Have you been recruited?

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.



1. For one limited example, the defense of Antifa by so many of the more "mainstream" democrats, show that we were right all along.

2. We don't believe that Trump colluded with Putin. So we deny it. Indeed, it is not clear that Trump benefited from Putin's alleged meddling.

3. The Deep State:

Deep state in the United States - Wikipedia

" United States the term "deep state" is used within political science to describe influential decision-making bodies believed to be within government who are relatively permanent and whose policies and long-term plans are unaffected by changing administrations. The term is often used in a critical sense, vis-à-vis, the general electorate to refer to the lack of influence popular democracy has on these institutions and the decisions they make as a shadow government...."


"While definitions vary, the term gained popularity among various groups, primarily supporters of Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and conspiracy theorists, during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, in opposition to establishment Republican and Democratic candidates. Since Trump's inauguration, the term has been used by some commentators, who argue that a "deep state" is aiming to delegitimize the Trump presidency and thwart its policy goals"


"President Donald Trump supporters use the term to refer to allegations that intelligence officers and executive branch officials guide policy through leaking or other internal means.[21][11] According to a July 2017 report by the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, "the Trump administration was being hit by national security leaks 'on a nearly daily basis' and at a far higher rate than its predecessors encountered".


"According to a poll of Americans in April 2017, about half (48%) thought there was a "deep state", "meaning military, intelligence and government officials who try to secretly manipulate government." Of those who thought that, more than half (58%) said it was a major problem (net of 28% surveyed).[31][32]

A March 2018 poll found most respondents (63%) were unfamiliar with the term "deep state", but a majority believe that a deep state likely exists in the United States when described as "a group of unelected government and military officials who secretly manipulate or direct national policy". Three-fourths (74%) of the respondents say that they believe this type of group definitely (27%) or probably (47%) exists in the federal government."

Mike Pompeo laughingly dismissed the entire idea that there is a "deep state"

Pompeo: No 'deep state' at State or CIA

Trump says there is.

Who do you believe and why?

Pompeo, of course. Who in their right mind will ever believe anything trump says or tweets.
 
D
For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.




DEFENDING PUTIN: I haven't seen one person here DEFEND Putin. But I have seen people point out that they have not seen any CONCLUSIVE PROOF that Russia tampered with the election. Even Julian Assange said a couple years ago that his source was NOT Russia. Oddly, the ONE PERSON we KNOW FOR A FACT colluded with Russia was Hillary! And no one is looking at that!

TRUMP BENEFITED: Again, how do we know this and where? And if Trump did benefit, it is yet another thing to show that he was a participant in that benefit.

Pointing out the facts and evidence, even when it leads to things you personally do not favor, is called objectivity. You call it "recruitment."
Denies defending Putin, does it in the next sentence.

You guys are too much.
 
For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.



1. For one limited example, the defense of Antifa by so many of the more "mainstream" democrats, show that we were right all along.

2. We don't believe that Trump colluded with Putin. So we deny it. Indeed, it is not clear that Trump benefited from Putin's alleged meddling.

3. The Deep State:

Deep state in the United States - Wikipedia

" United States the term "deep state" is used within political science to describe influential decision-making bodies believed to be within government who are relatively permanent and whose policies and long-term plans are unaffected by changing administrations. The term is often used in a critical sense, vis-à-vis, the general electorate to refer to the lack of influence popular democracy has on these institutions and the decisions they make as a shadow government...."


"While definitions vary, the term gained popularity among various groups, primarily supporters of Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and conspiracy theorists, during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, in opposition to establishment Republican and Democratic candidates. Since Trump's inauguration, the term has been used by some commentators, who argue that a "deep state" is aiming to delegitimize the Trump presidency and thwart its policy goals"


"President Donald Trump supporters use the term to refer to allegations that intelligence officers and executive branch officials guide policy through leaking or other internal means.[21][11] According to a July 2017 report by the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, "the Trump administration was being hit by national security leaks 'on a nearly daily basis' and at a far higher rate than its predecessors encountered".


"According to a poll of Americans in April 2017, about half (48%) thought there was a "deep state", "meaning military, intelligence and government officials who try to secretly manipulate government." Of those who thought that, more than half (58%) said it was a major problem (net of 28% surveyed).[31][32]

A March 2018 poll found most respondents (63%) were unfamiliar with the term "deep state", but a majority believe that a deep state likely exists in the United States when described as "a group of unelected government and military officials who secretly manipulate or direct national policy". Three-fourths (74%) of the respondents say that they believe this type of group definitely (27%) or probably (47%) exists in the federal government."

Mike Pompeo laughingly dismissed the entire idea that there is a "deep state"

Pompeo: No 'deep state' at State or CIA

Trump says there is.

Who do you believe and why?

Pompeo, of course. Who in their right mind will ever believe anything trump says or tweets.

Wait...watch. Pompeo will be a member of the "deep state" quite quickly.
 
Whoa how did you know? You got me I now post for cases of Stoli and Russian caviar. Get a grip catcher :21:

There's a place for sarcasm, sadly this is the wrong place and time. How would you know if you were recruited to push the agenda which you have; unless you critically examine your comments and thinking.

I doubt very much you've done that.
 
Just admit it, you know you guys are in deep sh*t.
The first to responders offer an opinion sans evidence. I have questions for them.

Did you accuse liberals, progressives and Democrats in the past of being fellow travelers of communism?

Yes or No. If yes, what has changed?
We are all in deep shit. Vladimir Putin's choice is in the White House.
 
For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.
Like China, Putin has embraced capitalism. He's selling natural gas to Merkel and her Islamic state. Like China, Putin is laughing at the uneducated, naive and gullible Americans who are embracing redistribution.

Putin is no more an enemy of the USA or German Islamic State than is Scotland. Trump and Putin have put the world on notice that we can be better friends and won't allow Soros and others to start a war.

Hillary lost because people had Obama fatigue, were tired of hearing how food stamps and unemployment checks powered the American economy and she was a worse candidate than Juan McCain.

Besides, the Eighties called.
 
Last edited:
For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.




DEFENDING PUTIN: I haven't seen one person here DEFEND Putin. But I have seen people point out that they have not seen any CONCLUSIVE PROOF that Russia tampered with the election. Even Julian Assange said a couple years ago that his source was NOT Russia. Oddly, the ONE PERSON we KNOW FOR A FACT colluded with Russia was Hillary! And no one is looking at that!

TRUMP BENEFITED: Again, how do we know this and where? And if Trump did benefit, it is yet another thing to show that he was a participant in that benefit.

Pointing out the facts and evidence, even when it leads to things you personally do not favor, is called objectivity. You call it "recruitment."
They are looking at it (Hillary/Obama/Russia collusion).
The fake media is just hiding it..and Trump plays this game where he gives the real fascists the rope, and they obligingly hang themselves with it.
 
For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.
Like China, Putin has embraced capitalism. He's selling natural gas to Merkel and her Islamic state. Like China, Putin is laughing at the uneducated, naive and gullible Americans who are embracing redistribution.

Putin is no more an enemy of the USA or German Islamic State than is Scotland. Trump and Putin have put the world on notice that we can be better friends and won't allow Soros and others to start a war.

Hillary lost because people had Obama fatigue, were tired of hearing how good stamps and unemployment checks powered the American economy and she was a worse candidate than Juan McCain.

Besides, the Eighties called.
The fake press is just freaking out because Trump has cut them out of the loop.

There will be journalists who go down with the dems who have been operating as traitors for decades, never fear.
 
For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.
Like China, Putin has embraced capitalism. He's selling natural gas to Merkel and her Islamic state. Like China, Putin is laughing at the uneducated, naive and gullible Americans who are embracing redistribution.

Putin is no more an enemy of the USA or German Islamic State than is Scotland. Trump and Putin have put the world on notice that we can be better friends and won't allow Soros and others to start a war.

Hillary lost because people had Obama fatigue, were tired of hearing how good stamps and unemployment checks powered the American economy and she was a worse candidate than Juan McCain.

Besides, the Eighties called.

Funny Frank, you were in my mind as one whose posting history was framed on the RED SCARE.

Now you side with Putin, because he's a "capitalist"? He's the same man with the same ethos he always was.
 
For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

DEFENDING PUTIN: I haven't seen one person here DEFEND Putin. But I have seen people point out that they have not seen any CONCLUSIVE PROOF that Russia tampered with the election. Even Julian Assange said a couple years ago that his source was NOT Russia. Oddly, the ONE PERSON we KNOW FOR A FACT colluded with Russia was Hillary! And no one is looking at that!

TRUMP BENEFITED: Again, how do we know this and where? And if Trump did benefit, it is yet another thing to show that he was a participant in that benefit.

Pointing out the facts and evidence, even when it leads to things you personally do not favor, is called objectivity. You call it "recruitment."

Herein ^^^ is an example of what I believe to be true. The propaganda attacking HRC infected her campaign, and is repeated as a BIG LIE, since no evidence has ever been presented which is probative.

Really? It was propaganda for years and years of who Hillary's mentor was in college? Do you know? And where did good ol' Bill go for his Rhodes Scholarship? Any idea? All of this was known LONG LONG before the 2016 election, yet I never heard any of it actually brought up during the election.

Meantime, there was no propaganda used attacking Trump? They even dug up a 12 year old secret video taken of him telling how beauty contestants would let you do anything to them to win and that morphed into Trump being a pussy grabber. Then there was Trump's big hands. Attacking his wife's model career. Lies about his business. Total suppression of the many kind and charitable things he did for people and NYC. So you see, both he and Hillary BOTH were the victims of propaganda, Trump I believe the victim far more because the media was for Hillary, so it all cancels out as an influence. When all the smoke clears, Hillary lost because she was a lousy candidate and an even lousier person. Not only did the democrats themselves laugh at Russia as a factor in anything until Hillary lost, in my entire life, I never once heard or saw a word about Trump and Putin or Russia being cozy until he became president.
 
Lol, you really don’t know how to follow the dots, or are just being a mouth piece.
Just admit it, you know you guys are in deep sh*t.
The first to responders offer an opinion sans evidence. I have questions for them.

Did you accuse liberals, progressives and Democrats in the past of being fellow travelers of communism?

Yes or No. If yes, what has changed?
We are all in deep shit. Vladimir Putin's choice is in the White House.
 
For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.




DEFENDING PUTIN: I haven't seen one person here DEFEND Putin. But I have seen people point out that they have not seen any CONCLUSIVE PROOF that Russia tampered with the election. Even Julian Assange said a couple years ago that his source was NOT Russia. Oddly, the ONE PERSON we KNOW FOR A FACT colluded with Russia was Hillary! And no one is looking at that!

TRUMP BENEFITED: Again, how do we know this and where? And if Trump did benefit, it is yet another thing to show that he was a participant in that benefit.

Pointing out the facts and evidence, even when it leads to things you personally do not favor, is called objectivity. You call it "recruitment."

They are looking at it (Hillary/Obama/Russia collusion).
The fake media is just hiding it..and Trump plays this game where he gives the real fascists the rope, and they obligingly hang themselves with it.

This post ^^^ is why I asked the question in the OP. Propaganda regurgitated.
 
Whoa how did you know? You got me I now post for cases of Stoli and Russian caviar. Get a grip catcher :21:

There's a place for sarcasm, sadly this is the wrong place and time. How would you know if you were recruited to push the agenda which you have; unless you critically examine your comments and thinking.

I doubt very much you've done that.

Most of them other than the real russian trolls on this board have no idea that they may been recruited through social media, they see a meme or some news on the internet and it's true and you're not going to change their minds. I have two relatives that do just that and then spread it all over the internet without checking a researching but by God to them it's true.
 
For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.




DEFENDING PUTIN: I haven't seen one person here DEFEND Putin. But I have seen people point out that they have not seen any CONCLUSIVE PROOF that Russia tampered with the election. Even Julian Assange said a couple years ago that his source was NOT Russia. Oddly, the ONE PERSON we KNOW FOR A FACT colluded with Russia was Hillary! And no one is looking at that!

TRUMP BENEFITED: Again, how do we know this and where? And if Trump did benefit, it is yet another thing to show that he was a participant in that benefit.

Pointing out the facts and evidence, even when it leads to things you personally do not favor, is called objectivity. You call it "recruitment."

They are looking at it (Hillary/Obama/Russia collusion).
The fake media is just hiding it..and Trump plays this game where he gives the real fascists the rope, and they obligingly hang themselves with it.

This post ^^^ is why I asked the question in the OP. Propaganda regurgitated.

Thank you, I take that as your acknowledgement that what I said is 100 percent truthful.
 
The left is openly calling for socialism! Are you listening?

One more example of propaganda regurgitated***.

***just for you WT, so you can understand my comment:

REGURGITATED: repeat (information) without analyzing or comprehending it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top