Hillary Clinton’s Political Career Ends not With a Bang, but a Whimper

[Claudette]

Wonder if Hitlery will get the nomination when no one is cheating or stacking the deck for her???

 

[Aba Incieni]

She would have made a great President

As it is, she is the most successful female politician in our history. Something she can be proud of

Interesting...so you claim that a woman who rode her husband's coattails...as First Lady...and as a Senator...a woman who's time as Secretary of State was marked by bad deals, embarrassing gaffes and scandals fueled by both incompetence and corruption...THAT woman is the most successful female politician in our history?

You have a strange definition of "success", Winger...just saying...

She rode her husbands coattails, how about Melania, she was never more than a model.

Hillary , first lady of Arkansas 12 years, first lady of the US 8 years, senator of NY for 8 years, Secretary of state for 4 years, and she won the popular vote in 2016. Earned her law degree from Yale.

So when you compare any female to Hillary, remember that.

Melania has yet to stumble her way through a sure win and fall flat on her face in front of the world.

 

[Oldstyle]

Wonder if Hitlery will get the nomination when no one is cheating or stacking the deck for her???

You honestly think that Hillary Clinton can run for office without cheating or stacking the deck? She was a lock for the Democratic nomination and she STILL had to screw over Bernie Sanders! She can't help herself. Why would anyone think it necessary to pay someone to created phony dossiers to smear an opponent that she was way ahead of in the polls? I mean who does that?

Hillary Clinton does...it's who she is...it's who she's always been.

 

[Claudette]

Wonder if Hitlery will get the nomination when no one is cheating or stacking the deck for her???

You honestly think that Hillary Clinton can run for office without cheating or stacking the deck? She was a lock for the Democratic nomination and she STILL had to screw over Bernie Sanders! She can't help herself. Why would anyone think it necessary to pay someone to created phony dossiers to smear an opponent that she was way ahead of in the polls? I mean who does that?

Hillary Clinton does...it's who she is...it's who she's always been.

I agree. She had a lock on the nomination so why all the dirty bullshit she pulled???

I also wonder why now one is accusing her of campaign fraud as she and the DNC paid for that fake dossier. Whats the difference between cash spent on that and cash used to pay off Stormy??

Woman is a waste of air and one giant POS.

 

[jknowgood]

She would have made a great President

As it is, she is the most successful female politician in our history. Something she can be proud of

Interesting...so you claim that a woman who rode her husband's coattails...as First Lady...and as a Senator...a woman who's time as Secretary of State was marked by bad deals, embarrassing gaffes and scandals fueled by both incompetence and corruption...THAT woman is the most successful female politician in our history?

You have a strange definition of "success", Winger...just saying...

Hillary was elected with millions of votes for Senator
If it is that easy....let’s see Melania do it

She moved to a state she knew she could win in.

Yup. She carpet bagged her way into NY just so she could run for office there. Of course NY, that blue state, elected her sorry ass.

Who ran against her there? I didn't pay attention, but does anyone wanna guess she was either unopposed or her opponent had a scandal?

Hell they probably committed suicide.

 

[mamooth]

Eternity will be unpleasant for the CDS crowd. See the tale of Lazarus as to why. The CDSers will be burning in Hell, due to their pathological dishonesty and vile hateful natures. They'll be begging Hillary Clinton to bring them water, but she'll be unable to do so, as a great chasm will lie between them.

So, Hillary Clinton wins, for all eternity. That's a long time. Think about it, CDSers. Are the rewards you currently get for lying on behalf of your hate-cult worth an eternity of torment?

 

[Tilly]

Eternity will be unpleasant for the CDS crowd. See the tale of Lazarus as to why. The CDSers will be burning in Hell, due to their pathological dishonesty and vile hateful natures. They'll be begging Hillary Clinton to bring them water, but she'll be unable to do so, as a great chasm will lie between them.

So, Hillary Clinton wins, for all eternity. That's a long time. Think about it, CDSers. Are the rewards you currently get for lying on behalf of your hate-cult worth an eternity of torment?

Wow

 

[mamooth]

Superdelegates have never had any effect on any Democratic primary.

Did you miss the DNC announcement today that indeed THEY DID??

No, they've never had any effect on the outcome of a primary. Yes, I should have been more specific, and specified "never had any effect on the outcome" instead of "never had any effect". They clearly have had an effect. They've given losers excuses to whine about losing, and they've given conservative conspiracy theorists excuses to lie about how Democrats are undemocratic.

Perez announced DEEP cuts to the superdelegate DISENFRANCH|SING of actual REAL votes..

Which has nothing to do with the way I very correctly pointed out that superdelegates have never had any effect on any Democratic presidential primary outcome. I'm correct.

You should look it up on the news before you look this stupid.

Now that this excuse to whine and make nonsense up is gone, what excuse will you use in the future?

 

[mamooth]

Wow

Satan is the Lord of Lies. By embracing lies about Clinton, you do the bidding of the Lord of Lies. Why do you think that won't earn you a toasty afterlife?

You'll try to tell God "But I was deceived into lying!", but He probably won't buy it. He'll ask why you didn't use the brains He gave you, and why you were so willing to believe such stupid and obvious lies.

 

[Tilly]

Wow

Satan is the Lord of Lies. By embracing lies about Clinton, you do the bidding of the Lord of Lies. Why do you think that won't earn you a toasty afterlife?

You'll try to tell God "But I was deceived into lying!", but He probably won't buy it. He'll ask why you didn't use the brains He gave you, and why you were so willing to believe such stupid and obvious lies.

Yeah, sure

But if your ‘belief’ is true, you must also know that Hillary will be roasting for all eternity in the lowest circle!

 

[flacaltenn]

No, they've never had any effect on the outcome of a primary.

Not gonna re-argue those idiotic assertions here. Go protest to the DNC. Because they just ADMITTED they were rigging the process and valuing each of the votes of their apparatchik leadership 10,000 times more important than their "common" voters.

Go try to raise the funds or media interest when on DAY ONE of your campaign, you're 700 delegates in the hole and the DNC treats you like a crazy uncle you moron..

It's fixed now. Because IT NEEDED to be fix. You can have a short cry over it..

 

[WTP]

You probably missed it over the weekend, what with all the air in the room and fake news media coverage having been consumed by the death of Senator John McCain, but the Pantsuit Princess’s career came to a sudden, if unheralded end on Saturday.

Wait, what? How did that happen, you ask?

In the end, the Fainting Felon was done in by an entity she literally owned throughout 2016: The Democrat National Committee. Yes, friends, that would be the very same DNC which conspired with the Clinton campaign throughout 2015 and 2016 to rig its nominating process in favor of the Grafting Grifter, denying her challengers – mainly, the Commie Bernie Sanders – a fair shake in the war for the party’s endorsement. The same DNC whose emails were released to the news media, causing massive embarrassment on the eve of the opening of the Democrat National Convention in August 2016, where the Deceptive Doyen ended up being coronated as a result of all the rigging. The same DNC that, in concert with the Clinton Campaign, funded the fake Trump Dossier.

Yes, THAT DNC. One and the same.

At the conclusion of its summer meeting held last week in Chicago, the members of the DNC voted to severely restrict the role played in the nominating process by the party’s so-called “Super Delegates,” that collection of congress members, state officials and other members of the Party’s chosen upper-crust who ensured the Coughing Crook would be the Party’s 2016 nominee regardless of how the voters felt about it all. The committee approved a proposal that will deny these Super Delegates the ability to vote in the first ballot at the party’s 2020 nominating convention.

Tom Perez, the radical Chairman of the DNC, said after the vote that “These reforms will help grow our party, unite Democrats, and restore voters’ trust by making our 2020 nominating process the most inclusive and transparent in our history.”

XXXX -- Mod Edit -- Posting Guidelines on the Home Page state that you may quote only small sections of suspected copyrighted material on USMB. Article quote shortened.
The Purge

Hillary Clinton’s Political Career Ends not With a Bang, but a Whimper

Recently I read her #1 man who supplied her with her drugs was knocked off last december. He failed her and he paid the ultimate price......

Special Agent who handled Hillary Clinton during 2016 seizure-like collapse dead at 49

View Todd Madison's Obituary and express your condolences

He did not follow protocol!

Secret Service might have broken protocol during Hillary Clinton's exit from 9/11 event

Google Groups

SHE is this countries #1 problem and the Republican party just sits on its ass while she runs amok.

If bottom feeding were a virtue, there would no longer be Republicans.

 

[mamooth]

Not gonna re-argue those idiotic assertions here.

Good, as your false assertions were definitely idiotic. Superdelegates have still never affected the outcome of any Democratic primary.

Go protest to the DNC. Because they just ADMITTED they were rigging the process and valuing each of the votes of their apparatchik leadership 10,000 times more important than their "common" voters.

Surely you can surely post those words from the DNC.

This is where you spit insults and declare it's everyone else's responsibility to prove your wild claims. You know, what you always do when you're called out to back up your nonsense.

It's fixed now. Because IT NEEDED to be fix. You can have a short cry over it..

Most Democrats supported the change. I supported it. So why are you stating otherwise? Oh, that's right, TheParty fed you a line of bull, and you fell for it.

I pointed out why the superdelegates were instituted -- as a pro-democracy measure. McGovern had rigged so many caucuses and then the convention in 1972, he was able to get the nomination despite being opposed by a strong majority of Democrats. Reforms in the primary and caucus and convention system have ensured that won't happen again, hence the superdelegates have outlived their original purpose, hence they were removed.

Now, speaking of rigging the process, you kiss the butts of the masters of voter disenfranchisement, the GOP. Republicans have gotten gerrymandering and voter suppression down to an art form, and you love them for it. That means that when you feign concern about voter disenfranchisement, you look like a hypocrite. We Democrats oppose voter disenfranchisement, and you support it. That puts us on the moral high ground, and you in the moral sewer.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Not gonna re-argue those idiotic assertions here.

Good, as your false assertions were definitely idiotic. Superdelegates have still never affected the outcome of any Democratic primary.

Go protest to the DNC. Because they just ADMITTED they were rigging the process and valuing each of the votes of their apparatchik leadership 10,000 times more important than their "common" voters.

Surely you can surely post those words from the DNC.

This is where you spit insults and declare it's everyone else's responsibility to prove your wild claims. You know, what you always do when you're called out to back up your nonsense.

It's fixed now. Because IT NEEDED to be fix. You can have a short cry over it..

Most Democrats supported the change. I supported it. So why are you stating otherwise? Oh, that's right, TheParty fed you a line of bull, and you fell for it.

I pointed out why the superdelegates were instituted -- as a pro-democracy measure. McGovern had rigged so many caucuses and then the convention in 1972, he was able to get the nomination despite being opposed by a strong majority of Democrats. Reforms in the primary and caucus and convention system have ensured that won't happen again, hence the superdelegates have outlived their original purpose, hence they were removed.

Now, speaking of rigging the process, you kiss the butts of the masters of voter disenfranchisement, the GOP. Republicans have gotten gerrymandering and voter suppression down to an art form, and you love them for it. That means that when you feign concern about voter disenfranchisement, you look like a hypocrite. We Democrats oppose voter disenfranchisement, and you support it. That puts us on the moral high ground, and you in the moral sewer.

The DNC just won a case brought by Bernie voters who said they were cheated.

The DNC won by claiming it's a private organization and has every right to ignore their own voters.

They don't need no super duper delegates to rig their own elections.

 

[HenryBHough]

Over?

With the fix already in and the 2020 campaign signs printed and stocked for distribution?

LMAO!

 

[flacaltenn]

Surely you can surely post those words from the DNC.

This is where you spit insults and declare it's everyone else's responsibility to prove your wild claims. You know, what you always do when you're called out to back up your nonsense.

Top 20 news stories from yesterday. It's in there. Ain't working hard for someone who just stepped in a big pile of cluelessness.

Keep it up Squidward -- makes you more pitiful and crazy when you admit you don't follow the topics you're so opinionated on. Wanna BET I've told the truth and whole truth? I'd be up for that..

 

[flacaltenn]

DNC Changes Superdelegate Rules in Presidential Campaign Process

"In a surprisingly united vote, almost all members of the Democratic National Convention curtailed the ability of the superdelegates to vote on the first ballot for the party's presidential nominee beginning with the next election. The group of about 700 automatic, unpledged party leaders, elected officials and activists previously were able to back whichever candidate for the nomination they chose," CNN reported.

Superdelegates will no longer be able to vote on the first ballot at the convention unless the candidate has received the necessary pledged delegates, which are based off primary and caucus results, to secure the nomination.

"Today is a historic day for our party," said DNC Chair Tom Perez. "We passed major reforms that will not only put our next presidential nominee in the strongest position possible, but will help us elect Democrats up and down the ballot, across the country. These reforms will help grow our party, unite Democrats, and restore voters' trust by making our 2020 nominating process the most inclusive and transparent in our history."

The fight over superdelegates has divided Democrats but it appears Saturday's rule change was a compromise most were willing to accept.

Democrats strip superdelegates of power in picking presidential nominee

“It’s a big victory for the base of the party,” said Jeff Cohen, co-founder of the online activist group RootsAction.org. “Tom Perez realizes that he’d rather lose 10 dead-enders in the DNC than a couple million activists,” he said of the party chairman.

While long a priority of Sanders and his supporters, the effort to reduce superdelegates’ clout was embraced more broadly in recent months by Democratic Party officials desperate to win over young voters skeptical of centralized party power.

Perez described the change as “historic,” and DNC organizers played a video message from former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean in which the former DNC chairman cast the measure it as an urgent response “to the will of grassroots voters.”

Many young voters, Dean said, “have lost faith in our party’s nominating process, and make no mistake, this is a perception that’s cost us at the ballot box.”

You -- Mammy just probably aren't a "young voter" or concerned about the Dem party being the party of voter disenfranchising... LOL..

 

[Oldstyle]

Eternity will be unpleasant for the CDS crowd. See the tale of Lazarus as to why. The CDSers will be burning in Hell, due to their pathological dishonesty and vile hateful natures. They'll be begging Hillary Clinton to bring them water, but she'll be unable to do so, as a great chasm will lie between them.

So, Hillary Clinton wins, for all eternity. That's a long time. Think about it, CDSers. Are the rewards you currently get for lying on behalf of your hate-cult worth an eternity of torment?

You think Hillary's going to heaven? Really?

 

[Ame®icano]

 

[MarathonMike]

Eternity will be unpleasant for the CDS crowd. See the tale of Lazarus as to why. The CDSers will be burning in Hell, due to their pathological dishonesty and vile hateful natures. They'll be begging Hillary Clinton to bring them water, but she'll be unable to do so, as a great chasm will lie between them.

So, Hillary Clinton wins, for all eternity. That's a long time. Think about it, CDSers. Are the rewards you currently get for lying on behalf of your hate-cult worth an eternity of torment?

What? You can't be serious!