Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, your insurance company can deny paying for preexisting conditions. Trust me, mine did, and you can go to the Commie Care web site and they have an explanation right there.
Credit card companies were disallowed from charging late fees and increasing interest rates on their irresponsible borrowers who paid late or not at all. Credit card companies had to make that money back on other people, and those other people are the responsible borrowers.
Banks can't screw over your kids, but kids are screwing over our federal government by not paying on their loans.
thanks, Ray, you prove that Conservatism is like Stockholm Syndrome..... you are sympathizing with your abusers.
Yeah, the only people abusing me are Democrats. That's why I want them as far away from leadership as I can.
I used credit cards my entire life. Until DumBama decided he knew better how to run banks than banks could, I never paid a transfer fee on a balance. Now I do, and it's a sizable one.
It's all politics. Irresponsible people generally vote Democrat while responsible people generally vote Republican. So DumBama figured a way to repay his voters while at the same time, passing the fees to his unlikely voters.
Obama and company bail out banks, don't prosecute the banks or bankers. And then let them come after the middle class with all sorts of fees and taxes. Banks got Obama elected and Obama needed to pay them back.
Not actually because when DumBama pulled that stunt, banks were upset with the law. It's the banks that had to figure out how to recoup those losses caused by DumBama.
Banks can offer good borrowers the world because it's the lowlifes that support the banks. With late fees and higher interest rates on less than credit worthy borrowers, people like me always got a break. That's what DumBama didn't like about it.
Not actually because when DumBama pulled that stunt, banks were upset with the law. It's the banks that had to figure out how to recoup those losses caused by DumBama.
Banks can offer good borrowers the world because it's the lowlifes that support the banks. With late fees and higher interest rates on less than credit worthy borrowers, people like me always got a break. That's what DumBama didn't like about it.
It strikes me that if you are carrying so much debt you are switching cards every year, you really aren't a particularly responsible borrower. So now you are paying your fair share because the banks aren't allowed to screw poor people anymore? I'm just not seeing a problem here.
They weren't passing anti middle class policies like the Republicans. They weren't giving tax breaks to the rich which means they weren't shifting the tax burden more onto us.And this is any less true of the GOP? I say its even worse with Republicans.Hillary is a corporate democrat. Economically only a little better than the Republicans. Socially she is much better than any Republican. Reproductive rights, gays, global warming, middle class, labor, welfare, infrastructure, regulations, epa, public schools, social security and so onBernie would be a better president but can he win? I think we should nominate a real liberal. I'm with bernie
Oh my! These far left drones believe Sanders is a real "Liberal"..
Really! You can not make this stuff up!
Global warming, she will side with corporations. Middle class, you still have not answered how Democrats differ. Labor, big corporations. Regulations, she will probably go less on regs, that is a good thing. EPA, depends on what her corporate base wants.
She is going to owe some corporations lots of favors, that is for sure.
All those things you say she'll do, are basically what the Republicans will do. And funny didn't Republicans say the Clinton's were lefty liberals? Were they lying?
I see through the right wing talking points. One minute you argue she's a dino the next she's a socialist. Which is it?
I have never said Hillary is a socialist. Again, you try to lump everyone into one group. I have always maintained Hillary is for Corporations at the expense of the middle class.
You still haven't told me what the Democrats have done for the middle class in the last few years.
They weren't passing anti middle class policies like the Republicans. They weren't giving tax breaks to the rich which means they weren't shifting the tax burden more onto us.And this is any less true of the GOP? I say its even worse with Republicans.Hillary is a corporate democrat. Economically only a little better than the Republicans. Socially she is much better than any Republican. Reproductive rights, gays, global warming, middle class, labor, welfare, infrastructure, regulations, epa, public schools, social security and so onOh my! These far left drones believe Sanders is a real "Liberal"..
Really! You can not make this stuff up!
Global warming, she will side with corporations. Middle class, you still have not answered how Democrats differ. Labor, big corporations. Regulations, she will probably go less on regs, that is a good thing. EPA, depends on what her corporate base wants.
She is going to owe some corporations lots of favors, that is for sure.
All those things you say she'll do, are basically what the Republicans will do. And funny didn't Republicans say the Clinton's were lefty liberals? Were they lying?
I see through the right wing talking points. One minute you argue she's a dino the next she's a socialist. Which is it?
I have never said Hillary is a socialist. Again, you try to lump everyone into one group. I have always maintained Hillary is for Corporations at the expense of the middle class.
You still haven't told me what the Democrats have done for the middle class in the last few years.
They weren't passing anti middle class policies like the Republicans. They weren't giving tax breaks to the rich which means they weren't shifting the tax burden more onto us.And this is any less true of the GOP? I say its even worse with Republicans.Hillary is a corporate democrat. Economically only a little better than the Republicans. Socially she is much better than any Republican. Reproductive rights, gays, global warming, middle class, labor, welfare, infrastructure, regulations, epa, public schools, social security and so onOh my! These far left drones believe Sanders is a real "Liberal"..
Really! You can not make this stuff up!
Global warming, she will side with corporations. Middle class, you still have not answered how Democrats differ. Labor, big corporations. Regulations, she will probably go less on regs, that is a good thing. EPA, depends on what her corporate base wants.
She is going to owe some corporations lots of favors, that is for sure.
All those things you say she'll do, are basically what the Republicans will do. And funny didn't Republicans say the Clinton's were lefty liberals? Were they lying?
I see through the right wing talking points. One minute you argue she's a dino the next she's a socialist. Which is it?
I have never said Hillary is a socialist. Again, you try to lump everyone into one group. I have always maintained Hillary is for Corporations at the expense of the middle class.
You still haven't told me what the Democrats have done for the middle class in the last few years.
When the rich and corporations got huge tax breaks and the debt doubles, that shifts more of the tax burden on us.They weren't passing anti middle class policies like the Republicans. They weren't giving tax breaks to the rich which means they weren't shifting the tax burden more onto us.And this is any less true of the GOP? I say its even worse with Republicans.Hillary is a corporate democrat. Economically only a little better than the Republicans. Socially she is much better than any Republican. Reproductive rights, gays, global warming, middle class, labor, welfare, infrastructure, regulations, epa, public schools, social security and so on
Global warming, she will side with corporations. Middle class, you still have not answered how Democrats differ. Labor, big corporations. Regulations, she will probably go less on regs, that is a good thing. EPA, depends on what her corporate base wants.
She is going to owe some corporations lots of favors, that is for sure.
All those things you say she'll do, are basically what the Republicans will do. And funny didn't Republicans say the Clinton's were lefty liberals? Were they lying?
I see through the right wing talking points. One minute you argue she's a dino the next she's a socialist. Which is it?
I have never said Hillary is a socialist. Again, you try to lump everyone into one group. I have always maintained Hillary is for Corporations at the expense of the middle class.
You still haven't told me what the Democrats have done for the middle class in the last few years.
When did Republicans ever shift the tax burden to the middle-class?
I'll challenge you right here and right now:
As a middle-class working man, I can easily list several expenses that I have to pay for thanks to the Democrat party and in particular, DumBama. I want you to show me one......just one expense I had to suffer under Republican leadership.
The truth of the matter is that under Democrat control, the wealthy and middle-class get screwed, because their money is transferred to the so-called poor, or otherwise those that don't feel like working.
The Republicans (and mostly the conservatives) are all for the middle-class. If there was never an Obama, nor a Democrat led Congress, I would be doing so much better today financially.
When the rich and corporations got huge tax breaks and the debt doubles, that shifts more of the tax burden on us.They weren't passing anti middle class policies like the Republicans. They weren't giving tax breaks to the rich which means they weren't shifting the tax burden more onto us.And this is any less true of the GOP? I say its even worse with Republicans.Global warming, she will side with corporations. Middle class, you still have not answered how Democrats differ. Labor, big corporations. Regulations, she will probably go less on regs, that is a good thing. EPA, depends on what her corporate base wants.
She is going to owe some corporations lots of favors, that is for sure.
All those things you say she'll do, are basically what the Republicans will do. And funny didn't Republicans say the Clinton's were lefty liberals? Were they lying?
I see through the right wing talking points. One minute you argue she's a dino the next she's a socialist. Which is it?
I have never said Hillary is a socialist. Again, you try to lump everyone into one group. I have always maintained Hillary is for Corporations at the expense of the middle class.
You still haven't told me what the Democrats have done for the middle class in the last few years.
When did Republicans ever shift the tax burden to the middle-class?
I'll challenge you right here and right now:
As a middle-class working man, I can easily list several expenses that I have to pay for thanks to the Democrat party and in particular, DumBama. I want you to show me one......just one expense I had to suffer under Republican leadership.
The truth of the matter is that under Democrat control, the wealthy and middle-class get screwed, because their money is transferred to the so-called poor, or otherwise those that don't feel like working.
The Republicans (and mostly the conservatives) are all for the middle-class. If there was never an Obama, nor a Democrat led Congress, I would be doing so much better today financially.
Gov Rick Snyder gave corporations tax breaks and now says he has to raise our taxes to fix the roads. Because we don't have any money he says. That's a great example
When the rich and corporations got huge tax breaks and the debt doubles, that shifts more of the tax burden on us.They weren't passing anti middle class policies like the Republicans. They weren't giving tax breaks to the rich which means they weren't shifting the tax burden more onto us.And this is any less true of the GOP? I say its even worse with Republicans.Global warming, she will side with corporations. Middle class, you still have not answered how Democrats differ. Labor, big corporations. Regulations, she will probably go less on regs, that is a good thing. EPA, depends on what her corporate base wants.
She is going to owe some corporations lots of favors, that is for sure.
All those things you say she'll do, are basically what the Republicans will do. And funny didn't Republicans say the Clinton's were lefty liberals? Were they lying?
I see through the right wing talking points. One minute you argue she's a dino the next she's a socialist. Which is it?
I have never said Hillary is a socialist. Again, you try to lump everyone into one group. I have always maintained Hillary is for Corporations at the expense of the middle class.
You still haven't told me what the Democrats have done for the middle class in the last few years.
When did Republicans ever shift the tax burden to the middle-class?
I'll challenge you right here and right now:
As a middle-class working man, I can easily list several expenses that I have to pay for thanks to the Democrat party and in particular, DumBama. I want you to show me one......just one expense I had to suffer under Republican leadership.
The truth of the matter is that under Democrat control, the wealthy and middle-class get screwed, because their money is transferred to the so-called poor, or otherwise those that don't feel like working.
The Republicans (and mostly the conservatives) are all for the middle-class. If there was never an Obama, nor a Democrat led Congress, I would be doing so much better today financially.
Gov Rick Snyder gave corporations tax breaks and now says he has to raise our taxes to fix the roads. Because we don't have any money he says. That's a great example
When the rich and corporations got huge tax breaks and the debt doubles, that shifts more of the tax burden on us.They weren't passing anti middle class policies like the Republicans. They weren't giving tax breaks to the rich which means they weren't shifting the tax burden more onto us.And this is any less true of the GOP? I say its even worse with Republicans.Global warming, she will side with corporations. Middle class, you still have not answered how Democrats differ. Labor, big corporations. Regulations, she will probably go less on regs, that is a good thing. EPA, depends on what her corporate base wants.
She is going to owe some corporations lots of favors, that is for sure.
All those things you say she'll do, are basically what the Republicans will do. And funny didn't Republicans say the Clinton's were lefty liberals? Were they lying?
I see through the right wing talking points. One minute you argue she's a dino the next she's a socialist. Which is it?
I have never said Hillary is a socialist. Again, you try to lump everyone into one group. I have always maintained Hillary is for Corporations at the expense of the middle class.
You still haven't told me what the Democrats have done for the middle class in the last few years.
When did Republicans ever shift the tax burden to the middle-class?
I'll challenge you right here and right now:
As a middle-class working man, I can easily list several expenses that I have to pay for thanks to the Democrat party and in particular, DumBama. I want you to show me one......just one expense I had to suffer under Republican leadership.
The truth of the matter is that under Democrat control, the wealthy and middle-class get screwed, because their money is transferred to the so-called poor, or otherwise those that don't feel like working.
The Republicans (and mostly the conservatives) are all for the middle-class. If there was never an Obama, nor a Democrat led Congress, I would be doing so much better today financially.
Gov Rick Snyder gave corporations tax breaks and now says he has to raise our taxes to fix the roads. Because we don't have any money he says. That's a great example
When the rich and corporations got huge tax breaks and the debt doubles, that shifts more of the tax burden on us.They weren't passing anti middle class policies like the Republicans. They weren't giving tax breaks to the rich which means they weren't shifting the tax burden more onto us.And this is any less true of the GOP? I say its even worse with Republicans.
All those things you say she'll do, are basically what the Republicans will do. And funny didn't Republicans say the Clinton's were lefty liberals? Were they lying?
I see through the right wing talking points. One minute you argue she's a dino the next she's a socialist. Which is it?
I have never said Hillary is a socialist. Again, you try to lump everyone into one group. I have always maintained Hillary is for Corporations at the expense of the middle class.
You still haven't told me what the Democrats have done for the middle class in the last few years.
When did Republicans ever shift the tax burden to the middle-class?
I'll challenge you right here and right now:
As a middle-class working man, I can easily list several expenses that I have to pay for thanks to the Democrat party and in particular, DumBama. I want you to show me one......just one expense I had to suffer under Republican leadership.
The truth of the matter is that under Democrat control, the wealthy and middle-class get screwed, because their money is transferred to the so-called poor, or otherwise those that don't feel like working.
The Republicans (and mostly the conservatives) are all for the middle-class. If there was never an Obama, nor a Democrat led Congress, I would be doing so much better today financially.
Gov Rick Snyder gave corporations tax breaks and now says he has to raise our taxes to fix the roads. Because we don't have any money he says. That's a great example
Exactly,
All at the same time the big corporations are outsourcing to china, replacing American workers with h1b's and giving their board/ceo most o the profit. All while the super rich with the huge tax breaks shits on the poor and middle class!!!
That is the republican plan for America.
When the rich and corporations got huge tax breaks and the debt doubles, that shifts more of the tax burden on us.They weren't passing anti middle class policies like the Republicans. They weren't giving tax breaks to the rich which means they weren't shifting the tax burden more onto us.And this is any less true of the GOP? I say its even worse with Republicans.Global warming, she will side with corporations. Middle class, you still have not answered how Democrats differ. Labor, big corporations. Regulations, she will probably go less on regs, that is a good thing. EPA, depends on what her corporate base wants.
She is going to owe some corporations lots of favors, that is for sure.
All those things you say she'll do, are basically what the Republicans will do. And funny didn't Republicans say the Clinton's were lefty liberals? Were they lying?
I see through the right wing talking points. One minute you argue she's a dino the next she's a socialist. Which is it?
I have never said Hillary is a socialist. Again, you try to lump everyone into one group. I have always maintained Hillary is for Corporations at the expense of the middle class.
You still haven't told me what the Democrats have done for the middle class in the last few years.
When did Republicans ever shift the tax burden to the middle-class?
I'll challenge you right here and right now:
As a middle-class working man, I can easily list several expenses that I have to pay for thanks to the Democrat party and in particular, DumBama. I want you to show me one......just one expense I had to suffer under Republican leadership.
The truth of the matter is that under Democrat control, the wealthy and middle-class get screwed, because their money is transferred to the so-called poor, or otherwise those that don't feel like working.
The Republicans (and mostly the conservatives) are all for the middle-class. If there was never an Obama, nor a Democrat led Congress, I would be doing so much better today financially.
Gov Rick Snyder gave corporations tax breaks and now says he has to raise our taxes to fix the roads. Because we don't have any money he says. That's a great example
Of course not, you're a Socialist and you believe government should control everything including banks and their practices.
Yes, I'm a responsible borrower. I pay my bill every month and in the meantime, I'm using interest free money. This is unlike your clan that throws credit card bills away or avoids paying them. They should be the ones paying the banks--not me. My fair share........
"Tell me what is YOUR fair share of what somebody else worked for?"
Thomas Sowell
Guy, the top 1% has 43% of the wealthy. They did not do 43% of the work to create that wealth.
And this is straight up Marxist/Maoist propaganda. You can't match labor production to wealth acquisition because the production is not what generates the wealth. If you want to prove that, go out in your yard with a shovel and start digging a hole. See how long you have to dig before any wealth is realized from your efforts. Wealth is produced through a variety of things happening in conjunction with labor of production.
When the "fair for all" system you dream of has been attempted, what happened was, the people who are the authority, the ruling class, became the wealthiest 1% controlling 43% of the wealth (or more). The "worker" class became peasants who existed at their pleasure. No opportunity to acquire wealth and escape their class, no political voice to affect change. When the people realized they had been duped and protested, they were executed and dumped into mass graves by the millions.
Guy, why don't you take your Bircher Bullshit and go somewhere else with it.
But we aren't talking about Communism. We are talking about what a country looks like when the wealth IS fairly distributed. We had that in this country after WWII, when a large chunk of the workforce was unionized and the rich paid high income taxes like they are supposed to. And we had unparalleled prosperity when that happened.
Yes, we're talking about Communism which is what you want. We did not have this after WWII, we've never had Communist government here. We used to run fucking Commies out of the country on a rail. The rich have NEVER paid high income tax because RICH people don't have to earn fucking income. They're RICH! So when you raise earned income tax rates, they simply stop earning incomes and put their money in securities and offshore trust funds that you can't get your grubby little Commie hands on.
We had unprecedented growth after WWII because government wasn't shackling industry and business with every kind of birdbrain regulation they could think up. People of that generation had a strong work ethic and since we kicked everyone's ass in the war, we were the top dogs in the world economy for the next 20 years. No one else could compete because their factories and infrastructure had been turned to rubble.
You get it. I get it. The rich get it. Only Ray doesn't get it.When the rich and corporations got huge tax breaks and the debt doubles, that shifts more of the tax burden on us.They weren't passing anti middle class policies like the Republicans. They weren't giving tax breaks to the rich which means they weren't shifting the tax burden more onto us.And this is any less true of the GOP? I say its even worse with Republicans.
All those things you say she'll do, are basically what the Republicans will do. And funny didn't Republicans say the Clinton's were lefty liberals? Were they lying?
I see through the right wing talking points. One minute you argue she's a dino the next she's a socialist. Which is it?
I have never said Hillary is a socialist. Again, you try to lump everyone into one group. I have always maintained Hillary is for Corporations at the expense of the middle class.
You still haven't told me what the Democrats have done for the middle class in the last few years.
When did Republicans ever shift the tax burden to the middle-class?
I'll challenge you right here and right now:
As a middle-class working man, I can easily list several expenses that I have to pay for thanks to the Democrat party and in particular, DumBama. I want you to show me one......just one expense I had to suffer under Republican leadership.
The truth of the matter is that under Democrat control, the wealthy and middle-class get screwed, because their money is transferred to the so-called poor, or otherwise those that don't feel like working.
The Republicans (and mostly the conservatives) are all for the middle-class. If there was never an Obama, nor a Democrat led Congress, I would be doing so much better today financially.
Gov Rick Snyder gave corporations tax breaks and now says he has to raise our taxes to fix the roads. Because we don't have any money he says. That's a great example
Some people are smart and some people are stupid. You and I are on the smart side of people.
