and drought. They are either misinformed or purposefully confusing the issue. Drought is a measure of annual precipitation, not the intensity of precipitation events.

As a consequence of global warming, annual precipitation levels have increased in many parts of the country and decreased in others. Between 1958 and 2007, for example, the Southeast and Southwest experienced more drought even while overall precipitation across the country increased an average of five percent. These precipitation changes, along with temperature shifts, threaten agriculture and have contributed to the northerly movement of plant hardiness zones.

It is worth noting that last months blizzard in the Midwest, Mid-Atlantic, and Northeast also is consistent with global warming. That heavy precipitation event just happened to occur in winter rather than spring, bringing snow rather than rain. Global warming will likely make the winter season shorter and colder weather less common, but winter will not disappear altogether.

Global warming also is causing measurable season creep worldwide. Spring weather is arriving earlier and fall weather is arriving later than ever before. If temperatures were a bit colder in the Northeast or Midwest, those regions would have been contending with a massive snowfall instead of heavy rains.

Geo-engineering via the use of aerosol nano-particulate metals used in conjunction with ionospheric heaters with the weird weather anomalies is the cause. They have been able to manipulate weather fronts in earnest for at least the last 25 years but they have been working on managing the weather since the late 40's. If we had an over abundance of c02, trees would not be dying at an alarming rate, we would have more rain not less. California is being intentionally droughted out so Monsanto can come in and buy up the farmland on the cheap. The aluminum corruption of the soil is killing organic farmers as one of the particulates being sprayed is aluminum. Guess what? Monsanto has hybrid seeds that are drought and aluminum resistant! What are the odds??? Hmmmm? Soil and water samples do not lie because they show an extremely unhealthy level of aluminum, barium and strontium. Until you figure in the aerosol spraying that began in earnest in every NATO country since 1997? I don't wnt to hear diddly squat about the alleged "Co2 problem. It is simply being used as a front to manipulate the dumbed down masses into believing that it's THEIR carbon footprint causing this. You might say that I am expert when it comes to this particular issue and especially when it comes to ionospheric heaters and the chemtrailing.

And one of the mainstays of the AGW/CC denier cult, a loony, anti-science, crackpot conspiracy theory wacko pops up with more deranged bullshit and nonsense.....seems like maybe an 'Alex Jones' type nutjob this time.

I know more than you....infinitely more and especially when it comes to this topic.

Flat-Earther idiots like you always say that, DumbSchmuck....even though, in reality, you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground, you poor paranoid conspiracy theory wacko.....your insane insistence that you "know infinitely more" than everybody else is entirely based on your severe affliction by the Dunning-Kruger Effect.....and belied by every bit of ignorant crackpot bullshit filling your every post.

The reality of CO2 driven global warming and its consequent climate disruptions and changes represents the strong conclusion of the world's climate scientists and is affirmed by virtually the entire rest of world scientific community.

The sources for your crazy crapola are undoubtedly crackpot conspiracy websites, like ol' Alex Jones and his PrisonPlanet/InfoWars baloney. You seem to be a very gullible retard.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So soil and water sample results by independent labs are just "crackpot"???? Listen up, you stupid fuck....I have been on this issue for the last 4 years and I have more knowledge and information than you could even digest and I know how far back this goes. You can't debate me on this on the best day you ever had. You are an infant........

 

[Old Rocks]

Fucking cultists, cold is caused by warming, floods are caused by warming, drought by warming. Declining ocean levels by warming, increasing ocean levels by warming. And of course, the heartbreak of psoriasis is caused by global warming.

Is it me or does the Insane Global warming Cult just blame every top weather story on the Glacier Eating Spaghetti Monster, the CO2 molecule. Fires, global warming Floods, global warming It's just ridiculous. Shit, if only the AGW clowns were as rational as the Scientologists or Jehovas Witnesses.....

And the retard chorus spews more deranged nonsense in the face of the evidence that they are deluded, confused, anti-science, crackpot cultists.

Pretty sure they're just anti-myth. Even if Global Warming wasn't a myth, it would be a myth that humans cause it.

And your proof of that is what, kiddo? Perhaps you should learn not the parrot the dumbest adults in the room.

 

[Old Rocks]

There is no doubt that the globe is warming.

It is unlikely that we will ever know why however.

It is extremely unlikely that the species comparable in scale to ants but called humans who inhabit it together with millions of other species can influence the climate one way or the other however.

Carbon tax is just more taxation.

Another vacuum skull. Tyndall gave us the why in 1858, Arrhenius gave us the numbers for that why in 1896. And fools like you continue to give us ignorant blather.

 

[Old Rocks]

I thought global warming causes fires and droughts.

You start lying with your first two words, CrazyFruitcake, followed by your usual ignorant twaddle.

Heavy Flooding and Global Warming: Is There a Connection?
Union of Concerned Scientists
Climate change increases the probability of some types of weather. Recent heavy rains and flooding in the Northeast, Midwest, and Great Plains are consistent with a warming planet, and such events are expected to become more common over time.

As average temperatures in regions across the country have gone up, more rain has fallen during the heaviest downpours. Very heavy precipitation events, defined as the heaviest one percent, now drop 67 percent more precipitation in the Northeast, 31 percent more in the Midwest and 15 percent more in the Great Plains, including the Dakotas, than they did 50 years ago.

This happens because warmer air holds more moisture. This fact is apparent when you see water vapor hanging in the air after turning off a hot shower. When warm air holding moisture meets cooler air, the moisture condenses into tiny droplets that float in the air. If the drops get bigger and become heavy enough, they fall as precipitation.

If the emissions that cause global warming continue unabated, scientists expect the amount of rainfall during the heaviest precipitation events across country to increase more than 40 percent by the end of the century. Even if we dramatically curbed emissions, these downpours will still increase, but by only a little more than 20 percent. Regardless of what action we take to cut emissions, municipalities that are vulnerable to heavy precipitation events should plan for more flooding. Any efforts to reduce emissions would make it easier for them to adapt.

Climate science contrarians often argue that it is impossible for global warming to cause both heavy precipitation and drought. They are either misinformed or purposefully confusing the issue. Drought is a measure of annual precipitation, not the intensity of precipitation events.

As a consequence of global warming, annual precipitation levels have increased in many parts of the country and decreased in others. Between 1958 and 2007, for example, the Southeast and Southwest experienced more drought even while overall precipitation across the country increased an average of five percent. These precipitation changes, along with temperature shifts, threaten agriculture and have contributed to the northerly movement of plant hardiness zones.

It is worth noting that last months blizzard in the Midwest, Mid-Atlantic, and Northeast also is consistent with global warming. That heavy precipitation event just happened to occur in winter rather than spring, bringing snow rather than rain. Global warming will likely make the winter season shorter and colder weather less common, but winter will not disappear altogether.

Global warming also is causing measurable season creep worldwide. Spring weather is arriving earlier and fall weather is arriving later than ever before. If temperatures were a bit colder in the Northeast or Midwest, those regions would have been contending with a massive snowfall instead of heavy rains.

Geo-engineering via the use of aerosol nano-particulate metals used in conjunction with ionospheric heaters with the weird weather anomalies is the cause. They have been able to manipulate weather fronts in earnest for at least the last 25 years but they have been working on managing the weather since the late 40's. If we had an over abundance of c02, trees would not be dying at an alarming rate, we would have more rain not less. California is being intentionally droughted out so Monsanto can come in and buy up the farmland on the cheap. The aluminum corruption of the soil is killing organic farmers as one of the particulates being sprayed is aluminum. Guess what? Monsanto has hybrid seeds that are drought and aluminum resistant! What are the odds??? Hmmmm? Soil and water samples do not lie because they show an extremely unhealthy level of aluminum, barium and strontium. Until you figure in the aerosol spraying that began in earnest in every NATO country since 1997? I don't wnt to hear diddly squat about the alleged "Co2 problem. It is simply being used as a front to manipulate the dumbed down masses into believing that it's THEIR carbon footprint causing this. You might say that I am expert when it comes to this particular issue and especially when it comes to ionospheric heaters and the chemtrailing.

And no sane person wants to hear diddly about your crackpot conspiracy stories.

 

[Old Rocks]

It's getting warmer!! Globull Warming!
It's getting colder!! Globull Warming!
It's flooding!!!! Globull Warming!
It's a drought!! Globull Warming!
It's raining! Globull Warming!
It's snowing !! Globull Warming!
I have poop in my pants!! Globull Warming!
Doubt Globull Warming?? You're a racist!!!

Meanwhile whenever I drive my truck the big V-8 engine is running and burning shitloads of "carbon" fuels. When I fly my Cessna 182 (just for fun!) I burn shitloads of "carbon" fuel so I can buy a hamburger that I could make at home. The best part? you enviro-nazi's can't do a fucking thing about it!

You have poop between your ears, asshole. Virtually every Scientific Society in the world, every National Academy of Science, and every major University have policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. That you retarded "Conservatives" absolutely do not believe in reality does not change that reality one bit.

One of the earliest predictions concerning what global warming would cause is wider and wilder swings in weather with an overall warming, and that is exactly what we are seeing.

 

[Old Rocks]

I thought global warming causes fires and droughts.

You start lying with your first two words, CrazyFruitcake, followed by your usual ignorant twaddle.

Heavy Flooding and Global Warming: Is There a Connection?
Union of Concerned Scientists
Climate change increases the probability of some types of weather. Recent heavy rains and flooding in the Northeast, Midwest, and Great Plains are consistent with a warming planet, and such events are expected to become more common over time.

As average temperatures in regions across the country have gone up, more rain has fallen during the heaviest downpours. Very heavy precipitation events, defined as the heaviest one percent, now drop 67 percent more precipitation in the Northeast, 31 percent more in the Midwest and 15 percent more in the Great Plains, including the Dakotas, than they did 50 years ago.

This happens because warmer air holds more moisture. This fact is apparent when you see water vapor hanging in the air after turning off a hot shower. When warm air holding moisture meets cooler air, the moisture condenses into tiny droplets that float in the air. If the drops get bigger and become heavy enough, they fall as precipitation.

If the emissions that cause global warming continue unabated, scientists expect the amount of rainfall during the heaviest precipitation events across country to increase more than 40 percent by the end of the century. Even if we dramatically curbed emissions, these downpours will still increase, but by only a little more than 20 percent. Regardless of what action we take to cut emissions, municipalities that are vulnerable to heavy precipitation events should plan for more flooding. Any efforts to reduce emissions would make it easier for them to adapt.

Climate science contrarians often argue that it is impossible for global warming to cause both heavy precipitation and drought. They are either misinformed or purposefully confusing the issue. Drought is a measure of annual precipitation, not the intensity of precipitation events.

As a consequence of global warming, annual precipitation levels have increased in many parts of the country and decreased in others. Between 1958 and 2007, for example, the Southeast and Southwest experienced more drought even while overall precipitation across the country increased an average of five percent. These precipitation changes, along with temperature shifts, threaten agriculture and have contributed to the northerly movement of plant hardiness zones.

It is worth noting that last months blizzard in the Midwest, Mid-Atlantic, and Northeast also is consistent with global warming. That heavy precipitation event just happened to occur in winter rather than spring, bringing snow rather than rain. Global warming will likely make the winter season shorter and colder weather less common, but winter will not disappear altogether.

Global warming also is causing measurable season creep worldwide. Spring weather is arriving earlier and fall weather is arriving later than ever before. If temperatures were a bit colder in the Northeast or Midwest, those regions would have been contending with a massive snowfall instead of heavy rains.

Geo-engineering via the use of aerosol nano-particulate metals used in conjunction with ionospheric heaters with the weird weather anomalies is the cause. They have been able to manipulate weather fronts in earnest for at least the last 25 years but they have been working on managing the weather since the late 40's. If we had an over abundance of c02, trees would not be dying at an alarming rate, we would have more rain not less. California is being intentionally droughted out so Monsanto can come in and buy up the farmland on the cheap. The aluminum corruption of the soil is killing organic farmers as one of the particulates being sprayed is aluminum. Guess what? Monsanto has hybrid seeds that are drought and aluminum resistant! What are the odds??? Hmmmm? Soil and water samples do not lie because they show an extremely unhealthy level of aluminum, barium and strontium. Until you figure in the aerosol spraying that began in earnest in every NATO country since 1997? I don't wnt to hear diddly squat about the alleged "Co2 problem. It is simply being used as a front to manipulate the dumbed down masses into believing that it's THEIR carbon footprint causing this. You might say that I am expert when it comes to this particular issue and especially when it comes to ionospheric heaters and the chemtrailing.

And one of the mainstays of the AGW/CC denier cult, a loony, anti-science, crackpot conspiracy theory wacko pops up with more deranged bullshit and nonsense.....seems like maybe an 'Alex Jones' type nutjob this time.

I know more than you....infinitely more and especially when it comes to this topic. Like I stated earlier, water and soil samples do not lie. Debate me like a man or STFU, punkinpuss.

But people like you sure as hell do. I do believe that I will listen to the real scientists, people with a reputation for integrity and credibility.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Fucking cultists, cold is caused by warming, floods are caused by warming, drought by warming. Declining ocean levels by warming, increasing ocean levels by warming. And of course, the heartbreak of psoriasis is caused by global warming.

Is it me or does the Insane Global warming Cult just blame every top weather story on the Glacier Eating Spaghetti Monster, the CO2 molecule. Fires, global warming Floods, global warming It's just ridiculous. Shit, if only the AGW clowns were as rational as the Scientologists or Jehovas Witnesses.....

And the retard chorus spews more deranged nonsense in the face of the evidence that they are deluded, confused, anti-science, crackpot cultists.

Pretty sure they're just anti-myth. Even if Global Warming wasn't a myth, it would be a myth that humans cause it.

And your proof of that is what, kiddo? Perhaps you should learn not the parrot the dumbest adults in the room.

The fact that ice sheets are the thickest they've ever been, and satellite data shows no abnormal global increase in heat for 17 years... also that to get the results they have been recently, they've had to edit the data to show heat... though, as far as the editing goes, whether you believe the scientists about having to edit it for 'science reasons' or if they're just tampering because they aren't getting what they want is totally up to you.

The RSS satellite dataset shows no global warming at all for 213 months from August 1996 to April 2014. That is more than half the entire 423-month satellite record. The fastest centennial warming rate was in Central England from 1663-1762, at 0.9 Cº per century – before the industrial revolution began, it literally couldn't have been our fault. The global warming trend since 1900 is equivalent to 0.8 Cº per century, which is well within natural variability and has nothing to do with us. The fastest warming trend lasting ten years or more occurred over the 40 years from 1694-1733 in Central England, which was equivalent to 4.3 Cº per century. Since 1950, when a human influence on global temperature first became theoretically possible, the global warming trend is equivalent to 1.2 Cº per century, and the fastest warming rate, lasting ten years or more, since 1950 occurred over the 33 years from 1974 to 2006, it was equivalent to 2.0 Cº per century. In 1990, the IPCC’s mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was equivalent to 3.5 Cº per century. The global warming trend since 1990, when the IPCC wrote its first report, is equivalent to 1.4 Cº per century – two-fifths of what the IPCC had then predicted. In 2013 the IPCC’s new mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was for warming at a rate equivalent to 1.7 Cº per century – just half its 1990 prediction. Though the IPCC has cut its near-term warming prediction, it has not cut its centennial warming prediction of 3.7 Cº warming to 2100 on business as usual. The IPCC’s prediction of 3.7 Cº warming by 2100 is more than twice the greatest rate of warming lasting more than ten years that has been measured since 1950. The IPCC’s 3.7 Cº-by-2100 prediction is more than three times the observed real-world warming trend since we might in theory have begun influencing it in 1950. Since 1 January 2001, the dawn of the new millennium, the warming trend on the dataset of five major datasets is zero – 0.0 Cº per century. No warming for 13 years 3 months.

It's not happening, period.

You're welcome.

 

[Old Rocks]

As a result of human caused global warming, the atmospheric and the oceans (and lakes, rivers and streams) are warmer.....warmer air can hold more water vapor......warmer oceans and other bodies of water tend to evaporate more water faster.....and now, water vapor levels have increased so much, rain and snowstorms can drop much larger quantities of water than before the air warmed and water vapor levels increased.

Although the denier cultists will undoubtedly chant that there have always been heavy rain and floods and massive blizzards, the plain fact is that all of those are becoming more intense and destructive because of the greater amount of water held in the air......which results in this example of global warming driven climate disruptions in action:
"...the torrential flooding after as much as 8-10 inches of rain fell in six to eight hours in parts of the state on Thursday", according to the National Weather Service. This amount of rain in such a short time is likely a "one-in-a-thousand-year event," the weather service said.

At least 26 dead as historic floods sweep West Virginia
USA TODAY
Doug Stanglin and Doyle Rice,
June 25, 2016
(excerpts)
The bodies of three more victims of West Virginia's historic flooding were found overnight Saturday, according to county authorities, raising the death toll to 26 from torrential rains and high water that has destroyed more than 100 homes, washed out scores of roads and bridges and knocked out power to tens of thousands of people. On Saturday, President Obama declared a major disaster for West Virginia and ordered federal aid to supplement state and local recovery efforts in the counties of Greenbrier, Kanawha and Nicholas.

...At least 23 others, including an 8-year-old boy who was wading in a foot of water, were killed in the torrential flooding after as much as 8-10 inches of rain fell in six to eight hours in parts of the state on Thursday, according to the National Weather Service. This amount of rain in such a short time is likely a "one-in-a-thousand-year event," the weather service said. The heavy rains and rising water swamped towns, inundated a two-century old resort and trapped 500 people in a shopping center when a bridge was washed out. The storm also knocked out power to 66,000 West Virginians, and forced the shut off of gas in the town of White Sulphur Springs, Tomblin said.

Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin told reporters Friday that damage is widespread and devastating. Saying search and rescue missions are still a top priority, Tomblin issued a state of emergency for 44 counties and deployed 150 members of the National Guard to help emergency responders. The Governer said 60 roads were closed, many of them destroyed, bridges were knocked out, and homes were burned down and washed off foundations. Tens of thousands of people were without power, and several roads were impassable, the Associated Press reported. One dramatic video posted on the WVMetro news website showed a burning house floating down Howard's Creek in White Sulphur Springs.

FLOOD EMERGENCY: Clendenin,WV can only be accessed by helicopter.

As a result of human caused global warming, the atmospheric and the oceans (and lakes, rivers and streams) are warmer

How much warmer?
How do you know?

River ice responses to a warming Arctic—recent evidence from Russian rivers
A I Shiklomanov1,2 and R B Lammers1

Published 31 March 2014 • 2014 IOP Publishing Ltd


Abstract
This paper looks at the response of river ice to recent warming in the Arctic at six major downstream gauges on large Russian rivers flowing to the Arctic Ocean. For the Severnaya Dvina, Ob, Yenisey, Lena, Yana and Kolyma we determine how river ice has changed in recent years and we try to understand the underlying causes of those changes. Long-term variability and trends in beginning and ending dates of ice events, duration of ice conditions, and maximum ice thickness were analyzed over 1955–2012. Significant changes in timing of ice events and a decrease in ice thickness were found for the five Siberian rivers. Duration of ice conditions decreased from 7 days for the Severnaya Dvina, Lena and Yenisey to almost 20 days for the Ob at Salekhard. The change in timing of ice events is consistent with changes in regional air temperature, which has significantly increased at each of these river gauges, except Lena-Kusur. The primary cause of the considerable increase in maximum ice thickness was not identified. Variation of mean winter air temperature and river discharge do not correlate well with maximum ice thickness and it is assumed the influence of specific local conditions can play a more important role in ice formation at these locations. Understanding this interrelationship across the Eurasian pan-Arctic using more comprehensive data archives for river ice and discharge is therefore needed.

River ice responses to a warming Arctic—recent evidence from Russian rivers - IOPscience

Fair enough, let's have a look at the warming of the Arctic rivers.

 

[Old Rocks]

As a result of human caused global warming, the atmospheric and the oceans (and lakes, rivers and streams) are warmer.....warmer air can hold more water vapor......warmer oceans and other bodies of water tend to evaporate more water faster.....and now, water vapor levels have increased so much, rain and snowstorms can drop much larger quantities of water than before the air warmed and water vapor levels increased.

Although the denier cultists will undoubtedly chant that there have always been heavy rain and floods and massive blizzards, the plain fact is that all of those are becoming more intense and destructive because of the greater amount of water held in the air......which results in this example of global warming driven climate disruptions in action:
"...the torrential flooding after as much as 8-10 inches of rain fell in six to eight hours in parts of the state on Thursday", according to the National Weather Service. This amount of rain in such a short time is likely a "one-in-a-thousand-year event," the weather service said.

At least 26 dead as historic floods sweep West Virginia
USA TODAY
Doug Stanglin and Doyle Rice,
June 25, 2016
(excerpts)
The bodies of three more victims of West Virginia's historic flooding were found overnight Saturday, according to county authorities, raising the death toll to 26 from torrential rains and high water that has destroyed more than 100 homes, washed out scores of roads and bridges and knocked out power to tens of thousands of people. On Saturday, President Obama declared a major disaster for West Virginia and ordered federal aid to supplement state and local recovery efforts in the counties of Greenbrier, Kanawha and Nicholas.

...At least 23 others, including an 8-year-old boy who was wading in a foot of water, were killed in the torrential flooding after as much as 8-10 inches of rain fell in six to eight hours in parts of the state on Thursday, according to the National Weather Service. This amount of rain in such a short time is likely a "one-in-a-thousand-year event," the weather service said. The heavy rains and rising water swamped towns, inundated a two-century old resort and trapped 500 people in a shopping center when a bridge was washed out. The storm also knocked out power to 66,000 West Virginians, and forced the shut off of gas in the town of White Sulphur Springs, Tomblin said.

Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin told reporters Friday that damage is widespread and devastating. Saying search and rescue missions are still a top priority, Tomblin issued a state of emergency for 44 counties and deployed 150 members of the National Guard to help emergency responders. The Governer said 60 roads were closed, many of them destroyed, bridges were knocked out, and homes were burned down and washed off foundations. Tens of thousands of people were without power, and several roads were impassable, the Associated Press reported. One dramatic video posted on the WVMetro news website showed a burning house floating down Howard's Creek in White Sulphur Springs.

FLOOD EMERGENCY: Clendenin,WV can only be accessed by helicopter.

As a result of human caused global warming, the atmospheric and the oceans (and lakes, rivers and streams) are warmer

How much warmer?
How do you know?

NASA Earth Science News Team

Beaufort Sea surface temperatures where Canada's Mackenzie River discharges into the Arctic Ocean, measured by NASA's MODIS instrument. The top image is from June 14, 2012. In the bottom image (July 5, 2012), warm river waters had broken through a shoreline sea ice barrier to enhance sea ice melt. Image Credit: NASA
The heat from warm river waters draining into the Arctic Ocean is contributing to the melting of Arctic sea ice each summer, a new NASA study finds.


A research team led by Son Nghiem of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., used satellite data to measure the surface temperature of the waters discharging from a Canadian river into the icy Beaufort Sea during the summer of 2012. They observed a sudden influx of warm river waters into the sea that rapidly warmed the surface layers of the ocean, enhancing the melting of sea ice. A paper describing the study is now published online in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.




NASA MODIS movie from June 14, 2012, shows a blue band of sea ice stuck to the Mackenzie River shoreline. The map fades, revealing the seafloor depth below. The band of stuck sea ice closely follows the highlighted 25-meter-depth contour line. The seafloor topography helps delay river discharge. Image Credit: NASA/International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic OceanSee animation
This Arctic process contrasts starkly with those that occur in Antarctica, a frozen continent without any large rivers. The sea ice cover in the Southern Ocean surrounding Antarctica has been relatively stable, while Arctic sea ice has been declining rapidly over the past decade.


“River discharge is a key factor contributing to the high sensitivity of Arctic sea ice to climate change,” said Nghiem. “We found that rivers are effective conveyers of heat across immense watersheds in the Northern Hemisphere. These watersheds undergo continental warming in summertime, unleashing an enormous amount of energy into the Arctic Ocean, and enhancing sea ice melt. You don’t have this in Antarctica.”

The team said the impacts of these warm river waters are increasing due to three factors. First, the overall volume of water discharged from rivers into the Arctic Ocean has increased. Second, rivers are getting warmer as their watersheds (drainage basins) heat up. And third, Arctic sea ice cover is becoming thinner and more fragmented, making it more vulnerable to rapid melt. In addition, as river heating contributes to earlier and greater loss of the Arctic’s reflective sea ice cover in summer, the amount of solar heat absorbed into the ocean increases, causing even more sea ice to melt.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Warm rivers play role in Arctic sea ice melt

Do you want more?

 

[RollingThunder]

As a result of human caused global warming, the atmospheric and the oceans (and lakes, rivers and streams) are warmer.....warmer air can hold more water vapor......warmer oceans and other bodies of water tend to evaporate more water faster.....and now, water vapor levels have increased so much, rain and snowstorms can drop much larger quantities of water than before the air warmed and water vapor levels increased.

Although the denier cultists will undoubtedly chant that there have always been heavy rain and floods and massive blizzards, the plain fact is that all of those are becoming more intense and destructive because of the greater amount of water held in the air......which results in this example of global warming driven climate disruptions in action:
"...the torrential flooding after as much as 8-10 inches of rain fell in six to eight hours in parts of the state on Thursday", according to the National Weather Service. This amount of rain in such a short time is likely a "one-in-a-thousand-year event," the weather service said.

At least 26 dead as historic floods sweep West Virginia
USA TODAY
Doug Stanglin and Doyle Rice,
June 25, 2016
(excerpts)
The bodies of three more victims of West Virginia's historic flooding were found overnight Saturday, according to county authorities, raising the death toll to 26 from torrential rains and high water that has destroyed more than 100 homes, washed out scores of roads and bridges and knocked out power to tens of thousands of people. On Saturday, President Obama declared a major disaster for West Virginia and ordered federal aid to supplement state and local recovery efforts in the counties of Greenbrier, Kanawha and Nicholas.

...At least 23 others, including an 8-year-old boy who was wading in a foot of water, were killed in the torrential flooding after as much as 8-10 inches of rain fell in six to eight hours in parts of the state on Thursday, according to the National Weather Service. This amount of rain in such a short time is likely a "one-in-a-thousand-year event," the weather service said. The heavy rains and rising water swamped towns, inundated a two-century old resort and trapped 500 people in a shopping center when a bridge was washed out. The storm also knocked out power to 66,000 West Virginians, and forced the shut off of gas in the town of White Sulphur Springs, Tomblin said.

Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin told reporters Friday that damage is widespread and devastating. Saying search and rescue missions are still a top priority, Tomblin issued a state of emergency for 44 counties and deployed 150 members of the National Guard to help emergency responders. The Governer said 60 roads were closed, many of them destroyed, bridges were knocked out, and homes were burned down and washed off foundations. Tens of thousands of people were without power, and several roads were impassable, the Associated Press reported. One dramatic video posted on the WVMetro news website showed a burning house floating down Howard's Creek in White Sulphur Springs.

FLOOD EMERGENCY: Clendenin,WV can only be accessed by helicopter.

Right out of the blocks, you get the science wrong, warm/hot air cannot hold more water vapor,than cold air. It's the other way around.
This is basic earth science, getting this wrong,invalidate the rest of your rant

Oh my, another retard, deluded by the Dunning-Kruger Effect into imagining that he knows something when he actually doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground.

No, little chickenshit, you are wrong. Completely wrong! Warmer air does indeed hold more water vapour than colder air....basic physics. You are an imbecile.

Learn something real about saturated water vapour pressure and temperature.

 

[RollingThunder]

Dumb republicans need to learn something about the jet stream and the effects of a changing climate. Anti-science party!!! Should be wiped out every last one of these kooks come election time.

Funny, but when I produce evidence....

So far, you have never "produced" anything even remotely resembling actual "evidence" for your demented conspiracy theories, DumbSchmuck.

 

[Old Rocks]

Fucking cultists, cold is caused by warming, floods are caused by warming, drought by warming. Declining ocean levels by warming, increasing ocean levels by warming. And of course, the heartbreak of psoriasis is caused by global warming.

Is it me or does the Insane Global warming Cult just blame every top weather story on the Glacier Eating Spaghetti Monster, the CO2 molecule. Fires, global warming Floods, global warming It's just ridiculous. Shit, if only the AGW clowns were as rational as the Scientologists or Jehovas Witnesses.....

And the retard chorus spews more deranged nonsense in the face of the evidence that they are deluded, confused, anti-science, crackpot cultists.

Pretty sure they're just anti-myth. Even if Global Warming wasn't a myth, it would be a myth that humans cause it.

And your proof of that is what, kiddo? Perhaps you should learn not the parrot the dumbest adults in the room.

The fact that ice sheets are the thickest they've ever been, and satellite data shows no abnormal global increase in heat for 17 years... also that to get the results they have been recently, they've had to edit the data to show heat... though, as far as the editing goes, whether you believe the scientists about having to edit it for 'science reasons' or if they're just tampering because they aren't getting what they want is totally up to you.

The RSS satellite dataset shows no global warming at all for 213 months from August 1996 to April 2014. That is more than half the entire 423-month satellite record. The fastest centennial warming rate was in Central England from 1663-1762, at 0.9 Cº per century – before the industrial revolution began, it literally couldn't have been our fault. The global warming trend since 1900 is equivalent to 0.8 Cº per century, which is well within natural variability and has nothing to do with us. The fastest warming trend lasting ten years or more occurred over the 40 years from 1694-1733 in Central England, which was equivalent to 4.3 Cº per century. Since 1950, when a human influence on global temperature first became theoretically possible, the global warming trend is equivalent to 1.2 Cº per century, and the fastest warming rate, lasting ten years or more, since 1950 occurred over the 33 years from 1974 to 2006, it was equivalent to 2.0 Cº per century. In 1990, the IPCC’s mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was equivalent to 3.5 Cº per century. The global warming trend since 1990, when the IPCC wrote its first report, is equivalent to 1.4 Cº per century – two-fifths of what the IPCC had then predicted. In 2013 the IPCC’s new mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was for warming at a rate equivalent to 1.7 Cº per century – just half its 1990 prediction. Though the IPCC has cut its near-term warming prediction, it has not cut its centennial warming prediction of 3.7 Cº warming to 2100 on business as usual. The IPCC’s prediction of 3.7 Cº warming by 2100 is more than twice the greatest rate of warming lasting more than ten years that has been measured since 1950. The IPCC’s 3.7 Cº-by-2100 prediction is more than three times the observed real-world warming trend since we might in theory have begun influencing it in 1950. Since 1 January 2001, the dawn of the new millennium, the warming trend on the dataset of five major datasets is zero – 0.0 Cº per century. No warming for 13 years 3 months.

It's not happening, period.

You're welcome.

RSS, eh. OK, RSS it is. And I'll even post a link so that you can check.

Climate Analysis | Remote Sensing Systems

So we can see that the water vapor is increasing.

That is pretty definate warming.

Definate cooling in the stratosphere, exactly as predicted.

Now there has always been a gap between the satellite measured troposphere temperatures, and that measured at surface systems.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Fucking cultists, cold is caused by warming, floods are caused by warming, drought by warming. Declining ocean levels by warming, increasing ocean levels by warming. And of course, the heartbreak of psoriasis is caused by global warming.

Is it me or does the Insane Global warming Cult just blame every top weather story on the Glacier Eating Spaghetti Monster, the CO2 molecule. Fires, global warming Floods, global warming It's just ridiculous. Shit, if only the AGW clowns were as rational as the Scientologists or Jehovas Witnesses.....

And the retard chorus spews more deranged nonsense in the face of the evidence that they are deluded, confused, anti-science, crackpot cultists.

Pretty sure they're just anti-myth. Even if Global Warming wasn't a myth, it would be a myth that humans cause it.

And your proof of that is what, kiddo? Perhaps you should learn not the parrot the dumbest adults in the room.

The fact that ice sheets are the thickest they've ever been, and satellite data shows no abnormal global increase in heat for 17 years... also that to get the results they have been recently, they've had to edit the data to show heat... though, as far as the editing goes, whether you believe the scientists about having to edit it for 'science reasons' or if they're just tampering because they aren't getting what they want is totally up to you.

The RSS satellite dataset shows no global warming at all for 213 months from August 1996 to April 2014. That is more than half the entire 423-month satellite record. The fastest centennial warming rate was in Central England from 1663-1762, at 0.9 Cº per century – before the industrial revolution began, it literally couldn't have been our fault. The global warming trend since 1900 is equivalent to 0.8 Cº per century, which is well within natural variability and has nothing to do with us. The fastest warming trend lasting ten years or more occurred over the 40 years from 1694-1733 in Central England, which was equivalent to 4.3 Cº per century. Since 1950, when a human influence on global temperature first became theoretically possible, the global warming trend is equivalent to 1.2 Cº per century, and the fastest warming rate, lasting ten years or more, since 1950 occurred over the 33 years from 1974 to 2006, it was equivalent to 2.0 Cº per century. In 1990, the IPCC’s mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was equivalent to 3.5 Cº per century. The global warming trend since 1990, when the IPCC wrote its first report, is equivalent to 1.4 Cº per century – two-fifths of what the IPCC had then predicted. In 2013 the IPCC’s new mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was for warming at a rate equivalent to 1.7 Cº per century – just half its 1990 prediction. Though the IPCC has cut its near-term warming prediction, it has not cut its centennial warming prediction of 3.7 Cº warming to 2100 on business as usual. The IPCC’s prediction of 3.7 Cº warming by 2100 is more than twice the greatest rate of warming lasting more than ten years that has been measured since 1950. The IPCC’s 3.7 Cº-by-2100 prediction is more than three times the observed real-world warming trend since we might in theory have begun influencing it in 1950. Since 1 January 2001, the dawn of the new millennium, the warming trend on the dataset of five major datasets is zero – 0.0 Cº per century. No warming for 13 years 3 months.

It's not happening, period.

You're welcome.

RSS, eh. OK, RSS it is. And I'll even post a link so that you can check.

Climate Analysis | Remote Sensing Systems

So we can see that the water vapor is increasing.

That is pretty definate warming.

Definate cooling in the stratosphere, exactly as predicted.

Now there has always been a gap between the satellite measured troposphere temperatures, and that measured at surface systems.

I did just open my post with the fact that they're modifying the received temperatures, and that whether or not you trust them is up to you. They gave a reason for it, don't recall what it was. I also pointed out several other things you have yet to address. Also, you show that the north pole is warming, but according to NASA, the ice there is at its thickest since the 1970s. If it actually were warming, they'd be thinning.

 

[Old Rocks]

It's getting warmer!! Globull Warming!
It's getting colder!! Globull Warming!
It's flooding!!!! Globull Warming!
It's a drought!! Globull Warming!
It's raining! Globull Warming!
It's snowing !! Globull Warming!
I have poop in my pants!! Globull Warming!
Doubt Globull Warming?? You're a racist!!!

Meanwhile whenever I drive my truck the big V-8 engine is running and burning shitloads of "carbon" fuels. When I fly my Cessna 182 (just for fun!) I burn shitloads of "carbon" fuel so I can buy a hamburger that I could make at home. The best part? you enviro-nazi's can't do a fucking thing about it!

Back in 2004, leftards were saying that hurricanes would keep getting more powerful and hitting us like Katrina....when it didn't? They blamed the lack of hurricanes (and I kid you not) on "global warming"....there's nothing it can't do or be blamed for......seriously...the jokes practically write themselves....

Dumb fuck, the Atlantic is not the only ocean in the world. In fact, when you consider all the oceans in the world, the hurricanes have been getting more powerful and destructive.

 

[Old Rocks]

And the retard chorus spews more deranged nonsense in the face of the evidence that they are deluded, confused, anti-science, crackpot cultists.

Pretty sure they're just anti-myth. Even if Global Warming wasn't a myth, it would be a myth that humans cause it.

And your proof of that is what, kiddo? Perhaps you should learn not the parrot the dumbest adults in the room.

The fact that ice sheets are the thickest they've ever been, and satellite data shows no abnormal global increase in heat for 17 years... also that to get the results they have been recently, they've had to edit the data to show heat... though, as far as the editing goes, whether you believe the scientists about having to edit it for 'science reasons' or if they're just tampering because they aren't getting what they want is totally up to you.

The RSS satellite dataset shows no global warming at all for 213 months from August 1996 to April 2014. That is more than half the entire 423-month satellite record. The fastest centennial warming rate was in Central England from 1663-1762, at 0.9 Cº per century – before the industrial revolution began, it literally couldn't have been our fault. The global warming trend since 1900 is equivalent to 0.8 Cº per century, which is well within natural variability and has nothing to do with us. The fastest warming trend lasting ten years or more occurred over the 40 years from 1694-1733 in Central England, which was equivalent to 4.3 Cº per century. Since 1950, when a human influence on global temperature first became theoretically possible, the global warming trend is equivalent to 1.2 Cº per century, and the fastest warming rate, lasting ten years or more, since 1950 occurred over the 33 years from 1974 to 2006, it was equivalent to 2.0 Cº per century. In 1990, the IPCC’s mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was equivalent to 3.5 Cº per century. The global warming trend since 1990, when the IPCC wrote its first report, is equivalent to 1.4 Cº per century – two-fifths of what the IPCC had then predicted. In 2013 the IPCC’s new mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was for warming at a rate equivalent to 1.7 Cº per century – just half its 1990 prediction. Though the IPCC has cut its near-term warming prediction, it has not cut its centennial warming prediction of 3.7 Cº warming to 2100 on business as usual. The IPCC’s prediction of 3.7 Cº warming by 2100 is more than twice the greatest rate of warming lasting more than ten years that has been measured since 1950. The IPCC’s 3.7 Cº-by-2100 prediction is more than three times the observed real-world warming trend since we might in theory have begun influencing it in 1950. Since 1 January 2001, the dawn of the new millennium, the warming trend on the dataset of five major datasets is zero – 0.0 Cº per century. No warming for 13 years 3 months.

It's not happening, period.

You're welcome.

RSS, eh. OK, RSS it is. And I'll even post a link so that you can check.

Climate Analysis | Remote Sensing Systems

So we can see that the water vapor is increasing.

That is pretty definate warming.

Definate cooling in the stratosphere, exactly as predicted.

Now there has always been a gap between the satellite measured troposphere temperatures, and that measured at surface systems.

I did just open my post with the fact that they're modifying the received temperatures, and that whether or not you trust them is up to you. They gave a reason for it, don't recall what it was. I also pointed out several other things you have yet to address. Also, you show that the north pole is warming, but according to NASA, the ice there is at its thickest since the 1970s. If it actually were warming, they'd be thinning.

Kiddo, have you taken any college level science courses yet? High school level? And why do you post such obvious bullshit?
The ice is not only thinning, it is radically reducing in volume.

PIOMAS April 2016

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Pretty sure they're just anti-myth. Even if Global Warming wasn't a myth, it would be a myth that humans cause it.

And your proof of that is what, kiddo? Perhaps you should learn not the parrot the dumbest adults in the room.

The fact that ice sheets are the thickest they've ever been, and satellite data shows no abnormal global increase in heat for 17 years... also that to get the results they have been recently, they've had to edit the data to show heat... though, as far as the editing goes, whether you believe the scientists about having to edit it for 'science reasons' or if they're just tampering because they aren't getting what they want is totally up to you.

The RSS satellite dataset shows no global warming at all for 213 months from August 1996 to April 2014. That is more than half the entire 423-month satellite record. The fastest centennial warming rate was in Central England from 1663-1762, at 0.9 Cº per century – before the industrial revolution began, it literally couldn't have been our fault. The global warming trend since 1900 is equivalent to 0.8 Cº per century, which is well within natural variability and has nothing to do with us. The fastest warming trend lasting ten years or more occurred over the 40 years from 1694-1733 in Central England, which was equivalent to 4.3 Cº per century. Since 1950, when a human influence on global temperature first became theoretically possible, the global warming trend is equivalent to 1.2 Cº per century, and the fastest warming rate, lasting ten years or more, since 1950 occurred over the 33 years from 1974 to 2006, it was equivalent to 2.0 Cº per century. In 1990, the IPCC’s mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was equivalent to 3.5 Cº per century. The global warming trend since 1990, when the IPCC wrote its first report, is equivalent to 1.4 Cº per century – two-fifths of what the IPCC had then predicted. In 2013 the IPCC’s new mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was for warming at a rate equivalent to 1.7 Cº per century – just half its 1990 prediction. Though the IPCC has cut its near-term warming prediction, it has not cut its centennial warming prediction of 3.7 Cº warming to 2100 on business as usual. The IPCC’s prediction of 3.7 Cº warming by 2100 is more than twice the greatest rate of warming lasting more than ten years that has been measured since 1950. The IPCC’s 3.7 Cº-by-2100 prediction is more than three times the observed real-world warming trend since we might in theory have begun influencing it in 1950. Since 1 January 2001, the dawn of the new millennium, the warming trend on the dataset of five major datasets is zero – 0.0 Cº per century. No warming for 13 years 3 months.

It's not happening, period.

You're welcome.

RSS, eh. OK, RSS it is. And I'll even post a link so that you can check.

Climate Analysis | Remote Sensing Systems

So we can see that the water vapor is increasing.

That is pretty definate warming.

Definate cooling in the stratosphere, exactly as predicted.

Now there has always been a gap between the satellite measured troposphere temperatures, and that measured at surface systems.

I did just open my post with the fact that they're modifying the received temperatures, and that whether or not you trust them is up to you. They gave a reason for it, don't recall what it was. I also pointed out several other things you have yet to address. Also, you show that the north pole is warming, but according to NASA, the ice there is at its thickest since the 1970s. If it actually were warming, they'd be thinning.

Kiddo, have you taken any college level science courses yet? High school level? And why do you post such obvious bullshit?
The ice is not only thinning, it is radically reducing in volume.

PIOMAS April 2016

According to NASA, they're actually getting thicker. Receded, like, a tiny bit... then went back to where it was before.