Hillary Clinton has at least 20 point lead over GOP in new poll

[Statistikhengst]

Hillary Clinton has at least 20 point lead over GOP in new poll | Early & Often

--------------------------------------------------
Way To Go!! We have your back, Hillary!!

Oh please please please PLEASE let Hilliary run. You want a land slide defeat for Democrats? Run Hilliary. The only way that the GOP could possibly lose an election against Hilliary, is if they ran Stalin, Mao, Hitler, or Bill Clinton on their ticket.

I did not vote for McCain, or Romney, because to me they were about as Democrap as you could get, without having a donkey tattoo'd on their forehead.

But you people run Hilliary.... I'd vote for absolutely ANYONE..... as in ANYONE the GOP ran opposite Hilliary.

You want to see a united GOP? Run Hilliary in 2016. People HATE Hilliary. Obama? People didn't like Obama's policies. But they didn't HATE him. People honestly truly HATE Hilliary Clinton. She is truly an EVIL person. Just flat out EVIL. The GOP would have to run Pol Pot to lose against Hilliary with how many people absolutely HATE her.

That diatribe sure sounds like you're pretty desperate right now as you see the polls all going in favor of Hillary. And any spin you can put on that you feel will save your party -- it won't. People have come to realize that Republicans cannot and will not do anything for anyone in a category below their rich constituent's. Therefore, A Vote For A Republican Is A Vote for Your Own Hardship and Demise, unless you're quite well to do that is.

Well, they realize they can never have the Oval Office, kinda like a spoiled child yelling 'I want it! I want it!', even though most Americans [who vote in Presidential races] clearly favor Clinton over the Republican candidates to hold it. The Congress and Senate races are different altogether however, for some reason though Republican political commentators correlate the same demographics that vote for Congress or the Senate with those that vote for the Presidency - even though the demographics of those who vote for the Senate, Congress and the Presidency are entirely different.*

*Which could help to explain how they were so out in declaring Romney the winner over Obama.

Midterms tend to be base elections, meaning that the hard-core base of each party comes out to vote, which means that voter turnout (VT) is considerably lower than for a presidential election. Republicans have traditionally done a better job of turning out their base, especially in years where they are in the opposition. But the demographics looking into 2016 do not look good for the GOP.

Hillary Clinton has at least 20 point lead over GOP in new poll | Early & Often

--------------------------------------------------
Way To Go!! We have your back, Hillary!!

Oh please please please PLEASE let Hilliary run. You want a land slide defeat for Democrats? Run Hilliary. The only way that the GOP could possibly lose an election against Hilliary, is if they ran Stalin, Mao, Hitler, or Bill Clinton on their ticket.

I did not vote for McCain, or Romney, because to me they were about as Democrap as you could get, without having a donkey tattoo'd on their forehead.

But you people run Hilliary.... I'd vote for absolutely ANYONE..... as in ANYONE the GOP ran opposite Hilliary.

You want to see a united GOP? Run Hilliary in 2016. People HATE Hilliary. Obama? People didn't like Obama's policies. But they didn't HATE him. People honestly truly HATE Hilliary Clinton. She is truly an EVIL person. Just flat out EVIL. The GOP would have to run Pol Pot to lose against Hilliary with how many people absolutely HATE her.

That diatribe sure sounds like you're pretty desperate right now as you see the polls all going in favor of Hillary. And any spin you can put on that you feel will save your party -- it won't. People have come to realize that Republicans cannot and will not do anything for anyone in a category below their rich constituent's. Therefore, A Vote For A Republican Is A Vote for Your Own Hardship and Demise, unless you're quite well to do that is.

Well, they realize they can never have the Oval Office, kinda like a spoiled child yelling 'I want it! I want it!', even though most Americans [who vote in Presidential races] clearly favor Clinton over the Republican candidates to hold it. The Congress and Senate races are different altogether however, for some reason though Republican political commentators correlate the same demographics that vote for Congress or the Senate with those that vote for the Presidency - even though the demographics of those who vote for the Senate, Congress and the Presidency are entirely different.*

*Which could help to explain how they were so out in declaring Romney the winner over Obama.

Midterms tend to be base elections, meaning that the hard-core base of each party comes out to vote, which means that voter turnout (VT) is considerably lower than for a presidential election. Republicans have traditionally done a better job of turning out their base, especially in years where they are in the opposition. But the demographics looking into 2016 do not look good for the GOP.

To add to that:

In 2008, out of voting age population of 231 million Americans, of which 213 million were voting eligible and about 175 million of them actually registered to vote, 131,304,731 votes were cast for president, a VT rate of 61.6%, based on voter eligible population:

United States Elections Project

In 2010, voter turnout was only 41%.

United States Elections Project


In 2012, Voter Turnout was 58.2%:

United States Elections Project

 

[Big Black Dog]

If what you say is true about Hillary being so far ahead in the polls, it just proves what a sorry mess our political situation is here in America. If you think things can't get any worse, vote for Hillary and you will see just how bad life in this country can be.

 

[Statistikhengst]

If you ran a poll of Rick Perry vs. the Democrats you'd find Perry doing pretty well. You never compare one specific person against a group. That's stupid. Only an idiot like Statistheilhitler would fall for it/
In any case, I am sure all the polls in 2006 showed Hillary was a shoo-in. Actually I recall looking back at this and yes they did. Whether the match up was Hillary v. McCain or Hillary v. Giuliani, who was the front runner.

Mod edit xxxxxxxx Each one of those matchups is a one-on-one matchup. Just because a pollster is pitting one candidate on one side against a number of candidates from the other side doesn't mean that the matchups themselves are not individual. Now, rub your two remaining brain cells together and let's see if you can figure that one out, fake Rabbi.

And btw, I have indicated more than once that one individual poll is of not much worth, but the aggregate of many polls does indeed tell us something.

Hey, when Hillary Clinton sweeps on election night 2016 with 57% and well over 400 EV, let's talk again.

Ahhh, yet another Rightie who, when his logic (if he had any at all) fails him, goes for personal attacks instead.

What you've indicated that you are an Area 51 boob when it comes to polls that produce results with which you agree.

No. I bring data and facts with to the table and you, newbie, go around insulting people whom you don't even know.

That says a lot more about you than it does about me. And the picture ain't pretty.

 

[Statistikhengst]

If what you say is true about Hillary being so far ahead in the polls, it just proves what a sorry mess our political situation is here in America. If you think things can't get any worse, vote for Hillary and you will see just how bad life in this country can be.

Your opinion, and I respect it.

But I do not concur with it.

 

[Statistikhengst]

If you ran a poll of Rick Perry vs. the Democrats you'd find Perry doing pretty well. You never compare one specific person against a group. That's stupid. Only an idiot like Statistheilhitler would fall for it/
In any case, I am sure all the polls in 2006 showed Hillary was a shoo-in. Actually I recall looking back at this and yes they did. Whether the match up was Hillary v. McCain or Hillary v. Giuliani, who was the front runner.

And actually, there have been a number of Perry vs. Clinton matchups and he pretty much sucks big donkey dicks in all of them, even in his home state of Texas.

Keep up the animal sexual phrases. You were edited by the mods once.
Get the picture there , Mr Credibility?

And that is somehow important to you, sock?

 

[PoliticalTorch]

If what you say is true about Hillary being so far ahead in the polls, it just proves what a sorry mess our political situation is here in America. If you think things can't get any worse, vote for Hillary and you will see just how bad life in this country can be.

The mess is being made by the opposite party, fyi. That is why Hillary is so popular and why she is drawing circles around Republicans with each poll. We know what "plans" Romney had when he ran and just how much the country placed their faith in his plans. For that matter any of the other Republican candidates. And Obama Won! Not only once but Twice despite running with his plan on Obamacare. So, the national voters can see the clear difference between the two political parties and that is why they are throwing their support for Hillary Clinton at this early stage. And you ain't seen nuthin' yet! Wait till she actually announces that she's running.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Hillary Clinton has at least 20 point lead over GOP in new poll | Early & Often

--------------------------------------------------
Way To Go!! We have your back, Hillary!!

In her home state by a university poll. Early and often is the motto of the left promoting illegal voting practices. Typical way they win.

Quinnipiac is a respected and ACCURATE pollster, one of the 4 best in the 2012 presidential election, also by far the best pollster in the 2013 Christie gubernatorial race and the Virginia senatorial.

Before you poo-poo a polling organization, you should learn their track record first:

Statistikhengst's ELECTORAL POLITICS - 2013 and beyond: The moment of truth: how did the pollsters do?

Hand in hand with NBC is often Quinnipiac:

Quinnipiac (NYT/CBS):

State	Pollster	Pollster Margin	Actual Margin	Bias	Bias (simplified)
Ohio	Quinnipiac / NYT / CBS	D +5	D +2,97	D +2,03	D +2
Florida	Quinnipiac / NYT / CBS	D +1	D +0,88	D +0,12	0
New York*	Quinnipiac	D +28	D +28,13	R +0,13	0
Virginia	Quinnipiac / NYT / CBS	D +2	D +3,87	R +1,87	R +2
Connecticut	Quinnipiac	D +14	D +17,33	R +3,33	R +3
New Jersey*	Quinnipiac	D +8	D +17,68	R +9,68	R +10
Bias (ALL)	R +2,17
Bias (3 battlegrounds)	R +0,66

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

As is the case with Marist, Quinnipiac has hooked up with a major newspaper and a major news network (NYT and CBS) to produce polling. There were 5 end polls, 3 were from battleground states.

Two big points here:

-Quinnipiac absolutely nailed the margin in Florida and New York.

-Though it has a conservative bias of R +2.17 for the 5 polls combined, among the three battlegrounds (Ohio, Florida and Virginia), its bias is absolute null. This is the only pollster to have acheived this mark, but then again, Quinnipiac only put out results for 3 of 12 battlegrounds. What "skewed" the results were the terrible poll numbers out of New Jersey (R +10!), which happened to a number of pollsters, most likely because of hurricane Sandy.

But just as was the case with Marist, no Liberal bias to be seen here!

You just said a lot of nothing proving nothing. Typical from the left.

 

[AmericanFirst]

If what you say is true about Hillary being so far ahead in the polls, it just proves what a sorry mess our political situation is here in America. If you think things can't get any worse, vote for Hillary and you will see just how bad life in this country can be.

The mess is being made by the opposite party, fyi. That is why Hillary is so popular and why she is drawing circles around Republicans with each poll. We know what "plans" Romney had when he ran and just how much the country placed their faith in his plans. For that matter any of the other Republican candidates. And Obama Won! Not only once but Twice despite running with his plan on Obamacare. So, the national voters can see the clear difference between the two political parties and that is why they are throwing their support for Hillary Clinton at this early stage. And you ain't seen nuthin' yet! Wait till she actually announces that she's running.

Voting more than once by freeloaders and illegal voting practices, yeah Iwould be proud of that. The mess is obamashitforbrains fault.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Hillary Clinton has at least 20 point lead over GOP in new poll | Early & Often

--------------------------------------------------
Way To Go!! We have your back, Hillary!!

In her home state by a university poll. Early and often is the motto of the left promoting illegal voting practices. Typical way they win.

Quinnipiac is a respected and ACCURATE pollster, one of the 4 best in the 2012 presidential election, also by far the best pollster in the 2013 Christie gubernatorial race and the Virginia senatorial.

Before you poo-poo a polling organization, you should learn their track record first:

Statistikhengst's ELECTORAL POLITICS - 2013 and beyond: The moment of truth: how did the pollsters do?

Hand in hand with NBC is often Quinnipiac:

Quinnipiac (NYT/CBS):

State	Pollster	Pollster Margin	Actual Margin	Bias	Bias (simplified)
Ohio	Quinnipiac / NYT / CBS	D +5	D +2,97	D +2,03	D +2
Florida	Quinnipiac / NYT / CBS	D +1	D +0,88	D +0,12	0
New York*	Quinnipiac	D +28	D +28,13	R +0,13	0
Virginia	Quinnipiac / NYT / CBS	D +2	D +3,87	R +1,87	R +2
Connecticut	Quinnipiac	D +14	D +17,33	R +3,33	R +3
New Jersey*	Quinnipiac	D +8	D +17,68	R +9,68	R +10
Bias (ALL)	R +2,17
Bias (3 battlegrounds)	R +0,66

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

As is the case with Marist, Quinnipiac has hooked up with a major newspaper and a major news network (NYT and CBS) to produce polling. There were 5 end polls, 3 were from battleground states.

Two big points here:

-Quinnipiac absolutely nailed the margin in Florida and New York.

-Though it has a conservative bias of R +2.17 for the 5 polls combined, among the three battlegrounds (Ohio, Florida and Virginia), its bias is absolute null. This is the only pollster to have acheived this mark, but then again, Quinnipiac only put out results for 3 of 12 battlegrounds. What "skewed" the results were the terrible poll numbers out of New Jersey (R +10!), which happened to a number of pollsters, most likely because of hurricane Sandy.

But just as was the case with Marist, no Liberal bias to be seen here!

You just said a lot of nothing proving nothing. Typical from the left.

No, actually, that is quite wrong. I presented just some of the data that shows Quinnipiac's track record, one that is measurable AND verifiable. Nice try, but ad hominems don't really phase me at all.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I could see her winning since we have a record number of freeloaders and leeches.

 

[Statistikhengst]

If what you say is true about Hillary being so far ahead in the polls, it just proves what a sorry mess our political situation is here in America. If you think things can't get any worse, vote for Hillary and you will see just how bad life in this country can be.

The mess is being made by the opposite party, fyi. That is why Hillary is so popular and why she is drawing circles around Republicans with each poll. We know what "plans" Romney had when he ran and just how much the country placed their faith in his plans. For that matter any of the other Republican candidates. And Obama Won! Not only once but Twice despite running with his plan on Obamacare. So, the national voters can see the clear difference between the two political parties and that is why they are throwing their support for Hillary Clinton at this early stage. And you ain't seen nuthin' yet! Wait till she actually announces that she's running.

Voting more than once by freeloaders and illegal voting practices, yeah Iwould be proud of that. The mess is obamashitforbrains fault.

And your proof for these accusations?



I wonder why there are so very, very few Righties here who can actually present an argument without getting emotional to the point of a heart attack, or just plain old nasty and ugly.

Gee, and then Righties wonder why they can't win national elections. They lost 5 of the last 6 in the NPV.

 

[Statistikhengst]

I could see her winning since we have a record number of freeloaders and leeches.

Yes, let the feeble excuses start now!!!

 

[Vigilante]

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I could see her winning since we have a record number of freeloaders and leeches.

Yes, let the feeble excuses start now!!!

That's not an excuse. There are record numbers of freeloaders. I can see the hillary offering the status quo and more trinkets from the treasury.

 

[PoliticalTorch]

I could see her winning since we have a record number of freeloaders and leeches.

Yes, let the feeble excuses start now!!!

That's not an excuse. There are record numbers of freeloaders. I can see the hillary offering the status quo and more trinkets from the treasury.

Hey, aren't you a little early to start consulting with your psychic as to what Hillary will do when she gets to the White House in 2016?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

You

I could see her winning since we have a record number of freeloaders and leeches.

Yes, let the feeble excuses start now!!!

That's not an excuse. There are record numbers of freeloaders. I can see the hillary offering the status quo and more trinkets from the treasury.

Hey, aren't you a little early to start consulting with your psychic as to what Hillary will do when she gets to the White House in 2016?

I could see her winning since we have a record number of freeloaders and leeches.

Yes, let the feeble excuses start now!!!

That's not an excuse. There are record numbers of freeloaders. I can see the hillary offering the status quo and more trinkets from the treasury.

Hey, aren't you a little early to start consulting with your psychic as to what Hillary will do when she gets to the White House in 2016?[/QUOTE]
You think she's gonna get get elected by telling the freeloaders to get a job?

 

[Statistikhengst]

Righties, release the hounds!!!

Send the black helicopters into the night sky!!!

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Righties, release the hounds!!!

Send the black helicopters into the night sky!!!

There's no need for conspiracy as to why the hil may get elected.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Andylusion]

Hillary Clinton has at least 20 point lead over GOP in new poll | Early & Often

--------------------------------------------------
Way To Go!! We have your back, Hillary!!

Oh please please please PLEASE let Hilliary run. You want a land slide defeat for Democrats? Run Hilliary. The only way that the GOP could possibly lose an election against Hilliary, is if they ran Stalin, Mao, Hitler, or Bill Clinton on their ticket.

I did not vote for McCain, or Romney, because to me they were about as Democrap as you could get, without having a donkey tattoo'd on their forehead.

But you people run Hilliary.... I'd vote for absolutely ANYONE..... as in ANYONE the GOP ran opposite Hilliary.

You want to see a united GOP? Run Hilliary in 2016. People HATE Hilliary. Obama? People didn't like Obama's policies. But they didn't HATE him. People honestly truly HATE Hilliary Clinton. She is truly an EVIL person. Just flat out EVIL. The GOP would have to run Pol Pot to lose against Hilliary with how many people absolutely HATE her.

That diatribe sure sounds like you're pretty desperate right now as you see the polls all going in favor of Hillary. And any spin you can put on that you feel will save your party -- it won't. People have come to realize that Republicans cannot and will not do anything for anyone in a category below their rich constituent's. Therefore, A Vote For A Republican Is A Vote for Your Own Hardship and Demise, unless you're quite well to do that is.

PLEASE run Hilliary. By all means! I would personally LOVE to see Hilliary run for president. For the first time in my entirely life, I would actually get complete pleasure just from voting against Hilliary Clinton. No matter who the GOP ran against her, I would not care in the slightest... just voting AGAINST Hilliary would be worth it. They could pick ANYONE. They could pick Ralph Nader, Bruce Springsteen, Robert Pattinson from the twilight movies, ANYONE. ABSOLUTELY ANYONE, just to vote against Hilliary.

You people on the left have no idea. None at all. If it wasn't for Obama, McCain would have won in 2008, by a land slide. People *HATE* Hilliary. I would have voted for McCain or Romney, or even Bob Dole, had the Democrats run Hilliary, and I would have done so with euphoric joy.

In 2000, when Hilliary was running for Senate in New York, one of my neighbors here in Ohio, had a vote against Hilliary sign. He was a Democrat, and voted for Gore, and Obama. But he put up a "No Hilliary" sign in 2000, when she was running in New York.

People HATE Hilliary. PLEASE run Hilliary Clinton. PLEASE believe the polls. PLEASE put her on the ballot. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE. It would be the first time in 20 years, I would take a vacation day, just to vote, and watch the election coverage on TV with absolute sadistic GLEE. Just absolutely GLEE, watching Hilliary cannon ball the deep end and never return.

Better still, have Sarah Palin run against her, just to rub as much salt into the wound as possible. Hilliary is EVIL. Pure EVIL. I can't wait for her to go down in flames.