Gunman at DC Navy Yard shoots at least 7

[Pauli007001]

This is why we need to add more to backgrounds checks. We should make it possible for a psychologist to put somebody who seems crazy and potentially dangerous on a no gun buy list. At least for some time period until the person can be further examined and these details brought to a judge. Of course since all sales don't need a background check we also have to fix that.

We don't let doctors put people on lists that restrict their freedom because we use something called due process. I would explain it to you, but you would need a working brain to comprehend it.

Yes and it might actually work right? Can't have that. Course the right keeps saying throw more people in jail. I think that restricts freedom quite a bit more.

Liberals have threatened to kill the children of gun owners.
All liberals should be jailed, just in case.

 

[Brain357]

We don't let doctors put people on lists that restrict their freedom because we use something called due process. I would explain it to you, but you would need a working brain to comprehend it.

Yes and it might actually work right? Can't have that. Course the right keeps saying throw more people in jail. I think that restricts freedom quite a bit more.

Liberals have threatened to kill the children of gun owners.
All liberals should be jailed, just in case.

Keep talking crazy. Really makes the pro gun people look good.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

This is why we need to add more to backgrounds checks. We should make it possible for a psychologist to put somebody who seems crazy and potentially dangerous on a no gun buy list. At least for some time period until the person can be further examined and these details brought to a judge. Of course since all sales don't need a background check we also have to fix that.

We don't let doctors put people on lists that restrict their freedom because we use something called due process. I would explain it to you, but you would need a working brain to comprehend it.

Yes and it might actually work right? Can't have that. Course the right keeps saying throw more people in jail. I think that restricts freedom quite a bit more.

It does work, except when the government invades peoples homes simply because someone else who doesn't even live in the same house visited a psychiatrist.

I dare you to tell me that doesn't happen.

Alternatively, you can prove me wrong about how stupid you are.

 

[Pauli007001]

Yes and it might actually work right? Can't have that. Course the right keeps saying throw more people in jail. I think that restricts freedom quite a bit more.

Liberals have threatened to kill the children of gun owners.
All liberals should be jailed, just in case.

Keep talking crazy. Really makes the pro gun people look good.

The threat was made.
Yet the liberal who made the threat was not arrested?

If some gun owner had said the exact same about liberals kids there would be a life sentence being considered.
The double standard of you racist fanatics.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

1. Another shooting.

2. Gun-grabbers make a stink.

3. Gun-owners shove the Constitution in their face and laugh at them.

4. No middle ground (semi-autos and assault rifles still OK, but much tighter controls on licensing).

5. Some time passes with nothing getting done.

6. Rinse and repeat.

I am willing to make a reasonable compromise, like tighter checks for mental health, but the other side wants to take away everyone's guns, not just the wacko nutjobs.

In your previous post you said no tighter checks for mental health. You seem very confused. Lets face it, the right is not opposed to doing something. They are just opposed to anything that would actually work.

I did not.

 

[Brain357]

Liberals have threatened to kill the children of gun owners.
All liberals should be jailed, just in case.

Keep talking crazy. Really makes the pro gun people look good.

The threat was made.
Yet the liberal who made the threat was not arrested?

If some gun owner had said the exact same about liberals kids there would be a life sentence being considered.
The double standard of you racist fanatics.

By definition it wasn't a threat. Get yourself a dictionary.

 

[Brain357]

We don't let doctors put people on lists that restrict their freedom because we use something called due process. I would explain it to you, but you would need a working brain to comprehend it.

Yes and it might actually work right? Can't have that. Course the right keeps saying throw more people in jail. I think that restricts freedom quite a bit more.

It does work, except when the government invades peoples homes simply because someone else who doesn't even live in the same house visited a psychiatrist.

I dare you to tell me that doesn't happen.

Alternatively, you can prove me wrong about how stupid you are.

I've no idea what your even talking about. My home has never been invaded. Post a link.

 

[Pauli007001]

The best and most practical method of gun control us tge excellent systems we have in place already.
We have extensive background checks on application for the license.
A 5 day waiting period, with further background checks.
Limits on the weapons that may be purchased by different groups.
Different types of licenses.
It's a long and arduous process to purchase a rifle or a shotgun, longer again to buy a handgun.
That's before we even get into the costs involved, safety courses, fees, more fees and then the purchase price of the weapon!!
The costs associated with buying a shotgun are more than the price of the shotgun.
Then the time limits on licenses.
It is actually easier to buy a shotgun in the UK!!

 

[Pauli007001]

Keep talking crazy. Really makes the pro gun people look good.

The threat was made.
Yet the liberal who made the threat was not arrested?

If some gun owner had said the exact same about liberals kids there would be a life sentence being considered.
The double standard of you racist fanatics.

By definition it wasn't a threat. Get yourself a dictionary.

By a strictly legal definition it could be.
If I said exactly the same thing mentioning the children of liberals, I would indeed be looking at life, for threatening a mass killing or act of terror.
You know it.

 

[Pauli007001]

If illegals demanded gun rights I bet the fanatics would be on board!!

 

[Brain357]

The best and most practical method of gun control us tge excellent systems we have in place already.
We have extensive background checks on application for the license.
A 5 day waiting period, with further background checks.
Limits on the weapons that may be purchased by different groups.
Different types of licenses.
It's a long and arduous process to purchase a rifle or a shotgun, longer again to buy a handgun.
That's before we even get into the costs involved, safety courses, fees, more fees and then the purchase price of the weapon!!
The costs associated with buying a shotgun are more than the price of the shotgun.
Then the time limits on licenses.
It is actually easier to buy a shotgun in the UK!!

And yet I can walk down the street to my neighbors house and quickly and easily buy a gun from him. It's completely legal and no background check. Very difficult. Plus we have no registration so it's very easy for guns to find their way into the hands of criminals.

 

[Brain357]

The threat was made.
Yet the liberal who made the threat was not arrested?

If some gun owner had said the exact same about liberals kids there would be a life sentence being considered.
The double standard of you racist fanatics.

By definition it wasn't a threat. Get yourself a dictionary.

By a strictly legal definition it could be.
If I said exactly the same thing mentioning the children of liberals, I would indeed be looking at life, for threatening a mass killing or act of terror.
You know it.

I'm pretty sure by any definition it is not.

 

[TemplarKormac]

 

[theliq]

1. Another shooting.

2. Gun-grabbers make a stink.

3. Gun-owners shove the Constitution in their face and laugh at them.

4. No middle ground (semi-autos and assault rifles still OK, but much tighter controls on licensing).

5. Some time passes with nothing getting done.

6. Rinse and repeat.

I am willing to make a reasonable compromise, like tighter checks for mental health, but the other side wants to take away everyone's guns, not just the wacko nutjobs.

Soooooooooo You think you are normal....self delusion is such a wonderful mindset,for a Windbag like you......aka the fool aka Mentally Gun MAD.

 

[Pauli007001]

The best and most practical method of gun control us tge excellent systems we have in place already.
We have extensive background checks on application for the license.
A 5 day waiting period, with further background checks.
Limits on the weapons that may be purchased by different groups.
Different types of licenses.
It's a long and arduous process to purchase a rifle or a shotgun, longer again to buy a handgun.
That's before we even get into the costs involved, safety courses, fees, more fees and then the purchase price of the weapon!!
The costs associated with buying a shotgun are more than the price of the shotgun.
Then the time limits on licenses.
It is actually easier to buy a shotgun in the UK!!

And yet I can walk down the street to my neighbors house and quickly and easily buy a gun from him. It's completely legal and no background check. Very difficult. Plus we have no registration so it's very easy for guns to find their way into the hands of criminals.

How will registration stop citizen A buying a gun from citizen B?

In the UK ownership of any semi automatic weapon or automatic weapon is a major crime carrying a mandatory 5 year sentence, even for possession ( finding it and taking it to the police), yet the AK 47 has been used in the murder of police officers and other crimes.
Strange, huh?
Outright ban, yet criminals still have them?
Effective gun bans..............

 

[theliq]

[

I gave 104 years of history.
In 88 of those years there were 10 mass shootings.
In the 16 since the 1997 firearms act there have been 14 mass shootings.
You bead to learn to count.
Loser.

One more time, Double Wide.

14 mass shooting in 16 years is a HELL of a lot better than 14 mass shootings a YEAR, which is what we tend to have.

Lying again?

There have been less than 100 mass shootings in the US in the last 30 years, which is less than 4 a year.

You are a CRAZY BASTARD...less than 4 a year!!!!!!!so that's OK THEN!!!!!!!!Windbag ya NUTS

 

[theliq]

We don't have a gun problem......we have a nut problem.

And anyway......philosophy about gun bans/laws = gay.


Harvard University just completed a study, published in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. Here is the complete research paper >>>

http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf



What did they conclude?


more guns = less crimes




Here is a summary of their conclusions >>>>


Many people believe that owning guns only increases the amount of crime. However, a recent study published in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy concluded that there is a negative correlation between gun ownership and violent crime in countries internationally. In other words, the more guns the less crime. The study showed that nations with strict gun control laws have substantially higher murder rates than those who do not. In fact, the 9 European nations with the lowest gun ownership rate have a combined murder rate that is three times that of the nine European nations with the highest gun ownership rate.







Gun grabber limpwristers like to tell tall stories.

Another CROCK OF SHIT......I wonder if the NRA and the GUN LOBBY PAID FOR THE STUDYOF COURSE THEY DID.....

 

[Quantum Windbag]

One more time, Double Wide.

14 mass shooting in 16 years is a HELL of a lot better than 14 mass shootings a YEAR, which is what we tend to have.

Lying again?

There have been less than 100 mass shootings in the US in the last 30 years, which is less than 4 a year.

You are a CRAZY BASTARD...less than 4 a year!!!!!!!so that's OK THEN!!!!!!!!Windbag ya NUTS

I am exaggerating by a lot, but don't let that get in the way of your outrage. By the way, why didn't you get upset about JoeB's claimed that there were 14 a year? Is it because you are a hack?

 

[theliq]

The best and most practical method of gun control us tge excellent systems we have in place already.
We have extensive background checks on application for the license.
A 5 day waiting period, with further background checks.
Limits on the weapons that may be purchased by different groups.
Different types of licenses.
It's a long and arduous process to purchase a rifle or a shotgun, longer again to buy a handgun.
That's before we even get into the costs involved, safety courses, fees, more fees and then the purchase price of the weapon!!
The costs associated with buying a shotgun are more than the price of the shotgun.
Then the time limits on licenses.
It is actually easier to buy a shotgun in the UK!!

And yet I can walk down the street to my neighbors house and quickly and easily buy a gun from him. It's completely legal and no background check. Very difficult. Plus we have no registration so it's very easy for guns to find their way into the hands of criminals.

How will registration stop citizen A buying a gun from citizen B?

In the UK ownership of any semi automatic weapon or automatic weapon is a major crime carrying a mandatory 5 year sentence, even for possession ( finding it and taking it to the police), yet the AK 47 has been used in the murder of police officers and other crimes.
Strange, huh?
Outright ban, yet criminals still have them?
Effective gun bans..............

Maybe Face Branding for those carrying or owning a GUN,and CHOPPING MURDERERS HEADS OFF(In public) OF COURSE.....Barbaric but Effective in introducing Gun Bans but no more Barbaric than Carrying a Lethal Weapon that will kill

 

[theliq]

Lying again?

There have been less than 100 mass shootings in the US in the last 30 years, which is less than 4 a year.

You are a CRAZY BASTARD...less than 4 a year!!!!!!!so that's OK THEN!!!!!!!!Windbag ya NUTS

I am exaggerating by a lot, but don't let that get in the way of your outrage. By the way, why didn't you get upset about JoeB's claimed that there were 14 a year? Is it because you are a hack?

Funny thing about people like you,IS the smoke screen of normality you put up,when infact you are completely MAD,as I said previously CRAZY BASTARD