🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Gun Grabbers??? : ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban, Firearm Confiscation Orders Did Not Prevent YouTube Attack

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,149
What's the Deal? I thought banning 'assault weapons', firearm confiscations, 'Gun-Free Zones', etc... was supposed to stop mass shootings?!



"California has an “assault weapons” ban and firearm confiscation orders, but neither control prevented the Tuesday attack at YouTube’s San Bruno headquarters.


Ironically, “assault weapons” bans and confiscation orders have been put forward as controls needed in the aftermath of the February 14 Parkland school shooting. Gun control proponents also pushed universal background checks and waiting periods following the Parkland attack, but California has both of those too.

In fact, California has some of the most stringent gun controls in the country. The “assault weapons” ban, confiscation orders, universal background checks, and 10-day waiting period are complimented by a requirement that would-be firearm owners acquire a safety certificate from the state, that all firearms be registered with the state, and that law-abiding citizens pursuing a concealed carry permit demonstrate “good cause” for wanting to carry a gun.

Ammunition controls already exist in California, too. These require that Californians only buy ammunition from state-approved vendors and, starting January 1, 2019, will require residents to pass a point-of-sale background check for a box of bullets.

But none of these controls prevented Nasim Aghdam from possessing a handgun with which she injured three then killed herself at YouTube headquarters."


'Assault Weapons' Ban, Firearm Confiscation Orders Did Not Prevent YouTube Shooting


I think this witness of the shooting has a better grasp on things than Liberals do:





After the Parkland shooting there was another shooting in Maryland...which you might not have heard about because the Leftists did not highly publicize it or the details concerning the incident. A shooter entered a school and began shooting. Unlike Parkland, the victims were not defenseless. Immediately after wounding 3 people the attacker was dropped dead on the floor by an armed guard / employee.

I would be willing to bet that had that witness been armed at least one if not more of the people killed in the YouTube shooting might still be alive.

Parkland: Shooter - 17 kills

Maryland: Shooter - 0 Kills, shooter killed

YouTube: Shooter - 3 Kills

Assault Weapon Ban / Gun Confiscation - FAIL



'Assault Weapons' Ban, Firearm Confiscation Orders Did Not Prevent YouTube Shooting
 
What's the Deal? I thought banning 'assault weapons', firearm confiscations, 'Gun-Free Zones', etc... was supposed to stop mass shootings?!



"California has an “assault weapons” ban and firearm confiscation orders, but neither control prevented the Tuesday attack at YouTube’s San Bruno headquarters.


Ironically, “assault weapons” bans and confiscation orders have been put forward as controls needed in the aftermath of the February 14 Parkland school shooting. Gun control proponents also pushed universal background checks and waiting periods following the Parkland attack, but California has both of those too.

In fact, California has some of the most stringent gun controls in the country. The “assault weapons” ban, confiscation orders, universal background checks, and 10-day waiting period are complimented by a requirement that would-be firearm owners acquire a safety certificate from the state, that all firearms be registered with the state, and that law-abiding citizens pursuing a concealed carry permit demonstrate “good cause” for wanting to carry a gun.

Ammunition controls already exist in California, too. These require that Californians only buy ammunition from state-approved vendors and, starting January 1, 2019, will require residents to pass a point-of-sale background check for a box of bullets.

But none of these controls prevented Nasim Aghdam from possessing a handgun with which she injured three then killed herself at YouTube headquarters."


'Assault Weapons' Ban, Firearm Confiscation Orders Did Not Prevent YouTube Shooting


I think this witness of the shooting has a better grasp on things than Liberals do:





After the Parkland shooting there was another shooting in Maryland...which you might not have heard about because the Leftists did not highly publicize it or the details concerning the incident. A shooter entered a school and began shooting. Unlike Parkland, the victims were not defenseless. Immediately after wounding 3 people the attacker was dropped dead on the floor by an armed guard / employee.

I would be willing to bet that had that witness been armed at least one if not more of the people killed in the YouTube shooting might still be alive.

Parkland: Shooter - 17 kills

Maryland: Shooter - 0 Kills, shooter killed

YouTube: Shooter - 3 Kills

Assault Weapon Ban / Gun Confiscation - FAIL



'Assault Weapons' Ban, Firearm Confiscation Orders Did Not Prevent YouTube Shooting


Your info is incorrect.

In Maryland, the shooter killed himself after being shot in the gun by the school resource officer.. The girl he shot died.

In the Youtube shooting, only the shooter died by committing suicide.
 
Your info is incorrect. In Maryland, the shooter killed himself after being shot in the gun by the school resource officer...

Thank you for that update of which I was unaware.

The fact remains, though, the Liberal solution of stripping Americans of their Constitutional Rights and ability to protect themselves is NOT the answer. Criminals don't obey laws, and citizens who have been disarmed, incapable of defending themselves, can not rely on those who disarmed them to protect them.
 
Your info is incorrect. In Maryland, the shooter killed himself after being shot in the gun by the school resource officer...

Thank you for that update of which I was unaware.

The fact remains, though, the Liberal solution of stripping Americans of their Constitutional Rights and ability to protect themselves is NOT the answer. Criminals don't obey laws, and citizens who have been disarmed, incapable of defending themselves, can not rely on those who disarmed them to protect them.

Murderers Murder, it's what they do.

Take away one tool of the trade, they'll find another and another and another until they accomplish their task.
 
“Take the guns first, go through due process second,” the president added. - Donald Trump
 
Lookey, Lookey.......

"Just Like In Parkland And Orlando, Law Enforcement Dropped The Ball On YouTube Shooting" - 'Nikolas Cruz 2.0'


"Aghdam’s father, Ismail, reported her missing Monday night. He told local police police she “hated” YouTube and could possibly act violently in some capacity. Officers eventually located Aghdam early Tuesday morning in Mountain View, California, more than 700 miles away from San Diego home.

Similarly, Aghdam’s brother contacted the authorities after she did not respond to multiple text messages and calls Tuesday morning."


The same guys who enforced the banned assault weapons law and confiscated firearms, those charged with protecting and defending people so they would not have to defend themselves, failed to do their jobs and protect people from getting shot by a whacko / criminal....



REPORTS: Police Dropped The Ball Again - Family Warned About YouTube Shooter BEFORE Attack
 

Forum List

Back
Top