Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The U.S. has a far higher murder rate than all of those countries you mentioned. And also a far, far, FAR, higher rate of gun ownership.Not really fair to compare the two countries, especially given our far more diverse population. Lets compare nations within Europe, that is more apt of a comparison. For example Sweden has about 4 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population versus Spain, but a lower murder rate(both with and without guns). Slovakia has about 15 times the number of guns per 100,000 vs Romania, but a lower overall murder rate and lower overall gun murder rate. Greece has about 5 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population vs Hungary, yet a lower overall murder rate and lower gun murder rate.Americans, who live without gun control, have a 5 times higher chance of being murdered than French people do.
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf
Norway has the second number rate of guns per 100,000 people in Europe yet the second lowest murder rate.
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Galley Template
There is no correlation between higher gun ownership rates and a higher murder rate.
Well obviously when your country is drowning in guns you're safer if you have a gun. No one's arguing thatThe U.S. has a far higher murder rate than all of those countries you mentioned. And also a far, far, FAR, higher rate of gun ownership.Not really fair to compare the two countries, especially given our far more diverse population. Lets compare nations within Europe, that is more apt of a comparison. For example Sweden has about 4 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population versus Spain, but a lower murder rate(both with and without guns). Slovakia has about 15 times the number of guns per 100,000 vs Romania, but a lower overall murder rate and lower overall gun murder rate. Greece has about 5 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population vs Hungary, yet a lower overall murder rate and lower gun murder rate.Americans, who live without gun control, have a 5 times higher chance of being murdered than French people do.
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf
Norway has the second number rate of guns per 100,000 people in Europe yet the second lowest murder rate.
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Galley Template
There is no correlation between higher gun ownership rates and a higher murder rate.
And Americans stop violent criminal attack and save lives using guns 1.6 million times a year on average.....far more than are murdered by gangs in the inner cities, or the random crazy who is allowed to kill people in gun free zones created by anti gunners.....
Not when you exclude non-whites. It isn't "far, far, FAR, higher".The U.S. has a far higher murder rate than all of those countries you mentioned. And also a far, far, FAR, higher rate of gun ownership.Not really fair to compare the two countries, especially given our far more diverse population. Lets compare nations within Europe, that is more apt of a comparison. For example Sweden has about 4 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population versus Spain, but a lower murder rate(both with and without guns). Slovakia has about 15 times the number of guns per 100,000 vs Romania, but a lower overall murder rate and lower overall gun murder rate. Greece has about 5 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population vs Hungary, yet a lower overall murder rate and lower gun murder rate.Americans, who live without gun control, have a 5 times higher chance of being murdered than French people do.
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf
Norway has the second number rate of guns per 100,000 people in Europe yet the second lowest murder rate.
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Galley Template
There is no correlation between higher gun ownership rates and a higher murder rate.
Ah you want to make it a racist thing. I've been to this rodeo before. If you feel like it please click here:Not when you exclude non-whites. It isn't "far, far, FAR, higher".The U.S. has a far higher murder rate than all of those countries you mentioned. And also a far, far, FAR, higher rate of gun ownership.Not really fair to compare the two countries, especially given our far more diverse population. Lets compare nations within Europe, that is more apt of a comparison. For example Sweden has about 4 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population versus Spain, but a lower murder rate(both with and without guns). Slovakia has about 15 times the number of guns per 100,000 vs Romania, but a lower overall murder rate and lower overall gun murder rate. Greece has about 5 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population vs Hungary, yet a lower overall murder rate and lower gun murder rate.Americans, who live without gun control, have a 5 times higher chance of being murdered than French people do.
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf
Norway has the second number rate of guns per 100,000 people in Europe yet the second lowest murder rate.
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Galley Template
There is no correlation between higher gun ownership rates and a higher murder rate.
Ann Coulter s Truthful Rhetoric on Gun Violence and Race National Review Online
Which proves my point, diversity skews the statistics far higher. Also, one country is just an outlier, the US doesn't negate the statistical reality that there is no correlation between high gun ownership and high murder rates.
I don't really care if you call me a racist. That isn't an argument. It doesn't disprove that diversity skews our statistics, and that America statistically speaking is an outlier in part because of it. Sorry, the stats don't lie, there is no correlation between high gun ownership and murder.Ah you want to make it a racist thing. I've been to this rodeo before. If you feel like it please click here:Not when you exclude non-whites. It isn't "far, far, FAR, higher".The U.S. has a far higher murder rate than all of those countries you mentioned. And also a far, far, FAR, higher rate of gun ownership.Not really fair to compare the two countries, especially given our far more diverse population. Lets compare nations within Europe, that is more apt of a comparison. For example Sweden has about 4 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population versus Spain, but a lower murder rate(both with and without guns). Slovakia has about 15 times the number of guns per 100,000 vs Romania, but a lower overall murder rate and lower overall gun murder rate. Greece has about 5 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population vs Hungary, yet a lower overall murder rate and lower gun murder rate.Americans, who live without gun control, have a 5 times higher chance of being murdered than French people do.
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf
Norway has the second number rate of guns per 100,000 people in Europe yet the second lowest murder rate.
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Galley Template
There is no correlation between higher gun ownership rates and a higher murder rate.
Ann Coulter s Truthful Rhetoric on Gun Violence and Race National Review Online
Which proves my point, diversity skews the statistics far higher. Also, one country is just an outlier, the US doesn't negate the statistical reality that there is no correlation between high gun ownership and high murder rates.
Yesterday in Canada the NRA was proven right.One good man with a gun stopped a bad man with a gun Page 5 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Read through mine and Rikurzhens posts. I bookmarked it just so I wouldn't have to waste my time with people like you again. Take from it what you will. Rikurzhen refused to accept I was right but then again, we don't see him around here anymore do we?
Like I said; click my link if you want to be proved wrong. But I'm not going to waste my time on it again. Race factors in... but guess what so does high gun ownership.I don't really care if you call me a racist. That isn't an argument. It doesn't disprove that diversity skews our statistics, and that America statistically speaking is an outlier in part because of it. Sorry, the stats don't lie, there is no correlation between high gun ownership and murder.Ah you want to make it a racist thing. I've been to this rodeo before. If you feel like it please click here:Not when you exclude non-whites. It isn't "far, far, FAR, higher".The U.S. has a far higher murder rate than all of those countries you mentioned. And also a far, far, FAR, higher rate of gun ownership.Not really fair to compare the two countries, especially given our far more diverse population. Lets compare nations within Europe, that is more apt of a comparison. For example Sweden has about 4 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population versus Spain, but a lower murder rate(both with and without guns). Slovakia has about 15 times the number of guns per 100,000 vs Romania, but a lower overall murder rate and lower overall gun murder rate. Greece has about 5 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population vs Hungary, yet a lower overall murder rate and lower gun murder rate.Americans, who live without gun control, have a 5 times higher chance of being murdered than French people do.
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf
Norway has the second number rate of guns per 100,000 people in Europe yet the second lowest murder rate.
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Galley Template
There is no correlation between higher gun ownership rates and a higher murder rate.
Ann Coulter s Truthful Rhetoric on Gun Violence and Race National Review Online
Which proves my point, diversity skews the statistics far higher. Also, one country is just an outlier, the US doesn't negate the statistical reality that there is no correlation between high gun ownership and high murder rates.
Yesterday in Canada the NRA was proven right.One good man with a gun stopped a bad man with a gun Page 5 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Read through mine and Rikurzhens posts. I bookmarked it just so I wouldn't have to waste my time with people like you again. Take from it what you will. Rikurzhen refused to accept I was right but then again, we don't see him around here anymore do we?
No it doesn't, you obviously didn't read the links to the Harvard University studies I linked which prove there is no correlation between gun ownership and the murder rate.Race factors in... but guess what so does high gun ownership.I don't really care if you call me a racist. That isn't an argument. It doesn't disprove that diversity skews our statistics, and that America statistically speaking is an outlier in part because of it. Sorry, the stats don't lie, there is no correlation between high gun ownership and murder.Ah you want to make it a racist thing. I've been to this rodeo before. If you feel like it please click here:Not when you exclude non-whites. It isn't "far, far, FAR, higher".The U.S. has a far higher murder rate than all of those countries you mentioned. And also a far, far, FAR, higher rate of gun ownership.Not really fair to compare the two countries, especially given our far more diverse population. Lets compare nations within Europe, that is more apt of a comparison. For example Sweden has about 4 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population versus Spain, but a lower murder rate(both with and without guns). Slovakia has about 15 times the number of guns per 100,000 vs Romania, but a lower overall murder rate and lower overall gun murder rate. Greece has about 5 times the number of guns per 100,000 in the population vs Hungary, yet a lower overall murder rate and lower gun murder rate.
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf
Norway has the second number rate of guns per 100,000 people in Europe yet the second lowest murder rate.
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Galley Template
There is no correlation between higher gun ownership rates and a higher murder rate.
Ann Coulter s Truthful Rhetoric on Gun Violence and Race National Review Online
Which proves my point, diversity skews the statistics far higher. Also, one country is just an outlier, the US doesn't negate the statistical reality that there is no correlation between high gun ownership and high murder rates.
Yesterday in Canada the NRA was proven right.One good man with a gun stopped a bad man with a gun Page 5 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Read through mine and Rikurzhens posts. I bookmarked it just so I wouldn't have to waste my time with people like you again. Take from it what you will. Rikurzhen refused to accept I was right but then again, we don't see him around here anymore do we?
GreatNo it doesn't, you obviously didn't read the links to the Harvard University studies I linked which prove there is no correlation between gun ownership and the murder rate.Race factors in... but guess what so does high gun ownership.I don't really care if you call me a racist. That isn't an argument. It doesn't disprove that diversity skews our statistics, and that America statistically speaking is an outlier in part because of it. Sorry, the stats don't lie, there is no correlation between high gun ownership and murder.Ah you want to make it a racist thing. I've been to this rodeo before. If you feel like it please click here:Not when you exclude non-whites. It isn't "far, far, FAR, higher".The U.S. has a far higher murder rate than all of those countries you mentioned. And also a far, far, FAR, higher rate of gun ownership.
Ann Coulter s Truthful Rhetoric on Gun Violence and Race National Review Online
Which proves my point, diversity skews the statistics far higher. Also, one country is just an outlier, the US doesn't negate the statistical reality that there is no correlation between high gun ownership and high murder rates.
Yesterday in Canada the NRA was proven right.One good man with a gun stopped a bad man with a gun Page 5 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Read through mine and Rikurzhens posts. I bookmarked it just so I wouldn't have to waste my time with people like you again. Take from it what you will. Rikurzhen refused to accept I was right but then again, we don't see him around here anymore do we?
I don't expect you to read them, you are just going to keep citing America, an outlier, and ignoring the international stats on the issue, so it is a waste of time.
Sounds great to me.GreatNo it doesn't, you obviously didn't read the links to the Harvard University studies I linked which prove there is no correlation between gun ownership and the murder rate.Race factors in... but guess what so does high gun ownership.I don't really care if you call me a racist. That isn't an argument. It doesn't disprove that diversity skews our statistics, and that America statistically speaking is an outlier in part because of it. Sorry, the stats don't lie, there is no correlation between high gun ownership and murder.Ah you want to make it a racist thing. I've been to this rodeo before. If you feel like it please click here:Not when you exclude non-whites. It isn't "far, far, FAR, higher".
Ann Coulter s Truthful Rhetoric on Gun Violence and Race National Review Online
Which proves my point, diversity skews the statistics far higher. Also, one country is just an outlier, the US doesn't negate the statistical reality that there is no correlation between high gun ownership and high murder rates.
Yesterday in Canada the NRA was proven right.One good man with a gun stopped a bad man with a gun Page 5 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Read through mine and Rikurzhens posts. I bookmarked it just so I wouldn't have to waste my time with people like you again. Take from it what you will. Rikurzhen refused to accept I was right but then again, we don't see him around here anymore do we?
I don't expect you to read them, you are just going to keep citing America, an outlier, and ignoring the international stats on the issue, so it is a waste of time.
give white people more guns
I've been thinking about that....blame their class system, and World War 1 and 2....it turned them into submissive, pacifists.....who when the time came to stop the mass murderers...they couldn't......
This article details all the stupidity of France's gun control laws and how the three terrorists, one of whom was a convicted criminal on a government, terrorist watch list....
So, try to tell us that gun control works.....
The long list of illegal weapons used by the terrorists in the Paris attack - Crime Prevention Research Center
The irony here is that the Paris attack occurred in a country with one of the strongest gun control restrictions in the world. You had people just 10 to 12 meters from the terrorists who were able to film them on their cell phones but they were unable to do anything to stop the attack. Yet, at the same time the laws hadn’t stopped the terrorists from being massively armed.
The four terrorists had body armor and radio communications. They were armed with numerous semi-automatic handguns, automatic Kalashnikov rifles, a loaded M42 rocket launcher, 10 Molotov cocktails, 10 smoke grenades, a hand grenade, and 15 sticks of dynamite.
In France, handguns (both pistols and revolvers), fully automatic firearms, and even semi-automatic “assault weapons” are prohibited with only extremely narrow exemptions. Loaded rocket launchers and grenades are also banned. Yet, despite bans and these terrorists having criminals records, these terrorists did possess all these weapons.
It is clear that the funding and weapons for the attack came from abroad.
Unfortunately, the French think that the solution is to station 10,000 troops in front of Jewish sitesacross the country. The problem is that there are so many possible targets, at times when the terrorists pick to attack, that there is no way that the troops can protect all the possible targets, even if they many times more than 10,000 troops. In addition, the terrorists can kill the uniformed troops before they start killing other people. It is an extremely difficult job for troops to be constantly vigilant day after day, week after week, month after month.
Information on French gun laws is available here:
This article details all the stupidity of France's gun control laws and how the three terrorists, one of whom was a convicted criminal on a government, terrorist watch list....
So, try to tell us that gun control works.....
The long list of illegal weapons used by the terrorists in the Paris attack - Crime Prevention Research Center
The irony here is that the Paris attack occurred in a country with one of the strongest gun control restrictions in the world. You had people just 10 to 12 meters from the terrorists who were able to film them on their cell phones but they were unable to do anything to stop the attack. Yet, at the same time the laws hadn’t stopped the terrorists from being massively armed.
The four terrorists had body armor and radio communications. They were armed with numerous semi-automatic handguns, automatic Kalashnikov rifles, a loaded M42 rocket launcher, 10 Molotov cocktails, 10 smoke grenades, a hand grenade, and 15 sticks of dynamite.
In France, handguns (both pistols and revolvers), fully automatic firearms, and even semi-automatic “assault weapons” are prohibited with only extremely narrow exemptions. Loaded rocket launchers and grenades are also banned. Yet, despite bans and these terrorists having criminals records, these terrorists did possess all these weapons.
It is clear that the funding and weapons for the attack came from abroad.
Unfortunately, the French think that the solution is to station 10,000 troops in front of Jewish sitesacross the country. The problem is that there are so many possible targets, at times when the terrorists pick to attack, that there is no way that the troops can protect all the possible targets, even if they many times more than 10,000 troops. In addition, the terrorists can kill the uniformed troops before they start killing other people. It is an extremely difficult job for troops to be constantly vigilant day after day, week after week, month after month.
Information on French gun laws is available here:
Gun nuts never let a good tragedy go to waste.
I don't think france wants to be like us with higher homicide rates and many more mass shootings.
This article details all the stupidity of France's gun control laws and how the three terrorists, one of whom was a convicted criminal on a government, terrorist watch list....
So, try to tell us that gun control works.....
The long list of illegal weapons used by the terrorists in the Paris attack - Crime Prevention Research Center
The irony here is that the Paris attack occurred in a country with one of the strongest gun control restrictions in the world. You had people just 10 to 12 meters from the terrorists who were able to film them on their cell phones but they were unable to do anything to stop the attack. Yet, at the same time the laws hadn’t stopped the terrorists from being massively armed.
The four terrorists had body armor and radio communications. They were armed with numerous semi-automatic handguns, automatic Kalashnikov rifles, a loaded M42 rocket launcher, 10 Molotov cocktails, 10 smoke grenades, a hand grenade, and 15 sticks of dynamite.
In France, handguns (both pistols and revolvers), fully automatic firearms, and even semi-automatic “assault weapons” are prohibited with only extremely narrow exemptions. Loaded rocket launchers and grenades are also banned. Yet, despite bans and these terrorists having criminals records, these terrorists did possess all these weapons.
It is clear that the funding and weapons for the attack came from abroad.
Unfortunately, the French think that the solution is to station 10,000 troops in front of Jewish sitesacross the country. The problem is that there are so many possible targets, at times when the terrorists pick to attack, that there is no way that the troops can protect all the possible targets, even if they many times more than 10,000 troops. In addition, the terrorists can kill the uniformed troops before they start killing other people. It is an extremely difficult job for troops to be constantly vigilant day after day, week after week, month after month.
Information on French gun laws is available here:
Gun nuts never let a good tragedy go to waste.
I don't think france wants to be like us with higher homicide rates and many more mass shootings.
Wether they allow law abiding citizens to own and carry guns will not effect their crime rate....what the criminals decide to do will....we have another hostage situation at a French post office today.....early reports say the guy has hand grenades......
Gun control only disarms law abiding people....as France, Canada, Australia and Belgium show us.....criminals and terrorists will get fully automatic guns even if they are illegal....the only ones who won't get them are the law abiding, decent citizens.......
This article details all the stupidity of France's gun control laws and how the three terrorists, one of whom was a convicted criminal on a government, terrorist watch list....
So, try to tell us that gun control works.....
The long list of illegal weapons used by the terrorists in the Paris attack - Crime Prevention Research Center
The irony here is that the Paris attack occurred in a country with one of the strongest gun control restrictions in the world. You had people just 10 to 12 meters from the terrorists who were able to film them on their cell phones but they were unable to do anything to stop the attack. Yet, at the same time the laws hadn’t stopped the terrorists from being massively armed.
The four terrorists had body armor and radio communications. They were armed with numerous semi-automatic handguns, automatic Kalashnikov rifles, a loaded M42 rocket launcher, 10 Molotov cocktails, 10 smoke grenades, a hand grenade, and 15 sticks of dynamite.
In France, handguns (both pistols and revolvers), fully automatic firearms, and even semi-automatic “assault weapons” are prohibited with only extremely narrow exemptions. Loaded rocket launchers and grenades are also banned. Yet, despite bans and these terrorists having criminals records, these terrorists did possess all these weapons.
It is clear that the funding and weapons for the attack came from abroad.
Unfortunately, the French think that the solution is to station 10,000 troops in front of Jewish sitesacross the country. The problem is that there are so many possible targets, at times when the terrorists pick to attack, that there is no way that the troops can protect all the possible targets, even if they many times more than 10,000 troops. In addition, the terrorists can kill the uniformed troops before they start killing other people. It is an extremely difficult job for troops to be constantly vigilant day after day, week after week, month after month.
Information on French gun laws is available here:
Gun nuts never let a good tragedy go to waste.
I don't think france wants to be like us with higher homicide rates and many more mass shootings.
Wether they allow law abiding citizens to own and carry guns will not effect their crime rate....what the criminals decide to do will....we have another hostage situation at a French post office today.....early reports say the guy has hand grenades......
Gun control only disarms law abiding people....as France, Canada, Australia and Belgium show us.....criminals and terrorists will get fully automatic guns even if they are illegal....the only ones who won't get them are the law abiding, decent citizens.......
And those countries have lower homicide rates....
This article details all the stupidity of France's gun control laws and how the three terrorists, one of whom was a convicted criminal on a government, terrorist watch list....
So, try to tell us that gun control works.....
The long list of illegal weapons used by the terrorists in the Paris attack - Crime Prevention Research Center
The irony here is that the Paris attack occurred in a country with one of the strongest gun control restrictions in the world. You had people just 10 to 12 meters from the terrorists who were able to film them on their cell phones but they were unable to do anything to stop the attack. Yet, at the same time the laws hadn’t stopped the terrorists from being massively armed.
The four terrorists had body armor and radio communications. They were armed with numerous semi-automatic handguns, automatic Kalashnikov rifles, a loaded M42 rocket launcher, 10 Molotov cocktails, 10 smoke grenades, a hand grenade, and 15 sticks of dynamite.
In France, handguns (both pistols and revolvers), fully automatic firearms, and even semi-automatic “assault weapons” are prohibited with only extremely narrow exemptions. Loaded rocket launchers and grenades are also banned. Yet, despite bans and these terrorists having criminals records, these terrorists did possess all these weapons.
It is clear that the funding and weapons for the attack came from abroad.
Unfortunately, the French think that the solution is to station 10,000 troops in front of Jewish sitesacross the country. The problem is that there are so many possible targets, at times when the terrorists pick to attack, that there is no way that the troops can protect all the possible targets, even if they many times more than 10,000 troops. In addition, the terrorists can kill the uniformed troops before they start killing other people. It is an extremely difficult job for troops to be constantly vigilant day after day, week after week, month after month.
Information on French gun laws is available here:
Gun nuts never let a good tragedy go to waste.
I don't think france wants to be like us with higher homicide rates and many more mass shootings.
Wether they allow law abiding citizens to own and carry guns will not effect their crime rate....what the criminals decide to do will....we have another hostage situation at a French post office today.....early reports say the guy has hand grenades......
Gun control only disarms law abiding people....as France, Canada, Australia and Belgium show us.....criminals and terrorists will get fully automatic guns even if they are illegal....the only ones who won't get them are the law abiding, decent citizens.......
And those countries have lower homicide rates....
Because their criminals don't kill at the same rate as our inner city gang members do.....not because there are gun bans....since the three terrorists in France, the terrorist in Belgium, the terrorist in Australia, the terrorist in Canada show that when a criminal wants a gun in any of these countries they are easily acquired, even fully automatic weapons, rocket propelled grenades and hand grenades, but because for some reason European criminals don't use guns as often....I would put that more to European culture, their historical class system and their reactions to World War 1 and 2.....because if they want guns, they get guns.....
This article details all the stupidity of France's gun control laws and how the three terrorists, one of whom was a convicted criminal on a government, terrorist watch list....
So, try to tell us that gun control works.....
The long list of illegal weapons used by the terrorists in the Paris attack - Crime Prevention Research Center
Gun nuts never let a good tragedy go to waste.
I don't think france wants to be like us with higher homicide rates and many more mass shootings.
Wether they allow law abiding citizens to own and carry guns will not effect their crime rate....what the criminals decide to do will....we have another hostage situation at a French post office today.....early reports say the guy has hand grenades......
Gun control only disarms law abiding people....as France, Canada, Australia and Belgium show us.....criminals and terrorists will get fully automatic guns even if they are illegal....the only ones who won't get them are the law abiding, decent citizens.......
And those countries have lower homicide rates....
Because their criminals don't kill at the same rate as our inner city gang members do.....not because there are gun bans....since the three terrorists in France, the terrorist in Belgium, the terrorist in Australia, the terrorist in Canada show that when a criminal wants a gun in any of these countries they are easily acquired, even fully automatic weapons, rocket propelled grenades and hand grenades, but because for some reason European criminals don't use guns as often....I would put that more to European culture, their historical class system and their reactions to World War 1 and 2.....because if they want guns, they get guns.....
But I wouldn't recommend they get more guns to be like us.
Gun nuts never let a good tragedy go to waste.
I don't think france wants to be like us with higher homicide rates and many more mass shootings.
Wether they allow law abiding citizens to own and carry guns will not effect their crime rate....what the criminals decide to do will....we have another hostage situation at a French post office today.....early reports say the guy has hand grenades......
Gun control only disarms law abiding people....as France, Canada, Australia and Belgium show us.....criminals and terrorists will get fully automatic guns even if they are illegal....the only ones who won't get them are the law abiding, decent citizens.......
And those countries have lower homicide rates....
Because their criminals don't kill at the same rate as our inner city gang members do.....not because there are gun bans....since the three terrorists in France, the terrorist in Belgium, the terrorist in Australia, the terrorist in Canada show that when a criminal wants a gun in any of these countries they are easily acquired, even fully automatic weapons, rocket propelled grenades and hand grenades, but because for some reason European criminals don't use guns as often....I would put that more to European culture, their historical class system and their reactions to World War 1 and 2.....because if they want guns, they get guns.....
But I wouldn't recommend they get more guns to be like us.
I would....the only people in Europe who don't have guns readily available are law abiding citizens.....the criminals get all the guns they need.....
Idaho is 93% white. Canada is 77% white. Guess where the murder rate is higher? Why do you want to make it easier for criminals and terrorists to acquire guns and when were you disarmed and who disarmed you?This article details all the stupidity of France's gun control laws and how the three terrorists, one of whom was a convicted criminal on a government, terrorist watch list....
So, try to tell us that gun control works.....
The long list of illegal weapons used by the terrorists in the Paris attack - Crime Prevention Research Center
The irony here is that the Paris attack occurred in a country with one of the strongest gun control restrictions in the world. You had people just 10 to 12 meters from the terrorists who were able to film them on their cell phones but they were unable to do anything to stop the attack. Yet, at the same time the laws hadn’t stopped the terrorists from being massively armed.
The four terrorists had body armor and radio communications. They were armed with numerous semi-automatic handguns, automatic Kalashnikov rifles, a loaded M42 rocket launcher, 10 Molotov cocktails, 10 smoke grenades, a hand grenade, and 15 sticks of dynamite.
In France, handguns (both pistols and revolvers), fully automatic firearms, and even semi-automatic “assault weapons” are prohibited with only extremely narrow exemptions. Loaded rocket launchers and grenades are also banned. Yet, despite bans and these terrorists having criminals records, these terrorists did possess all these weapons.
It is clear that the funding and weapons for the attack came from abroad.
Unfortunately, the French think that the solution is to station 10,000 troops in front of Jewish sitesacross the country. The problem is that there are so many possible targets, at times when the terrorists pick to attack, that there is no way that the troops can protect all the possible targets, even if they many times more than 10,000 troops. In addition, the terrorists can kill the uniformed troops before they start killing other people. It is an extremely difficult job for troops to be constantly vigilant day after day, week after week, month after month.
Information on French gun laws is available here:
Gun nuts never let a good tragedy go to waste.
I don't think france wants to be like us with higher homicide rates and many more mass shootings.
Wether they allow law abiding citizens to own and carry guns will not effect their crime rate....what the criminals decide to do will....we have another hostage situation at a French post office today.....early reports say the guy has hand grenades......
Gun control only disarms law abiding people....as France, Canada, Australia and Belgium show us.....criminals and terrorists will get fully automatic guns even if they are illegal....the only ones who won't get them are the law abiding, decent citizens.......
And those countries have lower homicide rates....
Because their criminals don't kill at the same rate as our inner city gang members do.....not because there are gun bans....since the three terrorists in France, the terrorist in Belgium, the terrorist in Australia, the terrorist in Canada show that when a criminal wants a gun in any of these countries they are easily acquired, even fully automatic weapons, rocket propelled grenades and hand grenades, but because for some reason European criminals don't use guns as often....I would put that more to European culture, their historical class system and their reactions to World War 1 and 2.....because if they want guns, they get guns.....
