Gut-Busting Laughter

[Little-Acorn]

200 interviews on the record. Many on audio-tape.
Only a few have come forward to deny their remarks for this book.
Steve Bannon is already apologizing for his remarks, so they must be true.

TRANSLATION: The usual Trump-haters who have been spewing lies and smears since the day he started running for President, have also been doing it into tape and video recorders.

(yawn)

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

200 interviews on the record. Many on audio-tape.
Only a few have come forward to deny their remarks for this book.
Steve Bannon is already apologizing for his remarks, so they must be true.
No one in the WH denies the guy had access for 18 months to the West Wing.
No one in the WH is filing a lawsuit for libel or slander.
But the WH did file a cease-and-desist order as soon as the news broke about the book, before they even read it.
Add all that up, Trumpanzees, if you can add that high.
I think it's TMI for you idiots.

Okiedokie! Let's hear the tapes! Whip them out!

 

[Auld Phart]

200 interviews on the record. Many on audio-tape.
Only a few have come forward to deny their remarks for this book.
Steve Bannon is already apologizing for his remarks, so they must be true.
No one in the WH denies the guy had access for 18 months to the West Wing.
No one in the WH is filing a lawsuit for libel or slander.
But the WH did file a cease-and-desist order as soon as the news broke about the book, before they even read it.
Add all that up, Trumpanzees, if you can add that high.
I think it's TMI for you idiots.

Okiedokie! Let's hear the tapes! Whip them out!

He'll never release the tapes...


might prove how little they have to do with the book

 

[eddiew37]

Read my post, you've already forgotten.
He has 200 people ON THE RECORD who were in the campaign and now the West Wing.
Do you even know what that means?
They were giving Wolff permission to quote them and/or audio-tape them.
Where are they now?
Fucking hiding from Trump, that's where.

I've read a lot of your posts, 2020....


Most of them attack Trump, and republicans, for having the audacity to breathe.

You're attacking the messenger because you can't attack the message. "Sad".

I see little difference between Wolff and Kitty Kelly, or any of the other 'tell all' authors in history .


Have no interest in the book, like I had no interest in his predecessors.

You, ed, others see it as the new Bible, your opposites see it as a comic book.

I see it as a hack riding the wave of anti-Trump.

And you will as an ""independent"" see no reason to be anti trump ?He's so presidential ? Speaks the truth ?? have no reason to question his ethics? or ties to Russia and putin?

?He's so presidential ?

Not really, but then, we haven't had a president like him before, have we, him not being a politician as such

Speaks the truth ??

not really

have no reason to question his ethics?

No more than any other president.

or ties to Russia and putin?

more. or less ties than the person he beat?

How many law suits against him and 19 meetings by his people with high up russians and you see nothing there?? Can't argue with you will Maybe after a T Bone Pittsburg style

 

[Auld Phart]

I've read a lot of your posts, 2020....


Most of them attack Trump, and republicans, for having the audacity to breathe.

You're attacking the messenger because you can't attack the message. "Sad".

I see little difference between Wolff and Kitty Kelly, or any of the other 'tell all' authors in history .


Have no interest in the book, like I had no interest in his predecessors.

You, ed, others see it as the new Bible, your opposites see it as a comic book.

I see it as a hack riding the wave of anti-Trump.

And you will as an ""independent"" see no reason to be anti trump ?He's so presidential ? Speaks the truth ?? have no reason to question his ethics? or ties to Russia and putin?

?He's so presidential ?

Not really, but then, we haven't had a president like him before, have we, him not being a politician as such

Speaks the truth ??

not really

have no reason to question his ethics?

No more than any other president.

or ties to Russia and putin?

more. or less ties than the person he beat?

How many law suits against him and 19 meetings by his people with high up russians and you see nothing there?? Can't argue with you will Maybe after a T Bone Pittsburg style

How many of those meetings were long before Trump even started to run for office.

Stop being a parrot.

(rumor has it, 7-8 were the person asking for Russian dressing for their salad)

 

[debbiedowner]

I have the book on my Kindle and into Chapter 5. It is not some sort of Kitty Kelly tell-all about the Queen. It's very detailed almost to the point of tedium. The cable news anchors have done a grab-bag approach and taken comments out of context. Once you read them within their context, it's all perfectly crystal clear.

I came about a copy an attorney on fb shared, I'm on the 5th chapter. don't know about you but I have a tad of empathy towards trump. this guy really isn't running a damn thing.

 

[debbiedowner]

I meant 18 months access to Trump during the campaign, senior campaign staff and then to the White House all gratis from Steve Bannon.
No one is denying that.

Thanks for the clarification.

It was obvious to all others Trump has not been in the White House 18 months yet.
I was wondering if you had received the news.

and, of course, you have evidence he was hanging around Trump during the campaign?

Read my post, you've already forgotten.
He has 200 people ON THE RECORD who were in the campaign and now the West Wing.
Do you even know what that means?
They were giving Wolff permission to quote them and/or audio-tape them.
Where are they now?
Fucking hiding from Trump, that's where.

I've read a lot of your posts, 2020....


Most of them attack Trump, and republicans, for having the audacity to breathe.

You're attacking the messenger because you can't attack the message. "Sad".

I see little difference between Wolff and Kitty Kelly, or any of the other 'tell all' authors in history .


Have no interest in the book, like I had no interest in his predecessors.

You, ed, others see it as the new Bible, your opposites see it as a comic book.

I see it as a hack riding the wave of anti-Trump.

Yep, a hack given permission to hand around the wh and tape for a year.

 

[Auld Phart]

Thanks for the clarification.

It was obvious to all others Trump has not been in the White House 18 months yet.
I was wondering if you had received the news.

and, of course, you have evidence he was hanging around Trump during the campaign?

Read my post, you've already forgotten.
He has 200 people ON THE RECORD who were in the campaign and now the West Wing.
Do you even know what that means?
They were giving Wolff permission to quote them and/or audio-tape them.
Where are they now?
Fucking hiding from Trump, that's where.

I've read a lot of your posts, 2020....


Most of them attack Trump, and republicans, for having the audacity to breathe.

You're attacking the messenger because you can't attack the message. "Sad".

I see little difference between Wolff and Kitty Kelly, or any of the other 'tell all' authors in history .


Have no interest in the book, like I had no interest in his predecessors.

You, ed, others see it as the new Bible, your opposites see it as a comic book.

I see it as a hack riding the wave of anti-Trump.

Yep, a hack given permission to hand around the wh and tape for a year.

heard the tapes?

Or just taking what you read as gospel?