Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
- May 3, 2011
- 102,224
- 36,253
That claim can’t be made because there isn’t enough resolution to make that comparison. Temps went up and down during the cycles. To say that they never rose or fell at this rate cannot be determined.How are you defining "resolution"?That claim can’t be made because there isn’t enough resolution to make that comparison. Temps went up and down during the cycles. To say that they never rose or fell at this rate cannot be determined.
Global Warming
"Models predict that Earth will warm between 2 and 6 degrees Celsius in the next century. When global warming has happened at various times in the past two million years, it has taken the planet about 5,000 years to warm 5 degrees. The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster. This rate of change is extremely unusual."
![]()
"Temperature histories from paleoclimate data (green line) compared to the history based on modern instruments (blue line) suggest that global temperature is warmer now than it has been in the past 1,000 years, and possibly longer. (Graph adapted from Mann et al., 2008.)"
The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster.
It could be 200 times faster!!!
Makes you wonder why these warmist twats are still anti-nuclear...….Obviously, they are better at the math of global warming than you areIt could be 200 times faster!!!
Makes you wonder why these warmist twats are still anti-nuclear...….
![]()
"The temperature at the center of a nuclear explosion depends on the yield of the weapon. Or whether the weapon is an atom bomb which relies on nuclear fission to detonate or a hydrogen bomb which uses both fusion and fission. Those are all factors that play a role in the temperature at the center of a nuke but the temperature at the core of the explosion is always between 50 and 150 million degrees Fahrenheit."
How hot is a nuclear explosion? - Introversion
If you think nuclear power involves 50 million degree explosions, you may be as dumb as Greta.If you think nuclear proliferation is another Chinese hoax, you're at least as stupid as your heroIf you think nuclear power involves 50 million degree explosions, you may be as dumb as Greta.
![]()
Too much MAGA?
We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!