- Feb 22, 2017
- 109,338
- 38,033
How about I let you know when no one is building ICE-powered vehicles anymore? It's not that far off.
Only a few decades
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about I let you know when no one is building ICE-powered vehicles anymore? It's not that far off.
How about I let you know when no one is building ICE-powered vehicles anymore? It's not that far off.
That is what the farriers and horse buggy makers said to Mr Ford....let us know when ICE sales equal horse sales.
Luddites always exist.
Indeed. The difference is cars were vastly superior to horses. Thus, the market adopted cars because they WANTED TO.
fROM: Oxford Languages and Google - English | Oxford LanguagesIndeed. The difference is cars were vastly superior to horses. Thus, the market adopted cars because they WANTED TO.
If the government has to mandate you use something the reality is it ISN'T vastly superior.
The luddites are the people ordering others to use inferior products.
Not when they first came out they were not. But they got better over time and were able to be better than a horse
fROM: Oxford Languages and Google - English | Oxford Languages
LUDDITE
- 1.
DEROGATORY
a person opposed to new technology or ways of working.
"a small-minded Luddite resisting progress"
Address the facts instead of trying to derail with your bullshit.
How's this, asshole?Address the facts instead of trying to derail with your bullshit.
Do you have any figures for the effect towing a 2,500 lb trailer would have on the mileage of ICE versions of those vehicles? Let's see:Haha yeah no.
There is a terrific video out there of people who bought either a Ford or GM electric truck. Their regrets are very vocal and disappointed they spent so much money for a vehicle they CANNOT use as a truck.
Especially towing. One video shows how a man pulling a trailer with only 2500 lbs. 400 mile range?? Try 90.
Yep - he only got 90 miles when pulling a trailer. He had to spend 4 hours recharging so he could go back home.
They ARE abandoning them [battery-powered power tools] as battery costs increase, because to be useful you have to have at least four batteries per tool or you are SOL.
Indeed. The difference is cars were vastly superior to horses. Thus, the market adopted cars because they WANTED TO.
That is not consistent with my experiences or observations as a professional construction worker.
For a long time, they were not. From the time that Bertha Benz famously borrowed her husband's invention, and took it for a long joyride, proving that it was possible to go cross-country (albeit, a much smaller country than ours) with an automobile, it was at least a few more decades before Henry Ford made it a practical alternative to a horse for Americans; and a few more Decades beyond that before Hitler commissioned an affordable car for common Europeans.
I just wanted to point out that while 500,000 cars seems like a lot, that was only 5 cars per 1,000 Americans; one car for every 200 people. Not exactly traffic jam conditions. And I guess we can assume that in 1910, 199 people out of every 200 still relied on horses.I disagree. Yes, cars were out of reach of the common man for quite a while, but the simple fact is they supplanted horses very quickly.
By 1910 there were over 500,000 cars in operation across the USA.
1910.
But then came the Model T. Ford sold 32,000 in 1910. 300,000 in 1911 and 1912. Ford then introduced the moving assembly line in 1914 which allowed them to produce more than 500,000 and they sold 734,811 in 1916.
The price dropped substantially year over year as well. 850 in 1910, but 440 by 1915, and under 300 by 1925.
Take a look at pictures from almost any major city from 1905 on and you see almost no horses. The car allowed the cities to get cleaned up incredibly fast, and the people loved them because of that.
I just wanted to point out that while 500,000 cars seems like a lot, that was only 5 cars per 1,000 Americans; one car for every 200 people. Not exactly traffic jam conditions. And I guess we can assume that in 1910, 199 people out of every 200 still relied on horses.
Where will you accept lithium and copper mining ?The sceptics have Lost.
EVs are Booming even on muscular vehicles you thought wouldn't happen for a long time or At All.
`
GMC Sierra EV Denali pickup packs 754 hp, 400-mile range
Fri, October 21, 2022
View attachment 713513
""The Chevrolet Silverado EV pickup is now joined by its electrified twin in the General Motors (GM) family with the new GMC Sierra EV.
The Sierra EV has the same chassis, powertrain, and Ultium batteries as the Silverado EV, but design-wise looks more like a traditional pickup, whereas the Silverado EV appears more like a lifestyle, adventure pickup. The traditional styling may appeal to a broader group of buyers, including those looking for work trucks.
The high-trim model GMC unveiled last night is the 2024 Sierra EV Denali Edition 1, which will have 400 miles of estimated range, a dual-motor setup with 754 horsepower and 785 lb-ft of torque, and an 800-volt architecture that can handle 350 kW DC fast charging."..."
[........]
![]()
GMC Sierra EV Denali pickup packs 754 hp, 400-mile range
The Chevrolet Silverado EV pickup is now joined by its electrified twin in the GM family with the new GMC Sierra EV.finance.yahoo.com
`
I never said otherwise. But one car per 200 people is a whole lot less than the current penetration of wind and solar power into the energy infrastructure and EVs and hybrids into our auto fleet and you've all been poo-pooing those levels as meaningless.No, most people walked.
Up here they are. At least the cabinet makers I know are.That is not consistent with my experiences or observations as a professional construction worker.They ARE abandoning them as battery costs increase, because to be useful you have to have at least four batteries per tool or you are SOL.
I disagree. Yes, cars were out of reach of the common man for quite a while, but the simple fact is they supplanted horses very quickly.
By 1910 there were over 500,000 cars in operation across the USA.
1910.
I never said otherwise. And someone who couldn't afford a horse certainly couldn't afford a car But one car per 200 people is a whole lot less than the current penetration of wind and solar power into the energy infrastructure and EVs and hybrids into our auto fleet and you've all been poo-pooing those levels as meaningless.
1. A truck that has no or low towing ability because it drain the battery mean the truck is worthless.I said above the F150 has lower towing range than it's gas twin.
But I'm i'm not watching your vid, which does not answer your question you 12 IQ little Twerp.
`