Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He wants to confiscate.No, actually Beta the Dork said he would criminalize past acts, you fucking moron.
Unbelivable. You keep saying retarded bullshit and calling someone else a moron? I guess you are just too fucking dumb to know when to put that little tail between your legs and run along.
Nobody is talking about criminalizing past acts, it's still just some made up nonsense in your head. Beto proposed criminalizing CURRENT possession, not past purchase or ownership.
Criminalizing current POSSESSION, not past purchase or ownership...Christ sake, talk about retarded bullshit. If anyone purchased one in the past, chances are pretty good they still possess it now....fricken liberal idiot.
Chances? What chances moron?
You either own the gun at time when the law will be passed and forfeiture window will expire or you won't and will not be violating this law. You will have zero liability for owning a gun before this law goes in effect. DUH
It's never ending with these fools.
The point is, beto wants to TAKE the gun from those that OWN them, he doesn't fricken care when it was purchased...idiot.
No that is not the point.
If it was, there would be no disagreement. Beto wants to require people to sell-back (not the same as simply take away) specific types of guns that excel at mass murdering.
The original point was specifically about this being unconstitutional because supposedly there is an ex post facto in play here.
Is this rocket science level complex to rightwingers? You guys can’t seem to get it right.
He wants to confiscate.Unbelivable. You keep saying retarded bullshit and calling someone else a moron? I guess you are just too fucking dumb to know when to put that little tail between your legs and run along.
Nobody is talking about criminalizing past acts, it's still just some made up nonsense in your head. Beto proposed criminalizing CURRENT possession, not past purchase or ownership.
Criminalizing current POSSESSION, not past purchase or ownership...Christ sake, talk about retarded bullshit. If anyone purchased one in the past, chances are pretty good they still possess it now....fricken liberal idiot.
Chances? What chances moron?
You either own the gun at time when the law will be passed and forfeiture window will expire or you won't and will not be violating this law. You will have zero liability for owning a gun before this law goes in effect. DUH
It's never ending with these fools.
The point is, beto wants to TAKE the gun from those that OWN them, he doesn't fricken care when it was purchased...idiot.
No that is not the point.
If it was, there would be no disagreement. Beto wants to require people to sell-back (not the same as simply take away) specific types of guns that excel at mass murdering.
The original point was specifically about this being unconstitutional because supposedly there is an ex post facto in play here.
Is this rocket science level complex to rightwingers? You guys can’t seem to get it right.
YOU want to confiscate.
Because of that, I want to destroy you. You are the most despicable human filth I can imagine and you do not deserve to share a country with me I want you and all like you gone.
.
No that is not the point.
If it was, there would be no disagreement. Beto wants to require people to sell-back (not the same as simply take away) specific types of guns that excel at mass murdering.
The original point was specifically about this being unconstitutional because supposedly there is an ex post facto in play here.
Is this rocket science level complex to rightwingers? You guys can’t seem to get it right.
If Beta can produce a bill of sale demonstrating that he sold me a weapon he could buy it back, if I agree to sell. Otherwise, it is confiscation, you fucking pathological liar.
---------------------------------- and taxpayer money would fund the confiscation / buyback Anton .No that is not the point.
If it was, there would be no disagreement. Beto wants to require people to sell-back (not the same as simply take away) specific types of guns that excel at mass murdering.
The original point was specifically about this being unconstitutional because supposedly there is an ex post facto in play here.
Is this rocket science level complex to rightwingers? You guys can’t seem to get it right.
If Beta can produce a bill of sale demonstrating that he sold me a weapon he could buy it back, if I agree to sell. Otherwise, it is confiscation, you fucking pathological liar.
Dumbass Beto didn't sell you anything, reimbursement would be some set price.
Bobby does.Hey crazy nutbag, where did you get an idea that I want to confiscate currently legal weapons?
[
Hey crazy nutbag, where did you get an idea that I want to confiscate currently legal weapons? I've not commited one way or another on that.
You want to destroy me? Who else do you want to kill? Beto? This can get interesting.
Dumbass Beto didn't sell you anything, reimbursement would be some set price from the feds.
[
Hey crazy nutbag, where did you get an idea that I want to confiscate currently legal weapons? I've not commited one way or another on that.
You want to destroy me? Who else do you want to kill? Beto? This can get interesting.
Maybe it's the utterly dishonest way you defend Beta who said he will confiscate currely legal weapons and kill anyone who resists....
----------------------------- nope , it'd be FORCED payment or confiscation of Money from USA Taxpayers by government Anton .No that is not the point.
If it was, there would be no disagreement. Beto wants to require people to sell-back (not the same as simply take away) specific types of guns that excel at mass murdering.
The original point was specifically about this being unconstitutional because supposedly there is an ex post facto in play here.
Is this rocket science level complex to rightwingers? You guys can’t seem to get it right.
If Beta can produce a bill of sale demonstrating that he sold me a weapon he could buy it back, if I agree to sell. Otherwise, it is confiscation, you fucking pathological liar.
Dumbass Beto didn't sell you anything, reimbursement would be some set price from the feds.
----------------------------- nope , it'd be FORCED payment or confiscation of Money from USA Taxpayers by government Anton .No that is not the point.
If it was, there would be no disagreement. Beto wants to require people to sell-back (not the same as simply take away) specific types of guns that excel at mass murdering.
The original point was specifically about this being unconstitutional because supposedly there is an ex post facto in play here.
Is this rocket science level complex to rightwingers? You guys can’t seem to get it right.
If Beta can produce a bill of sale demonstrating that he sold me a weapon he could buy it back, if I agree to sell. Otherwise, it is confiscation, you fucking pathological liar.
Dumbass Beto didn't sell you anything, reimbursement would be some set price from the feds.
-------------------------------------------- you read what I said , read it again just above Anton----------------------------- nope , it'd be FORCED payment or confiscation of Money from USA Taxpayers by government Anton .No that is not the point.
If it was, there would be no disagreement. Beto wants to require people to sell-back (not the same as simply take away) specific types of guns that excel at mass murdering.
The original point was specifically about this being unconstitutional because supposedly there is an ex post facto in play here.
Is this rocket science level complex to rightwingers? You guys can’t seem to get it right.
If Beta can produce a bill of sale demonstrating that he sold me a weapon he could buy it back, if I agree to sell. Otherwise, it is confiscation, you fucking pathological liar.
Dumbass Beto didn't sell you anything, reimbursement would be some set price from the feds.
Tell us:Beto...will kill?
That is not how our enforcement and justice systm works numbnuts.
Tell us:Beto...will kill?
That is not how our enforcement and justice systm works numbnuts.
How will Bobby confiscate weapons from those who refuse to give them up?
Characteristically, you avoided the question. I'll ask again:Seriously? How does "Bobby confiscate" illegal weapons today?Tell us:Beto...will kill?
That is not how our enforcement and justice systm works numbnuts.
How will Bobby confiscate weapons from those who refuse to give them up?
Characteristically, you avoided the question. I'll ask again:Seriously? How does "Bobby confiscate" illegal weapons today?Tell us:Beto...will kill?
That is not how our enforcement and justice systm works numbnuts.
How will Bobby confiscate weapons from those who refuse to give them up?
How will Bobby confiscate weapons from those who refuse to give them up?
And thus, you know you cannot meaningfully address my question without the admission that Bobby will have to kill people who refuse to give up their guns to confiscate them - as previously claimed, and denied by you.No I didn't avoid anything. You just don't understand the basics of how enforcement of illegal possetion works.Characteristically, you avoided the question. I'll ask again:Seriously? How does "Bobby confiscate" illegal weapons today?Tell us:Beto...will kill?
That is not how our enforcement and justice systm works numbnuts.
How will Bobby confiscate weapons from those who refuse to give them up?
How will Bobby confiscate weapons from those who refuse to give them up?
According to the resident dumbass, you certainly will - and Bobby won't have to use force to take them from you.
pretty sure i do.Characteristically, you avoided the question. I'll ask again:Seriously? How does "Bobby confiscate" illegal weapons today?Tell us:Beto...will kill?
That is not how our enforcement and justice systm works numbnuts.
How will Bobby confiscate weapons from those who refuse to give them up?
How will Bobby confiscate weapons from those who refuse to give them up?
No I didn't avoid anything. You just don't understand the basics of how enforcement of illegal possetion works.
And thus, you know you cannot meaningfully address my question without the admission that Bobby will have to kill people who refuse to give up their guns to confiscate them - as previously claimed, and denied by you.No I didn't avoid anything. You just don't understand the basics of how enforcement of illegal possetion works.Characteristically, you avoided the question. I'll ask again:Seriously? How does "Bobby confiscate" illegal weapons today?Tell us:Beto...will kill?
That is not how our enforcement and justice systm works numbnuts.
How will Bobby confiscate weapons from those who refuse to give them up?
How will Bobby confiscate weapons from those who refuse to give them up?
