2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,251
- 52,473
- 2,290
To the contrary, I quoted Scalia's applicable words verbatim that contradict various fallacies in denial of government's legitimate role in regulating firearms, as well as citing the applicable wording from the pertinent case:And you again ignored what Scalia actually said.......
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says "yes, there are some limitations that can be imposed" on the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. It's up to future court cases to determine what those limitations are, he said on "Fox News Sunday."Some limitations "undoubtedly" are permissible, Scalia said, because limitations existed when the Constitution was written: "For example, there was a tort called affrighting, which if you carried around a really horrible weapon just to scare people, like a head ax or something, that was, I believe, a misdemeanor," he explained.Front Page Featured | MRCTV
www.cnsnews.com"The Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carryany weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”
Obviously, despite the hysteria of some strident advocates for unbridled permissiveness, firearms are not exempt from government regulation - as further affirmed by all the extant statutes concerning them.
Federal Firearms Laws
www.justice.gov
Again, anyone wetting their cribs over the prospect of Big Blue Meanies snatching away their precious shooties are victims of paranoia-induced hysteria:
There is no legislative initiative in any of the fifty United StatesCan government regulate firearms? Legal precedent, multiple such regulations being on the books, and Constitutional authorities concur in answering "yes." It would be absurdly presumptuous of me to contradict that reality.
or at the national level to repeal the Second Amendment.
You really are dumb..........Mexico also has a 2nd Amendment in their Constitution.......they have only one gun store, located on a military base, controlled by the army.....they have a tiny selection of legal guns for those who get permission to buy one...
it doesn't take ending the 2nd Amendment to ban and confiscate guns........ ending the lawful commerce in arms act is the first big step after putting anti-gun judges on the courts.........