Got a question for the communists

[TNHarley]

Like so many other RWNJs, the OP is brainwashed by European political narratives and sees the only possibilities in the black vs. white framework of those narratives.

In short, he has forgotten what it is to be American and the fundamental philosophies that are unique to America:

Democracy, Equality, inalienable rights, and government for and by the people.

We are neither capitalist nor communist nor socialist, but may set economic policies, laws and regulation that satisfy the above principals.

Lol wth are you blabbing about?

 

[Hum Dinger]

Who gets to eat lobster and beef tenderloin?
This doesnt have to be about food. It can be about anything that is "classy" or what have you. Because, you know, it calls for no currency..
I am truly stumped :/

How do you define 'communist'? Anyone that doesn't agree with you?

I'm not, by a long shot, a communist, but I'll give you an answer anyway:

1. Utopian communism (i.e. the idea of no currency), is nothing but a fantasy. It can never become reality. It's as unrealistic as free market economics - another fantasy promoted by extremists who are out of touch with reality.

2. Even without communism or anything close, the answer as to who gets to "eat lobster and beef tenderloin" is:

EVERYONE!

If wealth distribution were based on the productive value of people's work, just about everyone could enjoy a very high standard of living.

Given the productive capabilities and available resources in our high tech society each worker can produce much, much more than they can consume.

What's preventing this now is that we live in a society that allows people to grab all the wealth that they can without regard for what they deserve (in terms of what they have contributed in productive work), as a matter of fact, those people who do the most productive work usually receive the least - because they're too busy being productive. Meanwhile there are legions of people who do no productive work at all. All they do is work at sucking up all the money they can.

This system is controlled by a financial system which prevents workers from accessing the resources to do productive work unless the money suckers are in full control of how the wealth, created by the workers, is distributed.

We don't need a communist or even a socialist system to insure that we have fair wealth distribution, we just need business regulation to make it possible.

Unfortunately, with the money suckers in full control of the political system, it seems unlikely that there will be fair wealth distribution. It seems that only in democratic socialist countries (like Denmark or Switzerland) is there a reasonable balance between the money suckers and the workers, and the result, in those countries is:

EVERYBODY EATS LOBSTER AND TENDERLOIN

(or at least the equivalent food stuffs for those countries)

Everyone can eat anything they want? Talk about utopian fantasies..

You don't believe that we have the industrial capabilities to produce food enough to feed everyone well?

This isn't the 1840s.

 

[Hum Dinger]

Like so many other RWNJs, the OP is brainwashed by European political narratives and sees the only possibilities in the black vs. white framework of those narratives.

In short, he has forgotten what it is to be American and the fundamental philosophies that are unique to America:

Democracy, Equality, inalienable rights, and government for and by the people.

We are neither capitalist nor communist nor socialist, but may set economic policies, laws and regulation that satisfy the above principals.

Lol wth are you blabbing about?

Can't read English, huh?

 

[TNHarley]

Who gets to eat lobster and beef tenderloin?
This doesnt have to be about food. It can be about anything that is "classy" or what have you. Because, you know, it calls for no currency..
I am truly stumped :/

How do you define 'communist'? Anyone that doesn't agree with you?

I'm not, by a long shot, a communist, but I'll give you an answer anyway:

1. Utopian communism (i.e. the idea of no currency), is nothing but a fantasy. It can never become reality. It's as unrealistic as free market economics - another fantasy promoted by extremists who are out of touch with reality.

2. Even without communism or anything close, the answer as to who gets to "eat lobster and beef tenderloin" is:

EVERYONE!

If wealth distribution were based on the productive value of people's work, just about everyone could enjoy a very high standard of living.

Given the productive capabilities and available resources in our high tech society each worker can produce much, much more than they can consume.

What's preventing this now is that we live in a society that allows people to grab all the wealth that they can without regard for what they deserve (in terms of what they have contributed in productive work), as a matter of fact, those people who do the most productive work usually receive the least - because they're too busy being productive. Meanwhile there are legions of people who do no productive work at all. All they do is work at sucking up all the money they can.

This system is controlled by a financial system which prevents workers from accessing the resources to do productive work unless the money suckers are in full control of how the wealth, created by the workers, is distributed.

We don't need a communist or even a socialist system to insure that we have fair wealth distribution, we just need business regulation to make it possible.

Unfortunately, with the money suckers in full control of the political system, it seems unlikely that there will be fair wealth distribution. It seems that only in democratic socialist countries (like Denmark or Switzerland) is there a reasonable balance between the money suckers and the workers, and the result, in those countries is:

EVERYBODY EATS LOBSTER AND TENDERLOIN

(or at least the equivalent food stuffs for those countries)

Everyone can eat anything they want? Talk about utopian fantasies..

You don't believe that we have the industrial capabilities to produce food enough to feed everyone well?

This isn't the 1840s.

To feed everyone lobster.
My point is, what if everyone wants the same things?

 

[TNHarley]

Like so many other RWNJs, the OP is brainwashed by European political narratives and sees the only possibilities in the black vs. white framework of those narratives.

In short, he has forgotten what it is to be American and the fundamental philosophies that are unique to America:

Democracy, Equality, inalienable rights, and government for and by the people.

We are neither capitalist nor communist nor socialist, but may set economic policies, laws and regulation that satisfy the above principals.

Lol wth are you blabbing about?

Can't read English, huh?

Yes. I just think you assume to much. Or just react. One or the other

 

[Hum Dinger]

Like so many other RWNJs, the OP is brainwashed by European political narratives and sees the only possibilities in the black vs. white framework of those narratives.

In short, he has forgotten what it is to be American and the fundamental philosophies that are unique to America:

Democracy, Equality, inalienable rights, and government for and by the people.

We are neither capitalist nor communist nor socialist, but may set economic policies, laws and regulation that satisfy the above principals.

Lol wth are you blabbing about?

Can't read English, huh?

Yes. I just think you assume to much. Or just react. One or the other

You apparently don't read and comprehend before replying. Try to understand what is being said before you reply.

 

[TNHarley]

Like so many other RWNJs, the OP is brainwashed by European political narratives and sees the only possibilities in the black vs. white framework of those narratives.

In short, he has forgotten what it is to be American and the fundamental philosophies that are unique to America:

Democracy, Equality, inalienable rights, and government for and by the people.

We are neither capitalist nor communist nor socialist, but may set economic policies, laws and regulation that satisfy the above principals.

Lol wth are you blabbing about?

Can't read English, huh?

Yes. I just think you assume to much. Or just react. One or the other

You apparently don't read and comprehend before replying. Try to understand what is being said before you reply.

I ask a question about lobster and communism and you start blabbering about forgetting how to be an american and then go on rambling about our economy.
It was stupid.

 

[Hum Dinger]

Who gets to eat lobster and beef tenderloin?
This doesnt have to be about food. It can be about anything that is "classy" or what have you. Because, you know, it calls for no currency..
I am truly stumped :/

How do you define 'communist'? Anyone that doesn't agree with you?

I'm not, by a long shot, a communist, but I'll give you an answer anyway:

1. Utopian communism (i.e. the idea of no currency), is nothing but a fantasy. It can never become reality. It's as unrealistic as free market economics - another fantasy promoted by extremists who are out of touch with reality.

2. Even without communism or anything close, the answer as to who gets to "eat lobster and beef tenderloin" is:

EVERYONE!

If wealth distribution were based on the productive value of people's work, just about everyone could enjoy a very high standard of living.

Given the productive capabilities and available resources in our high tech society each worker can produce much, much more than they can consume.

What's preventing this now is that we live in a society that allows people to grab all the wealth that they can without regard for what they deserve (in terms of what they have contributed in productive work), as a matter of fact, those people who do the most productive work usually receive the least - because they're too busy being productive. Meanwhile there are legions of people who do no productive work at all. All they do is work at sucking up all the money they can.

This system is controlled by a financial system which prevents workers from accessing the resources to do productive work unless the money suckers are in full control of how the wealth, created by the workers, is distributed.

We don't need a communist or even a socialist system to insure that we have fair wealth distribution, we just need business regulation to make it possible.

Unfortunately, with the money suckers in full control of the political system, it seems unlikely that there will be fair wealth distribution. It seems that only in democratic socialist countries (like Denmark or Switzerland) is there a reasonable balance between the money suckers and the workers, and the result, in those countries is:

EVERYBODY EATS LOBSTER AND TENDERLOIN

(or at least the equivalent food stuffs for those countries)

Everyone can eat anything they want? Talk about utopian fantasies..

You don't believe that we have the industrial capabilities to produce food enough to feed everyone well?

This isn't the 1840s.

To feed everyone lobster.
My point is, what if everyone wants the same things?

You should go to Acadia national park. Not only is it beautiful, but the Lobster farming techniques used by the people in the area are awesome.

Barring some environmental changes (but why should we worry about those?), I have no doubt they can meet whatever demand there is for Lobster.

 

[TNHarley]

Who gets to eat lobster and beef tenderloin?
This doesnt have to be about food. It can be about anything that is "classy" or what have you. Because, you know, it calls for no currency..
I am truly stumped :/

How do you define 'communist'? Anyone that doesn't agree with you?

I'm not, by a long shot, a communist, but I'll give you an answer anyway:

1. Utopian communism (i.e. the idea of no currency), is nothing but a fantasy. It can never become reality. It's as unrealistic as free market economics - another fantasy promoted by extremists who are out of touch with reality.

2. Even without communism or anything close, the answer as to who gets to "eat lobster and beef tenderloin" is:

EVERYONE!

If wealth distribution were based on the productive value of people's work, just about everyone could enjoy a very high standard of living.

Given the productive capabilities and available resources in our high tech society each worker can produce much, much more than they can consume.

What's preventing this now is that we live in a society that allows people to grab all the wealth that they can without regard for what they deserve (in terms of what they have contributed in productive work), as a matter of fact, those people who do the most productive work usually receive the least - because they're too busy being productive. Meanwhile there are legions of people who do no productive work at all. All they do is work at sucking up all the money they can.

This system is controlled by a financial system which prevents workers from accessing the resources to do productive work unless the money suckers are in full control of how the wealth, created by the workers, is distributed.

We don't need a communist or even a socialist system to insure that we have fair wealth distribution, we just need business regulation to make it possible.

Unfortunately, with the money suckers in full control of the political system, it seems unlikely that there will be fair wealth distribution. It seems that only in democratic socialist countries (like Denmark or Switzerland) is there a reasonable balance between the money suckers and the workers, and the result, in those countries is:

EVERYBODY EATS LOBSTER AND TENDERLOIN

(or at least the equivalent food stuffs for those countries)

Everyone can eat anything they want? Talk about utopian fantasies..

You don't believe that we have the industrial capabilities to produce food enough to feed everyone well?

This isn't the 1840s.

To feed everyone lobster.
My point is, what if everyone wants the same things?

You should go to Acadia national park. Not only is it beautiful, but the Lobster farming techniques used by the people in the area are awesome.

Barring some environmental changes (but why should we worry about those?), I have no doubt they can meet whatever demand there is for Lobster.

Would there be a national park if we had communism?

 

[Hum Dinger]

Like so many other RWNJs, the OP is brainwashed by European political narratives and sees the only possibilities in the black vs. white framework of those narratives.

In short, he has forgotten what it is to be American and the fundamental philosophies that are unique to America:

Democracy, Equality, inalienable rights, and government for and by the people.

We are neither capitalist nor communist nor socialist, but may set economic policies, laws and regulation that satisfy the above principals.

Lol wth are you blabbing about?

Can't read English, huh?

Yes. I just think you assume to much. Or just react. One or the other

You apparently don't read and comprehend before replying. Try to understand what is being said before you reply.

I ask a question about lobster and communism and you start blabbering about forgetting how to be an american and then go on rambling about our economy.
It was stupid.

Apparently understanding American political philosophy and economics is out of reach for you.

After all, you're the one who asked about communism and lobster...talk about STUPID!

Your assumption that capitalism is needed because of limited resources is plain wrong. (I assume that's what your OP was implying). It really is not the 1840s any more.

 

[Hum Dinger]

How do you define 'communist'? Anyone that doesn't agree with you?

I'm not, by a long shot, a communist, but I'll give you an answer anyway:

1. Utopian communism (i.e. the idea of no currency), is nothing but a fantasy. It can never become reality. It's as unrealistic as free market economics - another fantasy promoted by extremists who are out of touch with reality.

2. Even without communism or anything close, the answer as to who gets to "eat lobster and beef tenderloin" is:

EVERYONE!

If wealth distribution were based on the productive value of people's work, just about everyone could enjoy a very high standard of living.

Given the productive capabilities and available resources in our high tech society each worker can produce much, much more than they can consume.

What's preventing this now is that we live in a society that allows people to grab all the wealth that they can without regard for what they deserve (in terms of what they have contributed in productive work), as a matter of fact, those people who do the most productive work usually receive the least - because they're too busy being productive. Meanwhile there are legions of people who do no productive work at all. All they do is work at sucking up all the money they can.

This system is controlled by a financial system which prevents workers from accessing the resources to do productive work unless the money suckers are in full control of how the wealth, created by the workers, is distributed.

We don't need a communist or even a socialist system to insure that we have fair wealth distribution, we just need business regulation to make it possible.

Unfortunately, with the money suckers in full control of the political system, it seems unlikely that there will be fair wealth distribution. It seems that only in democratic socialist countries (like Denmark or Switzerland) is there a reasonable balance between the money suckers and the workers, and the result, in those countries is:

EVERYBODY EATS LOBSTER AND TENDERLOIN

(or at least the equivalent food stuffs for those countries)

Everyone can eat anything they want? Talk about utopian fantasies..

You don't believe that we have the industrial capabilities to produce food enough to feed everyone well?

This isn't the 1840s.

To feed everyone lobster.
My point is, what if everyone wants the same things?

You should go to Acadia national park. Not only is it beautiful, but the Lobster farming techniques used by the people in the area are awesome.

Barring some environmental changes (but why should we worry about those?), I have no doubt they can meet whatever demand there is for Lobster.

Would there be a national park if we had communism?

I'm pretty certain that there were National Parks or their equivalent in the U.S.S.R and PRC.

 

[TNHarley]

Lol wth are you blabbing about?

Can't read English, huh?

Yes. I just think you assume to much. Or just react. One or the other

You apparently don't read and comprehend before replying. Try to understand what is being said before you reply.

I ask a question about lobster and communism and you start blabbering about forgetting how to be an american and then go on rambling about our economy.
It was stupid.

Apparently understanding American political philosophy and economics is out of reach for you.

After all, you're the one who asked about communism and lobster...talk about STUPID!

Your assumption that capitalism is needed because of limited resources is plain wrong. (I assume that's what your OP was implying). It really is not the 1840s any more.

Have i even said anything about capitalism?
I understand plenty of it. I just didnt see the relevance because all you did was react..
I asked a fucking question about lobster and you guys flip the fuck out and go into defensive mode

 

[TNHarley]

Everyone can eat anything they want? Talk about utopian fantasies..

You don't believe that we have the industrial capabilities to produce food enough to feed everyone well?

This isn't the 1840s.

To feed everyone lobster.
My point is, what if everyone wants the same things?

You should go to Acadia national park. Not only is it beautiful, but the Lobster farming techniques used by the people in the area are awesome.

Barring some environmental changes (but why should we worry about those?), I have no doubt they can meet whatever demand there is for Lobster.

Would there be a national park if we had communism?

I'm pretty certain that there were National Parks or their equivalent in the U.S.S.R and PRC.

They werent communist..

 

[TNHarley]

richard says i dont understand economics and philosophy but he calls USSR and China communist

 

[g5000]

I'm in Maryland
We eat crabs

No matter where a person from Maryland goes, there are no crab cakes on the planet which are as good as Maryland crab cakes to them.

It's all they talk about.

 

[g5000]

Who gets to eat lobster and beef tenderloin?
This doesnt have to be about food. It can be about anything that is "classy" or what have you. Because, you know, it calls for no currency..
I am truly stumped :/

Translation: "Let the poor eat cake."

 

[TNHarley]

Who gets to eat lobster and beef tenderloin?
This doesnt have to be about food. It can be about anything that is "classy" or what have you. Because, you know, it calls for no currency..
I am truly stumped :/

Translation: "Let the poor eat cake."

But there wouldnt be any poor in a true communist society, correct?

 

[rightwinger]

I'm in Maryland
We eat crabs

No matter where a person from Maryland goes, there are no crab cakes on the planet which are as good as Maryland crab cakes to them.

It's all they talk about.

Its true

Those baby's cost more than lobster

 

[g5000]

Who gets to eat lobster and beef tenderloin?
This doesnt have to be about food. It can be about anything that is "classy" or what have you. Because, you know, it calls for no currency..
I am truly stumped :/

Translation: "Let the poor eat cake."

But there wouldnt be any poor in a true communist society, correct?

Why don't you lay off the sauce before starting any more topics.

 

[TNHarley]

Who gets to eat lobster and beef tenderloin?
This doesnt have to be about food. It can be about anything that is "classy" or what have you. Because, you know, it calls for no currency..
I am truly stumped :/

Translation: "Let the poor eat cake."

But there wouldnt be any poor in a true communist society, correct?

Why don't you lay off the sauce before starting any more topics.

So there would be poor people in a true communist society?
Why do some of you get so defensive when the word communism comes up? Do you think its the boogey man or something?