Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Isn't it a bit too ironic that the Right now wants to hide behind Political Correctness as a tactic to attempt to insulate conservative women from criticism and ridicule?
These are people right out of the same mold as those who have fought for years defending Limbaugh for his repeated use of the term 'feminazi'.
What makes 'feminazi' perfectly acceptable, versus 'slut' being the broadcasting crime of the century?
Because "feminazi" WAS part of the criticism and ridicule of the National Organization of Women.
Sluts was used to CHANGE THE SUBJECT and ATTACK ANYONE ACCUSING HORNDOG CLINTON.
"
Are you telling me that ONLY men were Nazis?
In other words, NYcarbineer, you keep repeating the same gibberish. You repeated it again. That's what teapartysamurai is showing you.
The term feminazi is directed at the adherents of feminism, an ideology that is ultimately premised on Marxism. It's not now and never was a derogatory term for women. It applies to male adherents of feminism too, you know, limp-wristed, leftist men.
Now do you intend to go on pretending that the term applies to gender and not ideology?
I can see that it ain't wise to mess with teapartysamurai; she wields a punishing categorical logic and a wicked right punch line.
But it's all flying right over your head.
You're ignorant.
So no one who calls Bush a Nazi was/is out of line? Perfectly acceptable rhetoric?
lol
Sure there is...that is what they are PAID (very well I might add) to do. They are political pundits that are paid to comment on politics. They are paid for their bias.
Oh, this is going to be EASY!
I can destroy you by pointing out one little fact.
IT WAS LIBERALS THAT MADE A FEDERAL LAW "BANNING." Not social conservatives.
You see before Roe v. Wade, each state had their own laws on abortion IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 10TH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION.
It was not until Roe v. Wade when the "Jane Roe" (who later admitted she lied about being raped) went to the USSC and the USSC VIOLATED THE 10TH AMENDMENT making a federal law from the bench.
Thus, liberals BANNED THE RIGHT OF THE STATES TO DECIDE ON THIS QUESTION, which is their legal right per the 10th Amendment.
Over turning the Unconstitutional, Roe v. Wade bans nothing. It simply RETURNS THE QUESTION TO THE STATES, where it resided before 1973.
Thus, your argument about my "hypocrisy" falls flat because it's built on your OWN IGNORANCE regarding the Constitution and the origins of Roe v. Wade.
That also collapses your "it doesn't go beyond you or your husband."
No, sorry. The question goes TO THE STATES as noted in the 10th Amendment.
You want to try again, and make it even more obvious how badly you just lost on that issue?
Wrong. The Supreme Court determined that since the 1st trimester fetus has NO constitutionally protected rights, but that a woman DOES have the constitutionally protected right of privacy,
the States cannot pass a law against first trimester abortion because that law violates the above constitutionally protected right.
That is not legislating from the bench. That is interpreting the law in accordance with the Constitution.
States cannot pass laws that are in conflict with the Constitution. The 10th amendment in no way allows that.
SHOW ME WHERE in the Constitution it says a 1st trimester Fetus has no Constitutional rights?
I have AN ULTRASOUND of my first trimester BABY sucking her thumb!
That was the ultrasound that turned my pro-abortion husband into an pro-life husband.
He was shocked. He had no idea that there was a fully formed baby in there, instead of just "tissue," as pro-abortion liars would have us believe.
But asside from that SHOW ME THE LANGUAGE IN THE CONSTITUTION determining 1st trimester fetuses have no rights??????
I would LOVE to hear this line of BS from you!
:
Isn't it a bit too ironic that the Right now wants to hide behind Political Correctness as a tactic to attempt to insulate conservative women from criticism and ridicule?
These are people right out of the same mold as those who have fought for years defending Limbaugh for his repeated use of the term 'feminazi'.
What makes 'feminazi' perfectly acceptable, versus 'slut' being the broadcasting crime of the century?
Because "feminazi" WAS part of the criticism and ridicule of the National Organization of Women.
And Ed Schultz's calling Ingraham a 'talk slut' was part of the criticism and ridicule of Rightwing talk radio.
So by your own standards, that makes it OK.
Sluts was used to CHANGE THE SUBJECT and ATTACK ANYONE ACCUSING HORNDOG CLINTON.
"
Ed Schultz wasn't talking about Clinton. What the fuck are you talking about?
LOL, yes, everyone is jealous of Palin, because she's not ugly as sin. Because that's what's important in a national leader.
There are a whole lot of hot women out there, but that sure as hell doesn't make Britney Spears qualified for public office.
Let's all just ignore the fact that Palin is a functional moron, and that she's crazy as a loon.
Obviously she's much more qualified to run the country than hags like, oh I don't know, Hutchinson or Olympia Snowe...
In other words, NYcarbineer, you keep repeating the same gibberish. You repeated it again. That's what teapartysamurai is showing you.
The term feminazi is directed at the adherents of feminism, an ideology that is ultimately premised on Marxism. It's not now and never was a derogatory term for women. It applies to male adherents of feminism too, you know, limp-wristed, leftist men.
Now do you intend to go on pretending that the term applies to gender and not ideology?
I can see that it ain't wise to mess with teapartysamurai; she wields a punishing categorical logic and a wicked right punch line.
But it's all flying right over your head.
You're ignorant.
So no one who calls Bush a Nazi was/is out of line? Perfectly acceptable rhetoric?
lol
Are you telling me your side DIDN'T call Bush a Nazi??????????
Because "feminazi" WAS part of the criticism and ridicule of the National Organization of Women.
And Ed Schultz's calling Ingraham a 'talk slut' was part of the criticism and ridicule of Rightwing talk radio.
So by your own standards, that makes it OK.
Nice try, but "feminazi" deals with the radical agenda of NOW, not their sexual proclivities or lack thereof.
Feminazi dealt with the actual radical AGENDA of the NOW gang. Slut does not. it's just a sexist harangue that has nothing to do with what Ingrahm believes or her political agenda.
Not even close. This is why you lose all the time. You try to make parallels that don't even come within the ballpark.
Wrong. The Supreme Court determined that since the 1st trimester fetus has NO constitutionally protected rights, but that a woman DOES have the constitutionally protected right of privacy,
the States cannot pass a law against first trimester abortion because that law violates the above constitutionally protected right.
That is not legislating from the bench. That is interpreting the law in accordance with the Constitution.
States cannot pass laws that are in conflict with the Constitution. The 10th amendment in no way allows that.
SHOW ME WHERE in the Constitution it says a 1st trimester Fetus has no Constitutional rights?
I have AN ULTRASOUND of my first trimester BABY sucking her thumb!
That was the ultrasound that turned my pro-abortion husband into an pro-life husband.
He was shocked. He had no idea that there was a fully formed baby in there, instead of just "tissue," as pro-abortion liars would have us believe.
But asside from that SHOW ME THE LANGUAGE IN THE CONSTITUTION determining 1st trimester fetuses have no rights??????
I would LOVE to hear this line of BS from you!
:
Show me where the Constitution says the 1st trimester fetus has rights.
In order to grant a 1st trimester fetus rights as a person, the Supreme Court would have to invent them.
'Hatred Towards Conservative Women is Last Acceptable Misogyny in U.S.'
You're ignorant.
So no one who calls Bush a Nazi was/is out of line? Perfectly acceptable rhetoric?
lol
Are you telling me your side DIDN'T call Bush a Nazi??????????
I'm asking if it was acceptable. I'm asking if people like you considered it perfectly permissible and acceptable rhetoric, if people like you defended it,
the way you claim 'feminazi' is and the way you're defending the use of 'feminazi'.
Careful how you answer. You have many posts on this forum.
And Ed Schultz's calling Ingraham a 'talk slut' was part of the criticism and ridicule of Rightwing talk radio.
So by your own standards, that makes it OK.
Nice try, but "feminazi" deals with the radical agenda of NOW, not their sexual proclivities or lack thereof.
Feminazi dealt with the actual radical AGENDA of the NOW gang. Slut does not. it's just a sexist harangue that has nothing to do with what Ingrahm believes or her political agenda.
Not even close. This is why you lose all the time. You try to make parallels that don't even come within the ballpark.
Schultz wasn't talking about sex.
He wasn't talking about sex?
Oh excuse me:
slut(slt)
n. 1. a. A person, especially a woman, considered sexually promiscuous.
b. A woman prostitute.
You're a dumbass!
Then why was it OK to call Cindy Sheehan a media whore? A tragedy pimp? A prostitute?
Do you have quotes of someone in the MSM like Shultz calling Sheehan that?
SHOW ME WHERE in the Constitution it says a 1st trimester Fetus has no Constitutional rights?
I have AN ULTRASOUND of my first trimester BABY sucking her thumb!
That was the ultrasound that turned my pro-abortion husband into an pro-life husband.
He was shocked. He had no idea that there was a fully formed baby in there, instead of just "tissue," as pro-abortion liars would have us believe.
But asside from that SHOW ME THE LANGUAGE IN THE CONSTITUTION determining 1st trimester fetuses have no rights??????
I would LOVE to hear this line of BS from you!
:
Show me where the Constitution says the 1st trimester fetus has rights.
In order to grant a 1st trimester fetus rights as a person, the Supreme Court would have to invent them.
Exactly. She doesn't realize that the burden of proof is on her.
Nice try, but "feminazi" deals with the radical agenda of NOW, not their sexual proclivities or lack thereof.
Feminazi dealt with the actual radical AGENDA of the NOW gang. Slut does not. it's just a sexist harangue that has nothing to do with what Ingrahm believes or her political agenda.
Not even close. This is why you lose all the time. You try to make parallels that don't even come within the ballpark.
He wasn't talking about sex?
Oh excuse me:
You're a dumbass!
Then why was it OK to call Cindy Sheehan a media whore? A tragedy pimp? A prostitute?
Do you have quotes of someone in the MSM like Shultz calling Sheehan that?
Yes.
Right after you tell me whether or not it's acceptable to use that sort of, as the OP calls it, MISOGYNISTIC rhetoric against Sheehan.
You claim it's wrong for Schultz to talk that way about Ingraham.
Is it wrong for __________ to talk that way about Sheehan?
Show me where the Constitution says the 1st trimester fetus has rights.
In order to grant a 1st trimester fetus rights as a person, the Supreme Court would have to invent them.
Exactly. She doesn't realize that the burden of proof is on her.
BWAHAHAHAA!
The burden of proof is on me?
I DIDN'T MAKE A CLAIM ON WHAT IS IN THE CONSTITUTION!
Nice damn try you dumbasses!
Carbiner claimed the USSC found in the Constitution that a 1st Trimester Fetus has no rights.
WHERE IS THAT IN THE CONSTITUTION????????
I'm still waiting!
Are you telling me your side DIDN'T call Bush a Nazi??????????
I'm asking if it was acceptable. I'm asking if people like you considered it perfectly permissible and acceptable rhetoric, if people like you defended it,
the way you claim 'feminazi' is and the way you're defending the use of 'feminazi'.
Careful how you answer. You have many posts on this forum.
Why don't you ask your wonderful Democrats!
l:
SHOW ME WHERE in the Constitution it says a 1st trimester Fetus has no Constitutional rights?
I have AN ULTRASOUND of my first trimester BABY sucking her thumb!
That was the ultrasound that turned my pro-abortion husband into an pro-life husband.
He was shocked. He had no idea that there was a fully formed baby in there, instead of just "tissue," as pro-abortion liars would have us believe.
But asside from that SHOW ME THE LANGUAGE IN THE CONSTITUTION determining 1st trimester fetuses have no rights??????
I would LOVE to hear this line of BS from you!
:
Show me where the Constitution says the 1st trimester fetus has rights.
In order to grant a 1st trimester fetus rights as a person, the Supreme Court would have to invent them.
Exactly. She doesn't realize that the burden of proof is on her.
'Hatred Towards Conservative Women is Last Acceptable Misogyny in U.S.'
Ed Schultz calling Laura Ingraham a 'Right-wing Slut' and 'Talk Slut' is totally unacceptable. I would hope that regular listeners of Mr. Schultz consider a boycott.
Cindy Sheehan is a tragedy slut.
We’re with a high class prostitute. That’s what we’re with…You’re not sittin’ there in a back alley and sayin’ hey what do you say, five bucks? No, no, no this comes to your Four Seasons hotel room and does it right. There’s nobody that’s going to look at her and say oh my gosh you’re with a whore…
That may be folks, that may be, the most expensive prostitute in the history of prostitution, and she’s bragging about it. Mary Landrieu bragging about a $300 million payoff from Dingy Harry to get her vote on this healthcare scam on Saturday night.
