Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Grieving parents and a majority of have asked and demanded the President and the Congress act on gun regulations
fact
How they act and if it is ruled constitutional will decide who is wrong, but the fanatical fringe has done nothing but launch viscous personal attacks for cheap political gains and for weird ideas about the 2nd.
Grieving parents and a majority of have asked and demanded the President and the Congress act on gun regulations
fact
How they act and if it is ruled constitutional will decide who is wrong, but the fanatical fringe has done nothing but launch viscous personal attacks for cheap political gains and for weird ideas about the 2nd.
The facts are the Grieving Parents asked Obama and Congress to pass Gun Legislation
And that should be ignored just as if they were asking to have alcohol and cars banned because their child was killed by a drunk driver.
Spoken like a true ideologue.
...and had he been properly ferreted out, the shooting may not have happened. That is what I think Rubio is saying in wanting to concentrate on violence control rather than guns. Restricting sales of certain items the shooters may have used will not preclude the next mass shooting.It won't bring those kids back. and it won't prevent future such incidents.
It won't bring those kids back. And of course we can prevent some similar types of attacks with regulations. The Virgina Tech shooter had a mental health record. Thee state did not comply with existing regulation. Jesus, stop shilling for the NRA
You can support 2nd Amendment rights without marching in lock step with a lobbying group
Grieving parents and a majority of have asked and demanded the President and the Congress act on gun regulations
fact
How they act and if it is ruled constitutional will decide who is wrong, but the fanatical fringe has done nothing but launch viscous personal attacks for cheap political gains and for weird ideas about the 2nd.
Which idea is "weirder"??
That nearly 1 million unborn children can be killed every three years and the people doing are getting tax dollars or that the average citizen should have the right to defend themselves and their family?
You mean fetuses? You mean to have the government take over pregnancies? How about a fetus having their own lawyer and a right to own a gun?
BTW, I am still waiting for an example of the "personal attacks" on the families.
I haven't seen one yet.
I've seen a lot of people disagreeing with them.. but no personal attacks.
That is just another, IMHO, left wing lie being used to shut up the opposition.
Rubio is NOT Trying to say anything. He knows what he IS saying and is NOT saying....and had he been properly ferreted out, the shooting may not have happened. That is what I think Rubio is saying in wanting to concentrate on violence control rather than guns. Restricting sales of certain items the shooters may have used will not preclude the next mass shooting.It won't bring those kids back. and it won't prevent future such incidents.
It won't bring those kids back. And of course we can prevent some similar types of attacks with regulations. The Virgina Tech shooter had a mental health record. Thee state did not comply with existing regulation. Jesus, stop shilling for the NRA
You can support 2nd Amendment rights without marching in lock step with a lobbying group
Grieving parents and a majority of have asked and demanded the President and the Congress act on gun regulations
fact
How they act and if it is ruled constitutional will decide who is wrong, but the fanatical fringe has done nothing but launch viscous personal attacks for cheap political gains and for weird ideas about the 2nd.
You do realize you are describing Obama and many Dems right?
The facts are the Grieving Parents asked Obama and Congress to pass Gun Legislation
The ones he picked.
Some are for gun rights and the ability to protect their family.
I did not say he said 'gun violence'. If you are going to quote me, you need to learn how to do it without changing what I typed.Rubio is NOT Trying to say anything. He knows what he IS saying and is NOT saying....and had he been properly ferreted out, the shooting may not have happened. That is what I think Rubio is saying in wanting to concentrate on violence control rather than guns. Restricting sales of certain items the shooters may have used will not preclude the next mass shooting.It won't bring those kids back. And of course we can prevent some similar types of attacks with regulations. The Virgina Tech shooter had a mental health record. Thee state did not comply with existing regulation. Jesus, stop shilling for the NRA
You can support 2nd Amendment rights without marching in lock step with a lobbying group
Rubio has not said 'gun violence' so what you THINK is in error.
I did not say he said 'gun violence'. If you are going to quote me, you need to learn how to do it without changing what I typed.Rubio is NOT Trying to say anything. He knows what he IS saying and is NOT saying....and had he been properly ferreted out, the shooting may not have happened. That is what I think Rubio is saying in wanting to concentrate on violence control rather than guns. Restricting sales of certain items the shooters may have used will not preclude the next mass shooting.
Rubio has not said 'gun violence' so what you THINK is in error.
BTW, I am still waiting for an example of the "personal attacks" on the families.
I haven't seen one yet.
I've seen a lot of people disagreeing with them.. but no personal attacks.
That is just another, IMHO, left wing lie being used to shut up the opposition.
it's in this thread/....go search
http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...o-promote-gun-legislation-18.html#post7088214
The facts are the Grieving Parents asked Obama and Congress to pass Gun Legislation
And that should be ignored just as if they were asking to have alcohol and cars banned because their child was killed by a drunk driver.
Ignored? There you go. Ignore real people.
No one should be ignored, yet I believe no one should drive all legislation. There is the stark difference between a liberal like Dante and a right winger like Oshroo
The facts are the Grieving Parents asked Obama and Congress to pass Gun Legislation
The ones he picked.
Some are for gun rights and the ability to protect their family.
No one has seriously proposed outlawing the ability own a gun to protect a family, though a few recent examples will show that owning a gun is no guarantee of safety
Appeal to peoples emotions over reason and logic. Right out of Joseph Goebble's playbook. Nazi Germany would be proud.
Government buying up ammo, setting up camps, trying to take away your guns...
yeah, all emotional appeals based on myths and outright lies
...and had he been properly ferreted out, the shooting may not have happened. That is what I think Rubio is saying in wanting to concentrate on violence control rather than guns. Restricting sales of certain items the shooters may have used will not preclude the next mass shooting.It won't bring those kids back. and it won't prevent future such incidents.
It won't bring those kids back. And of course we can prevent some similar types of attacks with regulations. The Virgina Tech shooter had a mental health record. Thee state did not comply with existing regulation. Jesus, stop shilling for the NRA
You can support 2nd Amendment rights without marching in lock step with a lobbying group
