Here Are 3 Really Simple Questions The FBI Needs To Answer Fast

[Wyatt earp]

When has a federal agency EVER released such reckless information so close to a presidential election?

When have we ever had a person so lying , corrupt and has been investigated before with whitewater as hillary?



.

When has a NaziCon ever answered a direct fucking question without childish diversions?

What facts confuse you?


.

 

[boedicca]

When has a federal agency EVER released such reckless information so close to a presidential election?

When has a candidate every run a Crime Syndicate from the Department of State?

George Bush Sr. ran one as VP, known as Iran Contra.

Please link to information showing that George 41 had a foundation that was used to jack up people for donations and "speaking fees". I missed that bit when reading about Iran Contra.

 

[WillowTree]

The RWnuts on USMB have already convicted Hillary Clinton of treason for what's on Huma's laptop.

Because they're retarded.

don"t ya just love how karma works? you guys had Trump convicted of sexual predation.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Kissinger "We believe peace is at hand"
10-26-72

Hurt Democrats chances

Wineburger implicated in Iran=Contra 4 days before election in 1992

Hurt GHW Bushs chances

weekend before 2000 election, drunk driving ticket of GW Bush came out

Hurt GW Bushs chances

This is hardly new

So the Reagan administration indicted Weinberger to fuck over G Bush Sr. in 1988? good one.

 

[NYcarbineer]

When has a federal agency EVER released such reckless information so close to a presidential election?

When has a candidate every run a Crime Syndicate from the Department of State?

George Bush Sr. ran one as VP, known as Iran Contra.

Please link to information showing that George 41 had a foundation that was used to jack up people for donations and "speaking fees". I missed that bit when reading about Iran Contra.

Oh gee look, another dog from the pack of hounds chasing Hillary demands proof!!!!!!!!!! Proof!!!!!!!

 

[NYcarbineer]

The RWnuts on USMB have already convicted Hillary Clinton of treason for what's on Huma's laptop.

Because they're retarded.

don"t ya just love how karma works? you guys had Trump convicted of sexual predation.

So you're equating this to what you people called the baseless accusations leveled at Trump.

Fascinating.

 

[boedicca]

When has a federal agency EVER released such reckless information so close to a presidential election?

When has a candidate every run a Crime Syndicate from the Department of State?

George Bush Sr. ran one as VP, known as Iran Contra.

Please link to information showing that George 41 had a foundation that was used to jack up people for donations and "speaking fees". I missed that bit when reading about Iran Contra.

Oh gee look, another dog from the pack of hounds chasing Hillary demands proof!!!!!!!!!! Proof!!!!!!!

Sad little hiLIARy drone can't understand that hiLIARy's unsecured email is plenty of proof...and the new Podesta revelation of Doug Band's "Clinton Inc." opus is just icing on the criminal cake.

 

[xyz]

When has a federal agency EVER released such reckless information so close to a presidential election?

When have we ever had a person so lying , corrupt and has been investigated before with whitewater as hillary?



.

When has a NaziCon ever answered a direct fucking question without childish diversions?

By the way, he's not a NaziCon, he's a Russian troll. 100% sure.

 

[Auld Phart]

Kissinger "We believe peace is at hand"
10-26-72

Hurt Democrats chances

Wineburger implicated in Iran=Contra 4 days before election in 1992

Hurt GHW Bushs chances

weekend before 2000 election, drunk driving ticket of GW Bush came out

Hurt GW Bushs chances

This is hardly new

So the Reagan administration indicted Weinberger to fuck over G Bush Sr. in 1988? good one.

He was indicted in 92.

Does the administration convene grand juries, or does Congress?

 

[Wyatt earp]

When has a federal agency EVER released such reckless information so close to a presidential election?

When have we ever had a person so lying , corrupt and has been investigated before with whitewater as hillary?



.

When has a NaziCon ever answered a direct fucking question without childish diversions?

By the way, he's not a NaziCon, he's a Russian troll. 100% sure.

Facts confuse you two little buddy?

 

[WillowTree]

The RWnuts on USMB have already convicted Hillary Clinton of treason for what's on Huma's laptop.

Because they're retarded.

don"t ya just love how karma works? you guys had Trump convicted of sexual predation.

So you're equating this to what you people called the baseless accusations leveled at Trump.

Fascinating.

this what? this is an Fbi investigation not the rwnj on this forum/ i know you hate being wrong but karma will get you every time

 

[leftwinger]

Sad little hiLIARy drone can't understand that hiLIARy's unsecured email is plenty of proof...and the new Podesta revelation of Doug Band's "Clinton Inc." opus is just icing on the criminal cake.

Here is what happened to a military guy..........seems like same thing as Clinton Foundation? Slick Willy gets the pussy, HRC stocks up on cash. MAR 26 2016
**************
Top US Navy officer jailed over massive bribery scandal - BBC News

Daniel Dusek provided the information in exchange for luxury hotel stays and the services of prostitutes.
Sentencing Dusek in San Diego, California to 46 months in prison, Judge Janis Sammartino said: "It is truly unimaginable to the court that someone in your position with the United States Navy would sell out based on what was provided to you - hotel rooms, entertainment and the services of prostitutes."

 

[Trump.Stamped]

The RWnuts on USMB have already convicted Hillary Clinton of treason for what's on Huma's laptop.

Because they're retarded.

And the LWnuts have pardoned her regardless of what is on the computer. Welcome to politics in the good ole USofA.

 

[Norman]

The last thing HIllary wants is those questions answered, but since she knows FBI can't answer them during investigation, she will call them fraudsters on monday for not answering. Her tactic is to ignore, deny and deflect.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Kissinger "We believe peace is at hand"
10-26-72

Hurt Democrats chances

Wineburger implicated in Iran=Contra 4 days before election in 1992

Hurt GHW Bushs chances

weekend before 2000 election, drunk driving ticket of GW Bush came out

Hurt GW Bushs chances

This is hardly new

So the Reagan administration indicted Weinberger to fuck over G Bush Sr. in 1988? good one.

He was indicted in 92.

Does the administration convene grand juries, or does Congress?

Fair enough, my bad on the year.

REAGAN's atty general Edwin Meese appointed Lawrence Walsh special counsel to investigate Iran/Contra in 1986. Walsh indicted Weinberger.

 

[paperview]

Kissinger "We believe peace is at hand"
10-26-72

Hurt Democrats chances

Wineburger implicated in Iran=Contra 4 days before election in 1992

Hurt GHW Bushs chances

weekend before 2000 election, drunk driving ticket of GW Bush came out

Hurt GW Bushs chances

This is hardly new

So the Reagan administration indicted Weinberger to fuck over G Bush Sr. in 1988? good one.

He was indicted in 92.

Does the administration convene grand juries, or does Congress?

Fair enough, my bad on the year.

REAGAN's atty general Edwin Meese appointed Lawrence Walsh special counsel to investigate Iran/Contra in 1986. Walsh indicted Weinberger.

Actually "The Special Division of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit appointed Lawrence E. Walsh as Independent Counsel on December 19, 1986."

The Office of Independent Counsel (now defunct, and not to be confused with Special Counsel) also was not under the restriction of the Hatch Act.

The Office of Independent Counsel did not fall under the executive branch.

 

[paperview]

And right after...Bush pardoned Weinberger -- and others in that crime cabal.

 

[OKTexas]

The Federal Bureau of Investigations has jumped into the election in a historic way. It has some questions to answer.

WASHINGTON ― FBI Director James Comey, by sending a vaguely worded letter to congressional Republicans on Friday that suggested he was re-opening the probe intoHillary Clinton’s email use, decided to become the central player in the presidential election’s final two weeks.

It was an unprecedented break with FBI practice throughout the agency’s history. But now that Comey is involved and the precedent is shattered, it looks like he has little choice but to keep talking.

“This letter is troubling because it is vaguely worded and leaves so many questions unanswered,” said four Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee in a letter sent Saturday. The Clinton camp, too, has been demanding Comey come forward with more information. Neither the Democratic senators nor the Clinton camp, though, have said exactly what questions they need answered.

Despite Comey’s dramatic entrance into the campaign, it’s striking how basic the remaining questions are. Here are a few.

Do you know how many emails you found? If so, how many?

There are reports that the emails number in the thousands. What is that based on? Are any of them classified? Any sent by or to Hillary Clinton? Are they duplicates of emails you’ve already read and analyzed?

Do you have access to them? Have you even seen the emails?

A letter Comey sent to FBI employees suggested the agency did not yet have access to the emails. New reporting by Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News finds that the FBI doesn’t yet have a warrant to review.

Perhaps Comey thinks that point is obvious to the public. But Donald Trump is on the campaign trail telling supporters that, without question, the FBI found something incriminating, otherwise it never would have taken such an extraordinary step. In Trump’s defense, his logic is sound. But if Comey took this step without having any idea what’s in the emails, he needs to let Trump (and everyone else) know that’s the case.

Do you plan to analyze the emails before Election Day?

The public ― and us journalists ― would kindly like to know if Comey has any more bombshells planned, or if he’s done until next Tuesday.

At this point, that’s not too much to ask.

Here Are 3 Really, Really Simple Questions The FBI Needs To Answer Fast

The fate of the nation hangs in the balance!

First off this is a lie:

It was an unprecedented break with FBI practice throughout the agency’s history. But now that Comey is involved and the precedent is shattered, it looks like he has little choice but to keep talking.

In 2006 the FBI announced an investigation against one of Andrew Cuomo's opponents 3 days before the NY Attorney General election. Nothing came of the investigation but the opponent lost big.

Second, didn't Lynch recuse herself from the Clinton investigation after her little meeting with wild willie on her airplane in AZ, saying she would go with the judgment of the FBI? Then she tries to interfere, what up with that?

Third and finally, if the clinton inc weren't so corrupt, they wouldn't have to be constantly looking over their shoulder wondering what's coming next.

 

[BluesLegend]

Here Are 3 Really Simple Questions The FBI Needs To Answer Fast

LMAO you are the ones who dragged this email thing out by stonewalling and now with the election only days away you want the FBI to hurry up lol well you can forget it.

 

[BluesLegend]

The Federal Bureau of Investigations has jumped into the election in a historic way. It has some questions to answer.

WASHINGTON ― FBI Director James Comey, by sending a vaguely worded letter to congressional Republicans on Friday that suggested he was re-opening the probe intoHillary Clinton’s email use, decided to become the central player in the presidential election’s final two weeks.

It was an unprecedented break with FBI practice throughout the agency’s history. But now that Comey is involved and the precedent is shattered, it looks like he has little choice but to keep talking.

“This letter is troubling because it is vaguely worded and leaves so many questions unanswered,” said four Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee in a letter sent Saturday. The Clinton camp, too, has been demanding Comey come forward with more information. Neither the Democratic senators nor the Clinton camp, though, have said exactly what questions they need answered.

Despite Comey’s dramatic entrance into the campaign, it’s striking how basic the remaining questions are. Here are a few.

Do you know how many emails you found? If so, how many?

There are reports that the emails number in the thousands. What is that based on? Are any of them classified? Any sent by or to Hillary Clinton? Are they duplicates of emails you’ve already read and analyzed?

Do you have access to them? Have you even seen the emails?

A letter Comey sent to FBI employees suggested the agency did not yet have access to the emails. New reporting by Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News finds that the FBI doesn’t yet have a warrant to review.

Perhaps Comey thinks that point is obvious to the public. But Donald Trump is on the campaign trail telling supporters that, without question, the FBI found something incriminating, otherwise it never would have taken such an extraordinary step. In Trump’s defense, his logic is sound. But if Comey took this step without having any idea what’s in the emails, he needs to let Trump (and everyone else) know that’s the case.

Do you plan to analyze the emails before Election Day?

The public ― and us journalists ― would kindly like to know if Comey has any more bombshells planned, or if he’s done until next Tuesday.

At this point, that’s not too much to ask.

Here Are 3 Really, Really Simple Questions The FBI Needs To Answer Fast

The fate of the nation hangs in the balance!

False, they don't need to answer shit. In fact, commenting on an investigation would endanger it.

It will be sweet when the corrupt are finally locked up.

Endanger it? Really? Then why did Comey comment in the first place on Friday? He violated the 60-protocol and ignored his boss.

Because its 'that' bad for Hillary, she's probably going to prison.