Asclepias
Diamond Member
- Aug 3, 2013
- 114,820
- 18,670
For Oakland city counsel considering raising the MW. Didnt you read your own link?"Retaliation"? LOL!You do realize that was Walmarts decision and not the results of a negative economic effect dont you? It was retaliation. From your link.It's been proven over and over. Look at the rate of teen unemployment. In the 1960s it tracked very closely with the general rate. Today it is three times the general rate. That isnt by accident.Spot on.
Conservatives have been using the same talking points against MW for decades. If they held any water at all, they would have been easily proven already. It's just the usual noise.
It's never been proven that MW increases have any significant or long term affects on unemployment. Please post up the graph that shows the correlated increase in unemployment for every time the MW has been raised.
“The minimum wage in the city of Oakland played a factor, was one of the factors, they considered in closing the stores,” Oakland City Councilman Larry Reid told the San Francisco Chronicle.
Oakland’s Minimum Wage Is Up, Wal-Mart Is Out
"“They wouldn’t go into any specific details in terms of their rationale for closing the store,” Reid told ABC 7 News. “But this store has been very successful for Wal-mart.”"
- Retaliation for what?
- Who closes a successful business to "retaliate"? The would be cutting off their nose to spite their face
"Hundreds of Wal-Mart employees fasted this past November in protest for a $15 minimum wage, arguing that Wal-Mart employees do not make enough money to put food on the table.
Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf, a Democrat, has been leading statewide efforts to raise the minimum wage to $15."