'Hatred Towards Conservative Women is Last Acceptable Misogyny in U.S.'

Recent stats show approximately 50% of women aged 15-44 have at least one unplanned pregnancy in their lives.

So the Republican Party wants to force half the women in America to have an unwanted child.

Are You Fortified? The Facts About Folic Acid: What Every Black Woman Needs to Know | Trying to Conceive


So the answer is to KILL THAT MANY CHILDREN???????????

I had an "unplanned" pregnancy.

My hubby and I wanted to wait until he finished college before having kids.

Didn't work out.

We were the adults. We made the kid.

We weren't going to make the kid pay for our "unplanned" pregnancy.

We did what we had to so the kid could be born and supported.

Did it EVER occur to you morons that the way to avoid "unplanned" pregnancies before marriage is simply say NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Sure as hell worked for me!

Liberals!

There is no such thing as being responsible or taking responsibility for one's actions.

Nope! Their answer is drag a kid out with a vacuum and cut it in pieces while it's still alive!

LIBERALS! DISGUSTING IRRESPONSIBLE VERMIN!

great you made a personal choice that worked for you. That personal choice doesnt go beyond the players in that situation.

But then again i am quoting a social conservative hypocrite

I would LOVE to hear how you figure I'm a hypocrite.

This is gonna be good! :lmao:

Notice liberals keep throwing accusations my way WITH NO EVIDENCE??

That's the definition of a liberal that's LOSING THE ARGUMENT.

They want to desperately put you on the defensive, and they hope something will stick and put you on the defensive.

It's so obvious! :lmao:

As for "that choice doesn't be beyond the players."

WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT MEAN?

That abortion goes beyond "personal choice" because the Democrat party is so invested in it?

What does that mean?

This rationalization, I have just GOT to hear!

I'm sharpening my claws now. Be my guest!


:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
My memory is good enough to recall the time you got in trouble over on hannity for putting up an avatar that was a picture of Hillary Clinton,

with a crosshairs superimposed on it...


WHAT?????????

Okay, YOU are full of it and a liar!

My Avatar was Sarah Palin holding a gun, Remember?????????

You let me know when you have evidence otherwise.

This is why you got banned from Hannity. This crap.

You are the biggest paid liar on the internet.

On top of that, how would that be misogyny, even if I did do it, which I didn't, I'M A WOMAN YOU MORON!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

It was long ago. Maybe it was a sigline picture. But YOU got busted for it. And now you're here feigning outrage at the same sort of thing.

Show an iota of integrity for once in your drab wretched oxygen wasting life.

Come on teapartylady. FESS UP!!!
 
your not helping the OP's case.

Oh, like you're the one to judge?

Like YOU help your side calling me a twat???????

Real progressive there, Plasma!

:lmao:
im not a progressive twat. My stances on issues tend to run case by case, and trust me, i am vastly more conservative that you ever will be.


If I had a dime for every liberal who claimed to be "more conservative than I am" I'd swear I'd buy Hannity's website! :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Oh, like you're the one to judge?

Like YOU help your side calling me a twat???????

Real progressive there, Plasma!

:lmao:
im not a progressive twat. My stances on issues tend to run case by case, and trust me, i am vastly more conservative that you ever will be.


If I had a dime for every liberal who claimed to be "more conservative than I am" I'd swear I'd buy Hannity's website! :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Are you still posting over there?
 
WHAT?????????

Okay, YOU are full of it and a liar!

My Avatar was Sarah Palin holding a gun, Remember?????????

You let me know when you have evidence otherwise.

This is why you got banned from Hannity. This crap.

You are the biggest paid liar on the internet.

On top of that, how would that be misogyny, even if I did do it, which I didn't, I'M A WOMAN YOU MORON!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

It was long ago. Maybe it was a sigline picture. But YOU got busted for it. And now you're here feigning outrage at the same sort of thing.

Show an iota of integrity for once in your drab wretched oxygen wasting life.

Come on teapartylady. FESS UP!!!

Now we have three sock puppets. :lmao:

This is why liberals are double and tripling down on Palin.

Same reason. They are terrified of a conservative women who can kick their asses.

They don't know what to do.

When they stop even discussing the issue in the op and just start making baseless accusations and insults, you know you have won the debate.

But then I knew that several hours ago. ;)

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
im not a progressive twat. My stances on issues tend to run case by case, and trust me, i am vastly more conservative that you ever will be.


If I had a dime for every liberal who claimed to be "more conservative than I am" I'd swear I'd buy Hannity's website! :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Are you still posting over there?

Yeah, and I'm posting under the nick of DaGooseman.

The next time you are on Hannity, just flame the heck out DaGooseman and tell everyone you know it's me. It's cool, I won't mind . . . . . . :eusa_whistle:
































































































:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
I'M A WOMAN, YOU IDIOT!

Just because you can't look at an attractive women without objectifying her, DON'T INCLUDE ME!

The picture is supposed to be of of fearless samurai.

You can't look at it without drooling, that's SAYS MORE ABOUT YOU!

Thanks for letting us know that!

As we can see from this thread, you are an imbecile who can not back none of your lies up. Being a women shows you disrepect your own gender by displaying them in soft porn. And that says a lot about yourself, not about me. LMAO! How easily she gets confused. :lol:

I think we see the imbecile.

As for "lies." When you have evidence of my "lies," let me know.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
The evidence is your inability to prove your lies by backing them up. It is you who needs to PUT UP OR SHUT UP UP. LMAO!

Just because I slamdunk you braindead liberals back to the stone age doesn't constitute a "lie."
You have failed on every lying accusation, Loser.
It just means you can't come up with anything else to refute my argument but the usual liberal baseless accusation. :lol::lol::lol::lol:
It just means you are a liar who cannot prove her point, and lost this thread by being an imbecile.
As for your charges of soft porn. I think that says far more about how YOU view STRONG WOMEN, than anything else.
Attempting to hide your disrepect for women is laughable at best, and fully ignorant of how women want to be protrayed.
Sorry, but you tried the typical sexism card you libs pull out to attack MEN and it backfired because I'm a woman.
Nothing backfired liar. You are still a liar who cannot back up your accusations, and an imbecile so stupid she doesn't realize she lost this thread. In other words, you are lying loser. LMAO!!!
But, as usual, with liberals, when something backfires, they never are intelligent enough to admit they goofed.

They just double down on the same stupidity and leave no doubt with anbody how without original thought or intelligence they are.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

That sounds like you Loser, unable to prove even one point with your dishonesty and lies.:lol:
 
As we can see from this thread, you are an imbecile who can not back none of your lies up. Being a women shows you disrepect your own gender by displaying them in soft porn. And that says a lot about yourself, not about me. LMAO! How easily she gets confused. :lol:

I think we see the imbecile.

As for "lies." When you have evidence of my "lies," let me know.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP.


Just because I slamdunk you braindead liberals back to the stone age doesn't constitute a "lie."

It just means you can't come up with anything else to refute my argument but the usual liberal baseless accusation. :lol::lol::lol::lol:

As for your charges of soft porn. I think that says far more about how YOU view STRONG WOMEN, than anything else.

Sorry, but you tried the typical sexism card you libs pull out to attack MEN and it backfired because I'm a woman.
Nothing backfired liar. You are still a liar who cannot back up your accusations, and an imbecile so stupid she doesn't realize she lost this thread. In other words, you are lying loser. LMAO!!!
But, as usual, with liberals, when something backfires, they never are intelligent enough to admit they goofed.

They just double down on the same stupidity and leave no doubt with anbody how without original thought or intelligence they are.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

That sounds like you Loser, unable to prove even one point with your dishonesty and lies.:lol:

IN OTHER WORDS.

I because I beat you and your mind can't accept that happened, "I must be lying."

The sad part is, I bet you think that really works.

NOTICE AGAIN, PEOPLE!

When liberals cease to even DISCUSS THE OP and just MAKE BASELESS ACCUSATIONS AGAINST YOU.

They are admitting they have lost.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
I think we see the imbecile.

As for "lies." When you have evidence of my "lies," let me know.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP.


Just because I slamdunk you braindead liberals back to the stone age doesn't constitute a "lie."

It just means you can't come up with anything else to refute my argument but the usual liberal baseless accusation. :lol::lol::lol::lol:

As for your charges of soft porn. I think that says far more about how YOU view STRONG WOMEN, than anything else.

Sorry, but you tried the typical sexism card you libs pull out to attack MEN and it backfired because I'm a woman.

But, as usual, with liberals, when something backfires, they never are intelligent enough to admit they goofed.

They just double down on the same stupidity and leave no doubt with anbody how without original thought or intelligence they are.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

That sounds like you Loser, unable to prove even one point with your dishonesty and lies.:lol:

IN OTHER WORDS.

I because I beat you and your mind can't accept that happened, "I must be lying."

The sad part is, I bet you think that really works.

NOTICE AGAIN, PEOPLE!

When liberals cease to even DISCUSS THE OP and just MAKE BASELESS ACCUSATIONS AGAINST YOU.

They are admitting they have lost.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

As we can see, the ignorant imbecile doesn't even know when she is lying. That makes her a habitual liar. PUT UP YOUR SUPPORTING EVIDENCE OR SHUT UP LOSER!!
 
im not a progressive twat. My stances on issues tend to run case by case, and trust me, i am vastly more conservative that you ever will be.


If I had a dime for every liberal who claimed to be "more conservative than I am" I'd swear I'd buy Hannity's website! :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

you want to compare Ideology then? I am willing to take the bet.

Didn't you earlier say this debate wasn't about me?

Now you want to make it about YOU?

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
great you made a personal choice that worked for you. That personal choice doesnt go beyond the players in that situation.

But then again i am quoting a social conservative hypocrite

I would LOVE to hear how you figure I'm a hypocrite.

This is gonna be good! :lmao:

Notice liberals keep throwing accusations my way WITH NO EVIDENCE??

That's the definition of a liberal that's LOSING THE ARGUMENT.

They want to desperately put you on the defensive, and they hope something will stick and put you on the defensive.

It's so obvious! :lmao:

As for "that choice doesn't be beyond the players."

WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT MEAN?

That abortion goes beyond "personal choice" because the Democrat party is so invested in it?

What does that mean?

This rationalization, I have just GOT to hear!

I'm sharpening my claws now. Be my guest!


:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
it means the choice doesnt go beyond you, your husband (or man you are with) and your doctor. Nobodies else's opinion matter.
I dont care what the Dem party has invested in abortion. The Choice is not yours to make unless it concerns you. My life does and never will concern you. If my wife and i decided we didnt want the child at this moment and went the abortion route, it is our choice.

I dont need to ask your permission, nor hear your opinion on it. If you felt you needed to state or stop us, i would not be above just decking you.
Stay out of other people's personal affairs. I dont give a shit if you get hit by a bus tomorrow, your life is meaningless to me, and if you choose to keep or abort a child has no impact on me whatsoever.

This is MY opinion and stance, Not a progressive, not a liberal, nor a democrat policy. They do not speak for me, just like you will never choose what i can and can not do with my body.

How are you a hypocrite? Answer these for me.

Are you against government removing transfats?
Smoking bans?
and other nannystate type situations?

See someone like you is for making a law banning all Abortions. You want to use government to limit peoples rights and freedoms. You will say its for the children blah blah, but the reality is you want your morals imposed on others.

Oh, this is going to be EASY!

I can destroy you by pointing out one little fact.

IT WAS LIBERALS THAT MADE A FEDERAL LAW "BANNING." Not social conservatives.

You see before Roe v. Wade, each state had their own laws on abortion IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 10TH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION.

It was not until Roe v. Wade when the "Jane Roe" (who later admitted she lied about being raped) went to the USSC and the USSC VIOLATED THE 10TH AMENDMENT making a federal law from the bench.

Thus, liberals BANNED THE RIGHT OF THE STATES TO DECIDE ON THIS QUESTION, which is their legal right per the 10th Amendment.

Over turning the Unconstitutional, Roe v. Wade bans nothing. It simply RETURNS THE QUESTION TO THE STATES, where it resided before 1973.

Thus, your argument about my "hypocrisy" falls flat because it's built on your OWN IGNORANCE regarding the Constitution and the origins of Roe v. Wade.

That also collapses your "it doesn't go beyond you or your husband."

No, sorry. The question goes TO THE STATES as noted in the 10th Amendment.

You want to try again, and make it even more obvious how badly you just lost on that issue?

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Last edited:
Its dissrespectful to the wife, the person your cheating on your wife with, women in general, and marriage which is the sanctity of an exclusive union between 2 individuals.

According to Newt Ginchrich, GnOP candidate for President, it's patriotic!

There's no question at times of my life, partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked far too hard and things happened in my life that were not appropriate. ~ Newtie
 
I had no point as I was stating a fact, and a fact that you just agreed with.

I"m not sure how pointing to bill o'reilly's problems justifies Matthew's blatant bias.

Yeah, I'm definitely going to agree with that.

Matthews has a major bias, as does O'Reilly.

There is no justification for either. They're both wrong.

Sure there is...that is what they are PAID (very well I might add) to do. They are political pundits that are paid to comment on politics. They are paid for their bias.
 
I would LOVE to hear how you figure I'm a hypocrite.

This is gonna be good! :lmao:

Notice liberals keep throwing accusations my way WITH NO EVIDENCE??

That's the definition of a liberal that's LOSING THE ARGUMENT.

They want to desperately put you on the defensive, and they hope something will stick and put you on the defensive.

It's so obvious! :lmao:

As for "that choice doesn't be beyond the players."

WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT MEAN?

That abortion goes beyond "personal choice" because the Democrat party is so invested in it?

What does that mean?

This rationalization, I have just GOT to hear!

I'm sharpening my claws now. Be my guest!


:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
it means the choice doesnt go beyond you, your husband (or man you are with) and your doctor. Nobodies else's opinion matter.
I dont care what the Dem party has invested in abortion. The Choice is not yours to make unless it concerns you. My life does and never will concern you. If my wife and i decided we didnt want the child at this moment and went the abortion route, it is our choice.

I dont need to ask your permission, nor hear your opinion on it. If you felt you needed to state or stop us, i would not be above just decking you.
Stay out of other people's personal affairs. I dont give a shit if you get hit by a bus tomorrow, your life is meaningless to me, and if you choose to keep or abort a child has no impact on me whatsoever.

This is MY opinion and stance, Not a progressive, not a liberal, nor a democrat policy. They do not speak for me, just like you will never choose what i can and can not do with my body.

How are you a hypocrite? Answer these for me.

Are you against government removing transfats?
Smoking bans?
and other nannystate type situations?

See someone like you is for making a law banning all Abortions. You want to use government to limit peoples rights and freedoms. You will say its for the children blah blah, but the reality is you want your morals imposed on others.

Oh, this is going to be EASY!

I can destroy you by pointing out one little fact.

IT WAS LIBERALS THAT MADE A FEDERAL LAW "BANNING." Not social conservatives.

You see before Roe v. Wade, each state had their own laws on abortion IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 10TH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION.

It was not until Roe v. Wade when the "Jane Roe" (who later admitted she lied about being raped) went to the USSC and the USSC VIOLATED THE 10TH AMENDMENT making a federal law from the bench.

Thus, liberals BANNED THE RIGHT OF THE STATES TO DECIDE ON THIS QUESTION, which is their legal right per the 10th Amendment.

Over turning the Unconstitutional, Roe v. Wade bans nothing. It simply RETURNS THE QUESTION TO THE STATES, where it resided before 1973.

Thus, your argument about my "hypocrisy" falls flat because it's built on your OWN IGNORANCE regarding the Constitution and the origins of Roe v. Wade.

That also collapses your "it doesn't go beyond you or your husband."

No, sorry. The question goes TO THE STATES as noted in the 10th Amendment.

You want to try again, and make it even more obvious how badly you just lost on that issue?

Wrong. The Supreme Court determined that since the 1st trimester fetus has NO constitutionally protected rights, but that a woman DOES have the constitutionally protected right of privacy,

the States cannot pass a law against first trimester abortion because that law violates the above constitutionally protected right.

That is not legislating from the bench. That is interpreting the law in accordance with the Constitution.

States cannot pass laws that are in conflict with the Constitution. The 10th amendment in no way allows that.
 
So comparing women to Nazis is acceptable if it's on topic??

Are you telling me that ONLY men were Nazis?

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

In other words, NYcarbineer, you keep repeating the same gibberish. You repeated it again. That's what teapartysamurai is showing you.

The term feminazi is directed at the adherents of feminism, an ideology that is ultimately premised on Marxism. It's not now and never was a derogatory term for women. It applies to male adherents of feminism too, you know, limp-wristed, leftist men.

Now do you intend to go on pretending that the term applies to gender and not ideology?

I can see that it ain't wise to mess with teapartysamurai; she wields a punishing categorical logic and a wicked right punch line.

But it's all flying right over your head.

You're ignorant.

So no one who calls Bush a Nazi was/is out of line? Perfectly acceptable rhetoric?

lol
 
it means the choice doesnt go beyond you, your husband (or man you are with) and your doctor. Nobodies else's opinion matter.
I dont care what the Dem party has invested in abortion. The Choice is not yours to make unless it concerns you. My life does and never will concern you. If my wife and i decided we didnt want the child at this moment and went the abortion route, it is our choice.

I dont need to ask your permission, nor hear your opinion on it. If you felt you needed to state or stop us, i would not be above just decking you.
Stay out of other people's personal affairs. I dont give a shit if you get hit by a bus tomorrow, your life is meaningless to me, and if you choose to keep or abort a child has no impact on me whatsoever.

This is MY opinion and stance, Not a progressive, not a liberal, nor a democrat policy. They do not speak for me, just like you will never choose what i can and can not do with my body.

How are you a hypocrite? Answer these for me.

Are you against government removing transfats?
Smoking bans?
and other nannystate type situations?

See someone like you is for making a law banning all Abortions. You want to use government to limit peoples rights and freedoms. You will say its for the children blah blah, but the reality is you want your morals imposed on others.

Oh, this is going to be EASY!

I can destroy you by pointing out one little fact.

IT WAS LIBERALS THAT MADE A FEDERAL LAW "BANNING." Not social conservatives.

You see before Roe v. Wade, each state had their own laws on abortion IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 10TH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION.

It was not until Roe v. Wade when the "Jane Roe" (who later admitted she lied about being raped) went to the USSC and the USSC VIOLATED THE 10TH AMENDMENT making a federal law from the bench.

Thus, liberals BANNED THE RIGHT OF THE STATES TO DECIDE ON THIS QUESTION, which is their legal right per the 10th Amendment.

Over turning the Unconstitutional, Roe v. Wade bans nothing. It simply RETURNS THE QUESTION TO THE STATES, where it resided before 1973.

Thus, your argument about my "hypocrisy" falls flat because it's built on your OWN IGNORANCE regarding the Constitution and the origins of Roe v. Wade.

That also collapses your "it doesn't go beyond you or your husband."

No, sorry. The question goes TO THE STATES as noted in the 10th Amendment.

You want to try again, and make it even more obvious how badly you just lost on that issue?

Wrong. The Supreme Court determined that since the 1st trimester fetus has NO constitutionally protected rights, but that a woman DOES have the constitutionally protected right of privacy,

the States cannot pass a law against first trimester abortion because that law violates the above constitutionally protected right.

That is not legislating from the bench. That is interpreting the law in accordance with the Constitution.

States cannot pass laws that are in conflict with the Constitution. The 10th amendment in no way allows that.

SHOW ME WHERE in the Constitution it says a 1st trimester Fetus has no Constitutional rights?

I have AN ULTRASOUND of my first trimester BABY sucking her thumb!

That was the ultrasound that turned my pro-abortion husband into an pro-life husband.

He was shocked. He had no idea that there was a fully formed baby in there, instead of just "tissue," as pro-abortion liars would have us believe.

But asside from that SHOW ME THE LANGUAGE IN THE CONSTITUTION determining 1st trimester fetuses have no rights??????

I would LOVE to hear this line of BS from you!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Hilly swipes the WH china.. Stays with a serial cheater.. Lies about being shot at in Iraq and is busted on it and lib skanks bust on Palin?? LMAO One word: JEALOUSY. Hilly looks like someone dropped a house on her.. come to think of it, all the lib hags are pretty homely.. Janet Rino, Janet Napalitano, Bubba's old Sec of State.. HAGITHA'S, all of them.

LOL, yes, everyone is jealous of Palin, because she's not ugly as sin. Because that's what's important in a national leader.

There are a whole lot of hot women out there, but that sure as hell doesn't make Britney Spears qualified for public office.

Let's all just ignore the fact that Palin is a functional moron, and that she's crazy as a loon.

Obviously she's much more qualified to run the country than hags like, oh I don't know, Hutchinson or Olympia Snowe... :cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top