Oldstyle
Platinum Member
- Jul 19, 2011
- 31,206
- 4,935
The biggest downsizing of state and local government in modern history has proved to be a big drag on the U.S. economy since 2009 and a primary reason the four-year-long recovery is more sluggish than other recoveries since World War II, economists say.
While the private sector has generated 7.4 million jobs since the recession and is approaching its pre-recession levels of overall employment, government at the federal, state and local levels continues to shed jobs, diminishing the performance of the job market. Overall, federal, state and local governments have eliminated more than 750,000 jobs since the recession ended in June 2009, with no end in sight to the trend, according to figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Read more: Government job cuts create a historically slow recession recovery - Washington Times
Follow us: [MENTION=39892]Was[/MENTION]htimes on Twitter
The fact that liberals are surprised that State and local governments were forced to lay off workers when the Obama Stimulus money ran out simply shows how clueless you all were to how economics works in the first place. We should have been pumping money into the private sector instead of the public sector because it's the private sector that creates the revenues to support the public sector. Now you'd like to think that someone as intelligent as this President was supposed to be would have learned from that mistake but you'd be wrong...he looked at what happened and called for more of the same! Another stimulus just like the first one. Stupid like that is hard to fathom.
Well the debate is over, no second round of stimulus spending. So we'll never know the results if we have. Just like we'll never know if JFK did get assassinated.
Second Stimulus Needed to Avoid Lost Decade: Krugman
However, the risk of a second round of the crisis in the medium run is high as a real revamp of the financial system has not happened, according to Krugman.
"At this point the prospects for major overhaul seem to be receding…because of the opposition in congress, because the industry - banks are profitable again, they want everybody to just go away," he said.
"The political will may not be there to do this. And that means that we may well be prepared for another round, another crisis some years down the pipe before we're actually prepared to change things," Krugman warned.
Krugman? You're quoting Krugman? He's one of the idiots that assured us the first stimulus would work....and then when it didn't...he immediately claimed that it only failed because it wasn't big enough. Paul Krugman has about as much credibility at this point as Larry Summers.
Last edited: