Hillary Above the Law, Part 2; Misuse of Air Force One Violates US Campaign Laws

[JimBowie1958]

So many have misconstrued what Comey was saying that non criminal sanction are often applied but that wasn't the topic of the conversation. What he did NOT mention is that many have been convicted of CRIMES for similar behavior. not just security or administrative sanctions.

Distinction without a difference.

Only to an idiot

There is a HUGE distinction being criminal sanctions and administrative sanctions.

You being an idiot wouldn't know that.

Absolutely

Republicans are demanding criminal sanctions for an offence that only warrants administrative or security sanctions at best

Wrong. She CLEARLY violated a criminal statute. The fact that you won't admit that doesn't change the fact that she broke the law. She didn't just violate a rule, she broke the LAW.

I guess it depends on what the definition of the word 'clearly' is.....

 

[Fair&Balanced]

So many have misconstrued what Comey was saying that non criminal sanction are often applied but that wasn't the topic of the conversation. What he did NOT mention is that many have been convicted of CRIMES for similar behavior. not just security or administrative sanctions.

Distinction without a difference.

Only to an idiot

There is a HUGE distinction being criminal sanctions and administrative sanctions.

You being an idiot wouldn't know that.

He is a libtard and it isnt fair to expect him to grasp what he is mentally incapable of grasping.

Jim, he grasps it, deep down RW and other liberals who post here. They aren't that stupid. They can read the statute and see that yes in fact Hillary broke the fucking law. They just won't admit it.

 

[rightwinger]

So many have misconstrued what Comey was saying that non criminal sanction are often applied but that wasn't the topic of the conversation. What he did NOT mention is that many have been convicted of CRIMES for similar behavior. not just security or administrative sanctions.

Distinction without a difference.

Only to an idiot

There is a HUGE distinction being criminal sanctions and administrative sanctions.

You being an idiot wouldn't know that.

Absolutely

Republicans are demanding criminal sanctions for an offence that only warrants administrative or security sanctions at best

Wrong. She CLEARLY violated a criminal statute. The fact that you won't admit that doesn't change the fact that she broke the law. She didn't just violate a rule, she broke the LAW.

Far from it

Nothing she did warranted criminal prosecution. The FBI affirmed it

Why don't you cite someone else who went to jail for similar actions

 

[JimBowie1958]

The truly sad part really is all the morons who will still vote for her.

They are not really voting for her as most of them know next to nothing about her.

They are voting for 'free chit' and we have to end this cycle of corruption, by Constitutional Amendment if necessary, or our Republic is dead, taken captive by corporate owned demagogues who have successfully bred an idiot majority.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Jim, he grasps it, deep down RW and other liberals who post here. They aren't that stupid. They can read the statute and see that yes in fact Hillary broke the fucking law. They just won't admit it.

I am being generous in ascribing it to their greedy stupidity rather than treasonous hatred of our nation.

 

[WillowTree]

So Coney just said the Hillary voluntarily spoke to the FBI over 4th of July and she was not placed under oath even though he knew she had lied about those emails.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

So many have misconstrued what Comey was saying that non criminal sanction are often applied but that wasn't the topic of the conversation. What he did NOT mention is that many have been convicted of CRIMES for similar behavior. not just security or administrative sanctions.

Distinction without a difference.

Only to an idiot

There is a HUGE distinction being criminal sanctions and administrative sanctions.

You being an idiot wouldn't know that.

Absolutely

Republicans are demanding criminal sanctions for an offence that only warrants administrative or security sanctions at best

Wrong. She CLEARLY violated a criminal statute. The fact that you won't admit that doesn't change the fact that she broke the law. She didn't just violate a rule, she broke the LAW.

Far from it

Nothing she did warranted criminal prosecution. The FBI affirmed it

Why don't you cite someone else who went to jail for similar actions

A criminal conviction doesn't have to result in jail time.

Sure , let's start with John Deutch who was actually working on a plea deal for a misdemeanor crime for storing classified material on his home computer before Bill Clinton pardoned him avoiding the plea deal.

How about BRYAN NISHIMURA who was fined and lost his security clearance for having classified material on his personal electronic devices even though the Justice Department concluded that there was no intent, but they felt like they had to send a message that this was not acceptable. By the way, that was in 2008, so under Obama.

 

[daws101]

So many have misconstrued what Comey was saying that non criminal sanction are often applied but that wasn't the topic of the conversation. What he did NOT mention is that many have been convicted of CRIMES for similar behavior. not just security or administrative sanctions.

Distinction without a difference.

Only to an idiot

There is a HUGE distinction being criminal sanctions and administrative sanctions.

You being an idiot wouldn't know that.

Since no criminal sanctions are being sought it's, as I said a distinction without a difference.
HUGE FAIL!

 

[rightwinger]

Distinction without a difference.

Only to an idiot

There is a HUGE distinction being criminal sanctions and administrative sanctions.

You being an idiot wouldn't know that.

Absolutely

Republicans are demanding criminal sanctions for an offence that only warrants administrative or security sanctions at best

Wrong. She CLEARLY violated a criminal statute. The fact that you won't admit that doesn't change the fact that she broke the law. She didn't just violate a rule, she broke the LAW.

Far from it

Nothing she did warranted criminal prosecution. The FBI affirmed it

Why don't you cite someone else who went to jail for similar actions

A criminal conviction doesn't have to result in jail time.

Sure , let's start with John Deutch who was actually working on a plea deal for a misdemeanor crime for storing classified material on his home computer before Bill Clinton pardoned him avoiding the plea deal.

How about BRYAN NISHIMURA who was fined and lost his security clearance for having classified material on his personal electronic devices even though the Justice Department concluded that there was no intent, but they felt like they had to send a message that this was not acceptable. By the way, that was in 2008, so under Obama.

Deutch: Intentionally taking classified material and storing it at home was his violation. Hillary was sent classified material with no header information marking it as classified. She did not place the information there or request that it be sent

Nishmura: Sounds like administrative and security sanctions.

 

[daws101]

So many have misconstrued what Comey was saying that non criminal sanction are often applied but that wasn't the topic of the conversation. What he did NOT mention is that many have been convicted of CRIMES for similar behavior. not just security or administrative sanctions.

Distinction without a difference.

Only to an idiot

There is a HUGE distinction being criminal sanctions and administrative sanctions.

You being an idiot wouldn't know that.

Absolutely

Republicans are demanding criminal sanctions for an offence that only warrants administrative or security sanctions at best

Wrong. She CLEARLY violated a criminal statute. The fact that you won't admit that doesn't change the fact that she broke the law. She didn't just violate a rule, she broke the LAW.

False! Comey himself said there was no law broken and her actions didn't rise to the level of criminality.

 

[daws101]

Distinction without a difference.

Only to an idiot

There is a HUGE distinction being criminal sanctions and administrative sanctions.

You being an idiot wouldn't know that.

Absolutely

Republicans are demanding criminal sanctions for an offence that only warrants administrative or security sanctions at best

Wrong. She CLEARLY violated a criminal statute. The fact that you won't admit that doesn't change the fact that she broke the law. She didn't just violate a rule, she broke the LAW.

Far from it

Nothing she did warranted criminal prosecution. The FBI affirmed it

Why don't you cite someone else who went to jail for similar actions

A criminal conviction doesn't have to result in jail time.

Sure , let's start with John Deutch who was actually working on a plea deal for a misdemeanor crime for storing classified material on his home computer before Bill Clinton pardoned him avoiding the plea deal.

How about BRYAN NISHIMURA who was fined and lost his security clearance for having classified material on his personal electronic devices even though the Justice Department concluded that there was no intent, but they felt like they had to send a message that this was not acceptable. By the way, that was in 2008, so under Obama.

Lol!

 

[WillowTree]

I think Hillary may go up on perjury charges. It is a crime to lie to congress.

 

[sealybobo]

This is use of Federal money for aiding Hilarys campaign and is a violation of federal law.

But nothing will happen because Hillary is above the law and the GOP is a bunch of cowardly lap dogs to do a damned thing about it.

More laws for the little people only, not the rulers.

The Latest: Hillary Clinton Joins Obama on Air Force One

Trump protests Clinton riding Air Force One with Obama

Citizens' Guide

Obama was going in airforce one. Should she have went American Airlines? Or should Obama have rode Southwest? Shut the fuck up.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I think Hillary may go up on perjury charges. It is a crime to lie to congress.

But it will have to happen with a new President in the Oval Office and not some Creature from the Black Lagoon of Chicago Machine politics.

We will also need a Congressional leadership that has some spine among them.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

This is use of Federal money for aiding Hilarys campaign and is a violation of federal law.

But nothing will happen because Hillary is above the law and the GOP is a bunch of cowardly lap dogs to do a damned thing about it.

More laws for the little people only, not the rulers.

The Latest: Hillary Clinton Joins Obama on Air Force One

Trump protests Clinton riding Air Force One with Obama

Citizens' Guide

And she used the POTUS podium, too.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Only to an idiot

There is a HUGE distinction being criminal sanctions and administrative sanctions.

You being an idiot wouldn't know that.

Absolutely

Republicans are demanding criminal sanctions for an offence that only warrants administrative or security sanctions at best

Wrong. She CLEARLY violated a criminal statute. The fact that you won't admit that doesn't change the fact that she broke the law. She didn't just violate a rule, she broke the LAW.

Far from it

Nothing she did warranted criminal prosecution. The FBI affirmed it

Why don't you cite someone else who went to jail for similar actions

A criminal conviction doesn't have to result in jail time.

Sure , let's start with John Deutch who was actually working on a plea deal for a misdemeanor crime for storing classified material on his home computer before Bill Clinton pardoned him avoiding the plea deal.

How about BRYAN NISHIMURA who was fined and lost his security clearance for having classified material on his personal electronic devices even though the Justice Department concluded that there was no intent, but they felt like they had to send a message that this was not acceptable. By the way, that was in 2008, so under Obama.

Lol!

Mac1958 perfect example of what we were discussing before. I point out a fact and all this troll can do is LOL because he knows the facts are not with him.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

This is use of Federal money for aiding Hilarys campaign and is a violation of federal law.

But nothing will happen because Hillary is above the law and the GOP is a bunch of cowardly lap dogs to do a damned thing about it.

More laws for the little people only, not the rulers.

The Latest: Hillary Clinton Joins Obama on Air Force One

Trump protests Clinton riding Air Force One with Obama

Citizens' Guide

Obama was going in airforce one. Should she have went American Airlines? Or should Obama have rode Southwest? Shut the fuck up.

A sitting President should be doing his fucking job, not be out speeding tax dollars to campaign for his choice to succeed him.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

This is use of Federal money for aiding Hilarys campaign and is a violation of federal law.

But nothing will happen because Hillary is above the law and the GOP is a bunch of cowardly lap dogs to do a damned thing about it.

More laws for the little people only, not the rulers.

The Latest: Hillary Clinton Joins Obama on Air Force One

Trump protests Clinton riding Air Force One with Obama

Citizens' Guide

Desperation.

Indeed it is; Hillary trying to look presidential only minutes after the FBI head detailed her utter corruption.

 

[sealybobo]

This is use of Federal money for aiding Hilarys campaign and is a violation of federal law.

But nothing will happen because Hillary is above the law and the GOP is a bunch of cowardly lap dogs to do a damned thing about it.

More laws for the little people only, not the rulers.

The Latest: Hillary Clinton Joins Obama on Air Force One

Trump protests Clinton riding Air Force One with Obama

Citizens' Guide

Obama was going in airforce one. Should she have went American Airlines? Or should Obama have rode Southwest? Shut the fuck up.

A sitting President should be doing his fucking job, not be out speeding tax dollars to campaign for his choice to succeed him.

STFU stupid. How many hours do you require him to work? 24 hours a day? When the POTUS has to go somewhere, or wants to go somewhere, he flies air force one and he takes security with him.

Now I see how it is. Boy you guys want to keep the black man working in the cotton fields until he breaks down. If he wants to run the plantation, you'll show him how hard it is huh? And you'll hold him to a higher standard than you would any white man. Now I see how it is. So obviously racist. Just like when you complain about how much Michelle spends. Did you ever do that to those whores Laura Nancy or Barbara?

 

[daws101]

Distinction without a difference.

Only to an idiot

There is a HUGE distinction being criminal sanctions and administrative sanctions.

You being an idiot wouldn't know that.

Absolutely

Republicans are demanding criminal sanctions for an offence that only warrants administrative or security sanctions at best

Wrong. She CLEARLY violated a criminal statute. The fact that you won't admit that doesn't change the fact that she broke the law. She didn't just violate a rule, she broke the LAW.

Far from it

Nothing she did warranted criminal prosecution. The FBI affirmed it

Why don't you cite someone else who went to jail for similar actions

A criminal conviction doesn't have to result in jail time.

Sure , let's start with John Deutch who was actually working on a plea deal for a misdemeanor crime for storing classified material on his home computer before Bill Clinton pardoned him avoiding the plea deal.

How about BRYAN NISHIMURA who was fined and lost his security clearance for having classified material on his personal electronic devices even though the Justice Department concluded that there was no intent, but they felt like they had to send a message that this was not acceptable. By the way, that was in 2008, so under Obama.

btw Comey distroyed the
BRYAN NISHIMURA defense Handley.