Guess what? God isnt playing with you retards about Man Made Climate Change, as again, the world isnt warming up.

[westwall]

No ... we just think you're retarded ... particularly your insistence that all scientists across all fields of study are well-informed about the climate system ... at a time when almost all climatologists claim we're just scratching the surface of our understanding of this ...

Drive two hours south and tell us why the weather there is catastrophic ... because that's all the change our great-great-geart-grandchildren will see ...

The climate scientists say AGW is happening and the rest of the scientific world is smart enough to trust their expertise.

But they can't show any empirical evidence for their claim. Only computer models that they create support them.

Computer models aren't data. Science illiterates don't seem to understand that.

 

[Anomalism]

But they can't show any empirical evidence for their claim. Only computer models that they create support them.

Computer models aren't data. Science illiterates don't seem to understand that.

You'd have to be a pretty dumb person to think a conspiracy like that would fly all over the world in science.

 

[westwall]

But they can't show any empirical evidence for their claim. Only computer models that they create support them.

Computer models aren't data. Science illiterates don't seem to understand that.

You'd have to be a pretty dumb person to think a conspiracy like that would fly all over the world in science.

Nah. It's pretty easy actually. All climate "problems" are solved by more government power.

Where have we heard that bullcrap before

 

[ReinyDays]

You'd have to be a pretty dumb person to think a conspiracy like that would fly all over the world in science.

Why are you speaking for all scientists over all subjects again? ... there's just a handful reading scripts into TV monitors for pay ... you go through the scientific literature and find us some empirical data ... it's pretty dumb thinking we know the exact temperature 50 years from now ...

It's pretty dumb looking at the unit volume value used in climate models and not start throwing handfuls of salt over your shoulder ... or do you even know what a unit volume is? ...

 

[ding]

This guy thinks all of the most informed scientists all over the planet are retarded.

No ... we just think you're retarded ... particularly your insistence that all scientists across all fields of study are well-informed about the climate system ... at a time when almost all climatologists claim we're just scratching the surface of our understanding of this ...

Drive two hours south and tell us why the weather there is catastrophic ... because that's all the change our great-great-geart-grandchildren will see ...

Unless she is south of the equator, right?

 

[ReinyDays]

Unless she is south of the equator, right?

Well ... no ... it always gets warmer the further you get from the Arctic ... all the way up the the edge of the disk we live on ... [rolls eyes] ... but thanks for the correction, this only works in the Northern Hemisphere ... if you live in the Southern Hemisphere, you'd have to travel 2 hours north to experience 100 years of global warming ... if in fact the Southern Hemisphere can experience global warming ... the so little land area within the temperature climate zone there it might make no difference at all ... 45ºS latitude crosses New Zealand and the southern tip of South America ... between there and 60ºS latitude, it's all open ocean ...

Oceanic climates aren't dependent on temperature ... it's strictly about the air/water interface ...

 

[Old Rocks]

No ... we just think you're retarded ... particularly your insistence that all scientists across all fields of study are well-informed about the climate system ... at a time when almost all climatologists claim we're just scratching the surface of our understanding of this ...

Drive two hours south and tell us why the weather there is catastrophic ... because that's all the change our great-great-geart-grandchildren will see ...

The climate scientists say AGW is happening and the rest of the scientific world is smart enough to trust their expertise.

But they can't show any empirical evidence for their claim. Only computer models that they create support them.

Computer models aren't data. Science illiterates don't seem to understand that.

What a liar you continue to be. Here is plenty of evidence of the warming;

 

[Old Rocks]

You'd have to be a pretty dumb person to think a conspiracy like that would fly all over the world in science.

Why are you speaking for all scientists over all subjects again? ... there's just a handful reading scripts into TV monitors for pay ... you go through the scientific literature and find us some empirical data ... it's pretty dumb thinking we know the exact temperature 50 years from now ...

It's pretty dumb looking at the unit volume value used in climate models and not start throwing handfuls of salt over your shoulder ... or do you even know what a unit volume is? ...

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University have policy statement that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Two of the Scientific Societies that deal with ice and climate directly, American Geophysical Union, and the Geological Society of America both have statements that AGW is real and already strongly affecting us.

 

[Sunsettommy]

You'd have to be a pretty dumb person to think a conspiracy like that would fly all over the world in science.

Why are you speaking for all scientists over all subjects again? ... there's just a handful reading scripts into TV monitors for pay ... you go through the scientific literature and find us some empirical data ... it's pretty dumb thinking we know the exact temperature 50 years from now ...

It's pretty dumb looking at the unit volume value used in climate models and not start throwing handfuls of salt over your shoulder ... or do you even know what a unit volume is? ...

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University have policy statement that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Two of the Scientific Societies that deal with ice and climate directly, American Geophysical Union, and the Geological Society of America both have statements that AGW is real and already strongly affecting us.

The Liberal Consensus fallacy argument never seems to go out of style, it is always a sign of science illiteracy since real scientists knows it is REPRODUCIBLE research is what matters.

 

[ReinyDays]

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University have policy statement that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Two of the Scientific Societies that deal with ice and climate directly, American Geophysical Union, and the Geological Society of America both have statements that AGW is real and already strongly affecting us.

Liar ...

 

[westwall]

No ... we just think you're retarded ... particularly your insistence that all scientists across all fields of study are well-informed about the climate system ... at a time when almost all climatologists claim we're just scratching the surface of our understanding of this ...

Drive two hours south and tell us why the weather there is catastrophic ... because that's all the change our great-great-geart-grandchildren will see ...

The climate scientists say AGW is happening and the rest of the scientific world is smart enough to trust their expertise.

But they can't show any empirical evidence for their claim. Only computer models that they create support them.

Computer models aren't data. Science illiterates don't seem to understand that.

What a liar you continue to be. Here is plenty of evidence of the warming;

No, that is a computer generated fairy tale. How about you learn what "empirical" means.

 

[westwall]

You'd have to be a pretty dumb person to think a conspiracy like that would fly all over the world in science.

Why are you speaking for all scientists over all subjects again? ... there's just a handful reading scripts into TV monitors for pay ... you go through the scientific literature and find us some empirical data ... it's pretty dumb thinking we know the exact temperature 50 years from now ...

It's pretty dumb looking at the unit volume value used in climate models and not start throwing handfuls of salt over your shoulder ... or do you even know what a unit volume is? ...

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University have policy statement that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Two of the Scientific Societies that deal with ice and climate directly, American Geophysical Union, and the Geological Society of America both have statements that AGW is real and already strongly affecting us.

Every one of them gets massive amounts of funding for perpetuating the fraud. That makes your appeal to authority not just a logic fail, but a really idiotic logic fail.

Makes sense, you ARE an idiot.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Back in reality, 2020 was tied for the highest global average temperature, with 2016. Some averages say 2020 was a tiny bit higher, some say a tiny bit lower.

2016 was an El Nino dominated year, which increases surface temperatures.

2020 was basically a neutral year. It was ENSO positive for first half, ENSO negative for the second half.

That means the warming is marching on. The next El Nino year will shatter the old high temperature record.

How does atmospheric CO2 heat the deep ocean?

 

[westwall]

Back in reality, 2020 was tied for the highest global average temperature, with 2016. Some averages say 2020 was a tiny bit higher, some say a tiny bit lower.

2016 was an El Nino dominated year, which increases surface temperatures.

2020 was basically a neutral year. It was ENSO positive for first half, ENSO negative for the second half.

That means the warming is marching on. The next El Nino year will shatter the old high temperature record.

How does atmospheric CO2 heat the deep ocean?

Magic!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Back in reality, 2020 was tied for the highest global average temperature, with 2016. Some averages say 2020 was a tiny bit higher, some say a tiny bit lower.

2016 was an El Nino dominated year, which increases surface temperatures.

2020 was basically a neutral year. It was ENSO positive for first half, ENSO negative for the second half.

That means the warming is marching on. The next El Nino year will shatter the old high temperature record.

How does atmospheric CO2 heat the deep ocean?

Magic!

They never answer! But they include the dataset in their presentation

 

[westwall]

Back in reality, 2020 was tied for the highest global average temperature, with 2016. Some averages say 2020 was a tiny bit higher, some say a tiny bit lower.

2016 was an El Nino dominated year, which increases surface temperatures.

2020 was basically a neutral year. It was ENSO positive for first half, ENSO negative for the second half.

That means the warming is marching on. The next El Nino year will shatter the old high temperature record.

How does atmospheric CO2 heat the deep ocean?

Magic!

They never answer! But they include the dataset in their presentation

Of course they do. They lie. It's all they can do.

 

[wamose]

No ... we just think you're retarded ... particularly your insistence that all scientists across all fields of study are well-informed about the climate system ... at a time when almost all climatologists claim we're just scratching the surface of our understanding of this ...

Drive two hours south and tell us why the weather there is catastrophic ... because that's all the change our great-great-geart-grandchildren will see ...

The climate scientists say AGW is happening and the rest of the scientific world is smart enough to trust their expertise.

Yeah, and 9 out of 10 doctors smoked Chesterfields. Democrats believe anything. I'm not saying we shouldn't endeavor to use more renewable energy. We should do that. But this Paris accord isn't the answer. That agreement was made by extremely stupid people and its result would be nothing except the US would get stuck with the bureaucratic bill. Wanna clean up the world? Clean up China and India, the two countries that have stolen millions of our jobs. Those countries need to make an attempt to clean up themselves before the global community should be expected to help. This accord is all about corruption, money and China's desire to weaken the US economy in the end.

 

[Anomalism]

What a liar you continue to be. Here is plenty of evidence of the warming;

I'm starting to suspect the science deniers have some kind of partisan mental block that prevents them from accepting reality. I can't think of a more ridiculous perspective that right wingers can potentially have; this one takes the cake. I kind of feel bad for somebody that looks to conspiracy blogs as legitimate scientific sources.

 

[Anomalism]

The climate is ALWAYS changing.

A deliberate deflection and mitigation of the situation. Spoken like a true partisan.

 

[fncceo]

The climate scientists say AGW is happening and the rest of the scientific world is smart enough to trust their expertise.

"When you believe in thing that you don't understand then you suffer. Superstition ain't the way "

-- Stevie Wonder