P@triot
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
No, snowflake, it wasn’t. The national polling essentially had her winning by 65 million votes - not 2.8 million.Ok....Ms. Clinton got 2.8M more votes than your blob. So the nationwide polling was correct.
They said she would win Pennsylvania based on the “polling”. Did she? Did she win Pennsylvania, CC?
![dunno :dunno: :dunno:](/styles/smilies/dunno.gif)
They said she would win Michigan based on the “polling”. Did she? Did she win Michigan, CC?
![dunno :dunno: :dunno:](/styles/smilies/dunno.gif)
They said she would win Wisconsin based on the “polling”. Did she? Did she win Wisconsin, CC?
![dunno :dunno: :dunno:](/styles/smilies/dunno.gif)
They said she would win Ohio based on the “polling”. Did she? Did she win Ohio, CC?
![dunno :dunno: :dunno:](/styles/smilies/dunno.gif)
They said she would win Kansas based on the “polling”. Did she? Did she win Kansas, CC?
![dunno :dunno: :dunno:](/styles/smilies/dunno.gif)
They said she would win Florida based on the “polling”. Did she? Did she win Florida, CC?
![dunno :dunno: :dunno:](/styles/smilies/dunno.gif)
Your inability to accept reality is bizarre. The polling wasn’t even in the stratosphere. Towards the end, the polling had her winning South Carolina even.
![laugh :laugh: :laugh:](/styles/smilies/laugh.gif)
Last edited: