GOP Presidential Candidates Unionizing? Isn't That Socialism?

So how many regressivecrats were asked if their run was a comic book version of a presidential campaign,

I could care less about this question, but if he can't deal with a question from John Harwood how will he deal with Putin?

or told their policies had as much chance of success as their flapping their arms and flying off stage?

If a plan is utter nonsense it should be pointed out. Numbers are still numbers despite what wingnuts want them to be.

How about they ask Bernie if the hildabeast has the moral authority to lead the nation?

Why wouldn't they have the moral authority? Neither of them has been married three times. Neither of them has stood on the stage and lied about being involved with a scam company for 10 years. Neither of them are going to have to make multiple court appearances to testify at their aide's trials for committing crimes while in their administration.

You seem to be confused about what a debate moderator is supposed to do vs. a political commentator.
 
It's funny to watch NaziCons embrace socialism - while trying to deny it.






What's hilarious is you have no clue of what you're talking about. Truly brainless thou art!
 
So how many regressivecrats were asked if their run was a comic book version of a presidential campaign,

I could care less about this question, but if he can't deal with a question from John Harwood how will he deal with Putin?

or told their policies had as much chance of success as their flapping their arms and flying off stage?

If a plan is utter nonsense it should be pointed out. Numbers are still numbers despite what wingnuts want them to be.

How about they ask Bernie if the hildabeast has the moral authority to lead the nation?

Why wouldn't they have the moral authority? Neither of them has been married three times. Neither of them has stood on the stage and lied about being involved with a scam company for 10 years. Neither of them are going to have to make multiple court appearances to testify at their aide's trials for committing crimes while in their administration.

You seem to be confused about what a debate moderator is supposed to do vs. a political commentator.
He's supposed to ask questions.

The candidate is supposed to answer them, not whine about them.
 
The GOP candidates should be banned from organizing. Since organizing is terrible for America. Why would they do this?

Where is Unions banned?
Since when are you against pro choice?

Pro-choice? You're trying to compare apples and oranges.

How is it comparing Apple's and oranges, except not choosing to join a Union don't entail killing a baby in it's mother's womb?

Don't try to derail this thread with your abortion bullshit. Hitler banned unions. Republicans are trying to do the same thing.
 
So how many regressivecrats were asked if their run was a comic book version of a presidential campaign,

I could care less about this question, but if he can't deal with a question from John Harwood how will he deal with Putin?

or told their policies had as much chance of success as their flapping their arms and flying off stage?

If a plan is utter nonsense it should be pointed out. Numbers are still numbers despite what wingnuts want them to be.

How about they ask Bernie if the hildabeast has the moral authority to lead the nation?

Why wouldn't they have the moral authority? Neither of them has been married three times. Neither of them has stood on the stage and lied about being involved with a scam company for 10 years. Neither of them are going to have to make multiple court appearances to testify at their aide's trials for committing crimes while in their administration.

You seem to be confused about what a debate moderator is supposed to do vs. a political commentator.
He's supposed to ask questions.

The candidate is supposed to answer them, not whine about them.

Right, questions without snide, personally demeaning commentary. If CNN had done that you your candidates you'd be beside yourself with anger, so take your hypocrisy and shove it.
 
The GOP candidates should be banned from organizing. Since organizing is terrible for America. Why would they do this?

Where is Unions banned?
Since when are you against pro choice?

Pro-choice? You're trying to compare apples and oranges.

How is it comparing Apple's and oranges, except not choosing to join a Union don't entail killing a baby in it's mother's womb?

Don't try to derail this thread with your abortion bullshit. Hitler banned unions. Republicans are trying to do the same thing.

You're a liar. It was FDR that said public sector unions didn't serve the countries interest. And name one private sector union or any union for that matter the republicans have attempted to ban through legislation.
 
The GOP candidates should be banned from organizing. Since organizing is terrible for America. Why would they do this?

Where is Unions banned?
Since when are you against pro choice?

Pro-choice? You're trying to compare apples and oranges.

How is it comparing Apple's and oranges, except not choosing to join a Union don't entail killing a baby in it's mother's womb?

Don't try to derail this thread with your abortion bullshit. Hitler banned unions. Republicans are trying to do the same thing.

You're a liar. It was FDR that said public sector unions didn't serve the countries interest. And name one private sector union or any union for that matter the republicans have attempted to ban through legislation.

Hitler banned unions! That's a fact. And, I didn't differentiate between private and public sector unions. It's a fact that many Republicans want to ban public sector unions - and they are also after private sector unions.

But in some cases — mostly in states with Republican governors and Republican statehouse majorities — officials are seeking more far-reaching, structural changes that would weaken the bargaining power and political influence of unions, including private sector ones.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/04/business/04labor.html?_r=0
 
It sure sounds like it. The campaigns are reportedly planning to meet this weekend to collectively plan and organize how their future debates will be conducted. It has also been reported that the RNC is not invited. This is really getting wild. I've never seen anything like it. RNC Chairman Reince Priebus is desperately trying to put a positive spin on this revolt - but he's not invited.

Exclusive: GOP campaigns plot revolt against RNC

Campaigns Consider Dramatic Changes To The GOP Debates
I think they should get together and publish a list of their preferred questions on social media. Then get ready for the blowback: a collective national yawn in their fat, sweaty faces.
 
It sure sounds like it. The campaigns are reportedly planning to meet this weekend to collectively plan and organize how their future debates will be conducted. It has also been reported that the RNC is not invited. This is really getting wild. I've never seen anything like it. RNC Chairman Reince Priebus is desperately trying to put a positive spin on this revolt - but he's not invited.

Exclusive: GOP campaigns plot revolt against RNC

Campaigns Consider Dramatic Changes To The GOP Debates
I think they should get together and publish a list of their preferred questions on social media. Then get ready for the blowback: a collective national yawn in their fat, sweaty faces.

I agree! These crybaby clowns have taken politics to a new low.
 
Where is Unions banned?
Since when are you against pro choice?

Pro-choice? You're trying to compare apples and oranges.

How is it comparing Apple's and oranges, except not choosing to join a Union don't entail killing a baby in it's mother's womb?

Don't try to derail this thread with your abortion bullshit. Hitler banned unions. Republicans are trying to do the same thing.

You're a liar. It was FDR that said public sector unions didn't serve the countries interest. And name one private sector union or any union for that matter the republicans have attempted to ban through legislation.

Hitler banned unions! That's a fact. And, I didn't differentiate between private and public sector unions. It's a fact that many Republicans want to ban public sector unions - and they are also after private sector unions.

But in some cases — mostly in states with Republican governors and Republican statehouse majorities — officials are seeking more far-reaching, structural changes that would weaken the bargaining power and political influence of unions, including private sector ones.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/04/business/04labor.html?_r=0

In other words NO REPUBLICAN has submitted legislation to ban any union so you comparison is totally bogus, as usual.
 
It sure sounds like it. The campaigns are reportedly planning to meet this weekend to collectively plan and organize how their future debates will be conducted. It has also been reported that the RNC is not invited. This is really getting wild. I've never seen anything like it. RNC Chairman Reince Priebus is desperately trying to put a positive spin on this revolt - but he's not invited.

Exclusive: GOP campaigns plot revolt against RNC

Campaigns Consider Dramatic Changes To The GOP Debates

Don't confuse Teamwork with Socialism or Unions.
 
Pro-choice? You're trying to compare apples and oranges.

How is it comparing Apple's and oranges, except not choosing to join a Union don't entail killing a baby in it's mother's womb?

Don't try to derail this thread with your abortion bullshit. Hitler banned unions. Republicans are trying to do the same thing.

You're a liar. It was FDR that said public sector unions didn't serve the countries interest. And name one private sector union or any union for that matter the republicans have attempted to ban through legislation.

Hitler banned unions! That's a fact. And, I didn't differentiate between private and public sector unions. It's a fact that many Republicans want to ban public sector unions - and they are also after private sector unions.

But in some cases — mostly in states with Republican governors and Republican statehouse majorities — officials are seeking more far-reaching, structural changes that would weaken the bargaining power and political influence of unions, including private sector ones.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/04/business/04labor.html?_r=0

In other words NO REPUBLICAN has submitted legislation to ban any union so you comparison is totally bogus, as usual.

Like I said before....after being the president of a union and a Democrat Reagan totally re did his politics because of one thing...he didn't want to pay taxes on his multi million dollar income. The prick almost single handedly did away with the middle class in this country. Wanna' know how? He borrowed $3 trillion from foreign banks and handed it to the richest people in America in the form of tax cuts:



3.jpg

6-25-10inc-f1.jpg



..........................Total U S Debt...........................

09/30/2014 $17,824,071,380,733.82
09/30/2013 $16,738,183,526,697.32
09/30/2012 $16,066,241,407,385.89
09/30/2011 $14,790,340,328,557.15
09/30/2010 $13,561,623,030,891.79
09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 ( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)(Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00
 
Pro-choice? You're trying to compare apples and oranges.

How is it comparing Apple's and oranges, except not choosing to join a Union don't entail killing a baby in it's mother's womb?

Don't try to derail this thread with your abortion bullshit. Hitler banned unions. Republicans are trying to do the same thing.

You're a liar. It was FDR that said public sector unions didn't serve the countries interest. And name one private sector union or any union for that matter the republicans have attempted to ban through legislation.

Hitler banned unions! That's a fact. And, I didn't differentiate between private and public sector unions. It's a fact that many Republicans want to ban public sector unions - and they are also after private sector unions.

But in some cases — mostly in states with Republican governors and Republican statehouse majorities — officials are seeking more far-reaching, structural changes that would weaken the bargaining power and political influence of unions, including private sector ones.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/04/business/04labor.html?_r=0

In other words NO REPUBLICAN has submitted legislation to ban any union so you comparison is totally bogus, as usual.

Do you deny that there is a Republican war on labor unions?
 
There's a difference between unifying and unionizing. If debate moderators were responsible enough to have not taken personal shots at the candidates and had stayed on topic, this wouldn't be an issue.
Havana Ted was asked an economics question and he chose to use his time to sermonize.

So their argument is total bullshit.

Sen. Cruz was asked a loaded "how often do you beat your wife" type of a question by a man-child who threw some economic content to spin it. Cruz called the moderator and the rest of the Democrat lapdogs out for the corrupt bias they have brought to journalism.
 
It sure sounds like it. The campaigns are reportedly planning to meet this weekend to collectively plan and organize how their future debates will be conducted. It has also been reported that the RNC is not invited. This is really getting wild. I've never seen anything like it. RNC Chairman Reince Priebus is desperately trying to put a positive spin on this revolt - but he's not invited.

Exclusive: GOP campaigns plot revolt against RNC

Campaigns Consider Dramatic Changes To The GOP Debates

Don't confuse Teamwork with Socialism or Unions.

I didn't know "teamwork" included taking over and throwing out the boss - the RNC.
 
How is it comparing Apple's and oranges, except not choosing to join a Union don't entail killing a baby in it's mother's womb?

Don't try to derail this thread with your abortion bullshit. Hitler banned unions. Republicans are trying to do the same thing.

You're a liar. It was FDR that said public sector unions didn't serve the countries interest. And name one private sector union or any union for that matter the republicans have attempted to ban through legislation.

Hitler banned unions! That's a fact. And, I didn't differentiate between private and public sector unions. It's a fact that many Republicans want to ban public sector unions - and they are also after private sector unions.

But in some cases — mostly in states with Republican governors and Republican statehouse majorities — officials are seeking more far-reaching, structural changes that would weaken the bargaining power and political influence of unions, including private sector ones.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/04/business/04labor.html?_r=0

In other words NO REPUBLICAN has submitted legislation to ban any union so you comparison is totally bogus, as usual.

Like I said before....after being the president of a union and a Democrat Reagan totally re did his politics because of one thing...he didn't want to pay taxes on his multi million dollar income. The prick almost single handedly did away with the middle class in this country. Wanna' know how? He borrowed $3 trillion from foreign banks and handed it to the richest people in America in the form of tax cuts:



3.jpg

6-25-10inc-f1.jpg



..........................Total U S Debt...........................

09/30/2014 $17,824,071,380,733.82
09/30/2013 $16,738,183,526,697.32
09/30/2012 $16,066,241,407,385.89
09/30/2011 $14,790,340,328,557.15
09/30/2010 $13,561,623,030,891.79
09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 ( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)(Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

Reagan almost killed the Middle Class?? Have you checked the take home pay among Middle Class members over the past 8 years? The economic policies embraced by this regime align with philosophies and nation states that do not have any middle class.
 
It sure sounds like it. The campaigns are reportedly planning to meet this weekend to collectively plan and organize how their future debates will be conducted. It has also been reported that the RNC is not invited. This is really getting wild. I've never seen anything like it. RNC Chairman Reince Priebus is desperately trying to put a positive spin on this revolt - but he's not invited.

Exclusive: GOP campaigns plot revolt against RNC

Campaigns Consider Dramatic Changes To The GOP Debates

Don't confuse Teamwork with Socialism or Unions.

I didn't know "teamwork" included taking over and throwing out the boss - the RNC.

There is no boss. That's union talk.
 

Forum List

Back
Top