regent
Gold Member
- Jan 30, 2012
- 10,459
- 1,148
- 245
That sign would not have been put up without the WH's kowledge and permission.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That sign would not have been put up without the WH's kowledge and permission.
That sign would not have been put up without the WH's kowledge and permission.
Well just as you are so sloppy and lazy in NOT spelling KNOWLEDGE which is really and totally IRONIC... you again shown your ignorance!!!
NOW for the f...king TRUTH you totally ignorant (can't even spell "KNOWLEDGE" right.. you know that when you write on this page if you misspell a work like "kowlege"
IT UNDERLINES in red the misspelling but being the lazy butt you are didn't even pay attention!!!)
THE TRUTH about Mission Accomplished BANNER!!!
If you wanted to take the time and FIND OUT the truth rather then be the Bush BASHING ignorant person that can't even spell 14 words correctly you would see
BUSH had nothing to do with it!!!
And who was responsible for the inclusion of the banner?
Robert Draper writes in Dead Certain (hardly what Id call a pro-Bush book), pg 194-5:
Scott Sforza flew out to the USS Lincoln five days before the speech. Sforza was the White Houses in-house producer.
In the course of his labors, Sforza became quite taken with the crew. When they mentioned to the White House aide that they would like to emblazon the stage with a banner reading MISSION ACCOMPLISHED so as to send up a victorious signal to their families and Navy buddies, Sforza loved the spirit of it and was effusive in his pitch to Fleischer, Bartlett, and the others. By conference call, they mused among themselves: Could the slogan backfire? But Fleischer reminded the others that the press had been haranguing Bush to declare an end to major combat operations for weeks now. The press shop gave Sforza the green light.
Sforza had the MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner designed by a private vendor, with a slick red-white-and-blue background. It was unfurled and pinned alongside the carrier, directly behind where the president would give his nationally televised speech on the evening of May 1.
Who was responsible for the Mission Accomplished banner? | Flopping Aces
So f...king WHAT? Bush's WH house staff did it! Bush didn't so why are you bashing Bush?
I mean honestly YOU guys spent ALL the Bush administration AS EVAN THOMAS EDITOR of NewsWeek said...
Well, our job is to bash the president, that's what we do." --
Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington,
February 2, 2007.Newsweek's Evan Thomas: 'Our Job Is To Bash the President' | NewsBusters.org
But then when it comes to Obama???
I mean in a way Obamas standing above the country, above above the world, hes sort of God."
Evan Thomas on Hardball, June 5, 2009.
Newsweek
YOU FEEL stupidly Obama is a God just as the EDITOR of NewsWeek feels..
SO is it ANY wonder the MSM et.al. Bashing Bush... kissing Obama's butt!!! YOU included...!
They should be forgiven their ignorance. Mantras have a way of locking into the simple-minded.
Thousands of US soldiers dead, many thousands more mutilated and/or emotionally damaged, families ruined, children who won't see Mom or Dad again, or who wonder why Mom or Dad just "isn't the same any more", parents who lost a child.
Oh yeah, plus four trillion borrowed dollars.
.
Lighten up. I forgive your ignorance, but I cannot speak for others.They should be forgiven their ignorance. Mantras have a way of locking into the simple-minded.
I see.
Well, I invite you to point out anything I said that was incorrect:
Lighten up. I forgive your ignorance, but I cannot speak for others.They should be forgiven their ignorance. Mantras have a way of locking into the simple-minded.
I see.
Well, I invite you to point out anything I said that was incorrect:
.
The one and only reason we're getting all this absolutely shameless spinning is the fact that Bush has an (R) after his name.
Partisan ideologues = zero credibility.
.
.
The one and only reason we're getting all this absolutely shameless spinning is the fact that Bush has an (R) after his name.
Partisan ideologues = zero credibility.
.
I welcome at anytime your disputing any facts i have offered
Saying it should come with some sort of proof
Thanks for the insight and poignant argument.GWB turns out was a pretty good President
No, he was one of the worst presidents ever.
Lighten up. I forgive your ignorance, but I cannot speak for others.I see.
Well, I invite you to point out anything I said that was incorrect:
I'll try again: Ignorance, where, precisely?
Looking forward to your direct response.
.
For what? And who the hell are you?Lighten up. I forgive your ignorance, but I cannot speak for others.
I'll try again: Ignorance, where, precisely?
Looking forward to your direct response.
.
Waiting.
.
For what? And who the hell are you?I'll try again: Ignorance, where, precisely?
Looking forward to your direct response.
.
Waiting.
.
The regular, intelligent people reading this thread do not need all of the evidence regurgitated once more.Thanks for the insight and poignant argument.GWB turns out was a pretty good President
No, he was one of the worst presidents ever.
Any "noted" historian would never render any such opinion as a historian, As such they would know, unlike you, that Bush's presidency is not in the realm of their expertise.As per an earlier post, 238 noted historians and presidential experts rated Bush as America's fifth worst president.
Aha! you've topped yourself yet again!The regular, intelligent people reading this thread do not need all of the evidence regurgitated once more.Thanks for the insight and poignant argument.GWB turns out was a pretty good President
No, he was one of the worst presidents ever.
Only the morons, who won't accept it anyway.