Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not a joke. It simply isn't happening.
Estimates of methane emissions are subject to a high degree of uncertainty
Love that sentence segment.
Are we already too late? Are we doomed already?
The arctic ice just won't agree with you.
Arctic Sea Ice Extent Second Highest in 18 Years at the end of 2021, Now Close to 13 million square kilometers, while the Hudson Bay Finally Froze in the Last 2 weeks
Arctic sea ice extent at the enArctic sea ice extent 2021 at the end of December is the highest in the last seven years, and the 2nd highest in eighteen years according to the US Snow and Ice Data Center. Although delayed by more than one month the Hudson Bay it finally froze in the last 2 weeks.www.severe-weather.eu
The methane from farts from one herd of bison is more that the total human caused methane today.
All of those graphs I showed say differently. Also, I have a time lapse video for you by NASA. Using temperature measurements from various places around the world over time, it gives a visual representation of how the Earth is warming. Take a good look at what "simply isn't happening."
Right there shows you are clueless on why 12 separate months data is far better than the Annual data since the discussion is about 6-9- or 9-12-months lag for CO2.
Already told you that CO2 is at it's highest in the COLD part of the year and lowest in the WARM part of the year that is why there is jigsaw pattern in the Mauna Loa CO2 data.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Second highest sea ice ....because of man madeup global climate warming change!The arctic ice just won't agree with you.
Arctic Sea Ice Extent Second Highest in 18 Years at the end of 2021, Now Close to 13 million square kilometers, while the Hudson Bay Finally Froze in the Last 2 weeks
Arctic sea ice extent at the enArctic sea ice extent 2021 at the end of December is the highest in the last seven years, and the 2nd highest in eighteen years according to the US Snow and Ice Data Center. Although delayed by more than one month the Hudson Bay it finally froze in the last 2 weeks.
The methane from farts from one herd of bison is more that the total human caused methane today.
That's the funny thing about "tipping points". You usually don't know until LONG after you passed it.
[/usage.
According to you loons we have passed multiple tipping points already.
Over and over from the 1990's through the 2000's we heard nothing but tipping point, tipping point, tipping point.
They all came and went and no one noticed.
That's because they were all lies.
Wait. You started that moronic thread?I started a thread about a climate hero who actually set himself on fire to bring attention to human caused global warming. But I think we need to get directly to the point. Human caused global warming is a reality. And you are all doomed. For the most part, the media won't tell you about it. Which is run by the wealthy. They dictate your lives in every way. And they have decided not only that you will die, but how you will die. That being with as much ignorance as possible. Not only have they decided that you must die, but no doubt for many they view it as a necessary thing. The only thing any of you will get out of the issue is lip service. Not real action.
Even on a couple different television shows they showed on PBS on the issue, they brought up often enough a feedback loop in global warming. They spoke fairly often how one thing will reinforce another thing. But I don't remember them ever saying what a a feedback loop would actually mean. It means that the warmer things get, the FASTER it will get even warmer. They also seem to like to speak often on TV about what the ocean levels will be in the year 2100. But it is unlikely any of you will see the year 2050.
Your time is short. How short exactly is hard to say. I would give it 20 to 30 years. The reason why is mainly methane. It is around 86 times more potent of a greenhouse gas than CO2. Bill Nye did a show about it called Global meltdown. Regardless of how you may feel about Bill Nye, in part of the show he talked to an actual scientist who had been studying the problem for about 15 years. Though he was a tenured professor at some university, he decided to give up his tenured professorship and start preparing for doomsday. And he said the worst culprit is methane. Like CO2, it is ever increasing. I will show you a graph of it. Astonishingly, despite things like thawing tundra, it is said that human activities are responsible for around 60% of it.
View attachment 651093
Or if you don't like that one, I have another.
View attachment 651094
One of the things that makes this so bad is that not in the history of the Earth have we ever been in this position. It the past of course it has been far warmer. But in more recent history it has been getting cooler. When things are cooler, of course more methane will have a chance to accumulate. Much gets buried underground of course. But not all of it. And when things start getting warmer faster as it is, that methane will have the ability to escape quickly. I will show you a graph of the Earths temperature to show what I am talking about.
View attachment 651095
Now for all those deniers out there, I will unload on you all of the human caused glob all warming graphs that I have. Feel free to deny away.
View attachment 651097
View attachment 651098
View attachment 651099
View attachment 651100
View attachment 651101
View attachment 651102
View attachment 651103
View attachment 651104
View attachment 651105
Meanwhile your link is garbage since they didn't even post the official W/m2 numbers for CH4 at all which is far less than the low number CO2 has they just run off at the mouth over GWP without bothering to show how much IR it actually absorbs.
CH4 has weak transmittance values while Water Vapor has strong Transmission values in the same wavelength areas.
There is a reason why CH4 is rarely talked about anymore.
Dude, governments are mandating the end of using fossil fuels. Where have you been?
Already told you that CO2 is at it's highest in the COLD part of the year and lowest in the WARM part of the year that is why there is jigsaw pattern in the Mauna Loa CO2 data.
Experts are paid to be interested.GWP is on a "per molecule" or "per mole" basis. So it's closer to an intrinsic characteristic.
If you had as much CH4 pumped into the atmosphere as you do CO2 (as many moles of CH4 as CO2) you would see MUCH stronger warming.
CH4 is more EFFICIENT as a greenhouse gas than CO2. Which is why it is a scary thing. I believe it may have a shorter lifespan in the atmosphere but it may just oxidize to CO2 (I am forgetting the details right now).
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4-wg1-chapter2-1.pdf
That's the job of GWP. It is an apples-to-apples comparison.
I think you mean "absorption". Transmittance would be if the molecule didn't absorb the IR. (Usually in IR graphs they simply flip the spectrum and call "absorption peaks" "transmission valleys".)
H2O is a strong greenhouse gas but more of a "feedback" than a forcing since the relative concentration is controlled by air temperature. From what I understand the GWP of H2O is smaller because "indirect effects" are not part of the GWP calculation.
It is still quite commonly talked about. It isn't necessarily what is driving the climate change now, but if it gets warm enough and enough permafrost melts or, heaven forbid, a shelf load of clathrates in the ocean are destabilized (this is often called the "clathrate gun hypothesis") then CH4 will become a very powerful problem.
YOU may not be interested in it but the experts are.
Experts are paid to be interested.
I disagreeOh, just follow the money. The climate has been changing since the peak of the last ice age.
Apparently with rather high temperatures. I went looking for CO2 data going back that far. I found two sources, neither of which agree with what you've provided. For that matter, you have failed to provide a link to a source for your data as the forum requires.
If a graph says something haveanut buys it.I'll tell you what "the discussion is all about." Look at my thread. Look at all the graphs I posted.
I started a thread about a climate hero who actually set himself on fire to bring attention to human caused global warming. But I think we need to get directly to the point. Human caused global warming is a reality. And you are all doomed. For the most part, the media won't tell you about it. Which is run by the wealthy. They dictate your lives in every way. And they have decided not only that you will die, but how you will die. That being with as much ignorance as possible. Not only have they decided that you must die, but no doubt for many they view it as a necessary thing. The only thing any of you will get out of the issue is lip service. Not real action.
Even on a couple different television shows they showed on PBS on the issue, they brought up often enough a feedback loop in global warming. They spoke fairly often how one thing will reinforce another thing. But I don't remember them ever saying what a a feedback loop would actually mean. It means that the warmer things get, the FASTER it will get even warmer. They also seem to like to speak often on TV about what the ocean levels will be in the year 2100. But it is unlikely any of you will see the year 2050.
Your time is short. How short exactly is hard to say. I would give it 20 to 30 years. The reason why is mainly methane. It is around 86 times more potent of a greenhouse gas than CO2. Bill Nye did a show about it called Global meltdown. Regardless of how you may feel about Bill Nye, in part of the show he talked to an actual scientist who had been studying the problem for about 15 years. Though he was a tenured professor at some university, he decided to give up his tenured professorship and start preparing for doomsday. And he said the worst culprit is methane. Like CO2, it is ever increasing. I will show you a graph of it. Astonishingly, despite things like thawing tundra, it is said that human activities are responsible for around 60% of it.
View attachment 651093
Or if you don't like that one, I have another.
View attachment 651094
One of the things that makes this so bad is that not in the history of the Earth have we ever been in this position. It the past of course it has been far warmer. But in more recent history it has been getting cooler. When things are cooler, of course more methane will have a chance to accumulate. Much gets buried underground of course. But not all of it. And when things start getting warmer faster as it is, that methane will have the ability to escape quickly. I will show you a graph of the Earths temperature to show what I am talking about.
View attachment 651095
Now for all those deniers out there, I will unload on you all of the human caused glob all warming graphs that I have. Feel free to deny away.
View attachment 651097
View attachment 651098
View attachment 651099
View attachment 651100
View attachment 651101
View attachment 651102
View attachment 651103
View attachment 651104
View attachment 651105
Your disagreement doesn’t alter reality in the slightest.I disagree
