Hey Moronic Atheists.... Educate Yourselves

Has 45,000 visitors.
Where's your video, anus?

:cuckoo: :lol:

Is your position that Yahweh claimed to be "GOD" as defined as the creator of everything, including Yahweh? Besides the logically impossibility, where in the Old and New Testament does Yahweh and or Jesus (the same deity according to theologists) is a claim made to be "GOD" as defined as the creator of everything?
 
Last edited:

28948_389516384411_133279014411_4056372_2420724_s.jpg
 
Last edited:
Why we hate people who believe in god. Anthropocentrism is the belief that human beings are the central or most significant species on the planet.

It is a major concept in the field of environmental ethics and environmental philosophy, where it is often considered to be the root cause of problems created by human interaction with the environment.

I bet a lot of religious people don't believe in man made global warming. This is why religion needs to go.

Yeah, go ahead and bet on that.

You'd be incorrect, with regard to the Christians who are truly familiar with the Scriptures.



"Hear the word of the Lord, ye children of Israel: for the Lord hath a controversy with the inhabitants of the land, because there is no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God in the land.

By swearing, and lying, and killing, and stealing, and committing adultery, they break out, and blood toucheth blood.

Therefore shall the land mourn, and every one that dwelleth therein shall languish, with the beasts of the field, and with the fowls of heaven; yea, the fishes of the sea also shall be taken away."
— Hosea 4:1-3



God instructs us to take care of His creation, His land, His earth. We humans are not necessarily the center of the world, the heavens, the universe, in the anthropocentric sense of the term:

We are merely its stewards. And the blessings God has given man, He can also just as easily take away, if we do not follow Him.

God has His own special covenant with the animals — their own Bible, perhaps. We humans are not aware of it; we are not supposed to be.

The Bible is merely God's testament to us humans — for whom He sent His Son to die; not His animals.

This is most likely why, for example, we see unexplainable psychic phenomena such as how creatures of the sea like dolphins and whales are able to communicate via sonar; how animals act strangely prior to the eruptions of volcanoes and earthquakes.



"The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.

And the cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together: and the lion shall eat straw like the ox.

And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice' den.

They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain: for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the LORD, as the waters cover the sea."
Isaiah 11:6-9



Has God made man the center of creation?

Does God believe in anthropocentrism?

Not according to His Word to us humans—The Bible—He doesn't. And as brilliant as you like to fancy yourself, you have obviously never read it.
 
Last edited:
I think the bigger question is...did the guy in the video serve?

You sure as shit didn't……
Why don't you shut your mouth (AKA shithole).

Thanks

Do you really think it requires a deity to be the disrespectful, cretinous, racist bore that you are?
The Fruits of the Spirit are peace, love, joy, patience, goodness, kindness, faithfulness, gentleness and self control. In Galatians, Paul tells us these would be the characteristics of a person indwelt by the Holy Spirit. You don't demonstrate these.
Why do you hate the Holy Spirit?
Or why has He rejected you?
 

Have you noticed that not ONE of the idiotic naysayers came up with a SINGLE viable answer to the man's initial premise -- that Big Bang, Abiogenesis, and Evolution are all theories but NOT science? And that it takes a great amount of faith to believe in them? Nope ... all we got was a bunch of slope-headed, slack-jaws frothing at the mouth and slobbering the same drivel that they always do. They're so predictable and well practiced at sidestepping.
 

Have you noticed that not ONE of the idiotic naysayers came up with a SINGLE viable answer to the man's initial premise -- that Big Bang, Abiogenesis, and Evolution are all theories but NOT science? And that it takes a great amount of faith to believe in them? Nope ... all we got was a bunch of slope-headed, slack-jaws frothing at the mouth and slobbering the same drivel that they always do. They're so predictable and well practiced at sidestepping.

Then what is science?
 

Have you noticed that not ONE of the idiotic naysayers came up with a SINGLE viable answer to the man's initial premise -- that Big Bang, Abiogenesis, and Evolution are all theories but NOT science? And that it takes a great amount of faith to believe in them? Nope ... all we got was a bunch of slope-headed, slack-jaws frothing at the mouth and slobbering the same drivel that they always do. They're so predictable and well practiced at sidestepping.


Go back and read my post.
 

Have you noticed that not ONE of the idiotic naysayers came up with a SINGLE viable answer to the man's initial premise -- that Big Bang, Abiogenesis, and Evolution are all theories but NOT science? And that it takes a great amount of faith to believe in them? Nope ... all we got was a bunch of slope-headed, slack-jaws frothing at the mouth and slobbering the same drivel that they always do. They're so predictable and well practiced at sidestepping.

Have you noticed that no matter his many times the science of the the Big Bang, Abiogenesis and Evolution are addressed, religious extremists will ignore the established evidence (to exclude abiogenesis), and simply rattle on about their gods?

Conspiracy theories? That's all you have?
 

All the dude in the video is saying is that he is intellectually lazy and like Bush II lacking in curiosity. What he is bragging on is that his "faith" is the easier path.

He like most IDers miss understands the OBSERVATIONS of Darwin. He doesn't get the significance of the isolation of the Galapagos in taking the place of direct observation. His forcefull delivery is only proof of the willfullness of his ignorance.
 

Forum List

Back
Top