Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WOW compromise something I thought I never would be suggesting to anti gun people, but here it goes.
Being that Gun shows are privately run and held on private property. Those who manage these gun shows and those who own the property could place restrictions on the property site too private sales. The gun community would police itself by doing this.
In other words,no private sales allowed.
Would this compromise be sufficient to end this argument?
That's interesting. EVERY gun show I have ever attended was held in a public building, usually a hall or auditorium or other large building, and about 99% of the spaces were rented by legitimate gun dealers.
EVERY firearm I have ever purchased from a GUN SHOW has required me to do the paperwork for the federal (and state) background checks.
This whole "gun show loophole" thing is a MYTH.
PRIVATE SALES are the "loophole" that worries the anti-gun nuts.
No person under any circumstances should be able to sell a gun to a person not qualified to purchase a gun,
in the same way that no person is allowed to sell alcohol to a minor. Public, private, wherever, whatever.
Why would you want loopholes/exceptions?
Why would you trust the Government to determine who is "qualified" to own a firearm?No person under any circumstances should be able to sell a gun to a person not qualified to purchase a gun,
in the same way that no person is allowed to sell alcohol to a minor. Public, private, wherever, whatever.
Why would you want loopholes/exceptions?
Governments are Instituted to PROTECT Rights, NOT take them away.
How is my right to life better protected when government does not even attempt to keep guns out of the hands of convicted killers?
WOW compromise something I thought I never would be suggesting to anti gun people, but here it goes.
Being that Gun shows are privately run and held on private property. Those who manage these gun shows and those who own the property could place restrictions on the property site too private sales. The gun community would police itself by doing this.
In other words,no private sales allowed.
Would this compromise be sufficient to end this argument?
WOW compromise something I thought I never would be suggesting to anti gun people, but here it goes.
Being that Gun shows are privately run and held on private property. Those who manage these gun shows and those who own the property could place restrictions on the property site too private sales. The gun community would police itself by doing this.
In other words,no private sales allowed.
Would this compromise be sufficient to end this argument?
Wed need to know the percentage of private sales at gun shows compared to other venues, such as private homes, meeting halls, and shooting ranges.
My guess would be only a tiny percentage of private sales occur at gun shows, making the restriction by show owners pointless.
Moreover, criminals dont acquire their firearms at gun shows, they acquire them through theft or via the black market.
No.WOW compromise something I thought I never would be suggesting to anti gun people, but here it goes.
Being that Gun shows are privately run and held on private property. Those who manage these gun shows and those who own the property could place restrictions on the property site too private sales. The gun community would police itself by doing this.
In other words,no private sales allowed.
Would this compromise be sufficient to end this argument?
No.WOW compromise something I thought I never would be suggesting to anti gun people, but here it goes.
Being that Gun shows are privately run and held on private property. Those who manage these gun shows and those who own the property could place restrictions on the property site too private sales. The gun community would police itself by doing this.
In other words,no private sales allowed.
Would this compromise be sufficient to end this argument?
The anti-gun side will not accept anything less than what it wants, and willl not not (because it can not) give anything to the pro-gun side in return for what it wants.
Thus, there shall be no compomise.
That's all well and good - my point is that the anti-gun side will not accept this.No.WOW compromise something I thought I never would be suggesting to anti gun people, but here it goes.
Being that Gun shows are privately run and held on private property. Those who manage these gun shows and those who own the property could place restrictions on the property site too private sales. The gun community would police itself by doing this.
In other words,no private sales allowed.
Would this compromise be sufficient to end this argument?
The anti-gun side will not accept anything less than what it wants, and willl not not (because it can not) give anything to the pro-gun side in return for what it wants.
Thus, there shall be no compomise.
What if those private run gun shows restricted private sales at their events? It is after all their event they control how things are run.
This has nothing to do with taking anyones right away.
That's all well and good - my point is that the anti-gun side will not accept this.No.
The anti-gun side will not accept anything less than what it wants, and willl not not (because it can not) give anything to the pro-gun side in return for what it wants.
Thus, there shall be no compomise.
What if those private run gun shows restricted private sales at their events? It is after all their event they control how things are run.
This has nothing to do with taking anyones right away.
The only remedy would be to ban private sales, since there can be no process with regard to conducting background checks.
How a ban on private sales would be enforced is anyones guess, however, since there would be no way to know which guns were acquired before the ban went into effect, in jurisdictions where registration is not required.
No person under any circumstances should be able to sell a gun to a person not qualified to purchase a gun,
in the same way that no person is allowed to sell alcohol to a minor. Public, private, wherever, whatever.
Why would you want loopholes/exceptions?
Shut up
no compromise.
No person under any circumstances should be able to sell a gun to a person not qualified to purchase a gun,
in the same way that no person is allowed to sell alcohol to a minor. Public, private, wherever, whatever.
Why would you want loopholes/exceptions?
Shut up
I'll repeat the question. Why would you want loopholes/exceptions?
No person under any circumstances should be able to sell a gun to a person not qualified to purchase a gun,
in the same way that no person is allowed to sell alcohol to a minor. Public, private, wherever, whatever.
Why would you want loopholes/exceptions?
Shut up
I'll repeat the question. Why would you want loopholes/exceptions?
Shut up
I'll repeat the question. Why would you want loopholes/exceptions?
What about the person who can't afford to pay for a background check?
Shut up
I'll repeat the question. Why would you want loopholes/exceptions?
This isn't up for debate. I made a proposal you either agree with it or don't you don't get too make any suggestions in this thread nor will I entertain any questions.
I'll repeat the question. Why would you want loopholes/exceptions?
This isn't up for debate. I made a proposal you either agree with it or don't you don't get too make any suggestions in this thread nor will I entertain any questions.
Your proposal is dumber than you are.
Satisfied?
