Have you been recruited?

[Jantje_Smit]

[Mike Pompeo laughingly dismissed the entire idea that there is a "deep state"

Pompeo: No 'deep state' at State or CIA

Trump says there is.

Who do you believe and why?

Pompeo is loyal member of the deep state, you think he's going to announce that to the world?

Rosenstein is a member too

But since Trump is totally clueless he appointed them both.....

Sad!

 

[Correll]

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

1. For one limited example, the defense of Antifa by so many of the more "mainstream" democrats, show that we were right all along.

2. We don't believe that Trump colluded with Putin. So we deny it. Indeed, it is not clear that Trump benefited from Putin's alleged meddling.

3. The Deep State:

Deep state in the United States - Wikipedia

" United States the term "deep state" is used within political science to describe influential decision-making bodies believed to be within government who are relatively permanent and whose policies and long-term plans are unaffected by changing administrations. The term is often used in a critical sense, vis-à-vis, the general electorate to refer to the lack of influence popular democracy has on these institutions and the decisions they make as a shadow government...."


"While definitions vary, the term gained popularity among various groups, primarily supporters of Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and conspiracy theorists, during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, in opposition to establishment Republican and Democratic candidates. Since Trump's inauguration, the term has been used by some commentators, who argue that a "deep state" is aiming to delegitimize the Trump presidency and thwart its policy goals"


"President Donald Trump supporters use the term to refer to allegations that intelligence officers and executive branch officials guide policy through leaking or other internal means.[21][11] According to a July 2017 report by the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, "the Trump administration was being hit by national security leaks 'on a nearly daily basis' and at a far higher rate than its predecessors encountered".


"According to a poll of Americans in April 2017, about half (48%) thought there was a "deep state", "meaning military, intelligence and government officials who try to secretly manipulate government." Of those who thought that, more than half (58%) said it was a major problem (net of 28% surveyed).[31][32]

A March 2018 poll found most respondents (63%) were unfamiliar with the term "deep state", but a majority believe that a deep state likely exists in the United States when described as "a group of unelected government and military officials who secretly manipulate or direct national policy". Three-fourths (74%) of the respondents say that they believe this type of group definitely (27%) or probably (47%) exists in the federal government."

The information in the link suggests the Deep State is an amorphous body. It seems such an organization would have an agenda too difficult to keep hidden, and one which could not remain secret if more than a few were members.

The closet example which comes to mind is the K st. group organized by Grover Norquist:

Grover Norquist - GU Politics

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

1. For one limited example, the defense of Antifa by so many of the more "mainstream" democrats, show that we were right all along.

2. We don't believe that Trump colluded with Putin. So we deny it. Indeed, it is not clear that Trump benefited from Putin's alleged meddling.

3. The Deep State:

Deep state in the United States - Wikipedia

" United States the term "deep state" is used within political science to describe influential decision-making bodies believed to be within government who are relatively permanent and whose policies and long-term plans are unaffected by changing administrations. The term is often used in a critical sense, vis-à-vis, the general electorate to refer to the lack of influence popular democracy has on these institutions and the decisions they make as a shadow government...."


"While definitions vary, the term gained popularity among various groups, primarily supporters of Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and conspiracy theorists, during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, in opposition to establishment Republican and Democratic candidates. Since Trump's inauguration, the term has been used by some commentators, who argue that a "deep state" is aiming to delegitimize the Trump presidency and thwart its policy goals"


"President Donald Trump supporters use the term to refer to allegations that intelligence officers and executive branch officials guide policy through leaking or other internal means.[21][11] According to a July 2017 report by the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, "the Trump administration was being hit by national security leaks 'on a nearly daily basis' and at a far higher rate than its predecessors encountered".


"According to a poll of Americans in April 2017, about half (48%) thought there was a "deep state", "meaning military, intelligence and government officials who try to secretly manipulate government." Of those who thought that, more than half (58%) said it was a major problem (net of 28% surveyed).[31][32]

A March 2018 poll found most respondents (63%) were unfamiliar with the term "deep state", but a majority believe that a deep state likely exists in the United States when described as "a group of unelected government and military officials who secretly manipulate or direct national policy". Three-fourths (74%) of the respondents say that they believe this type of group definitely (27%) or probably (47%) exists in the federal government."

The information in the link suggests the Deep State is an amorphous body. It seems such an organization would have an agenda too difficult to keep hidden, and one which could not remain secret if more than a few were members.

The closet example which comes to mind is the K st. group organized by Grover Norquist:

Grover Norquist - GU Politics

You seem to be trying to frame the question to require a formal organization with a name and a well defined structure.


Isn't it funny that you claimed that no one has defined the term, and I found the wikepedia definition in seconds?


Would you like to discuss any of the points you made that I addressed?


For example the support show for the marxist antifa by "mainstream" liberals and dems.

 

[koshergrl]

Denies defending Putin, does it in the next sentence.

Please quote the EXACT WORDS where I defended Putin and the post number I did it in, rather than just SAY I did.

This is just more of the left's nazi anti-free speech campaign.
Have you noticed? They have criminalized the act of speaking. Trump is a traitor because he spoke to Putin and they don't want him to speak to Putin without the filter of the press. That should tell everybody everything they need to know right there.

But it's just another instance of their ongoing war against free speech. The nazis maintain they get to club people and steal from people and prevent people they don't agree with from sharing their views. The whole "Trump is a traitor for speaking to Putin" deal is just that projected onto the prez.

 

[Wry Catcher]

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

DEFENDING PUTIN: I haven't seen one person here DEFEND Putin. But I have seen people point out that they have not seen any CONCLUSIVE PROOF that Russia tampered with the election. Even Julian Assange said a couple years ago that his source was NOT Russia. Oddly, the ONE PERSON we KNOW FOR A FACT colluded with Russia was Hillary! And no one is looking at that!

TRUMP BENEFITED: Again, how do we know this and where? And if Trump did benefit, it is yet another thing to show that he was a participant in that benefit.

Pointing out the facts and evidence, even when it leads to things you personally do not favor, is called objectivity. You call it "recruitment."

They are looking at it (Hillary/Obama/Russia collusion).
The fake media is just hiding it..and Trump plays this game where he gives the real fascists the rope, and they obligingly hang themselves with it.

This post ^^^ is why I asked the question in the OP. Propaganda regurgitated.

Thank you, I take that as your acknowledgement that what I said is 100 percent truthful.

That's interesting. Your comment on the "fake media" is an example of a meme which Limbaugh created decades ago.

 

[Correll]

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

1. For one limited example, the defense of Antifa by so many of the more "mainstream" democrats, show that we were right all along.

2. We don't believe that Trump colluded with Putin. So we deny it. Indeed, it is not clear that Trump benefited from Putin's alleged meddling.

3. The Deep State:

Deep state in the United States - Wikipedia

" United States the term "deep state" is used within political science to describe influential decision-making bodies believed to be within government who are relatively permanent and whose policies and long-term plans are unaffected by changing administrations. The term is often used in a critical sense, vis-à-vis, the general electorate to refer to the lack of influence popular democracy has on these institutions and the decisions they make as a shadow government...."


"While definitions vary, the term gained popularity among various groups, primarily supporters of Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and conspiracy theorists, during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, in opposition to establishment Republican and Democratic candidates. Since Trump's inauguration, the term has been used by some commentators, who argue that a "deep state" is aiming to delegitimize the Trump presidency and thwart its policy goals"


"President Donald Trump supporters use the term to refer to allegations that intelligence officers and executive branch officials guide policy through leaking or other internal means.[21][11] According to a July 2017 report by the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, "the Trump administration was being hit by national security leaks 'on a nearly daily basis' and at a far higher rate than its predecessors encountered".


"According to a poll of Americans in April 2017, about half (48%) thought there was a "deep state", "meaning military, intelligence and government officials who try to secretly manipulate government." Of those who thought that, more than half (58%) said it was a major problem (net of 28% surveyed).[31][32]

A March 2018 poll found most respondents (63%) were unfamiliar with the term "deep state", but a majority believe that a deep state likely exists in the United States when described as "a group of unelected government and military officials who secretly manipulate or direct national policy". Three-fourths (74%) of the respondents say that they believe this type of group definitely (27%) or probably (47%) exists in the federal government."

Mike Pompeo laughingly dismissed the entire idea that there is a "deep state"

Pompeo: No 'deep state' at State or CIA

Trump says there is.

Who do you believe and why?

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

1. For one limited example, the defense of Antifa by so many of the more "mainstream" democrats, show that we were right all along.

2. We don't believe that Trump colluded with Putin. So we deny it. Indeed, it is not clear that Trump benefited from Putin's alleged meddling.

3. The Deep State:

Deep state in the United States - Wikipedia

" United States the term "deep state" is used within political science to describe influential decision-making bodies believed to be within government who are relatively permanent and whose policies and long-term plans are unaffected by changing administrations. The term is often used in a critical sense, vis-à-vis, the general electorate to refer to the lack of influence popular democracy has on these institutions and the decisions they make as a shadow government...."


"While definitions vary, the term gained popularity among various groups, primarily supporters of Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and conspiracy theorists, during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, in opposition to establishment Republican and Democratic candidates. Since Trump's inauguration, the term has been used by some commentators, who argue that a "deep state" is aiming to delegitimize the Trump presidency and thwart its policy goals"


"President Donald Trump supporters use the term to refer to allegations that intelligence officers and executive branch officials guide policy through leaking or other internal means.[21][11] According to a July 2017 report by the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, "the Trump administration was being hit by national security leaks 'on a nearly daily basis' and at a far higher rate than its predecessors encountered".


"According to a poll of Americans in April 2017, about half (48%) thought there was a "deep state", "meaning military, intelligence and government officials who try to secretly manipulate government." Of those who thought that, more than half (58%) said it was a major problem (net of 28% surveyed).[31][32]

A March 2018 poll found most respondents (63%) were unfamiliar with the term "deep state", but a majority believe that a deep state likely exists in the United States when described as "a group of unelected government and military officials who secretly manipulate or direct national policy". Three-fourths (74%) of the respondents say that they believe this type of group definitely (27%) or probably (47%) exists in the federal government."

Mike Pompeo laughingly dismissed the entire idea that there is a "deep state"

Pompeo: No 'deep state' at State or CIA

Trump says there is.

Who do you believe and why?

Mike who?

And why bring Trump into this?


For me, when the FBI gave Hillary a pass on her mishandling of classified materials.


I've worked with merely CONFIDENTIAL materials, and I was shocked by her behavior.


That pass made the Deep State Theory a lot more credible.


As time went on, and we saw more and more push back from government officials, that solidified it for me.

 

[toobfreak]

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

DEFENDING PUTIN: I haven't seen one person here DEFEND Putin. But I have seen people point out that they have not seen any CONCLUSIVE PROOF that Russia tampered with the election. Even Julian Assange said a couple years ago that his source was NOT Russia. Oddly, the ONE PERSON we KNOW FOR A FACT colluded with Russia was Hillary! And no one is looking at that!

TRUMP BENEFITED: Again, how do we know this and where? And if Trump did benefit, it is yet another thing to show that he was a participant in that benefit.

Pointing out the facts and evidence, even when it leads to things you personally do not favor, is called objectivity. You call it "recruitment."

They are looking at it (Hillary/Obama/Russia collusion).
The fake media is just hiding it..and Trump plays this game where he gives the real fascists the rope, and they obligingly hang themselves with it.

Propaganda regurgitated.

Funny you say it is just propaganda the easily half dozen visible, documented, photographed and proven ties and connections between Hillary and Russia, yet you accuse Trump of a Russian connection with NO evidence, no documentation, pictures, ties or connections and say it is all fact! Don't you know disassociation from reality is a form of cognitive dissonance that can now be successfully treated in many cases? You should look into getting help.

But not until after the midterms and 2020 reelection of Trump. We like you guys just as you are.

 

[koshergrl]

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

1. For one limited example, the defense of Antifa by so many of the more "mainstream" democrats, show that we were right all along.

2. We don't believe that Trump colluded with Putin. So we deny it. Indeed, it is not clear that Trump benefited from Putin's alleged meddling.

3. The Deep State:

Deep state in the United States - Wikipedia

" United States the term "deep state" is used within political science to describe influential decision-making bodies believed to be within government who are relatively permanent and whose policies and long-term plans are unaffected by changing administrations. The term is often used in a critical sense, vis-à-vis, the general electorate to refer to the lack of influence popular democracy has on these institutions and the decisions they make as a shadow government...."


"While definitions vary, the term gained popularity among various groups, primarily supporters of Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and conspiracy theorists, during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, in opposition to establishment Republican and Democratic candidates. Since Trump's inauguration, the term has been used by some commentators, who argue that a "deep state" is aiming to delegitimize the Trump presidency and thwart its policy goals"


"President Donald Trump supporters use the term to refer to allegations that intelligence officers and executive branch officials guide policy through leaking or other internal means.[21][11] According to a July 2017 report by the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, "the Trump administration was being hit by national security leaks 'on a nearly daily basis' and at a far higher rate than its predecessors encountered".


"According to a poll of Americans in April 2017, about half (48%) thought there was a "deep state", "meaning military, intelligence and government officials who try to secretly manipulate government." Of those who thought that, more than half (58%) said it was a major problem (net of 28% surveyed).[31][32]

A March 2018 poll found most respondents (63%) were unfamiliar with the term "deep state", but a majority believe that a deep state likely exists in the United States when described as "a group of unelected government and military officials who secretly manipulate or direct national policy". Three-fourths (74%) of the respondents say that they believe this type of group definitely (27%) or probably (47%) exists in the federal government."

The information in the link suggests the Deep State is an amorphous body. It seems such an organization would have an agenda too difficult to keep hidden, and one which could not remain secret if more than a few were members.

The closet example which comes to mind is the K st. group organized by Grover Norquist:

Grover Norquist - GU Politics

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

1. For one limited example, the defense of Antifa by so many of the more "mainstream" democrats, show that we were right all along.

2. We don't believe that Trump colluded with Putin. So we deny it. Indeed, it is not clear that Trump benefited from Putin's alleged meddling.

3. The Deep State:

Deep state in the United States - Wikipedia

" United States the term "deep state" is used within political science to describe influential decision-making bodies believed to be within government who are relatively permanent and whose policies and long-term plans are unaffected by changing administrations. The term is often used in a critical sense, vis-à-vis, the general electorate to refer to the lack of influence popular democracy has on these institutions and the decisions they make as a shadow government...."


"While definitions vary, the term gained popularity among various groups, primarily supporters of Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and conspiracy theorists, during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, in opposition to establishment Republican and Democratic candidates. Since Trump's inauguration, the term has been used by some commentators, who argue that a "deep state" is aiming to delegitimize the Trump presidency and thwart its policy goals"


"President Donald Trump supporters use the term to refer to allegations that intelligence officers and executive branch officials guide policy through leaking or other internal means.[21][11] According to a July 2017 report by the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, "the Trump administration was being hit by national security leaks 'on a nearly daily basis' and at a far higher rate than its predecessors encountered".


"According to a poll of Americans in April 2017, about half (48%) thought there was a "deep state", "meaning military, intelligence and government officials who try to secretly manipulate government." Of those who thought that, more than half (58%) said it was a major problem (net of 28% surveyed).[31][32]

A March 2018 poll found most respondents (63%) were unfamiliar with the term "deep state", but a majority believe that a deep state likely exists in the United States when described as "a group of unelected government and military officials who secretly manipulate or direct national policy". Three-fourths (74%) of the respondents say that they believe this type of group definitely (27%) or probably (47%) exists in the federal government."

The information in the link suggests the Deep State is an amorphous body. It seems such an organization would have an agenda too difficult to keep hidden, and one which could not remain secret if more than a few were members.

The closet example which comes to mind is the K st. group organized by Grover Norquist:

Grover Norquist - GU Politics

You seem to be trying to frame the question to require a formal organization with a name and a well defined structure.


Isn't it funny that you claimed that no one has defined the term, and I found the wikepedia definition in seconds?


Would you like to discuss any of the points you made that I addressed?


For example the support show for the marxist antifa by "mainstream" liberals and dems.

They did the same thing in Germany. The media and German citizenry lauded the SS..and decried capitalism:

"

A Nazi propaganda poster which reads "Marxism is the guardian angel of capitalism".
Capitalists[edit]
Capitalism was also attacked as morally inferior to German values[3] and as failing to provide for the German people.[3] Great Britain was attacked as a plutocracy. A few months after the invasion of Poland, Goebbels released his “England’s Guilt” speech that blamed the war on Imperial Britain’s “capitalist democracy” and warmongers, denouncing England for having the richest men on earth while their people get little of this wealth.[110] In that speech, Goebbels claimed that “English capitalists want to destroy Hitlerism” in order to retain its imperial status and harmful economic policies."

Almost word for word the same shit being spewed by today's globalists.Only today the focus is on America, not England, because America is the government they need to overthrow.

Themes in Nazi propaganda - Wikipedia

 

[debbiedowner]

There are no free thinker's anymore.

Not on your side there aren't.

On my side? Which one is that? But if you are talking left and right then it's just about equal.

 

[Wry Catcher]

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

DEFENDING PUTIN: I haven't seen one person here DEFEND Putin. But I have seen people point out that they have not seen any CONCLUSIVE PROOF that Russia tampered with the election. Even Julian Assange said a couple years ago that his source was NOT Russia. Oddly, the ONE PERSON we KNOW FOR A FACT colluded with Russia was Hillary! And no one is looking at that!

TRUMP BENEFITED: Again, how do we know this and where? And if Trump did benefit, it is yet another thing to show that he was a participant in that benefit.

Pointing out the facts and evidence, even when it leads to things you personally do not favor, is called objectivity. You call it "recruitment."

They are looking at it (Hillary/Obama/Russia collusion).
The fake media is just hiding it..and Trump plays this game where he gives the real fascists the rope, and they obligingly hang themselves with it.

Propaganda regurgitated.

Funny you say it is just propaganda the easily half dozen visible, documented, photographed and proven ties and connections between Hillary and Russia, yet you accuse Trump of a Russian connection with NO evidence, no documentation, pictures, ties or connections and say it is all fact! Don't you know disassociation from reality is a form of cognitive dissonance that can now be successfully treated in many cases? You should look into getting help.

But not until after the midterms and 2020 reelection of Trump. We like you guys just as you are.

Do you recall that Trump had Russian Officials and Russian media for tea and no American official or media outlet was in attendance?

You're the one who needs help.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

Like China, Putin has embraced capitalism. He's selling natural gas to Merkel and her Islamic state. Like China, Putin is laughing at the uneducated, naive and gullible Americans who are embracing redistribution.

Putin is no more an enemy of the USA or German Islamic State than is Scotland. Trump and Putin have put the world on notice that we can be better friends and won't allow Soros and others to start a war.

Hillary lost because people had Obama fatigue, were tired of hearing how good stamps and unemployment checks powered the American economy and she was a worse candidate than Juan McCain.

Besides, the Eighties called.

Funny Frank, you were in my mind as one whose posting history was framed on the RED SCARE.

Now you side with Putin, because he's a "capitalist"? He's the same man with the same ethos he always was.

The modern democrat Party is far, far, far more red than either Putin or modern China.

The Red Scare was legitimate. McCarthy was accused of it in the time between Stalins USSR tried to start WWIII in Berlin and ChiComs killing US Marines in Korea.

 

[imawhosure]

The first to responders offer an opinion sans evidence. I have questions for them.

Did you accuse liberals, progressives and Democrats in the past of being fellow travelers of communism?

Yes or No. If yes, what has changed?

Nothing at all, you are still Marxists!

Which party does Bernie vote with? Which party does Ocasio-Cortez belong to? Which group burned an American flag in front of their persons office? Which party had the Orca of the Senate COLLUDE with Russia to try and defeat Ronaldus Maximus?

The list goes on, and on; you people are Marxist, you are either to young, or to dumb, to know it-)

 

[WillowTree]

The left is openly calling for socialism! Are you listening?

One more example of propaganda regurgitated***.

***just for you WT, so you can understand my comment:

REGURGITATED: repeat (information) without analyzing or comprehending it.

You have candidates openly calling for it and that’s a fact!

 

[Doc1]

The left is openly calling for socialism! Are you listening?

One more example of propaganda regurgitated***.

***just for you WT, so you can understand my comment:

REGURGITATED: repeat (information) without analyzing or comprehending it.

IF only everyone was as "smart" as you think you are. (rolling my eyes) Bernie and Cortez are in the middle of a US Socialism tour right now.

 

[edward37]

No one is defending Putin. He’s a bad apple. He just didn’t orchestrate what the left accuses him of. They did.

Another recruit

 

[Jantje_Smit]

Nothing at all, you are still Marxists!

Which party does Bernie vote with? Which party does Ocasio-Cortez belong to? Which group burned an American flag in front of their persons office? Which party had the Orca of the Senate COLLUDE with Russia to try and defeat Ronaldus Maximus?

The list goes on, and on; you people are Marxist, you are either to young, or to dumb, to know it-)

I don't think you really understand Marxism

Let me give you a hint, it doesn't involve giving $200k speeches to wall street bankers and sollicting bribes from oil sheiks

 

[imawhosure]

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

DEFENDING PUTIN: I haven't seen one person here DEFEND Putin. But I have seen people point out that they have not seen any CONCLUSIVE PROOF that Russia tampered with the election. Even Julian Assange said a couple years ago that his source was NOT Russia. Oddly, the ONE PERSON we KNOW FOR A FACT colluded with Russia was Hillary! And no one is looking at that!

TRUMP BENEFITED: Again, how do we know this and where? And if Trump did benefit, it is yet another thing to show that he was a participant in that benefit.

Pointing out the facts and evidence, even when it leads to things you personally do not favor, is called objectivity. You call it "recruitment."

They are looking at it (Hillary/Obama/Russia collusion).
The fake media is just hiding it..and Trump plays this game where he gives the real fascists the rope, and they obligingly hang themselves with it.

Propaganda regurgitated.

Funny you say it is just propaganda the easily half dozen visible, documented, photographed and proven ties and connections between Hillary and Russia, yet you accuse Trump of a Russian connection with NO evidence, no documentation, pictures, ties or connections and say it is all fact! Don't you know disassociation from reality is a form of cognitive dissonance that can now be successfully treated in many cases? You should look into getting help.

But not until after the midterms and 2020 reelection of Trump. We like you guys just as you are.

You tell them! And please explain to these MARXISTS that because of the 2 jump rule, with the FISA warrant in hand, they listened to EVERYTHING going on in Trump tower. Know what it got them? NOTHING?

Finally, let me say--------> The Left think they are in the drivers seat, lol. Why? Because of hate!

I have a question for these Leftists------------> If you mildly dislike someone, is it worth LESS votes than if you HATE someone in office? Point is------>just because 20% of the population HATE Trump, it is still only 20% of the vote, lol. You want to HATE him more? Still only worth 20%. Do you have TDS 24/7, and twice as bad on weekends? Still only 1 vote-)

You people are sorely screwed, but your TDS won't let you see it, or admit it. For some reason, you think your HATE translates into more votes. Well, YES IT DOES, for our side, lol. With your asses hanging out acting like a bunch of Marxists, you have virtually insured your defeat. Even Democrats are fleeing you, lol.

Enjoy your shrinking ability to do anything, we surely are!

 

[blackhawk]

Have you considered your a couple tacos short of a combo platter?

 

[WillowTree]

The left is openly calling for socialism! Are you listening?

One more example of propaganda regurgitated***.

***just for you WT, so you can understand my comment:

REGURGITATED: repeat (information) without analyzing or comprehending it.

IF only everyone was as "smart" as you think you are. (rolling my eyes) Bernie and Cortez are in the middle of a US Socialism tour right now.

Pocahontas too!

 

[toobfreak]

For years many of those opposing RussiaGate were posting the left was pursuing a socialist / marxist agenda and calling out liberals, progressives and the Democratic Party as fellow travelers of Communism.

Now the same posters are defending Putin, attacking Mueller and in denial that Trump benefited, if not colluded, with Putin's agenda to attack HRC to Trump' benefit.

This is perplexing. Why is this switch in play by so many of you? Have you considered you have been recruited, and are now a recruiter?

One more thing, the Deep State Meme has never been defined. It is a conspiracy theory, but lacks the substance to even be called a theory.

DEFENDING PUTIN: I haven't seen one person here DEFEND Putin. But I have seen people point out that they have not seen any CONCLUSIVE PROOF that Russia tampered with the election. Even Julian Assange said a couple years ago that his source was NOT Russia. Oddly, the ONE PERSON we KNOW FOR A FACT colluded with Russia was Hillary! And no one is looking at that!

TRUMP BENEFITED: Again, how do we know this and where? And if Trump did benefit, it is yet another thing to show that he was a participant in that benefit.

Pointing out the facts and evidence, even when it leads to things you personally do not favor, is called objectivity. You call it "recruitment."

They are looking at it (Hillary/Obama/Russia collusion).
The fake media is just hiding it..and Trump plays this game where he gives the real fascists the rope, and they obligingly hang themselves with it.

Propaganda regurgitated.

Funny you say it is just propaganda the easily half dozen visible, documented, photographed and proven ties and connections between Hillary and Russia, yet you accuse Trump of a Russian connection with NO evidence, no documentation, pictures, ties or connections and say it is all fact! Don't you know disassociation from reality is a form of cognitive dissonance that can now be successfully treated in many cases? You should look into getting help.

But not until after the midterms and 2020 reelection of Trump. We like you guys just as you are.

Do you recall that Trump had Russian Officials and Russian media for tea and no American official or media outlet was in attendance?

You're the one who needs help.

You keep saying stuff, but where is the LINK? And with that proof? After you prove what you say, then prove that something clandestine happened. Then show us where neither Hillary nor Barry ever did the exact same thing. If not, then all you are really saying is that here is a case where I KNOW NOTHING, so have filled in the MISSING PARTS with my own supposition and unsupported conclusions, the epitome of propaganda and cognitive bias.

IF YOU CAN'T EVEN MAKE THE CASE FOR YOUR OWN CLAIMS then maybe you should just sit down and STFU?

Again, I will point out that no one hardly needs to meet with Russians over tea in the Oval office to hatch a conspiracy in full view of the world. He could just call them up on his cellphone and you'd never be the wiser. Ever consider that you've been duped by Donald yet again and he is playing you fools like a fiddle? If I know Trump, he probably met with them without our own media covering them so he could talk freely without the Left listening in to make another blown up fake story like when he called PR a cesspool and a democrat ran straight out of the meeting to tell the media Trump was calling every 3rd world country in the world a shithole.

 

[WillowTree]

Opinion | The Democrats have become socialists



After Its Hard Left Turn, Will Democratic Party Officially Admit It's Socialist?