Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 66,968
- 17,023
- 2,190
Well good, I like anybody who tries to be fair and objective. Perhaps we have confusion over terminology then. Let’s take QPQ out... would you say this is a fair assessment?First, I am not a Trump supporter so my opinions are objective. I did not see any quid pro quo in the transcript. I did not see anything wrong with what Hunter Biden did. Joe Biden made a boneheaded tape, kind of like Mulvaney's press conference, but I don't any wrong doing by any of them. And I don't think there clearly was any quid pro quo-my opinion, obviously not yours.Ok then if there’s no problem with the quid pro quo why are you making the argument that there wasn’t one? Especially when there clearly was one. That makes you sound like your just defending trumps talking points when your true feelings are that there’s nothing wrong with the QPQI would say OK because I would see it in light of following up on probable corruption. Since Biden probably won't be the Democrat nominee. Trump gains nothing checking up on Biden..let me ask a simple question. If there was absolute proof of a quid pro quo. Military aid for investigating the DNC server and Biden, would you say that was ok or illegal?What is POINT? You hate Trump? We know that. It seems YOU are blowing smoke-we all saw the transcript and THERE WAS NO QUID PRO QUO!https://nypost.com/2019/10/21/linds...impeachment-if-proof-of-quid-pro-quo-emerges/
You kidding me? His Chief of Staff stood behind a podium and said it WAS Quid Pro Quo.....but you still need more. Mulvaney says we do it all the time. But you still want more?
Naw...you are giving up you golf butt buddy....you are blowing smoke Lindsey.....
Trump froze aid and used it as leverage to try and get Ukraine to open two investigations, both of which appear to be for political purposes