Hillary Is To Blame for Orlando Mass Shooting

Since when do property and business owners not have the right to prohibit firearms?
Since when Donald Trump becomes president (Hopefully)
So you think Donald Trump is going to get a law passed that says I can carry a firearm into ANY place I want over the objections of the owner? :cuckoo:
Will it be a close vote in Congress? Will the language include the White House or just Donald Trump's private residence? How about your house or business?
 
You can abolish "gun free zones" to your heart's content. Establishment owners still have the right prohibit firearms on their property. You won't find many venues that serve alcohol where firearms are allowed.
We're not talking about what IS. We're talking about what SHOULD BE. Get it ?
In reality there is no should, shit happens or it doesn't. You live in a state of delusion.
More evidence of your mental illness.
 
So you think Donald Trump is going to get a law passed that says I can carry a firearm into ANY place I want over the objections of the owner?
Will it be a close vote in Congress? Will the language include the White House or just Donald Trump's private residence? How about your house or business?
Something like that, yeah. But not into people's private homes. GUN-FREE ZONES are applicable to PUBLIC places, not homes. Businesses open to the public, should not be GUN-FREE ZONES. All that are, are endangering the American people. It is the responsibility of the POTUS to PROTECT the American people, not endanger them.
 
It would be really stupid to allow guns in bars.

Yeah, maybe if they did that, a terrorist like Omar Mattin wouldn't show up to kill 50 people there, and badly injure 53 more. "It would be really stupid to allow guns in bars" >> FROM A TERRORIST'S POINT OF VIEW.

If one really has a trauma about guns in bars, then let the bars hire ADEQUATE ARMED SECURITY to compensate for the bar's gun-free zone status. That would need to be a BUNCH of armed guards, capable of stopping any terrorist attack.
 
And George Bush was to blame and responsible for 9-11-2001:deal:..

Talk to Rick Scott, Florida state law DOES NOT ALLOW FIREARMS, in places where Booze is served you dumbfuck..

You Tea Maggots, and inbred right wing maggots, are already infected with Hillary derangement syndrome, AND SHE'S NOT EVEN PRESIDENT:laugh:, just goes to show how scared you are that she's gonna win!!
You DUMB FUCK, read the previous post ( # 57) which just explained why your current post is stupid Please stop making a fool out of yourself..
Who the fuck are you to decide what SHOULD BE?? you goofy inbred white trash motherfucker, go shove that up your rectum bitch..

Only a DUMBSHIT, like yourself believes bringing firearms in a bar is a good idea????

Fucking losers like you with 13 thousand posts, just proves this message board is your sorry ass life:fu::fu:..FUCKING TROLL

You Trump groupies aka (the uneducated) are nothing but white redneck inbred trash that love to worship, that fat bag of Orange shit who is gonna get an ass whupping in November, GO FUCK YOURSELF.....
 
Hillary Clinton appears to be much to blame for this worst mass shooting attack in US history. She has America's attention more than anyone, other than Donald Trump. Just like in Paris and San Bernardino, mass numbers of people are slaughtered in an apparent GUN-FREE ZONE, as Hillary publicly supports, and influences people nationwide, to follow that policy.

If the club were not a gun-free zone, then 1) the killer probably would have been deterred from going there and attacking, and 2) if the killer did attack there, he could/would have been stopped instantly, saving dozens of lives. 3) Right now, gun-grab, crazy liberals are saying less guns are needed to stop shooting like this, when clearly, it is MORE guns (in the hands of law-abiding licensed gun owners) that is needed, and needed everywhere, to stop these massacres.

This is the policy that Donald Trump correctly advocates > ie. to abolish gun-free zones. It is because this club was gun-free, that this massacre occured.

More deaths on Hillary's bloody slate.
I disagree. There was one armed guard in the club that engaged the terrorist with his firearm.
That has been confirmed.
 
Simple ,your speculation is in no way logical or reasonable.
It's an ad ignorantum fallacy.
"In no way" ? Try comparing what we saw in Paris, San Bernardino, and Orlando today, with what I posted in Post # 28. Remember THESE GUYS ?


images
Hesham Mohammed Hadayet - Shot dead by security guard.


alton-nolen-beheading-suspect-oklahoma.jpg


Alton Nolen - Shot and captured by armed citizen.

And THIS guy ? >>>>

AFvewQ4-590b5sePlOjrNf5TlKCVYosc9O_DZLlKFLPAzfh3KSr7WxKA8qWMzKZDtK97sxsmy0qoKpvvlb4ytRy29IcxSd8IrKK3JIfYihr_jCTygJKANvby5K7aBraimQ
 
It would be really stupid to allow guns in bars.

Yeah, maybe if they did that, a terrorist like Omar Mattin wouldn't show up to kill 50 people there, and badly injure 53 more. "It would be really stupid to allow guns in bars" >> FROM A TERRORIST'S POINT OF VIEW.

If one really has a trauma about guns in bars, then let the bars hire ADEQUATE ARMED SECURITY to compensate for the bar's gun-free zone status. That would need to be a BUNCH of armed guards, capable of stopping any terrorist attack.


If guns were allowed in bars the death toll would far surpass 53, as you have drunken ass cocks mouthing off at each other and pulling guns. Think.
 
Hillary Clinton appears to be much to blame for this worst mass shooting attack in US history. She has America's attention more than anyone, other than Donald Trump. Just like in Paris and San Bernardino, mass numbers of people are slaughtered in an apparent GUN-FREE ZONE, as Hillary publicly supports, and influences people nationwide, to follow that policy.


If the club were not a gun-free zone, then 1) the killer probably would have been deterred from going there and attacking, and 2) if the killer did attack there, he could/would have been stopped instantly, saving dozens of lives. 3) Right now, gun crazy liberals are saying less guns are needed to stop shooting like this, when clearly, it is MORE guns (in the hands of law-abiding licensed gun owners) that is needed, and needed everywhere, to stop these massacres.


This is the policy that Donald Trump correctly advocates > ie. to abolish gun-free zones. It is because this club was gun-free that this massacre occured.


More deaths on Hillary's bloody slate.
Just a few hours old, this is already the second worst terrorist attack inside the U.S. in our history.

Following the worst attack on September the 11th, the whole country, including the vast majority of Democrats, rallied behind the president.

Let's see if the right can muster as much class following this attack...
That would depend on what he says,if he dosnt use use it for political leverage,than ya he gets shit for it if he does.
 
If Hillary jumps on the gun grabbing train Obama is about to roll out Trump will benefit politically.
 
Again.... Florida law bans firearms in establishments which serve alcohol. Now while you're wasting your bandwidth blaming Obama for Florida law, those with a functional brain know he has nothing to do with that law.

And again, this is an opportunity for the country to unite behind the president, just as we did in 2001. Don't be so committed to your partisan bullshit that you can't see there is no place for that in times like this.
And that Florida law should NOT ban firearms ANYWHERE. And that law should be changed, as Donald trump has proposed.

Obama, as I mentioned, has plenty to do with ANY law in America, just by opening his mouth and speaking, and influencing policymakers everywhere. He also sets policy for federal building in all 50 states, such as VA hospitals.

In times like this it is imperative for us to unite behind Donald Trump and his call to abolish GUN-FREE ZONES and to establish nationwide CCW law. It is critical that the irresponsible gun-grab policies of Obama and Hillewry be opposed.
He has nothing to do with state laws. Especially state laws which predate his presidency.

Do you ever say anything that isn't retarded?
 
If guns were allowed in bars the death toll would far surpass 53, as you have drunken ass cocks mouthing off at each other and pulling guns. Think.
Problem is your bad case is a "WOULD" (AKA "maybe").. My case is an "IS" or an ARE (as in 50 people ARE dead. Like I said make the bars provide armed security, let gun-owners carry guns, or else choose another kind of business to run.

PS - EARTH TO WT: the CCW gun owners didn't get that license by going around shooting people in bars.
 

Forum List

Back
Top