🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Has Black Lies Matter Already Launched a Slow Civil War?

Nothing proves white superiority better than the objections to the idea that black lives matter.

Perhaps the idea is that ALL lives matter and there shouldn't be a racial caveat to that statement.
That pretty much should have been the motto before Black Lives Matters was coined. As it is All Lives matter was only used to deflect away from police brutality in the Black community.

It has been the motto of decent humans for years and years. While I don't want to assign a motive to your posts, you SEEM to be trying to justify attacks on all police officers because some have been corrupt. But, isn't that just as incorrect as treating all black people as criminal because a few commit crimes? I hope that's just a misconception and not your intention.
Must not be that many decent humans around then. Weird how you seem to think descent humans shoot Black people out of fear. I'm glad you dont want to assign a motive but you do want to imply I support attacks on all police offers. Lets clarify. If a cop is dirty I'm glad he got his ass smoked. If not then I feel for him just as I would feel for the members of my family that are good cops.

Excellent start. Now, how do we determine if a policeman is "dirty"? Do YOU decide or should you file charges and let society decide? Because if YOU are the one deciding, then you really don't have a lot of difference between yourself and those who decide to shoot a Black person out of fear.
"We" dont do the determining. If there is no clear proof either way then I am ambivalent. For instance a cop could be an upstanding man of the people in his white community. However, when policing Blacks, he is a raging racist cave ape. That guy I would laugh when he was killed. You probably would mourn him. So your little question really has no merit because you dont determine how I judge someone and I could care less how you judge them.
 
It's time for white people to start laughing when black people kill other black people.

How funny is that? The enemy is killing each other!
 
I don't want a Pinochet, but that is what we will end up with because the Marxists WANT a Pinochet.

They know that their worst enemy is a free people living in peace and prosperity, so if they cant themselves take power by force, then they maneuver the establishment into putting a dictator in place who will curtail freedoms with martial law and heavy handed use of force. Over time the population becomes willing to have Marxists if they can get rid of the dictator, and of course the Marxists promise the Moon to the people to get their support, then kill them by the millions when they do get power. Pinochet was able to so cripple the Marxists that they never fully recovered, but give it time. Eventually enough bleeding heart libtards will be in control of the government that when the Marxists move again there will be no effective opposition.

The use of Death Squads will also come, as our Justus system is not able to handle the logistics of putting thousands upon thousands of leftwing terrorists on trial, and so various people in the government and in our law enforcement will clandestinely engage in frontier justice. I used to despise that idea, but what I am seeing lately makes me not quite so judgmental today.

Pinochet actually purged his country of marxists and kept Chile prosperous for decades. Afterwards he relinquished his despotic authority and held elections.

When was the last time a leftist despot allowed elections and relinquished power without a blood bath?

I do agree that it is not a desireable scenario, but it seems we are getting closer and close to a point where we will either have:

A) a right wing dictator who will liquidate tens of thousands,

or

B) a leftist dictator who will liquidate millions.

I choose A.


 
In one of his porn fantasies.

You even laughed when I posted it. Here it is again. Jim can give me another funny rating.


One can observe instances of local race war tactics, such as black lives matter engages in, without feeling that an oncoming conflict is best characterized as a race war.

I laughed because you were being so stupid it was funny.



Wait, so when he said he NEVER said race war.

And I show a thread where he says race war.

And that means he NEVER said race war?

So, in ANOTHER thread, he talks about race war but not this one so you think you've proven he lied about never saying race war in this thread? Sorry, I didn't realize you're a delusional troll.

I'll have to put you on ignore now, because you're obviously not serious at all.


ClosedCaption wins! :D

The vote of a lying troll is not persuasive. Sorry. This ID is going to be ignored as well.
 
Pinochet actually purged his country of marxists and kept Chile prosperous for decades. Afterwards he relinquished his despotic authority and held elections.

When was the last time a leftist despot allowed elections and relinquished power without a blood bath?

I do agree that it is not a desireable scenario, but it seems we are getting closer and close to a point where we will either have:

A) a right wing dictator who will liquidate tens of thousands,

or

B) a leftist dictator who will liquidate millions.

I choose A.

My regret is that Pinochet didn't get all of the Marxists who are now back in their larval stage waiting for another economic crisis.

And I think we have a third option here; strong executive leadership with isolated local declarations of martial law and military justice for designated terrorists.

I am only saying that I cannot blame the Death Squads any more. I am so outraged with the slaughter of these good peace officers that my blood just boils and this is true of most people I know.

The Democrats are digging themselves a hole that will last generations.
 
You even laughed when I posted it. Here it is again. Jim can give me another funny rating.

One can observe instances of local race war tactics, such as black lives matter engages in, without feeling that an oncoming conflict is best characterized as a race war.

I laughed because you were being so stupid it was funny.



Wait, so when he said he NEVER said race war.

And I show a thread where he says race war.

And that means he NEVER said race war?

So, in ANOTHER thread, he talks about race war but not this one so you think you've proven he lied about never saying race war in this thread? Sorry, I didn't realize you're a delusional troll.

I'll have to put you on ignore now, because you're obviously not serious at all.


ClosedCaption wins! :D

The vote of a lying troll is not persuasive. Sorry. This ID is going to be ignored as well.



I win! :D
 
Perhaps the idea is that ALL lives matter and there shouldn't be a racial caveat to that statement.
That pretty much should have been the motto before Black Lives Matters was coined. As it is All Lives matter was only used to deflect away from police brutality in the Black community.

It has been the motto of decent humans for years and years. While I don't want to assign a motive to your posts, you SEEM to be trying to justify attacks on all police officers because some have been corrupt. But, isn't that just as incorrect as treating all black people as criminal because a few commit crimes? I hope that's just a misconception and not your intention.
Must not be that many decent humans around then. Weird how you seem to think descent humans shoot Black people out of fear. I'm glad you dont want to assign a motive but you do want to imply I support attacks on all police offers. Lets clarify. If a cop is dirty I'm glad he got his ass smoked. If not then I feel for him just as I would feel for the members of my family that are good cops.

Excellent start. Now, how do we determine if a policeman is "dirty"? Do YOU decide or should you file charges and let society decide? Because if YOU are the one deciding, then you really don't have a lot of difference between yourself and those who decide to shoot a Black person out of fear.
"We" dont do the determining. If there is no clear proof either way then I am ambivalent. For instance a cop could be an upstanding man of the people in his white community. However, when policing Blacks, he is a raging racist cave ape. That guy I would laugh when he was killed. You probably would mourn him. So your little question really has no merit because you dont determine how I judge someone and I could care less how you judge them.

So, by taking that stand, you're actually saying that individuals should judge, not society and that society shouldn't interfere with that judgment. Your opinion seems to be based on race and anarchy. That's sad.
 
It's time for white people to start laughing when black people kill other black people.

How funny is that? The enemy is killing each other!

You are a disgusting racist and your perspective will only end in failure as it has been played against so many times with complete defeat for racists like you over the last century, it isn't even funny.

Welcome to my ignore/shun list, dude.
 
It's time for white people to start laughing when black people kill other black people.

How funny is that? The enemy is killing each other!

That's not funny. They aren't our enemy and it is sad that the violence is robbing our society of their talents and possible positive contributions.
 
That pretty much should have been the motto before Black Lives Matters was coined. As it is All Lives matter was only used to deflect away from police brutality in the Black community.

It has been the motto of decent humans for years and years. While I don't want to assign a motive to your posts, you SEEM to be trying to justify attacks on all police officers because some have been corrupt. But, isn't that just as incorrect as treating all black people as criminal because a few commit crimes? I hope that's just a misconception and not your intention.
Must not be that many decent humans around then. Weird how you seem to think descent humans shoot Black people out of fear. I'm glad you dont want to assign a motive but you do want to imply I support attacks on all police offers. Lets clarify. If a cop is dirty I'm glad he got his ass smoked. If not then I feel for him just as I would feel for the members of my family that are good cops.

Excellent start. Now, how do we determine if a policeman is "dirty"? Do YOU decide or should you file charges and let society decide? Because if YOU are the one deciding, then you really don't have a lot of difference between yourself and those who decide to shoot a Black person out of fear.
"We" dont do the determining. If there is no clear proof either way then I am ambivalent. For instance a cop could be an upstanding man of the people in his white community. However, when policing Blacks, he is a raging racist cave ape. That guy I would laugh when he was killed. You probably would mourn him. So your little question really has no merit because you dont determine how I judge someone and I could care less how you judge them.

So, by taking that stand, you're actually saying that individuals should judge, not society and that society shouldn't interfere with that judgment. Your opinion seems to be based on race and anarchy. That's sad.

Yes, he is supporting anarchy and the murder of our peace officers.
 
I don't want a Pinochet, but that is what we will end up with because the Marxists WANT a Pinochet.

They know that their worst enemy is a free people living in peace and prosperity, so if they cant themselves take power by force, then they maneuver the establishment into putting a dictator in place who will curtail freedoms with martial law and heavy handed use of force. Over time the population becomes willing to have Marxists if they can get rid of the dictator, and of course the Marxists promise the Moon to the people to get their support, then kill them by the millions when they do get power. Pinochet was able to so cripple the Marxists that they never fully recovered, but give it time. Eventually enough bleeding heart libtards will be in control of the government that when the Marxists move again there will be no effective opposition.

The use of Death Squads will also come, as our Justus system is not able to handle the logistics of putting thousands upon thousands of leftwing terrorists on trial, and so various people in the government and in our law enforcement will clandestinely engage in frontier justice. I used to despise that idea, but what I am seeing lately makes me not quite so judgmental today.

Pinochet actually purged his country of marxists and kept Chile prosperous for decades. Afterwards he relinquished his despotic authority and held elections.

When was the last time a leftist despot allowed elections and relinquished power without a blood bath?

I do agree that it is not a desireable scenario, but it seems we are getting closer and close to a point where we will either have:

A) a right wing dictator who will liquidate tens of thousands,

or

B) a leftist dictator who will liquidate millions.

I choose A.

Allende was elected to office. The CIA, under Nixon, took him out in a coup and stalled Pinochet .. a war criminal.
 

Forum List

Back
Top