Here's the thing about CharlottesvilleIt

[Marion Morrison]

Hitlers socialism is what happened to Germany, you're thinking of the wrong side of things.
Socialism is the enemy of individuality and any sort of freedom… Fact

Hitler was far more fascist than socialist.

Really the same difference, socialism was the very name of Hitler's party. He acted far more left than anything else.

That you think there's little difference between socialism and fascism only serves to expose your ignorance.

Just as pointing to "socialist" being what Nazi's called themselves as evidence they were socialist does.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

Nazis were socialist, you Commie fuck. It's no secret you're a shill here.

They didn't allow very much private business.

Government controlled everything. The schools, business, you could get killed for listening to non-Nazi radio. Fuck right the hell off.

Right down to automobile manufacturing. Never heard of Volksvagen? Your theory=

wrong!


The Myth: Adolf Hitler, starter of World War 2 in Europe and driving force behind the Holocaust, was a socialist.

The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.

Hitler as Conservative Weapon
Twenty-first-century commentators like to attack left leaning policies by calling them socialist, and occasionally follow this up by explaining how Hitler, the mass murdering dictator around whom the twentieth century pivoted, was a socialist himself.


There’s no way anyone can, or ever should, defend Hitler, and so things like health-care reform are equated with something terrible, a Nazi regime which sought to conquer an empire and commit several genocides. The problem is, this is a distortion of history.

----------

Hitler as the Scourge of Socialism
Richard Evans, in his magisterial three volume history of Nazi Germany, is quite clear on whether Hitler was a socialist: “…it would be wrong to see Nazism as a form of, or an outgrowth of, socialism.” (The Coming of the Third Reich, Evans, p. 173). Not only was Hitler not a socialist himself, nor a communist, but he actually hated these ideologies and did his utmost to eradicate them. At first this involved organizing bands of thugs to attack socialists in the street, but grew into invading Russia, in part to enslave the population and earn ‘living ‘ room for Germans, and in part to wipe out communism and ‘Bolshevism’.




The key element here is what Hitler did, believed and tried to create. Nazism, confused as it was, was fundamentally an ideology built around race, while socialism was entirely different: built around class. Hitler aimed to unite the right and left, including workers and their bosses, into a new German nation based on the racial identity of those in it.


Socialism, in contrast, was a class struggle, aiming to build a workers state, whatever race the worker was from. Nazism drew on a range of pan-German theories, which wanted to blend Aryan workers and Aryan magnates into a super Aryan state, which would involve the eradication of class focused socialism, as well as Judaism and other ideas deemed non-German.

When Hitler came to power he attempted to dismantle trade unions and the shell that remained loyal to him; he supported the actions of leading industrialists, actions far removed from socialism which tends to want the opposite. Hitler used the fear of socialism and communism as a way of terrifying middle and upper-class Germans into supporting him. Workers were targeted with slightly different propaganda, but these were promises simply to earn support, to get into power, and then to remake the workers along with everyone else into a racial state. There was to be no dictatorship of the proletariat as in socialism; there was just to be the dictatorship of the Fuhrer.

MUCH MORE TO READ HERE!
Was Adolf Hitler a Socialist? Debunking a Historical Myth

I'm sorry sister, copy/paste bullshit drivel does not an argument make.

Oh! You found an article that alludes to the opposite. Too bad it's not true and factual, and is full of fallacies.

 

[irosie91]

White Supremacists are in such insignificant numbers it really doesn't matter…
You Really need to pick a scarier boogie man

Of course it matters to some who are determined to not let happen here what happened in Germany.

Hitlers socialism is what happened to Germany, you're thinking of the wrong side of things.
Socialism is the enemy of individuality and any sort of freedom… Fact

Hitler was far more fascist than socialist.

Really the same difference, socialism was the very name of Hitler's party. He acted far more left than anything else.

NO HE DID NOT act more socialist than fascist! THAT is simply bonkers!

he was a NATIONAL SOCIALIST-----socialist for the ARYAN NATION------ "socialism" describes
an economic system. " Fascism" describes a system of governmental rule. You are comparing
apples and oranges

 

[The Original Tree]

Hitlers socialism is what happened to Germany, you're thinking of the wrong side of things.
Socialism is the enemy of individuality and any sort of freedom… Fact

Hitler was far more fascist than socialist.

Really the same difference, socialism was the very name of Hitler's party. He acted far more left than anything else.

That you think there's little difference between socialism and fascism only serves to expose your ignorance.

Just as pointing to "socialist" being what Nazi's called themselves as evidence they were socialist does.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

Nazis were socialist, you Commie fuck. It's no secret you're a shill here.

They didn't allow very much private business.

Government controlled everything. The schools, business, you could get killed for listening to non-Nazi radio. Fuck right the hell off.

Right down to automobile manufacturing. Never heard of Volksvagen? Your theory=

wrong!


The Myth: Adolf Hitler, starter of World War 2 in Europe and driving force behind the Holocaust, was a socialist.

The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.

Hitler as Conservative Weapon
Twenty-first-century commentators like to attack left leaning policies by calling them socialist, and occasionally follow this up by explaining how Hitler, the mass murdering dictator around whom the twentieth century pivoted, was a socialist himself.


There’s no way anyone can, or ever should, defend Hitler, and so things like health-care reform are equated with something terrible, a Nazi regime which sought to conquer an empire and commit several genocides. The problem is, this is a distortion of history.

----------

Hitler as the Scourge of Socialism
Richard Evans, in his magisterial three volume history of Nazi Germany, is quite clear on whether Hitler was a socialist: “…it would be wrong to see Nazism as a form of, or an outgrowth of, socialism.” (The Coming of the Third Reich, Evans, p. 173). Not only was Hitler not a socialist himself, nor a communist, but he actually hated these ideologies and did his utmost to eradicate them. At first this involved organizing bands of thugs to attack socialists in the street, but grew into invading Russia, in part to enslave the population and earn ‘living ‘ room for Germans, and in part to wipe out communism and ‘Bolshevism’.




The key element here is what Hitler did, believed and tried to create. Nazism, confused as it was, was fundamentally an ideology built around race, while socialism was entirely different: built around class. Hitler aimed to unite the right and left, including workers and their bosses, into a new German nation based on the racial identity of those in it.


Socialism, in contrast, was a class struggle, aiming to build a workers state, whatever race the worker was from. Nazism drew on a range of pan-German theories, which wanted to blend Aryan workers and Aryan magnates into a super Aryan state, which would involve the eradication of class focused socialism, as well as Judaism and other ideas deemed non-German.

When Hitler came to power he attempted to dismantle trade unions and the shell that remained loyal to him; he supported the actions of leading industrialists, actions far removed from socialism which tends to want the opposite. Hitler used the fear of socialism and communism as a way of terrifying middle and upper-class Germans into supporting him. Workers were targeted with slightly different propaganda, but these were promises simply to earn support, to get into power, and then to remake the workers along with everyone else into a racial state. There was to be no dictatorship of the proletariat as in socialism; there was just to be the dictatorship of the Fuhrer.

MUCH MORE TO READ HERE!
Was Adolf Hitler a Socialist? Debunking a Historical Myth

TAKE YOUR INACCURATE PROPAGANDA AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR COMMUNIST ASS.

ANTIFA IS COMMUNIST. NEO NAZIS ARE FASCISTS. BOTH ARE LEFTISTS.
ANTIFA WAS THE STREET ARM OF THE GERMAN COMMUNIST PARTY, AND THEY DECLARED NAZI GERMANY FASCIST WHO BTW WAS ALLIED WITH FASCIST ITALY.

What IS ANTIFA & Their Relationship with Neo NAZIS?

 

[The Original Tree]

Of course it matters to some who are determined to not let happen here what happened in Germany.

Hitlers socialism is what happened to Germany, you're thinking of the wrong side of things.
Socialism is the enemy of individuality and any sort of freedom… Fact

Hitler was far more fascist than socialist.

Really the same difference, socialism was the very name of Hitler's party. He acted far more left than anything else.

NO HE DID NOT act more socialist than fascist! THAT is simply bonkers!

he was a NATIONAL SOCIALIST-----socialist for the ARYAN NATION------ "socialism" describes
an economic system. " Fascism" describes a system of governmental rule. You are comparing
apples and oranges

NAZI GERMANY was both FASCIST AND SOCIALIST. IT WAS ANTIFA WHO DECLARED THEM FASCIST IN NAZI GERMANY. FASCISM APPLIES TO THEM MORE APPROPRIATELY, despite the fact they did have some elements of Socialism.

AT ANY RATE THEY ARE WITHIN THE SAME SPECTRUM OF IDEOLOGIES.

What IS ANTIFA & Their Relationship with Neo NAZIS?

 

[Slash]

ROBERT E. LEE FACTS:

• Was asked by Abraham Lincoln to Lead The North in The Civil War. Declined because he would be forced to fight against Virginia (his home state) and his own neighbors and friends.
• He and his wife conducted an Illegal School for Black Children teaching them reading and writing in blatant violation of Virginia Law daring Virginia Law Enforcement to stop them.
• Robert E. Lee paid to smuggle as many slaves as he could out of Virginia and paid passage for them to Liberia. Robert E. Lee is considered one of the founders of Liberia. A Free State for Former American Slaves in Africa.
• He ended The Civil War early when he had the manpower and supplies to fight 3 more years for the good of the country, and devoted the rest of his life to activism for the reconciliation of The North and South.

Interesting facts.

Granted while other generals in the Confederacy may have been able to fight on and did, Lee only surrendered when his army was facing a much larger force that was sure to defeat them and he realized no help was coming. He said "Then there is nothing left for me to do but to go and see General Grant, and I would rather die a thousand deaths." So while you make it sound like he had other options, his other options were get killed or get caught. And while he surrendered the Army of Northern Virginia, other military forces and armies of the Confederacy didn't surrender for weeks and even months later.

Things like your made up fact that was untrue is why I would use written history rather than monuments to learn from.


More Robert E Lee facts

The only former US military officer to call for the surrender of a sitting US President.

The only former US military officer to lay siege and attack Washington DC to attempt overthrowing the US Government

Believed that slavery was good for blacks and better than emancipation.

Took a stand against the Washingon and Custis tradition of keeping slave families together and would often sell familiy members off to different plantations.

Nearly had a slave revolt when he tried to use a court interpretation to say slaves that should have been freed were his property, only giving them their freedom when forced to by court order. Lee rather than have them be free in the US "disposed of" (his words) them to Africa where he could.

His former slaves said he was more cruel than most masters with his torture, one saying he was "not satisfied with simply lacerating our naked flesh, Gen. Lee then ordered the overseer to thoroughly wash our backs with brine, which was done."

Lee allowed his army to routinely abduct free blacks and enslave them.

Lee allowed his soldiers to slaughter black US troops when they attempted to surrender.

When General Grant asked that his black POW's be exchanged the same as white soldiers, Lee refused

 

[Care4all]

Hitler was far more fascist than socialist.

Really the same difference, socialism was the very name of Hitler's party. He acted far more left than anything else.

That you think there's little difference between socialism and fascism only serves to expose your ignorance.

Just as pointing to "socialist" being what Nazi's called themselves as evidence they were socialist does.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

Nazis were socialist, you Commie fuck. It's no secret you're a shill here.

They didn't allow very much private business.

Government controlled everything. The schools, business, you could get killed for listening to non-Nazi radio. Fuck right the hell off.

Right down to automobile manufacturing. Never heard of Volksvagen? Your theory=

wrong!


The Myth: Adolf Hitler, starter of World War 2 in Europe and driving force behind the Holocaust, was a socialist.

The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.

Hitler as Conservative Weapon
Twenty-first-century commentators like to attack left leaning policies by calling them socialist, and occasionally follow this up by explaining how Hitler, the mass murdering dictator around whom the twentieth century pivoted, was a socialist himself.


There’s no way anyone can, or ever should, defend Hitler, and so things like health-care reform are equated with something terrible, a Nazi regime which sought to conquer an empire and commit several genocides. The problem is, this is a distortion of history.

----------

Hitler as the Scourge of Socialism
Richard Evans, in his magisterial three volume history of Nazi Germany, is quite clear on whether Hitler was a socialist: “…it would be wrong to see Nazism as a form of, or an outgrowth of, socialism.” (The Coming of the Third Reich, Evans, p. 173). Not only was Hitler not a socialist himself, nor a communist, but he actually hated these ideologies and did his utmost to eradicate them. At first this involved organizing bands of thugs to attack socialists in the street, but grew into invading Russia, in part to enslave the population and earn ‘living ‘ room for Germans, and in part to wipe out communism and ‘Bolshevism’.




The key element here is what Hitler did, believed and tried to create. Nazism, confused as it was, was fundamentally an ideology built around race, while socialism was entirely different: built around class. Hitler aimed to unite the right and left, including workers and their bosses, into a new German nation based on the racial identity of those in it.


Socialism, in contrast, was a class struggle, aiming to build a workers state, whatever race the worker was from. Nazism drew on a range of pan-German theories, which wanted to blend Aryan workers and Aryan magnates into a super Aryan state, which would involve the eradication of class focused socialism, as well as Judaism and other ideas deemed non-German.

When Hitler came to power he attempted to dismantle trade unions and the shell that remained loyal to him; he supported the actions of leading industrialists, actions far removed from socialism which tends to want the opposite. Hitler used the fear of socialism and communism as a way of terrifying middle and upper-class Germans into supporting him. Workers were targeted with slightly different propaganda, but these were promises simply to earn support, to get into power, and then to remake the workers along with everyone else into a racial state. There was to be no dictatorship of the proletariat as in socialism; there was just to be the dictatorship of the Fuhrer.

MUCH MORE TO READ HERE!
Was Adolf Hitler a Socialist? Debunking a Historical Myth

I'm sorry sister, copy/paste bullshit drivel does not an argument make.

Oh! You found an article that alludes to the opposite. Too bad it's not true and factual, and is full of fallacies.

it's not AN article, near ALL ARTICLES written about the time by historians all say the same thing, it is YOU and the other revisionists trying to rewrite history for some sort of convoluted political point....Nazism hated socialism and communism!

 

[Marion Morrison]

Really the same difference, socialism was the very name of Hitler's party. He acted far more left than anything else.

That you think there's little difference between socialism and fascism only serves to expose your ignorance.

Just as pointing to "socialist" being what Nazi's called themselves as evidence they were socialist does.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

Nazis were socialist, you Commie fuck. It's no secret you're a shill here.

They didn't allow very much private business.

Government controlled everything. The schools, business, you could get killed for listening to non-Nazi radio. Fuck right the hell off.

Right down to automobile manufacturing. Never heard of Volksvagen? Your theory=

wrong!


The Myth: Adolf Hitler, starter of World War 2 in Europe and driving force behind the Holocaust, was a socialist.

The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.

Hitler as Conservative Weapon
Twenty-first-century commentators like to attack left leaning policies by calling them socialist, and occasionally follow this up by explaining how Hitler, the mass murdering dictator around whom the twentieth century pivoted, was a socialist himself.


There’s no way anyone can, or ever should, defend Hitler, and so things like health-care reform are equated with something terrible, a Nazi regime which sought to conquer an empire and commit several genocides. The problem is, this is a distortion of history.

----------

Hitler as the Scourge of Socialism
Richard Evans, in his magisterial three volume history of Nazi Germany, is quite clear on whether Hitler was a socialist: “…it would be wrong to see Nazism as a form of, or an outgrowth of, socialism.” (The Coming of the Third Reich, Evans, p. 173). Not only was Hitler not a socialist himself, nor a communist, but he actually hated these ideologies and did his utmost to eradicate them. At first this involved organizing bands of thugs to attack socialists in the street, but grew into invading Russia, in part to enslave the population and earn ‘living ‘ room for Germans, and in part to wipe out communism and ‘Bolshevism’.




The key element here is what Hitler did, believed and tried to create. Nazism, confused as it was, was fundamentally an ideology built around race, while socialism was entirely different: built around class. Hitler aimed to unite the right and left, including workers and their bosses, into a new German nation based on the racial identity of those in it.


Socialism, in contrast, was a class struggle, aiming to build a workers state, whatever race the worker was from. Nazism drew on a range of pan-German theories, which wanted to blend Aryan workers and Aryan magnates into a super Aryan state, which would involve the eradication of class focused socialism, as well as Judaism and other ideas deemed non-German.

When Hitler came to power he attempted to dismantle trade unions and the shell that remained loyal to him; he supported the actions of leading industrialists, actions far removed from socialism which tends to want the opposite. Hitler used the fear of socialism and communism as a way of terrifying middle and upper-class Germans into supporting him. Workers were targeted with slightly different propaganda, but these were promises simply to earn support, to get into power, and then to remake the workers along with everyone else into a racial state. There was to be no dictatorship of the proletariat as in socialism; there was just to be the dictatorship of the Fuhrer.

MUCH MORE TO READ HERE!
Was Adolf Hitler a Socialist? Debunking a Historical Myth

I'm sorry sister, copy/paste bullshit drivel does not an argument make.

Oh! You found an article that alludes to the opposite. Too bad it's not true and factual, and is full of fallacies.

it's not AN article, near ALL ARTICLES written about the time by historians all say the same thing, it is YOU and the other revisionists trying to rewrite history for some sort of convoluted political point....Nazism hated socialism and communism!

Hated socialism? The Nazis vied to control every facet of society. Tell me again how that's not socialism?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

White Supremacists are in such insignificant numbers it really doesn't matter…
You Really need to pick a scarier boogie man

Of course it matters to some who are determined to not let happen here what happened in Germany.

Hitlers socialism is what happened to Germany, you're thinking of the wrong side of things.
Socialism is the enemy of individuality and any sort of freedom… Fact

Hitler was far more fascist than socialist.

Really the same difference, socialism was the very name of Hitler's party. He acted far more left than anything else.

That you think there's little difference between socialism and fascism only serves to expose your ignorance.

Just as pointing to "socialist" being what Nazi's called themselves as evidence they were socialist does.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

Yeah, those Nazis were all about small government, low taxes and freedom, eh comrade?

 

[Rustic]

ROBERT E. LEE FACTS:

• Was asked by Abraham Lincoln to Lead The North in The Civil War. Declined because he would be forced to fight against Virginia (his home state) and his own neighbors and friends.
• He and his wife conducted an Illegal School for Black Children teaching them reading and writing in blatant violation of Virginia Law daring Virginia Law Enforcement to stop them.
• Robert E. Lee paid to smuggle as many slaves as he could out of Virginia and paid passage for them to Liberia. Robert E. Lee is considered one of the founders of Liberia. A Free State for Former American Slaves in Africa.
• He ended The Civil War early when he had the manpower and supplies to fight 3 more years for the good of the country, and devoted the rest of his life to activism for the reconciliation of The North and South.

Interesting facts.

Granted while other generals in the Confederacy may have been able to fight on and did, Lee only surrendered when his army was facing a much larger force that was sure to defeat them and he realized no help was coming. He said "Then there is nothing left for me to do but to go and see General Grant, and I would rather die a thousand deaths." So while you make it sound like he had other options, his other options were get killed or get caught. And while he surrendered the Army of Northern Virginia, other military forces and armies of the Confederacy didn't surrender for weeks and even months later.

Things like your made up fact that was untrue is why I would use written history rather than monuments to learn from.


More Robert E Lee facts

The only former US military officer to call for the surrender of a sitting US President.

The only former US military officer to lay siege and attack Washington DC to attempt overthrowing the US Government

Believed that slavery was good for blacks and better than emancipation.

Took a stand against the Washingon and Custis tradition of keeping slave families together and would often sell familiy members off to different plantations.

Nearly had a slave revolt when he tried to use a court interpretation to say slaves that should have been freed were his property, only giving them their freedom when forced to by court order. Lee rather than have them be free in the US "disposed of" (his words) them to Africa where he could.

His former slaves said he was more cruel than most masters with his torture, one saying he was "not satisfied with simply lacerating our naked flesh, Gen. Lee then ordered the overseer to thoroughly wash our backs with brine, which was done."

Lee allowed his army to routinely abduct free blacks and enslave them.

Lee allowed his soldiers to slaughter black US troops when they attempted to surrender.

When General Grant asked that his black POW's be exchanged the same as white soldiers, Lee refused

Fake

 

[Rustic]

Nazi Germany/cuba/north Korea are the poster children for socialism...

 

[Faun]

Of course it matters to some who are determined to not let happen here what happened in Germany.

Hitlers socialism is what happened to Germany, you're thinking of the wrong side of things.
Socialism is the enemy of individuality and any sort of freedom… Fact

Hitler was far more fascist than socialist.

Really the same difference, socialism was the very name of Hitler's party. He acted far more left than anything else.

That you think there's little difference between socialism and fascism only serves to expose your ignorance.

Just as pointing to "socialist" being what Nazi's called themselves as evidence they were socialist does.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

Yeah, those Nazis were all about small government, low taxes and freedom, eh comrade?

Did I say they were like modern American Libertarians? And does that mean they weren't fascists?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hitlers socialism is what happened to Germany, you're thinking of the wrong side of things.
Socialism is the enemy of individuality and any sort of freedom… Fact

Hitler was far more fascist than socialist.

Really the same difference, socialism was the very name of Hitler's party. He acted far more left than anything else.

That you think there's little difference between socialism and fascism only serves to expose your ignorance.

Just as pointing to "socialist" being what Nazi's called themselves as evidence they were socialist does.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

Yeah, those Nazis were all about small government, low taxes and freedom, eh comrade?

Did I say they were like modern American Libertarians? And does that mean they weren't fascists?

Did I say they were like modern American Libertarians?

No.
Nazis, Commies, Fascists, Socialists are all big government, left wingers....the opposite of American Libertarians.

 

[bodecea]

I am fascinated. The "SPECIFIC" reason for putting up a statue of a general like Robert
E Lee was to "INTIMIDATE BLACKs......." I am not DENYING your allegation----it just seems
silly to me...... You got anything to support your allegation? Laws removing the right to
vote from felons were created SPECIFICALLY to target blacks? I assume that would be sometime
in the mid 1800s-----you got something to support that allegation?. I am not denying the fact that
blacks were oppressed in the south

There is something to be said for her argument. MANY of the Confederate monuments were erected by DEMOCRAT leaders in the wake of desegregation and Civil Rights. But like virtually every horrid thing Democrats have ever done (their history of it is long), they want to twist and distort it into the fault of Republicans.

I don't personally have an issue with statues and monuments and I think if you are such a weak person that this is an issue to you, it's a pathetic thing. That said, if a community or city wants to put up or take down a monument, it should be up to the people who live there. Not some bunch of sniveling, virtue-signalling, moron Democrats!

Yes...Democrats erected them back in the day....who's fighting to keep them and their so-called "history and heritage" now?

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

 

[bodecea]

they were erected by southern conservatives, those who wanted to preserve the past days of slavery and yes, they were Democrats at the time....and KKK ers at the time.

No, they were ALL erected by DEMOCRATS who opposed Civil Rights! They had nothing to do with Conservatives or Republicans.

Wrong...Southern Dems WERE the con-servatives.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

 

[The Original Tree]

Hitler was far more fascist than socialist.

Really the same difference, socialism was the very name of Hitler's party. He acted far more left than anything else.

That you think there's little difference between socialism and fascism only serves to expose your ignorance.

Just as pointing to "socialist" being what Nazi's called themselves as evidence they were socialist does.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

Yeah, those Nazis were all about small government, low taxes and freedom, eh comrade?

Did I say they were like modern American Libertarians? And does that mean they weren't fascists?

Did I say they were like modern American Libertarians?

No.
Nazis, Commies, Fascists, Socialists are all big government, left wingers....the opposite of American Libertarians.

100% UNADULTERATED TRUTH!

 

[The Original Tree]

That you think there's little difference between socialism and fascism only serves to expose your ignorance.

Just as pointing to "socialist" being what Nazi's called themselves as evidence they were socialist does.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

Nazis were socialist, you Commie fuck. It's no secret you're a shill here.

They didn't allow very much private business.

Government controlled everything. The schools, business, you could get killed for listening to non-Nazi radio. Fuck right the hell off.

Right down to automobile manufacturing. Never heard of Volksvagen? Your theory=

wrong!


The Myth: Adolf Hitler, starter of World War 2 in Europe and driving force behind the Holocaust, was a socialist.

The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.

Hitler as Conservative Weapon
Twenty-first-century commentators like to attack left leaning policies by calling them socialist, and occasionally follow this up by explaining how Hitler, the mass murdering dictator around whom the twentieth century pivoted, was a socialist himself.


There’s no way anyone can, or ever should, defend Hitler, and so things like health-care reform are equated with something terrible, a Nazi regime which sought to conquer an empire and commit several genocides. The problem is, this is a distortion of history.

----------

Hitler as the Scourge of Socialism
Richard Evans, in his magisterial three volume history of Nazi Germany, is quite clear on whether Hitler was a socialist: “…it would be wrong to see Nazism as a form of, or an outgrowth of, socialism.” (The Coming of the Third Reich, Evans, p. 173). Not only was Hitler not a socialist himself, nor a communist, but he actually hated these ideologies and did his utmost to eradicate them. At first this involved organizing bands of thugs to attack socialists in the street, but grew into invading Russia, in part to enslave the population and earn ‘living ‘ room for Germans, and in part to wipe out communism and ‘Bolshevism’.




The key element here is what Hitler did, believed and tried to create. Nazism, confused as it was, was fundamentally an ideology built around race, while socialism was entirely different: built around class. Hitler aimed to unite the right and left, including workers and their bosses, into a new German nation based on the racial identity of those in it.


Socialism, in contrast, was a class struggle, aiming to build a workers state, whatever race the worker was from. Nazism drew on a range of pan-German theories, which wanted to blend Aryan workers and Aryan magnates into a super Aryan state, which would involve the eradication of class focused socialism, as well as Judaism and other ideas deemed non-German.

When Hitler came to power he attempted to dismantle trade unions and the shell that remained loyal to him; he supported the actions of leading industrialists, actions far removed from socialism which tends to want the opposite. Hitler used the fear of socialism and communism as a way of terrifying middle and upper-class Germans into supporting him. Workers were targeted with slightly different propaganda, but these were promises simply to earn support, to get into power, and then to remake the workers along with everyone else into a racial state. There was to be no dictatorship of the proletariat as in socialism; there was just to be the dictatorship of the Fuhrer.

MUCH MORE TO READ HERE!
Was Adolf Hitler a Socialist? Debunking a Historical Myth

I'm sorry sister, copy/paste bullshit drivel does not an argument make.

Oh! You found an article that alludes to the opposite. Too bad it's not true and factual, and is full of fallacies.

it's not AN article, near ALL ARTICLES written about the time by historians all say the same thing, it is YOU and the other revisionists trying to rewrite history for some sort of convoluted political point....Nazism hated socialism and communism!

Hated socialism? The Nazis vied to control every facet of society. Tell me again how that's not socialism?

LOL, yet THE NAZIS ALLIED WITH THE COMMUNIST SOVIET UNION. LMFAO.
COMMIE LIBS CAN'T EVEN GET THEIR OWN PROPAGANDA RIGHT

 

[irosie91]

Really the same difference, socialism was the very name of Hitler's party. He acted far more left than anything else.

That you think there's little difference between socialism and fascism only serves to expose your ignorance.

Just as pointing to "socialist" being what Nazi's called themselves as evidence they were socialist does.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

Nazis were socialist, you Commie fuck. It's no secret you're a shill here.

They didn't allow very much private business.

Government controlled everything. The schools, business, you could get killed for listening to non-Nazi radio. Fuck right the hell off.

Right down to automobile manufacturing. Never heard of Volksvagen? Your theory=

wrong!


The Myth: Adolf Hitler, starter of World War 2 in Europe and driving force behind the Holocaust, was a socialist.

The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.

Hitler as Conservative Weapon
Twenty-first-century commentators like to attack left leaning policies by calling them socialist, and occasionally follow this up by explaining how Hitler, the mass murdering dictator around whom the twentieth century pivoted, was a socialist himself.


There’s no way anyone can, or ever should, defend Hitler, and so things like health-care reform are equated with something terrible, a Nazi regime which sought to conquer an empire and commit several genocides. The problem is, this is a distortion of history.

----------

Hitler as the Scourge of Socialism
Richard Evans, in his magisterial three volume history of Nazi Germany, is quite clear on whether Hitler was a socialist: “…it would be wrong to see Nazism as a form of, or an outgrowth of, socialism.” (The Coming of the Third Reich, Evans, p. 173). Not only was Hitler not a socialist himself, nor a communist, but he actually hated these ideologies and did his utmost to eradicate them. At first this involved organizing bands of thugs to attack socialists in the street, but grew into invading Russia, in part to enslave the population and earn ‘living ‘ room for Germans, and in part to wipe out communism and ‘Bolshevism’.




The key element here is what Hitler did, believed and tried to create. Nazism, confused as it was, was fundamentally an ideology built around race, while socialism was entirely different: built around class. Hitler aimed to unite the right and left, including workers and their bosses, into a new German nation based on the racial identity of those in it.


Socialism, in contrast, was a class struggle, aiming to build a workers state, whatever race the worker was from. Nazism drew on a range of pan-German theories, which wanted to blend Aryan workers and Aryan magnates into a super Aryan state, which would involve the eradication of class focused socialism, as well as Judaism and other ideas deemed non-German.

When Hitler came to power he attempted to dismantle trade unions and the shell that remained loyal to him; he supported the actions of leading industrialists, actions far removed from socialism which tends to want the opposite. Hitler used the fear of socialism and communism as a way of terrifying middle and upper-class Germans into supporting him. Workers were targeted with slightly different propaganda, but these were promises simply to earn support, to get into power, and then to remake the workers along with everyone else into a racial state. There was to be no dictatorship of the proletariat as in socialism; there was just to be the dictatorship of the Fuhrer.

MUCH MORE TO READ HERE!
Was Adolf Hitler a Socialist? Debunking a Historical Myth

I'm sorry sister, copy/paste bullshit drivel does not an argument make.

Oh! You found an article that alludes to the opposite. Too bad it's not true and factual, and is full of fallacies.

it's not AN article, near ALL ARTICLES written about the time by historians all say the same thing, it is YOU and the other revisionists trying to rewrite history for some sort of convoluted political point....Nazism hated socialism and communism!

you are confused------adolf NATIONALIZED all sorts of industries------that is the mechanism of SOCIALISM.------that's why it is called NATIONAL SOCIALISM

 

[bripat9643]

From what I've seen, many on the so-called right are running to the nearest camera and microphone to cower and capitulate to the virtue signalling left.

'So-called right'? Do you go with the line that fascists are actually socialists?

Of course they are, dumbass.

That's why you support them.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

Right, because you can read my mind. It's amazing how libs know what conservatives are thinking.

 

[Faun]

Hitler was far more fascist than socialist.

Really the same difference, socialism was the very name of Hitler's party. He acted far more left than anything else.

That you think there's little difference between socialism and fascism only serves to expose your ignorance.

Just as pointing to "socialist" being what Nazi's called themselves as evidence they were socialist does.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

They were socialist like North Korea is Democratic.

Yeah, those Nazis were all about small government, low taxes and freedom, eh comrade?

Did I say they were like modern American Libertarians? And does that mean they weren't fascists?

Did I say they were like modern American Libertarians?

No.
Nazis, Commies, Fascists, Socialists are all big government, left wingers....the opposite of American Libertarians.

Idiot. I didn't say you did. <smh>

 

[Faun]

Nazis were socialist, you Commie fuck. It's no secret you're a shill here.

They didn't allow very much private business.

Government controlled everything. The schools, business, you could get killed for listening to non-Nazi radio. Fuck right the hell off.

Right down to automobile manufacturing. Never heard of Volksvagen? Your theory=

wrong!


The Myth: Adolf Hitler, starter of World War 2 in Europe and driving force behind the Holocaust, was a socialist.

The Truth: Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.

Hitler as Conservative Weapon
Twenty-first-century commentators like to attack left leaning policies by calling them socialist, and occasionally follow this up by explaining how Hitler, the mass murdering dictator around whom the twentieth century pivoted, was a socialist himself.


There’s no way anyone can, or ever should, defend Hitler, and so things like health-care reform are equated with something terrible, a Nazi regime which sought to conquer an empire and commit several genocides. The problem is, this is a distortion of history.

----------

Hitler as the Scourge of Socialism
Richard Evans, in his magisterial three volume history of Nazi Germany, is quite clear on whether Hitler was a socialist: “…it would be wrong to see Nazism as a form of, or an outgrowth of, socialism.” (The Coming of the Third Reich, Evans, p. 173). Not only was Hitler not a socialist himself, nor a communist, but he actually hated these ideologies and did his utmost to eradicate them. At first this involved organizing bands of thugs to attack socialists in the street, but grew into invading Russia, in part to enslave the population and earn ‘living ‘ room for Germans, and in part to wipe out communism and ‘Bolshevism’.




The key element here is what Hitler did, believed and tried to create. Nazism, confused as it was, was fundamentally an ideology built around race, while socialism was entirely different: built around class. Hitler aimed to unite the right and left, including workers and their bosses, into a new German nation based on the racial identity of those in it.


Socialism, in contrast, was a class struggle, aiming to build a workers state, whatever race the worker was from. Nazism drew on a range of pan-German theories, which wanted to blend Aryan workers and Aryan magnates into a super Aryan state, which would involve the eradication of class focused socialism, as well as Judaism and other ideas deemed non-German.

When Hitler came to power he attempted to dismantle trade unions and the shell that remained loyal to him; he supported the actions of leading industrialists, actions far removed from socialism which tends to want the opposite. Hitler used the fear of socialism and communism as a way of terrifying middle and upper-class Germans into supporting him. Workers were targeted with slightly different propaganda, but these were promises simply to earn support, to get into power, and then to remake the workers along with everyone else into a racial state. There was to be no dictatorship of the proletariat as in socialism; there was just to be the dictatorship of the Fuhrer.

MUCH MORE TO READ HERE!
Was Adolf Hitler a Socialist? Debunking a Historical Myth

I'm sorry sister, copy/paste bullshit drivel does not an argument make.

Oh! You found an article that alludes to the opposite. Too bad it's not true and factual, and is full of fallacies.

it's not AN article, near ALL ARTICLES written about the time by historians all say the same thing, it is YOU and the other revisionists trying to rewrite history for some sort of convoluted political point....Nazism hated socialism and communism!

Hated socialism? The Nazis vied to control every facet of society. Tell me again how that's not socialism?

LOL, yet THE NAZIS ALLIED WITH THE COMMUNIST SOVIET UNION. LMFAO.
COMMIE LIBS CAN'T EVEN GET THEIR OWN PROPAGANDA RIGHT

Idiot. The Nazi's invaded the Soviet Union.