Greta Thunberg Meets With Barack Obama To Talk Climate Fear

[The Purge]

SURPRISE! The Official Escort for 16-Year-Old Global Warming ‘Expert’ Greta Thunberg Is a Leftist Hack Funded by George Soros Org.

16-year-old Greta Thunberg traveled by boat to the US from Sweden to lecture Americans on Global Warming.

The 16-year-old is an expert we are told.

Greta Thunberg told Americans, “You’re not trying hard enough!” Evidently Greta wants us to travel by boats to and from Europe.

Greta is a media-created phenomenon. What the media does not tell you is who is behind this perky kid.

If you check out her photos young Greta is being escorted around the country by her handler – far left activist Luisa-Marie Neubauer.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...

 

[mudwhistle]

How many Industrial Revolutions have followed previous ice ages, Einstein?

"Earth has experienced climate change in the past without help from humanity. We know about past climates because of evidence left in tree rings, layers of ice in glaciers, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks...."

"Using this ancient evidence, scientists have built a record of Earth’s past climates, or 'paleoclimates.'

"The paleoclimate record combined with global models shows past ice ages as well as periods even warmer than today.

"But the paleoclimate record also reveals that the current climatic warming is occurring much more rapidly than past warming events.

"As the Earth moved out of ice ages over the past million years, the global temperature rose a total of 4 to 7 degrees Celsius over about 5,000 years. In the past century alone, the temperature has climbed 0.7 degrees Celsius, roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming."

Global Warming

Let me ask it this way. Why did we exit each interglacial cycle and why did we enter each glacial cycle?

It is irrelevant.

It is rising now due to man made emissions.

T

Of course it is relevant. It is literally a climate change.

If CO2 was at 400 ppm and we entered an ice age it is relevant.

Oh....so CO2 doesn't cause warming....you claim it causes cooling now.

Not sure how you made that leap in logic.

Throughout earth’s history CO2 has reinforced climate change. It hasn’t driven climate change.

Actually CO2 minimizes climate change.
It's part of a cycle needed for life on Earth.... along with ozone and water vapor

 

[georgephillip]

How are you defining "resolution"?

Global Warming

"Models predict that Earth will warm between 2 and 6 degrees Celsius in the next century. When global warming has happened at various times in the past two million years, it has taken the planet about 5,000 years to warm 5 degrees. The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster. This rate of change is extremely unusual."

"Temperature histories from paleoclimate data (green line) compared to the history based on modern instruments (blue line) suggest that global temperature is warmer now than it has been in the past 1,000 years, and possibly longer. (Graph adapted from Mann et al., 2008.)"

The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster.

It could be 200 times faster!!!

Makes you wonder why these warmist twats are still anti-nuclear...….

It could be 200 times faster!!!

Makes you wonder why these warmist twats are still anti-nuclear...….

Obviously, they are better at the math of global warming than you are

"The temperature at the center of a nuclear explosion depends on the yield of the weapon. Or whether the weapon is an atom bomb which relies on nuclear fission to detonate or a hydrogen bomb which uses both fusion and fission. Those are all factors that play a role in the temperature at the center of a nuke but the temperature at the core of the explosion is always between 50 and 150 million degrees Fahrenheit."

How hot is a nuclear explosion? - Introversion

If you think nuclear power involves 50 million degree explosions, you may be as dumb as Greta.

If you think nuclear power involves 50 million degree explosions, you may be as dumb as Greta.

If you think nuclear proliferation is another Chinese hoax, you're at least as stupid as your hero

Too much MAGA?

We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!

We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!

If nuclear energy is "reliable", why does it require government subsidies to remain economically viable?

Debunking the 14 myths about why we should go nuclear

"Subsidies that bail out uncompetitive nuclear power plants cost ratepayers and distort wholesale electricity markets. Thorough and independent analysis of subsidy streams probably would find that nuclear and fossil-fueled generators receive more subsidies than renewables. Indeed, the subsidies relevant to current power-market prices appear to be generally larger and more durable (PDF) for fossil-fueled and nuclear plants than for modern renewables. New, long-term state subsidies to distressed nuclear plants already total around $10-plus billion and threaten to go far higher. Nuclear operators’ insistence on locking in decade-plus subsidies harms market flexibility, innovation and competition. It rejects and defeats the whole purpose of having wholesale power markets."

 

[georgephillip]

What explains the increase in the rate of global warming since the Industrial Revolution?

Global Warming

"As the Earth moved out of ice ages over the past million years, the global temperature rose a total of 4 to 7 degrees Celsius over about 5,000 years. In the past century alone, the temperature has climbed 0.7 degrees Celsius, roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming."

"Temperature histories from paleoclimate data (green line) compared to the history based on modern instruments (blue line) suggest that global temperature is warmer now than it has been in the past 1,000 years, and possibly longer. (Graph adapted from Mann et al., 2008.)"

Hey dumbass, we’ve had many ice ages followed up by slow warming. Then suddenly there is a huge spike in warming, it accelerates. Then after a hot period comes a new ice age. This has all happened before, and will happen again.

Hey dumbass, we’ve had many ice ages followed up by slow warming. Then suddenly there is a huge spike in warming, it accelerates. Then after a hot period comes a new ice age. This has all happened before, and will happen again.

How many Industrial Revolutions have followed previous ice ages, Einstein?

"Earth has experienced climate change in the past without help from humanity. We know about past climates because of evidence left in tree rings, layers of ice in glaciers, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks...."

"Using this ancient evidence, scientists have built a record of Earth’s past climates, or 'paleoclimates.'

"The paleoclimate record combined with global models shows past ice ages as well as periods even warmer than today.

"But the paleoclimate record also reveals that the current climatic warming is occurring much more rapidly than past warming events.

"As the Earth moved out of ice ages over the past million years, the global temperature rose a total of 4 to 7 degrees Celsius over about 5,000 years. In the past century alone, the temperature has climbed 0.7 degrees Celsius, roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming."

Global Warming

Did you not look at your own graph? It clearly shows how it warmed up very quickly then goes into the next ice age. Who cares if it’s happening any more quickly? There is no evidence that it would adversely affect the next ice age. You’re just fear mongering so people will be inclined to support your idiotic political Agenda.

Did you not look at your own graph? It clearly shows how it warmed up very quickly then goes into the next ice age. Who cares if it’s happening any more quickly? There is no evidence that it would adversely affect the next ice age. You’re just fear mongering so people will be inclined to support your idiotic political Agenda.

Over the past two million years, it has taken the planet about 5000 years to warm 5 degrees. How does that rate of warming compare to the last two hundred years?

1700 years of Temperature from Proxy Data | GlobalChange.gov

Your graph goes back 1700 years....not 2 million. You might want to get your lies in order.

Your graph goes back 1700 years....not 2 million. You might want to get your lies in order.

When did the Industrial Revolution begin?

Changes since the Industrial Revolution - American Chemical Society

 

[georgephillip]

"What is Global Warming?

"Global warming is the unusually rapid increase in Earth’s average surface temperature over the past century primarily due to the greenhouse gases released as people burn fossil fuels.

"The global average surface temperature rose 0.6 to 0.9 degrees Celsius (1.1 to 1.6° F) between 1906 and 2005, and the rate of temperature increase has nearly doubled in the last 50 years. Temperatures are certain to go up further."

Global Warming

Global warming is the unusually rapid increase in Earth’s average surface temperature over the past century

Unusually rapid compared to what?

Global warming is the unusually rapid increase in Earth’s average surface temperature over the past century

Unusually rapid compared to what?

Pre-Industrial Revolution global temperature rises.

"Despite ups and downs from year to year, global average surface temperature is rising. By the beginning of the 21st century, Earth’s temperature was roughly 0.5 degrees Celsius above the long-term (1951–1980) average. (NASA figure adapted from Goddard Institute for Space Studies Surface Temperature Analysis.)"

Global Warming

Ten thousand years ago was much warmer than it is now. If you go further, Antarctica was ice free during the Cretaceous Period, for millions of years. Don't tell me, dinosaurs industrial revolution cause temperature to rise and run them into extinction, and we don't want to make the same mistake.

Ten thousand years ago was much warmer than it is now. If you go further, Antarctica was ice free during the Cretaceous Period, for millions of years. Don't tell me, dinosaurs industrial revolution cause temperature to rise and run them into extinction, and we don't want to make the same mistake

The Cretaceous Period occurred 66 million to 145 million years ago while anatomically modern humans rose in Africa about 300,000 years ago and reached behavioral modernity about 50,000 years ago. If you're a human being under 30 years old today, you have never experienced a year in which the average surface temperature of the earth was below average.
History of the world - Wikipedia

"Each month, the US National Climatic Data Center calculates Earth’s average surface temperature using temperature measurements that cover the Earth’s surface.

"Then, another average is calculated for each month of the year for the twentieth century, 1901-2000.

"For each month, this gives one number representative of the entire century.

"Subtract this overall 1900s monthly average – which for February is 53.9F (12.1C) – from each individual month’s temperature and you’ve got the anomaly: that is, the difference from the average.

"The last month that was at or below that 1900s average was February 1985.

"Ronald Reagan had just started his second presidential term and Foreigner had the number one single with 'I want to know what love is.'"

Let’s Call It: 30 Years Of Above Average Temperatures Means The Climate Has Changed

By that logic it started 22,000 years ago.

By that logic it started 22,000 years ago.

Changes since the Industrial Revolution - American Chemical Society

"Data for the past 2000 years show that the atmospheric concentrations of CO2, CH4, and N2O – three important long-lived greenhouse gases – have increased substantially since about 1750.

"Rates of increase in levels of these gases are dramatic.

"CO2, for instance, never increased more than 30 ppm during any previous 1,000-year period in this record but has already risen by 30 ppm in the past two decades.

"These increases in greenhouse gas concentrations and their marked rate of change are largely attributable to human activities since the Industrial Revolution (1800)."

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster.

It could be 200 times faster!!!

Makes you wonder why these warmist twats are still anti-nuclear...….

It could be 200 times faster!!!

Makes you wonder why these warmist twats are still anti-nuclear...….

Obviously, they are better at the math of global warming than you are

"The temperature at the center of a nuclear explosion depends on the yield of the weapon. Or whether the weapon is an atom bomb which relies on nuclear fission to detonate or a hydrogen bomb which uses both fusion and fission. Those are all factors that play a role in the temperature at the center of a nuke but the temperature at the core of the explosion is always between 50 and 150 million degrees Fahrenheit."

How hot is a nuclear explosion? - Introversion

If you think nuclear power involves 50 million degree explosions, you may be as dumb as Greta.

If you think nuclear power involves 50 million degree explosions, you may be as dumb as Greta.

If you think nuclear proliferation is another Chinese hoax, you're at least as stupid as your hero

Too much MAGA?

We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!

We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!

If nuclear energy is "reliable", why does it require government subsidies to remain economically viable?

Debunking the 14 myths about why we should go nuclear

"Subsidies that bail out uncompetitive nuclear power plants cost ratepayers and distort wholesale electricity markets. Thorough and independent analysis of subsidy streams probably would find that nuclear and fossil-fueled generators receive more subsidies than renewables. Indeed, the subsidies relevant to current power-market prices appear to be generally larger and more durable (PDF) for fossil-fueled and nuclear plants than for modern renewables. New, long-term state subsidies to distressed nuclear plants already total around $10-plus billion and threaten to go far higher. Nuclear operators’ insistence on locking in decade-plus subsidies harms market flexibility, innovation and competition. It rejects and defeats the whole purpose of having wholesale power markets."

If nuclear energy is "reliable",

Reliable; that means it's available, even if the wind slows or a cloud covers the Sun.

why does it require government subsidies to remain economically viable?

CO2 is gonna end the world in 12 years, but we should worry about subsidies?

Thorough and independent analysis of subsidy streams probably would find that nuclear and fossil-fueled generators receive more subsidies than renewables.

Probably? I love these hilarious claims.

 

[The Purge]

IMDB.Com ^ | 09/25/2019 |

Granted, most of her credits are from 2019. But you should know that this girl comes from a whole family of actors

 

[TNHarley]

Why do conservatives feel the need to attack a little girl?

Yea the left doesnt insult children, do they?
If you had any self awareness you would have committed suicide long ago.

 

[RealDave]

Let me ask it this way. Why did we exit each interglacial cycle and why did we enter each glacial cycle?

It is irrelevant.

It is rising now due to man made emissions.

T

Of course it is relevant. It is literally a climate change.

If CO2 was at 400 ppm and we entered an ice age it is relevant.

Oh....so CO2 doesn't cause warming....you claim it causes cooling now.

Not sure how you made that leap in logic.

Throughout earth’s history CO2 has reinforced climate change. It hasn’t driven climate change.

Actually CO2 minimizes climate change.
It's part of a cycle needed for life on Earth.... along with ozone and water vapor

Dumbass.

Water is part of life. Here is a cement block, hold onto this & jump in the lake.

Any advantage higher CO2 might give to plant growth would be eliminated by the effects of higher temperatures . Plants grown in higher CO2 environmental tend to be less nutritious.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is irrelevant.

It is rising now due to man made emissions.

T

Of course it is relevant. It is literally a climate change.

If CO2 was at 400 ppm and we entered an ice age it is relevant.

Oh....so CO2 doesn't cause warming....you claim it causes cooling now.

Not sure how you made that leap in logic.

Throughout earth’s history CO2 has reinforced climate change. It hasn’t driven climate change.

Actually CO2 minimizes climate change.
It's part of a cycle needed for life on Earth.... along with ozone and water vapor

Dumbass.

Water is part of life. Here is a cement block, hold onto this & jump in the lake.

Any advantage higher CO2 might give to plant growth would be eliminated by the effects of higher temperatures . Plants grown in higher CO2 environmental tend to be less nutritious.

Plants grown in higher CO2 environmental tend to be less nutritious.

Yeah, that's why all the animals starved to death when CO2 was 1000 PPM.

DURR.

 

[mudwhistle]

Global warming is the unusually rapid increase in Earth’s average surface temperature over the past century

Unusually rapid compared to what?

Global warming is the unusually rapid increase in Earth’s average surface temperature over the past century

Unusually rapid compared to what?

Pre-Industrial Revolution global temperature rises.

"Despite ups and downs from year to year, global average surface temperature is rising. By the beginning of the 21st century, Earth’s temperature was roughly 0.5 degrees Celsius above the long-term (1951–1980) average. (NASA figure adapted from Goddard Institute for Space Studies Surface Temperature Analysis.)"

Global Warming

Ten thousand years ago was much warmer than it is now. If you go further, Antarctica was ice free during the Cretaceous Period, for millions of years. Don't tell me, dinosaurs industrial revolution cause temperature to rise and run them into extinction, and we don't want to make the same mistake.

Ten thousand years ago was much warmer than it is now. If you go further, Antarctica was ice free during the Cretaceous Period, for millions of years. Don't tell me, dinosaurs industrial revolution cause temperature to rise and run them into extinction, and we don't want to make the same mistake

The Cretaceous Period occurred 66 million to 145 million years ago while anatomically modern humans rose in Africa about 300,000 years ago and reached behavioral modernity about 50,000 years ago. If you're a human being under 30 years old today, you have never experienced a year in which the average surface temperature of the earth was below average.
History of the world - Wikipedia

"Each month, the US National Climatic Data Center calculates Earth’s average surface temperature using temperature measurements that cover the Earth’s surface.

"Then, another average is calculated for each month of the year for the twentieth century, 1901-2000.

"For each month, this gives one number representative of the entire century.

"Subtract this overall 1900s monthly average – which for February is 53.9F (12.1C) – from each individual month’s temperature and you’ve got the anomaly: that is, the difference from the average.

"The last month that was at or below that 1900s average was February 1985.

"Ronald Reagan had just started his second presidential term and Foreigner had the number one single with 'I want to know what love is.'"

Let’s Call It: 30 Years Of Above Average Temperatures Means The Climate Has Changed

By that logic it started 22,000 years ago.

By that logic it started 22,000 years ago.

Changes since the Industrial Revolution - American Chemical Society

"Data for the past 2000 years show that the atmospheric concentrations of CO2, CH4, and N2O – three important long-lived greenhouse gases – have increased substantially since about 1750.

"Rates of increase in levels of these gases are dramatic.

"CO2, for instance, never increased more than 30 ppm during any previous 1,000-year period in this record but has already risen by 30 ppm in the past two decades.

"These increases in greenhouse gas concentrations and their marked rate of change are largely attributable to human activities since the Industrial Revolution (1800)."

Yet why is it the worst polluters get a pass?
China and India.

 

[RealDave]

Obviously, they are better at the math of global warming than you are

"The temperature at the center of a nuclear explosion depends on the yield of the weapon. Or whether the weapon is an atom bomb which relies on nuclear fission to detonate or a hydrogen bomb which uses both fusion and fission. Those are all factors that play a role in the temperature at the center of a nuke but the temperature at the core of the explosion is always between 50 and 150 million degrees Fahrenheit."

How hot is a nuclear explosion? - Introversion

If you think nuclear power involves 50 million degree explosions, you may be as dumb as Greta.

If you think nuclear power involves 50 million degree explosions, you may be as dumb as Greta.

If you think nuclear proliferation is another Chinese hoax, you're at least as stupid as your hero

Too much MAGA?

We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!

We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!

If nuclear energy is "reliable", why does it require government subsidies to remain economically viable?

Debunking the 14 myths about why we should go nuclear

"Subsidies that bail out uncompetitive nuclear power plants cost ratepayers and distort wholesale electricity markets. Thorough and independent analysis of subsidy streams probably would find that nuclear and fossil-fueled generators receive more subsidies than renewables. Indeed, the subsidies relevant to current power-market prices appear to be generally larger and more durable (PDF) for fossil-fueled and nuclear plants than for modern renewables. New, long-term state subsidies to distressed nuclear plants already total around $10-plus billion and threaten to go far higher. Nuclear operators’ insistence on locking in decade-plus subsidies harms market flexibility, innovation and competition. It rejects and defeats the whole purpose of having wholesale power markets."

If nuclear energy is "reliable",

Reliable; that means it's available, even if the wind slows or a cloud covers the Sun.

why does it require government subsidies to remain economically viable?

CO2 is gonna end the world in 12 years, but we should worry about subsidies?

Thorough and independent analysis of subsidy streams probably would find that nuclear and fossil-fueled generators receive more subsidies than renewables.

Probably? I love these hilarious claims.

Still lying about the world ending in twelve years.

A windmill blowing up is no big deal, a failing nuclear reactor is.

When that windmill has lived its useful life, it can be dismantled & recycled.

The Three Mile Island Plant shut down last week. It will take 50 years & a billion dollars to make it "safe".

There are 15 reactors along the New Madrid fault line of the same design as Fukushima.

 

[RealDave]

Pre-Industrial Revolution global temperature rises.

"Despite ups and downs from year to year, global average surface temperature is rising. By the beginning of the 21st century, Earth’s temperature was roughly 0.5 degrees Celsius above the long-term (1951–1980) average. (NASA figure adapted from Goddard Institute for Space Studies Surface Temperature Analysis.)"

Global Warming

Ten thousand years ago was much warmer than it is now. If you go further, Antarctica was ice free during the Cretaceous Period, for millions of years. Don't tell me, dinosaurs industrial revolution cause temperature to rise and run them into extinction, and we don't want to make the same mistake.

Ten thousand years ago was much warmer than it is now. If you go further, Antarctica was ice free during the Cretaceous Period, for millions of years. Don't tell me, dinosaurs industrial revolution cause temperature to rise and run them into extinction, and we don't want to make the same mistake

The Cretaceous Period occurred 66 million to 145 million years ago while anatomically modern humans rose in Africa about 300,000 years ago and reached behavioral modernity about 50,000 years ago. If you're a human being under 30 years old today, you have never experienced a year in which the average surface temperature of the earth was below average.
History of the world - Wikipedia

"Each month, the US National Climatic Data Center calculates Earth’s average surface temperature using temperature measurements that cover the Earth’s surface.

"Then, another average is calculated for each month of the year for the twentieth century, 1901-2000.

"For each month, this gives one number representative of the entire century.

"Subtract this overall 1900s monthly average – which for February is 53.9F (12.1C) – from each individual month’s temperature and you’ve got the anomaly: that is, the difference from the average.

"The last month that was at or below that 1900s average was February 1985.

"Ronald Reagan had just started his second presidential term and Foreigner had the number one single with 'I want to know what love is.'"

Let’s Call It: 30 Years Of Above Average Temperatures Means The Climate Has Changed

By that logic it started 22,000 years ago.

By that logic it started 22,000 years ago.

Changes since the Industrial Revolution - American Chemical Society

"Data for the past 2000 years show that the atmospheric concentrations of CO2, CH4, and N2O – three important long-lived greenhouse gases – have increased substantially since about 1750.

"Rates of increase in levels of these gases are dramatic.

"CO2, for instance, never increased more than 30 ppm during any previous 1,000-year period in this record but has already risen by 30 ppm in the past two decades.

"These increases in greenhouse gas concentrations and their marked rate of change are largely attributable to human activities since the Industrial Revolution (1800)."

Yet why is it the worst polluters get a pass?
China and India.

They are developing countries where they are still working on providing utilities to all their citizens. Even with efforts being made to use less emitting generation could increase their overall emissions because of expansion.

Look at the per capita greenhouse gas emissions sometimes & maybe you won't be such an ass. We are we are with CO2 because of the US & Europe.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If you think nuclear power involves 50 million degree explosions, you may be as dumb as Greta.

If you think nuclear power involves 50 million degree explosions, you may be as dumb as Greta.

If you think nuclear proliferation is another Chinese hoax, you're at least as stupid as your hero

Too much MAGA?

We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!

We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!

If nuclear energy is "reliable", why does it require government subsidies to remain economically viable?

Debunking the 14 myths about why we should go nuclear

"Subsidies that bail out uncompetitive nuclear power plants cost ratepayers and distort wholesale electricity markets. Thorough and independent analysis of subsidy streams probably would find that nuclear and fossil-fueled generators receive more subsidies than renewables. Indeed, the subsidies relevant to current power-market prices appear to be generally larger and more durable (PDF) for fossil-fueled and nuclear plants than for modern renewables. New, long-term state subsidies to distressed nuclear plants already total around $10-plus billion and threaten to go far higher. Nuclear operators’ insistence on locking in decade-plus subsidies harms market flexibility, innovation and competition. It rejects and defeats the whole purpose of having wholesale power markets."

If nuclear energy is "reliable",

Reliable; that means it's available, even if the wind slows or a cloud covers the Sun.

why does it require government subsidies to remain economically viable?

CO2 is gonna end the world in 12 years, but we should worry about subsidies?

Thorough and independent analysis of subsidy streams probably would find that nuclear and fossil-fueled generators receive more subsidies than renewables.

Probably? I love these hilarious claims.

Still lying about the world ending in twelve years.

A windmill blowing up is no big deal, a failing nuclear reactor is.

When that windmill has lived its useful life, it can be dismantled & recycled.

The Three Mile Island Plant shut down last week. It will take 50 years & a billion dollars to make it "safe".

There are 15 reactors along the New Madrid fault line of the same design as Fukushima.

Still lying about the world ending in twelve years.

Was AOC wrong? Lying?

A windmill blowing up is no big deal, a failing nuclear reactor is.

How many people have died in the US due to civilian nuke plants?

The Three Mile Island Plant shut down last week. It will take 50 years & a billion dollars to make it "safe".

And?

There are 15 reactors along the New Madrid fault line of the same design as Fukushima.

Worried about a tsunami along the New Madrid?
Are their backup generators on the first floor?

 

[RealDave]

Of course it is relevant. It is literally a climate change.

If CO2 was at 400 ppm and we entered an ice age it is relevant.

Oh....so CO2 doesn't cause warming....you claim it causes cooling now.

Not sure how you made that leap in logic.

Throughout earth’s history CO2 has reinforced climate change. It hasn’t driven climate change.

Actually CO2 minimizes climate change.
It's part of a cycle needed for life on Earth.... along with ozone and water vapor

Dumbass.

Water is part of life. Here is a cement block, hold onto this & jump in the lake.

Any advantage higher CO2 might give to plant growth would be eliminated by the effects of higher temperatures . Plants grown in higher CO2 environmental tend to be less nutritious.

Plants grown in higher CO2 environmental tend to be less nutritious.

Yeah, that's why all the animals starved to death when CO2 was 1000 PPM.

DURR.

Were they farmers trying to feed the world. Or did they have ample food supplies.

Midwest farmers can expect to lose yield due to higher CO2 and then couple that with less nutrition. From where will thosr losses be recovered?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Ten thousand years ago was much warmer than it is now. If you go further, Antarctica was ice free during the Cretaceous Period, for millions of years. Don't tell me, dinosaurs industrial revolution cause temperature to rise and run them into extinction, and we don't want to make the same mistake.

Ten thousand years ago was much warmer than it is now. If you go further, Antarctica was ice free during the Cretaceous Period, for millions of years. Don't tell me, dinosaurs industrial revolution cause temperature to rise and run them into extinction, and we don't want to make the same mistake

The Cretaceous Period occurred 66 million to 145 million years ago while anatomically modern humans rose in Africa about 300,000 years ago and reached behavioral modernity about 50,000 years ago. If you're a human being under 30 years old today, you have never experienced a year in which the average surface temperature of the earth was below average.
History of the world - Wikipedia

"Each month, the US National Climatic Data Center calculates Earth’s average surface temperature using temperature measurements that cover the Earth’s surface.

"Then, another average is calculated for each month of the year for the twentieth century, 1901-2000.

"For each month, this gives one number representative of the entire century.

"Subtract this overall 1900s monthly average – which for February is 53.9F (12.1C) – from each individual month’s temperature and you’ve got the anomaly: that is, the difference from the average.

"The last month that was at or below that 1900s average was February 1985.

"Ronald Reagan had just started his second presidential term and Foreigner had the number one single with 'I want to know what love is.'"

Let’s Call It: 30 Years Of Above Average Temperatures Means The Climate Has Changed

By that logic it started 22,000 years ago.

By that logic it started 22,000 years ago.

Changes since the Industrial Revolution - American Chemical Society

"Data for the past 2000 years show that the atmospheric concentrations of CO2, CH4, and N2O – three important long-lived greenhouse gases – have increased substantially since about 1750.

"Rates of increase in levels of these gases are dramatic.

"CO2, for instance, never increased more than 30 ppm during any previous 1,000-year period in this record but has already risen by 30 ppm in the past two decades.

"These increases in greenhouse gas concentrations and their marked rate of change are largely attributable to human activities since the Industrial Revolution (1800)."

Yet why is it the worst polluters get a pass?
China and India.

They are developing countries where they are still working on providing utilities to all their citizens. Even with efforts being made to use less emitting generation could increase their overall emissions because of expansion.

Look at the per capita greenhouse gas emissions sometimes & maybe you won't be such an ass. We are we are with CO2 because of the US & Europe.

Look at the per capita greenhouse gas emissions

Exactly. The best way to reduce US emissions of CO2 would be to boot 20 million illegal aliens.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Oh....so CO2 doesn't cause warming....you claim it causes cooling now.

Not sure how you made that leap in logic.

Throughout earth’s history CO2 has reinforced climate change. It hasn’t driven climate change.

Actually CO2 minimizes climate change.
It's part of a cycle needed for life on Earth.... along with ozone and water vapor

Dumbass.

Water is part of life. Here is a cement block, hold onto this & jump in the lake.

Any advantage higher CO2 might give to plant growth would be eliminated by the effects of higher temperatures . Plants grown in higher CO2 environmental tend to be less nutritious.

Plants grown in higher CO2 environmental tend to be less nutritious.

Yeah, that's why all the animals starved to death when CO2 was 1000 PPM.

DURR.

Were they farmers trying to feed the world. Or did they have ample food supplies.

Midwest farmers can expect to lose yield due to higher CO2 and then couple that with less nutrition. From where will thosr losses be recovered?

 

[Pilot1]

I hope Bagger Vance gave her some golf tips.

 

[RealDave]

If you think nuclear proliferation is another Chinese hoax, you're at least as stupid as your hero

Too much MAGA?

We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!

We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!

If nuclear energy is "reliable", why does it require government subsidies to remain economically viable?

Debunking the 14 myths about why we should go nuclear

"Subsidies that bail out uncompetitive nuclear power plants cost ratepayers and distort wholesale electricity markets. Thorough and independent analysis of subsidy streams probably would find that nuclear and fossil-fueled generators receive more subsidies than renewables. Indeed, the subsidies relevant to current power-market prices appear to be generally larger and more durable (PDF) for fossil-fueled and nuclear plants than for modern renewables. New, long-term state subsidies to distressed nuclear plants already total around $10-plus billion and threaten to go far higher. Nuclear operators’ insistence on locking in decade-plus subsidies harms market flexibility, innovation and competition. It rejects and defeats the whole purpose of having wholesale power markets."

If nuclear energy is "reliable",

Reliable; that means it's available, even if the wind slows or a cloud covers the Sun.

why does it require government subsidies to remain economically viable?

CO2 is gonna end the world in 12 years, but we should worry about subsidies?

Thorough and independent analysis of subsidy streams probably would find that nuclear and fossil-fueled generators receive more subsidies than renewables.

Probably? I love these hilarious claims.

Still lying about the world ending in twelve years.

A windmill blowing up is no big deal, a failing nuclear reactor is.

When that windmill has lived its useful life, it can be dismantled & recycled.

The Three Mile Island Plant shut down last week. It will take 50 years & a billion dollars to make it "safe".

There are 15 reactors along the New Madrid fault line of the same design as Fukushima.

Still lying about the world ending in twelve years.

Was AOC wrong? Lying?

A windmill blowing up is no big deal, a failing nuclear reactor is.

How many people have died in the US due to civilian nuke plants?

The Three Mile Island Plant shut down last week. It will take 50 years & a billion dollars to make it "safe".

And?

There are 15 reactors along the New Madrid fault line of the same design as Fukushima.

Worried about a tsunami along the New Madrid?
Are their backup generators on the first floor?

AOC said we need to act within 12 years. Why are you people too fucking stupid top get that? Are you all retarted in some eway? Did Trump make you this dumb?


Three Mile Island. Infant death rate increased 28% in the year after.

Figure those costs into your "cheap" nuclear power argument.

Who is so fucking stupid to build nuclear reactors on fault lines? These are "designed" to be safe for the expected worse earthquakes. Like Fukushima was design to withstand anything including a tsunami. Like Deepwater Horizon well was design to stop any blow out.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!

We need windmills, instead of reliable nuclear energy, because of proliferation? LOL!

If nuclear energy is "reliable", why does it require government subsidies to remain economically viable?

Debunking the 14 myths about why we should go nuclear

"Subsidies that bail out uncompetitive nuclear power plants cost ratepayers and distort wholesale electricity markets. Thorough and independent analysis of subsidy streams probably would find that nuclear and fossil-fueled generators receive more subsidies than renewables. Indeed, the subsidies relevant to current power-market prices appear to be generally larger and more durable (PDF) for fossil-fueled and nuclear plants than for modern renewables. New, long-term state subsidies to distressed nuclear plants already total around $10-plus billion and threaten to go far higher. Nuclear operators’ insistence on locking in decade-plus subsidies harms market flexibility, innovation and competition. It rejects and defeats the whole purpose of having wholesale power markets."

If nuclear energy is "reliable",

Reliable; that means it's available, even if the wind slows or a cloud covers the Sun.

why does it require government subsidies to remain economically viable?

CO2 is gonna end the world in 12 years, but we should worry about subsidies?

Thorough and independent analysis of subsidy streams probably would find that nuclear and fossil-fueled generators receive more subsidies than renewables.

Probably? I love these hilarious claims.

Still lying about the world ending in twelve years.

A windmill blowing up is no big deal, a failing nuclear reactor is.

When that windmill has lived its useful life, it can be dismantled & recycled.

The Three Mile Island Plant shut down last week. It will take 50 years & a billion dollars to make it "safe".

There are 15 reactors along the New Madrid fault line of the same design as Fukushima.

Still lying about the world ending in twelve years.

Was AOC wrong? Lying?

A windmill blowing up is no big deal, a failing nuclear reactor is.

How many people have died in the US due to civilian nuke plants?

The Three Mile Island Plant shut down last week. It will take 50 years & a billion dollars to make it "safe".

And?

There are 15 reactors along the New Madrid fault line of the same design as Fukushima.

Worried about a tsunami along the New Madrid?
Are their backup generators on the first floor?

AOC said we need to act within 12 years. Why are you people too fucking stupid top get that? Are you all retarted in some eway? Did Trump make you this dumb?


Three Mile Island. Infant death rate increased 28% in the year after.

Figure those costs into your "cheap" nuclear power argument.

Who is so fucking stupid to build nuclear reactors on fault lines? These are "designed" to be safe for the expected worse earthquakes. Like Fukushima was design to withstand anything including a tsunami. Like Deepwater Horizon well was design to stop any blow out.

AOC said we need to act within 12 years.

Because we haven't been acting? DURR

Three Mile Island. Infant death rate increased 28% in the year after.

Bull shit.

Like Fukushima was design to withstand anything including a tsunami.

It did. If their backup generators weren't on the first floor, they wouldn't have flooded.
Would have kept the cores cooled.