Hagel: Troops' workplaces will be checked

But two guys can suck each others dicks in the military now -
That's perfectly fine.

As long as they don't gang-rape women, that's the important thing. I don't care what they do to each other.

Though male rape in the military will follow right along, you realize.
 
As long as they don't rape women, that's the important thing.

Correct. No porn. No rape - but dicksucking is now authorized. No wonder people are leaving the military in droves. Soon it'll be nothing more that a fag/lesbian fraternity.
 
Unlike the perverted Navy the U.S.M.C. has regulations and standards that must be met.

I served more years with Marines aboard ship in the Navy than you were ever in total enlisted, shitforbrains. 24 years - NINE at sea hauling Marines around the globe and serving alongside a MARDET aboard BB-61.

Don't fuck with me, Bootcamp, or I'll slap you in the face with my dick.

24 Years? Couldnt hack it in the private sector? Sorry but not interested in your dick, I dont swing that way but you must have been very relieved when DADT went into affect.
 
Imagine how many of the honourable soldiers from WWII would have disciplined under these regulations had they existed back then. Soldiers with pictures of Rita Hayworth or Betty Grable would've been court-martialed? This shows you how absurd Hagel and his master are.

But two guys can suck each others dicks in the military now -
That's perfectly fine.

Since you fantasize about slapping men in the face with your dick that must be more than perfectly fine by you.
 
“materials that create a degrading or offensive work environment.”

Hagel: Troops' workplaces will be checked for 'degrading' images of women | Army Times | armytimes.com

Let me tell you folks, this is a slippery slope. You can take my comments as to being credible, but I will leave that for each of you to decide.

The inspections are being carried out this week 17 June by 1st Level Supervisors in the Civilian workforce. The guidance is subjective at best as it leads each Supervisor to 'interpret' the meaning of inappropriate. This is going beyond 'sexual' depictions. Although pornography can't be defined, everyone know's what it is when they see it. Moreover, the military and civilian workforce has been down this path before sans 'Tailhook'. Pin-up girl calendars in the workplace have been removed years ago. Everyone knows its a career sinker if caught displaying such.

Is this a witch hunt? IDK

So now we have management implementing an agenda looking beyond sexual material. Could the bible on a desk be considered offensive? How about a 'Field & Stream' magazine with a 12ga shotgun review? Then the next supervisor across the hall feels differently and allows aforementioned material to remain.

'Houston, we have a Problem'

-Geaux

Absolutely a complete witch hunt. Workplaces are already EXTREMELY scrubbed of anything that is close to ‘offensive.’ One of the commanders at our base ended up in deep trouble because he had a picture of a Texas cheerleader in his office. Never mind that she was HIS DAUGHTER and the picture was in no way suggestive. Anything that is offensive to someone for any reason is suddenly a travesty. Even basic terminology has been changed. The term cockpit is now not allowed on most flight lines and red ball has been renamed to red streak. Such changes are destructive rather than constructive. I understand the need to have a workplace that is free of harassment but when you extend that to such extremes that you have to be cognizant of every damn word that might be taken as an offence even when it simply is not offensive in any way shape or form you have gone insane.

Let’s be quite frank, your job in the military is to either directly kill people or support killing people, period. If you are not capable of hearing the word cockpit without being offended then you are simply not the type of material that we need to get that job done. Simple as that.

This is part of an effort to keep military rape/sexual assault cases out of civilian courts.
 
This crackdown is because of the rape problem in the military. Some of you must have noticed the news coverage of the Senate hearings on the serious sexual assault problem in the military.

They are trying to deal with it. This is one of the ways, that's all. Probably a good idea.

Yes because somehow it is a good idea to put men and women togerther in the most stressful environment possible, demand that they do not under any circumstances allow their nature to take over and have sex then turn around and remove the one and only form of release that the young men use…

Really good idea…

The ‘sexual assault’ meme is also way overstated. ANY contact that is unwanted becomes sexual assault so do not act as though this is rape. It can be something as simple as a grab or smack on the ass. Yes, wrong and should be defiantly punished and punished very strictly but there is a HUGE difference between this and rape.
 
Speaking of gay...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np67piTSAzk]Sam Kinison - Homonecrophilia - YouTube[/ame]
 
Unlike the perverted Navy the U.S.M.C. has regulations and standards that must be met.

I served more years with Marines aboard ship in the Navy than you were ever in total enlisted, shitforbrains. 24 years - NINE at sea hauling Marines around the globe and serving alongside a MARDET aboard BB-61.

Don't fuck with me, Bootcamp, or I'll slap you in the face with my dick.

ROFL. I remember our Master Chief of the Command (BMMC) yelling at us like that, when we were slow getting to battle stations when I was a GMGSA. He would kick us in the ass as we ran down the passageway trying to get to the gun mounts. He would get so red in the face we thought the top of his head would blow off. :razz:
 
"...This is part of an effort to keep military rape/sexual assault cases out of civilian courts."
If that's true, then it's a misguided effort.

A continued plethora of wank-able material reduces the amount of energy that wankers would otherwise devote to wankees...
tongue_smile.gif
 
Last edited:
in the Navy back in the mid 1970's, before i retired we had a safety poster in our jet engine shop that read, "when she says yes.., will you hear her ?" the lady posing in the photo was very good looking, her lips pursed in that "suggestive" appearance, at the bottom of the poster in smaller letters was, "wear hearing protection"

would that be considered "inappropriate" today ?

Yes! Highly!

So, uhh...any idea where I can get one? :D
 

Forum List

Back
Top