Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is either the first time, ever, a child has tried to enter the exhibit in 38 years or the first time a parent hasn't been paying close enough attention to keep their child out.Human life at risk, zoo takes appropriate action, liberal bitches about it. Sums it up. Liberals, doh!Human screws up, animal pays price. Sums it up. America. Meh
Liberals, doh???
Liberals my eye!
I have never been a liberal, all the contrary!
It's a matter of love and caring about all creatures, big and small.
It's a matter of right and wrong!
It's a matter of possible carelessness of a zoo and neglect from the part of a stupid mother who perhaps, just perhaps, should have never become a mother in the first place.
Stop blaming the mother for the zoo's mistake of not fixing the railing barrier.
Unless you c an be certain that the gorilla would go down immediately from a tranq dart, it is a half measure, IMO.Human life at risk, zoo takes appropriate action, liberal bitches about it. Sums it up. Liberals, doh!Human screws up, animal pays price. Sums it up. America. Meh
Liberals, doh???
Liberals my eye!
I have never been a liberal, all the contrary!
It's a matter of love and caring about all creatures, big and small.
It's a matter of right and wrong!
It's a matter of possible carelessness of a zoo and neglect from the part of a stupid mother who perhaps, just perhaps, should have never become a mother in the first place.
I didnt say that everyone objecting to the gorillas death was a liberal.
But how does a conservative argue that the childs life should be put at risk by taking partial measures to neutralize the gorilla as a threat to the child's safety?
I understand
But "partial measures" would be to put the gorilla to sleep for awhile.
Not to kill him.
Human life at risk, zoo takes appropriate action, liberal bitches about it. Sums it up. Liberals, doh!Human screws up, animal pays price. Sums it up. America. Meh
Liberals, doh???
Liberals my eye!
I have never been a liberal, all the contrary!
It's a matter of love and caring about all creatures, big and small.
It's a matter of right and wrong!
It's a matter of possible carelessness of a zoo and neglect from the part of a stupid mother who perhaps, just perhaps, should have never become a mother in the first place.
I didnt say that everyone objecting to the gorillas death was a liberal.
But how does a conservative argue that the childs life should be put at risk by taking partial measures to neutralize the gorilla as a threat to the child's safety?
I understand
But "partial measures" would be to put the gorilla to sleep for awhile.
Not to kill him.
And until now no one has noticed that the enclosure was not properly enclosed so that children could not get it, so the mother is not the only one at fault.This is either the first time, ever, a child has tried to enter the exhibit in 38 years or the first time a parent hasn't been paying close enough attention to keep their child out.
This is either the first time, ever, a child has tried to enter the exhibit in 38 years or the first time a parent hasn't been paying close enough attention to keep their child out.Human life at risk, zoo takes appropriate action, liberal bitches about it. Sums it up. Liberals, doh!Human screws up, animal pays price. Sums it up. America. Meh
Liberals, doh???
Liberals my eye!
I have never been a liberal, all the contrary!
It's a matter of love and caring about all creatures, big and small.
It's a matter of right and wrong!
It's a matter of possible carelessness of a zoo and neglect from the part of a stupid mother who perhaps, just perhaps, should have never become a mother in the first place.
Stop blaming the mother for the zoo's mistake of not fixing the railing barrier.
Human life at risk, zoo takes appropriate action, liberal bitches about it. Sums it up. Liberals, doh!Human screws up, animal pays price. Sums it up. America. Meh
Liberals, doh???
Liberals my eye!
I have never been a liberal, all the contrary!
It's a matter of love and caring about all creatures, big and small.
It's a matter of right and wrong!
It's a matter of possible carelessness of a zoo and neglect from the part of a stupid mother who perhaps, just perhaps, should have never become a mother in the first place.
I didnt say that everyone objecting to the gorillas death was a liberal.
But how does a conservative argue that the childs life should be put at risk by taking partial measures to neutralize the gorilla as a threat to the child's safety?
I understand
But "partial measures" would be to put the gorilla to sleep for awhile.
Not to kill him.
I, along with thousands of others, will take the advice from an expert.
Famed Animal Expert Jack Hanna Says Gorilla Would Have Killed Boy
I'll go with that. At 8ft intervals of the vertical bars, Yao Ming could roll through with room to spare.And until now no one has noticed that the enclosure was not properly enclosed so that children could not get it, so the mother is not the only one at fault.This is either the first time, ever, a child has tried to enter the exhibit in 38 years or the first time a parent hasn't been paying close enough attention to keep their child out.
That no one else had previously noticed that a child could get through to the gorilla compound I think exonerates the mother.Even it had been 100 years, what difference does it make. The hole in the railing barrier was there and the child found it. Do you really think the mother, who had 3 other children, thought for a second that the hole was there?
From what i understand the child was with the mom, she turned around to take a picture and the little boy had hopped the barrier. She was looking around for him and someone saw him crawling in the bushes and tried to get him before he fell in.Ace, I agree.....although very sad, it had to go down that way....but I still think the parents of this child are SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS WHOLE ORDEAL AND THAT WEIGHT SHOULD BARE HEAVY ON THEIR SHOULDERS....NO CHILD EVER THAT YOUNG SHOULD BE OUT OF A PARENTS SITE, NOT EVER. THE SOLE PURPOSE FOR VISITING THE ZOO IS FOR THE KIDS AMUSEMENT, HOW JR. GOT OUT OF THEIR SITE ONLY GOD KNOWS.Probably because he most likely would have flipped out and killed the boy before going down due to the tranquilizer 15 minutes later.Why couldn't the zoo keepers hit him with a tazer or sleep arrow?
Skye if that had been your son, you would have taken the chance that the other expert was right THIS TIME?And I along with millions of others listen to the advice of the experts too
Animal behaviour expert doesn't believe Harambe would have hurt boy
The mother was more at fault than any zoo, animal, enclosureThat no one else had previously noticed that a child could get through to the gorilla compound I think exonerates the mother.Even it had been 100 years, what difference does it make. The hole in the railing barrier was there and the child found it. Do you really think the mother, who had 3 other children, thought for a second that the hole was there?
Human life at risk, zoo takes appropriate action, liberal bitches about it. Sums it up. Liberals, doh!
Liberals, doh???
Liberals my eye!
I have never been a liberal, all the contrary!
It's a matter of love and caring about all creatures, big and small.
It's a matter of right and wrong!
It's a matter of possible carelessness of a zoo and neglect from the part of a stupid mother who perhaps, just perhaps, should have never become a mother in the first place.
I didnt say that everyone objecting to the gorillas death was a liberal.
But how does a conservative argue that the childs life should be put at risk by taking partial measures to neutralize the gorilla as a threat to the child's safety?
I understand
But "partial measures" would be to put the gorilla to sleep for awhile.
Not to kill him.
I, along with thousands of others, will take the advice from an expert.
Famed Animal Expert Jack Hanna Says Gorilla Would Have Killed Boy
And I along with millions of others listen to the advice of the experts too
Animal behaviour expert doesn't believe Harambe would have hurt boy
The mother was more at fault than any zoo, animal, enclosureThat no one else had previously noticed that a child could get through to the gorilla compound I think exonerates the mother.Even it had been 100 years, what difference does it make. The hole in the railing barrier was there and the child found it. Do you really think the mother, who had 3 other children, thought for a second that the hole was there?
You can see it. It's pretty obvious. When one of them says they want to get in the cage and go for a swim it's probably a good idea to know where they are at all times.This is either the first time, ever, a child has tried to enter the exhibit in 38 years or the first time a parent hasn't been paying close enough attention to keep their child out.Human life at risk, zoo takes appropriate action, liberal bitches about it. Sums it up. Liberals, doh!Human screws up, animal pays price. Sums it up. America. Meh
Liberals, doh???
Liberals my eye!
I have never been a liberal, all the contrary!
It's a matter of love and caring about all creatures, big and small.
It's a matter of right and wrong!
It's a matter of possible carelessness of a zoo and neglect from the part of a stupid mother who perhaps, just perhaps, should have never become a mother in the first place.
Stop blaming the mother for the zoo's mistake of not fixing the railing barrier.
Even it had been 100 years, what difference does it make. The hole in the railing barrier was there and the child found it. Do you really think the mother, who had 3 other children, thought for a second that the hole was there?
You can see it. It's pretty obvious. When one of them says they want to get in the cage and go for a swim it's probably a good idea to know where they are at all times.This is either the first time, ever, a child has tried to enter the exhibit in 38 years or the first time a parent hasn't been paying close enough attention to keep their child out.Human life at risk, zoo takes appropriate action, liberal bitches about it. Sums it up. Liberals, doh!
Liberals, doh???
Liberals my eye!
I have never been a liberal, all the contrary!
It's a matter of love and caring about all creatures, big and small.
It's a matter of right and wrong!
It's a matter of possible carelessness of a zoo and neglect from the part of a stupid mother who perhaps, just perhaps, should have never become a mother in the first place.
Stop blaming the mother for the zoo's mistake of not fixing the railing barrier.
Even it had been 100 years, what difference does it make. The hole in the railing barrier was there and the child found it. Do you really think the mother, who had 3 other children, thought for a second that the hole was there?
How would you put the gorilla to sleep without endangering the child?Human life at risk, zoo takes appropriate action, liberal bitches about it. Sums it up. Liberals, doh!Human screws up, animal pays price. Sums it up. America. Meh
Liberals, doh???
Liberals my eye!
I have never been a liberal, all the contrary!
It's a matter of love and caring about all creatures, big and small.
It's a matter of right and wrong!
It's a matter of possible carelessness of a zoo and neglect from the part of a stupid mother who perhaps, just perhaps, should have never become a mother in the first place.
I didnt say that everyone objecting to the gorillas death was a liberal.
But how does a conservative argue that the childs life should be put at risk by taking partial measures to neutralize the gorilla as a threat to the child's safety?
I understand
But "partial measures" would be to put the gorilla to sleep for awhile.
Not to kill him.
Liberals, doh???
Liberals my eye!
I have never been a liberal, all the contrary!
It's a matter of love and caring about all creatures, big and small.
It's a matter of right and wrong!
It's a matter of possible carelessness of a zoo and neglect from the part of a stupid mother who perhaps, just perhaps, should have never become a mother in the first place.
I didnt say that everyone objecting to the gorillas death was a liberal.
But how does a conservative argue that the childs life should be put at risk by taking partial measures to neutralize the gorilla as a threat to the child's safety?
I understand
But "partial measures" would be to put the gorilla to sleep for awhile.
Not to kill him.
I, along with thousands of others, will take the advice from an expert.
Famed Animal Expert Jack Hanna Says Gorilla Would Have Killed Boy
And I along with millions of others listen to the advice of the experts too
Animal behaviour expert doesn't believe Harambe would have hurt boy
My vote is for saving the life of the little boy, unlike the New England professor.
"The Bondi Vet went on to explain the other ways the situation could have been handled, but also admitted 'the zoo staff were placed in an awful situation'.Liberals, doh???
Liberals my eye!
I have never been a liberal, all the contrary!
It's a matter of love and caring about all creatures, big and small.
It's a matter of right and wrong!
It's a matter of possible carelessness of a zoo and neglect from the part of a stupid mother who perhaps, just perhaps, should have never become a mother in the first place.
I didnt say that everyone objecting to the gorillas death was a liberal.
But how does a conservative argue that the childs life should be put at risk by taking partial measures to neutralize the gorilla as a threat to the child's safety?
I understand
But "partial measures" would be to put the gorilla to sleep for awhile.
Not to kill him.
I, along with thousands of others, will take the advice from an expert.
Famed Animal Expert Jack Hanna Says Gorilla Would Have Killed Boy
And I along with millions of others listen to the advice of the experts too
Animal behaviour expert doesn't believe Harambe would have hurt boy
My vote is for saving the life of the little boy, unlike the New England professor.
I didnt say that everyone objecting to the gorillas death was a liberal.
But how does a conservative argue that the childs life should be put at risk by taking partial measures to neutralize the gorilla as a threat to the child's safety?
I understand
But "partial measures" would be to put the gorilla to sleep for awhile.
Not to kill him.
I, along with thousands of others, will take the advice from an expert.
Famed Animal Expert Jack Hanna Says Gorilla Would Have Killed Boy
And I along with millions of others listen to the advice of the experts too
Animal behaviour expert doesn't believe Harambe would have hurt boy
My vote is for saving the life of the little boy, unlike the New England professor.
BUT DO NOT KILL THE ANIMAL!
Use a sleeping dart.
My God, what is the use to try to explain things to these people!
Just a waste of time.
Thick as brick they are!![]()